Forum Discussion

keltzjd's avatar
keltzjd
Brass Contributor
Nov 09, 2022
Solved

Formula Changed And Now I'm Getting "#NAME?" Errors?

Good morning all! I've used a formula to calculate many aspects of my data - and it works amazing, until this week for some reason. Now whenever I change the filters on my table, the formula breaks:

 

=SUM(
MMULT(
--(Table57[[PM]:[CM5]] = Table1[@[Name]:[Name]] ),
_xlfn.SEQUENCE( COLUMNS( Table57[[PM]:[CM5]] ), , 1,0) ) *
Table57[[SUM]:[SUM]] *
( Table57[[Start Date]:[Start Date]] <=
DATEVALUE(Table1[[#Headers],[7/1/2022]] )
) *
( Table57[[End Date]:[End Date]] >=
DATEVALUE(Table1[[#Headers],[7/1/2022]] )
)
)

 I think it has to do with "_xlfn.SEQUENCE" function, because I dont remember that being like that - but I don't remember exactly what I used to have. Did a function change recently within Excel? 

 

Here's what happens when I change the view:

 

Any thoughts? Thank you!

  • mtarler's avatar
    mtarler
    Nov 09, 2022
    as noted SEQUENCE should definitely be recognized and you should fix your Excel.
    also as noted that formula could probably be improved.
    as for a quick fix to get rid of SEQUENCE I might try just deleting it and see if it works but if it is needed to make sure the array lengths for the MMULT() are correct then:
    SEQUENCE( COLUMNS( Table57[[PM]:[CM5]] ), , 1,0) )
    could be
    TRANSPOSE(--LEN(Table57[[#HEADERS],[PM]:[CM5]] )>0) )
  • Patrick2788's avatar
    Patrick2788
    Silver Contributor
    It appears you're working in a version of Excel that does not support dynamic arrays so SEQUENCE is not available. It's worth checking to see if XLOOKUP and FILTER are available, too.
    • keltzjd's avatar
      keltzjd
      Brass Contributor
      I checked and XLOOKUP and filter are available, but not sequence. Is there an easy replacement for that function?
    • mtarler's avatar
      mtarler
      Silver Contributor
      Is that part even needed?
      SEQUENCE( COLUMNS( Table57[[PM]:[CM5]] ), , 1,0) ) *
      that sequence just creates a column of 1 values which doesn't change the multiplication, I don't think.
      • Patrick2788's avatar
        Patrick2788
        Silver Contributor
        Probably not. The entire formula could be simplified once we know the goal. It might be a good idea to get MMULT out of there, too.

Resources