Product function returning 0

NikolinoDE  wrote:  "A tool that can also bring fear, fear in people who see it as their helplessness in their own further development."

I think it is silly when people fear technology for its advancement because it might replace them.  Humans can always find better ways to apply themselves.  On the contrary, I welcome any new technology or idea that is truly an improvement.

But a tool is only as good as the person using it.  For answers.microsoft moderators, they have introduced an AI Moderator Assist feature ("OpenAI") that can assist moderators in developing answers.

But the OpenAI developers recognize that it is not to be used blindly.  They emphasize that it "is designed to create an AI generated first draft response to an OP question posted in Answers. It is intended to be used only by technical experts who are able to validate the accuracy of the AI generated first draft and make any necessary changes to the content before posting it".

(Unfortunately, I do not agree with whom they consider to be "experts".)

I should emphasize that my criticism of "AI" is mainly of free chatGPT.  In my limited use (tests, really), it repeatedly churns out responses that might correctly offer valuable conceptual information, but they are always wrong in some details -- sometimes horribly wrong to the point of being misdirections.

In contrast, in another forum, I saw one "AI" response that was truly insightful and mostly correct.  It was generated by a more-advanced "for pay" version of GPT.

It is also important to understand that not all AI are equally capable.  I was intrigued by early developments in "machine learning" (robotics, too); and that has come a long way in the past many decades.  Unfortunately, my computer science took me in another direction, and now, I no longer have the energy nor the wherewithal to delve into it again.

In contrast, GPTs are "large language" processors.  They have an amazing ability to interpret natural language and to synthesize natural language responses.  But it is important to understand that they are just language processors.  For technical responses, they do not have the ability to truly understand the technology (e.g. math).  This is a point that chatGPT has now been modified to emphasize, both when we log in, and in "chats" when we point out technical errors in its responses.

Enough said!  This is an irrelevant and useless digression.  The point of my first response in this thread was:  free chatGPT responses to Excel questions should never be taken at face value.  And the responses to this OP's question were totally wrong and a misdirection.