Exchange SE Published Calendar URLs giving HTTP 500 error (both html and ics)
I'm getting an http 500 error when trying to browse any published calendar url. I already recreated the owa virtual directories and just updated to the latest patch level of Exchange Server SE. I did a failed request tracing for error 500 and I see the following info: When I got to that section of the web.config I see the following under rewrite: I tried using AI to "fix" this but it didn't fix anything. Can anyone offer any insite as to what's wrong here? Thanks! p.s. this was getting listed as spam so I will paste the text from the pictures in a reply below
Exchange SE 15.2.2562.46: MRSProxy returns HTTP 401 after successful NTLM authentication
Hello, Anonymization note: The domain names contoso.com and contoso.local, the server name EXCH-SE-01, and the account name CONTOSO\MigrationAccount used in this post are anonymized placeholders. They do not represent the actual production domain, server, or account names. The Exchange versions, configuration values, HTTP status codes, diagnostic results, and sequence of events are unchanged. We are experiencing an issue with remote mailbox moves from Exchange Server Subscription Edition to Exchange Online. The Exchange Online migration endpoint and the following command both fail: Test-MigrationServerAvailability -ExchangeRemoteMove -RemoteServer "mail.contoso.com" -Credentials $cred The error returned by Exchange Online is: The connection to the server 'mail.contoso.com' could not be completed. The call to: https://mail.contoso.com/EWS/mrsproxy.svc failed with: The HTTP request is unauthorized with client authentication scheme 'Negotiate'. The authentication header received from the server was: 'Negotiate, NTLM'. The remote server returned an error: (401) Unauthorized. Environment Exchange version: Exchange Server Subscription Edition RTM Installed update: August 2026 Security Update KB5121573 Binary version: 15.2.2562.46 Topology: Single Exchange server Mailbox role Classic Full Hybrid Operating system: Windows Server 2022 Exchange Online migration type: Remote Move / onboarding The environment does not have separate frontend and backend Exchange servers. Both the Client Access frontend and mailbox backend services are hosted on the same Exchange server. All checked MRS binaries have the same version: Microsoft.Exchange.MailboxReplicationService.dll Microsoft.Exchange.MailboxReplicationService.Common.dll Microsoft.Exchange.MailboxReplicationService.ProxyClient.dll Microsoft.Exchange.MailboxReplicationService.ProxyService.dll MSExchangeMailboxReplication.exe File version: 15.2.2562.46 MRSProxy configuration Get-WebServicesVirtualDirectory | Format-List Identity, MRSProxyEnabled, BasicAuthentication, WindowsAuthentication, WSSecurityAuthentication, OAuthAuthentication, ExternalUrl Current configuration: MRSProxyEnabled : True BasicAuthentication : False WindowsAuthentication : True WSSecurityAuthentication : True OAuthAuthentication : True ExternalUrl : https://mail.contoso.com/EWS/Exchange.asmx Extended Protection settings have been validated by the latest Exchange Health Checker: Default Web Site/EWS: Extended Protection = Allow SSL flags = Ssl, Ssl128 Authentication = Windows, Negotiate, NTLM Exchange Back End/EWS: Extended Protection = Require SSL flags = Ssl, Ssl128 Authentication = Windows, Negotiate, NTLM Anonymous authentication = enabled Exchange Health Checker reports: Exchange SE RTM Aug26SU Build Number: 15.2.2562.46 MRS Proxy Enabled: True Extended Protection configured correctly for EWS Default Web Site: Started Exchange Back End: Started MSExchangeServicesAppPool: Started Local MRS health All local MRS health checks pass: Get-MailboxServer | Test-MRSHealth | Format-Table Check,Passed,Message -Wrap Results: ServiceCheck : Passed RPCPingCheck : Passed MRSProxyPingCheck : Passed QueueScanCheck : Passed Migration accounts The test was performed with two different on-premises accounts. Both accounts return the same HTTP 401 result. The primary migration account: Enabled : True LockedOut : False PasswordExpired : False The account is also a direct member of: Organization Management One of the accounts used for testing also has domain administrative permissions, so the symptom does not appear to be caused by missing Exchange RBAC permissions. Changing the password and updating the credentials stored in the migration endpoint did not change the result. Failed Request Tracing results Failed Request Tracing was enabled temporarily for Default Web Site. The MRSProxy request is processed in three stages. Stage 1: anonymous request The initial anonymous request to: /EWS/mrsproxy.svc returns HTTP 401, which appears to be the expected