Blog Post

Access Blog
1 MIN READ

Our Road Ahead - Microsoft Access Engineering Priorities Oct 2022

Michael_Aldridge's avatar
Oct 13, 2022

If you remember back in May 2022, we blogged about moving to a new model for how we communicate our Access feature priorities vs. the Microsoft Public Roadmap.

 

We promised we would communicate updated priorities as plans evolved. New feature development priorities will be listed in regular blog posts but in the Microsoft Public Roadmap we will only list those new features that our engineering team has 90% confidence will be shipping in the month listed. 

 

We just completed our plans for the next semester (which for us is 6 months Oct-March) and we wanted you to see our updated priorities and why we made them. 

 

Our focus for the next year is really in two key areas 

1) Improving Access product quality, customer satisfaction and critical modern Access features

2) Learning from our newly released Dataverse connector and iterate where we see critical areas that can be improved to evolve the hybrid cloud story for Access customers with Power Platform.

 

Based on these areas of focus, below is our list in priority order on what we are working on over the next 6 months.

 

Currently the Macro Signing feature is now available in the latest beta of the Microsoft 365 Current Channel. We encourage you to use it and give us feedback. We will be updating the public roadmap to reflect our 90% confident date in the coming month.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Updated Oct 13, 2022
Version 3.0

10 Comments

  • treefiddy's avatar
    treefiddy
    Copper Contributor

    Karl_Donaubauer  Thank you for the information.  The excuse provided by MS makes no sense and was a clear attempt to deflect.  PowerQuery was added to PowerBI to address reporting/analytics use cases.  PowerQuery was added to Excel for data analysis use cases.  PowerQuery is a natural fit for Access for data integration use cases.  Seems very complementary to me and very short sighted by MS to make such comments as above.  It is no surprise to learn the Access community voted it so high as a requested feature.

     

    Too bad.  A missed opportunity by MS for sure.  Hopefully they have had time to re-think their position and see how this type of functionality would be very complementary.

  • Hi,

     

    > Have there been any discussions around the possibility of a built in integration between Access and Power Query?

     

    Yes. In 2017, a German colleague wrote a request for the integration of PowerQuery into Access on UserVoice, Microsoft's wish page at the time. As we organised a little campaign in our German-speaking Access community, 😉 the topic got a lot of votes and reached number 1. Here is a screenshot:

     

    Unfortunately, the response of the Microsoft Access team in early 2018 was negative, with the argument of not wanting to compete with Excel. Here is another screenshot from back then:

     

     

    BTW The current plans of the Access team until March 2024 can be found here.

     

    Servus
    Karl
    ****************

    Access Forever

    Access News
    Access DevCon

    Access-Entwickler-Konferenz AEK

  • treefiddy's avatar
    treefiddy
    Copper Contributor

    Michael,

     

    Have there been any discussions around the possibility of a built in integration between Access and Power Query?  I can imagine such functionality might scare some folks outside of the Access team, but seems like it would be a killer feature for Access.

  • Thanks Karl.

    Sadly that's what I expected and somewhat depressing in terms of innovation and keeping Access relevant into the future.

     

    EDIT

    Answered using a different account as I can't access my Isladogs account for this forum on my Windows tablet for reasons I cannot understand

     

  • Hi Colin,

     

    > Please can you explain what the current status is regarding three public priorities recently removed from the list: 

    > 1.   Enabling Large Address Aware (LAA) for 32-bit Access
    > 2.   SQL Monaco Editor
    > 3.   New Microsoft Graph Data Connector

     

    At my German conference AEK two weeks ago, I asked the Access team what the situation is with the here missing Monaco Editor and LAA. Michael Aldridge answered that they are still in the team's backlog, but not in the timeframe until March 2023.

    (asking about the Graph Connector I gave up a few years ago 😉

     

    Servus
    Karl
    ************
    Access News
    Access DevCon

  • Tom

    I think one of several drawbacks to the new roadmap "90% confident" strategy is that we have no idea whether a feature has been dropped or just further postponed. That's why I asked for clarification

     

    To take a specific example, the Monaco SQL editor was first announced in the old roadmap several years ago.

    When that happened, development work was halted on the excellent Access SQL Editor add-in. How can the developer make an informed decision whether to restart work on that add-in?

    I also know of other developers who are currently working on their own alternatives. For example, Chris Arnold's Access Studio.

    It would be very useful for them to know what is the current status of the Monaco editor.

     

    I think the only thing we can be certain of from the above article is that any items not on the list are definitely NOT being worked on at present. (Apologies for the double negative)

     

     

  • isladogs, I think the difference is that per the new roadmap "90% confident" strategy, linked to in the original post, items that are too far in the future have been removed. That does not mean they are no longer being worked on.

  • Thanks

    For info, I wrote an article based on this information yesterday: Access Roadmap Update (isladogs.co.uk)

     

    Please can you explain what the current status is regarding three public priorities recently removed from the list: 

    1.   Enabling Large Address Aware (LAA) for 32-bit Access
    2.   SQL Monaco Editor
    3.   New Microsoft Graph Data Connector