storage
2 TopicsMSIX AppAttach Storage and Performance
Hoping someone has had some experience with this... Planning out a new WVD environment utilizing MSIX AppAttach. We will have a large number of applications packaged and made available via AppAttach and the corresponding permissions to access a certain app. My questions are: 1. Has anyone setup a large AppAttach environment like this before? If so, how did things work? Were they smooth in terms of Performance? 2. For Storage of the Apps, did you use Azure Files or Azure NetApp Files? What tier did you use for throughput? 3. If you used Azure Files, did you use Standard Storage (HDD) or Premium (SSD) storage and the throughput that goes with each? 4. If you used NetApp Files what Tier did you use? Basically looking for some suggestions / recommendations on what to use if setting this up for a large number of applications that will grow over time. I should also add that all user profiles are setup via FSLogix using Azure NetApp Files Premium Tier (64 MiB/s per TB). Thanks!1.1KViews1like1CommentMSIX AppAttach - Disk Space on Host VMs
When attaching an MSIX App via AppAttach to a host VM, the attached application shows up as its own drive and doesnt take up available space on host VM correct? Trying to decide what size of disk on the host VMs for an AppAttach pool if our users profiles are done via FSLogix and apps are using AppAttach. Seems like I could go with a small disk size for the host VM. Is my assumption correct?948Views0likes1Comment