C# MIP SDK v1.17.x - AccessViolationException on creation of MIPContext in 64-bit console app
I first logged this on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79746967/accessviolationexception-when-creating-mipcontext-after-upgrade-to-v1-17 and the responses there have indicated I should raise with Microsoft a a likely bug, but I don't see a clear route to reporting other than here so any response would be appreciated, even if just to direct me to the appropriate reporting location. I've built a simple console app that demonstrates this issue that I'm happy to provide but we're seeing an issue with the 1.17.x version of the C# MIP SDK where an AccessViolationException is being thrown when trying to create an MIP context object. This is for a .Net Framework 4.8 console app built in 64-bit configuration, deployed to a Windows Server 2016 with the latest VC++ redistributable (14.44.35211) installed (both x86 and x64 versions), though we've seen the same on Windows Server 2019 and 2022. When the same app is built in 32-bit and deployed to the same environment the exception doesn't occur. The following code is what I've used to repro the issue: MIP.Initialize(MipComponent.File); var appInfo = new ApplicationInfo { ApplicationId = string.Empty, ApplicationName = string.Empty, ApplicationVersion = string.Empty }; var diagnosticConfiguration = new DiagnosticConfiguration { IsMinimalTelemetryEnabled = true }; var mipConfiguration = new MipConfiguration(appInfo, "mip_data", LogLevel.Info, false, CacheStorageType.InMemory) { DiagnosticOverride = diagnosticConfiguration }; //Expect BadInputException here due to empty properties of appInfo //When built as part of a 64-bit console app this causes AccessViolationException instead MIP.CreateMipContext(mipConfiguration); The AccessViolationException crashes the console app, with the following logged in the Windows Event Log: Framework Version: v4.0.30319 Description: The process was terminated due to an unhandled exception. Exception Info: System.AccessViolationException at Microsoft.InformationProtection.Internal.SdkWrapperPINVOKE.MipContext_Create__SWIG_1(System.Runtime.InteropServices.HandleRef) at Microsoft.InformationProtection.Internal.MipContext.Create(Microsoft.InformationProtection.Internal.MipConfiguration) at Microsoft.InformationProtection.Utils.MIPHelper.CreateMipContext(Microsoft.InformationProtection.MipConfiguration) The issue doesn't occur with the latest 1.16 version (1.16.149) of the SDK but does appear to be in all versions of the 1.17 release. Library: C# MIP SDK v1.17.x Target App: .Net Framework 4.8 console app Deployed OS: Windows Server 2016, 2019 and 2022 (With .Net Framework 4.8 and latest VC++ redist installed)
Auto-label cannot scope to Synapse Analytics Database
After testing some Purview functionality I have discovered that any Synapse Analytics Serverless SQL Database cannot be handled by Purview when scoped to the individual database. You get the following error: As the "AppliedScope" is just a tick box for the user, I am presuming there is a long FQDN in the Azure backend causing this error. The synapse workspace name and database name are not particularly long as well. We were testing this for a customer and know that their own Synapse workspace names and database names will be more characters than our test scenario. The scenario was an Auto-Label policy for a sensitivity label against a data source in data map. This data source was a single Synapse Workspace with a single serverless SQL database. All names for these were around 8-10 characters. Can anyone in the Purview team confirm if this is a known error at all and if there is a fix incoming anytime soon?Microsoft Purview Best Practices
Microsoft Purview is a solution that helps organizations manage data and compliance. It also uses AI to classify data, monitor compliance, and identify risks. Key features include data discovery, classification, governence, retention, compliance management, encryption, and access controls. Purview ensures data security, prevents insider threats, and helps implement data loss prevention policies to meet compliance requirements. Hello everyone - This is just a short introduction, I am Dogan Colak. I have been working as an M365 Consultant for about 5 years, holding certifications such as MCT, SC-100, SC-200, SC-300, and MS-102, with a focus on Security & Compliance. This year, I am excited to share what I have learned with the Microsoft Technology Community. In the coming days, I will be publishing videos and articles based on the training agenda I have created. I will also share these articles on LinkedIn, so feel free to follow me there. I am always open to feedback and suggestions. See you soon!
information protection label, label policies, auto-labeling - what is the difference?
plz help me understand the functionality of the partitions, because when creating a label, I have the opportunity to choose auto-assignment. At the same time there is a separate section for auto-labeling where, as far as I understand, are there more advanced settings, but do I need to remove the auto-assignment of the label when creating a label? At the same time, Label Policies uses the same label with individual policies. How do they interact? Why did you divide similar functionality into different sections?))
Auto-labelling
I have created labels, SIT's and have now got auto-labelling setup so that if I create a new document it will change the label from the default label to the new label after about 8-10 minutes which is great but.... I saw youtube videos where the document would instantly change when info was type in, or when someone would attach a document to an email that was a higher label. What have I missed to not get that working - all seems to work but not at the time. ThanksDefault Sensitivity Label to be added to migrated files (from Local Network Server)
Hi Experts, We are migrating our file-sharing services from a local network file server to MS Teams/SPO. The requirement is to enable and give default sensitivity labels from the migrated files. Manually assigning sensitivity labels in over a TB of files is hectic and could be prone to error as well. MS Purview MIP labels and label policies are configured, however, at present, only new documents and/or revised files are only having the sensitivity labels assigned. Any suggestions, guide, and tips will be highly appreciated. Thanks, RheyUnable to open rpmsg
Hello, We have AIP and in the last couple of weeks there are lot of complaints about people not able to send/open protected e-mails. E-mails either marked for "Recipients Only" or any AIP unified label that is set for "protection". I am sure this was all working until this last Outlook update.Microsoft Ignite Security, Compliance, and Identity Highlights
In the latest Blue Security Podcast episode, the hosts, Andy Jaw and Adam Brewer, provide a summary of the security announcements made at Microsoft's Ignite 2023 conference. They highlight the packed slate of announcements and how the reorganization within the security business contributed to that.