authentication challenge. Stage 2: NTLM negotiation The next request shows: WindowsAuthenticationModule AUTH_SSPI_CONTINUE_NEEDED HTTP 401.1 0x8009030e This also appears to be the normal intermediate NTLM challenge. Stage 3: authenticated request The final request shows: Authentication type : Negotiate NTLMUsed : true AUTH_SUCCEEDED : true RemoteUserName : DOMAIN\MigrationAccount AuthUserName : DOMAIN\MigrationAccount The Exchange frontend also calculates the expected backend server. However, after authentication succeeds, the request ends with: ModuleName : ManagedPipelineHandler Notification : EXECUTE_REQUEST_HANDLER HttpStatus : 401 HttpSubStatus : 0 ErrorCode : 0 Therefore, Windows Authentication appears to complete successfully. The final HTTP 401 is returned later, while the Exchange/WCF MRSProxy handler is executing. No corresponding failed domain logon events are recorded in the Windows Security log. No new ASP.NET event stating: MRS proxy service is disabled is generated for the current requests. Additional checks already completed We have already verified the following: MRSProxyEnabled=True Test-MRSHealth passes Two migration accounts tested Migration account is in Organization Management Basic Authentication enabled temporarily for testing Windows Authentication enabled Negotiate and NTLM providers present Frontend Extended Protection set to Allow Backend Extended Protection set to Require Frontend TLS certificate valid Backend port 444 certificate valid MSExchangeServicesAppPool running Mailbox Replication Service running EWS physical paths valid WCF *.svc handler mapping present MRS binaries present and version-consistent Exchange server fully restarted IIS restarted MRSProxy disabled and enabled again Temporarily enabling Basic Authentication did not change the result. Using another migration account did not change the result. The dedicated Exchange hybrid application and Microsoft Graph hybrid flow are also configured and Test-OAuthConnectivity succeeds. We understand that this configuration is not used for MRS remote mailbox moves. August 2026 SU known issue We reviewed the Exchange Team announcement for the August 2026 Security Update. The article mentions that MRS migrations can fail if a backend mailbox server has the August 2026 SU while the frontend Exchange server proxying the connection is on an older build. This does not seem to match our topology because this is a single Exchange server and all MRS components are on version 15.2.2562.46. The error is also HTTP 401 rather than TooManyTransientFailureRetriesPermanentException. Questions Has anyone observed the following behavior after installing Exchange SE August 2026 SU, KB5121573? MRSProxyEnabled=True Test-MRSHealth passes NTLM authentication reaches AUTH_SUCCEEDED ManagedPipelineHandler returns final HTTP 401.0 Test-MigrationServerAvailability fails In particular: Is there a known issue in KB5121573 related to MRSProxy authorization after successful NTLM authentication? Does MRSProxy require any additional authorization configuration introduced by the August 2026 security changes? Is there a supported way to validate the MRSProxyAuthorizationManager decision? Are there additional diagnostic logs that show why the WCF MRSProxy handler returns HTTP 401 after AUTH_SUCCEEDED? Is reapplying KB5121573 the recommended repair action in this situation? Has anyone resolved the issue without recreating the EWS virtual directory or disabling Extended Protection? We have retained the following diagnostic evidence and can provide sanitized excerpts: Exchange Health Checker TXT/XML Test-MigrationServerAvailability output Test-MRSHealth output Frontend EWS Failed Request Tracing EWS HttpProxy logs EWS and backend IIS configuration MRS binary versions and hashes Any guidance or confirmation from the Exchange Team or administrators who encountered the same behavior would be appreciated. Thank you.
Exchange Server OWA does not display lnline Images after EEMS M2.1.0 mitigation.
Exchange Server can automatically apply applicable mitigations by using the Exchange Emergency Mitigation Service (EEMS) to retrieve mitigation information from Microsoft's Office Config Service (OCS). EEMS can apply several types of mitigations: 1. IIS URL Rewrite Rule Mitigation: Blocks specific malicious HTTP request patterns that could put an Exchange Server at risk. 2. Exchange Service Mitigation: Disables a vulnerable Exchange service. 3. Application Pool Mitigation: Disables a vulnerable application pool on the Exchange Server. In this case, inline images were displayed correctly in Outlook, but the same images were not displayed in OWA. The issue was identified as being related to the IIS URL Rewrite rule deployed by the M2.1.0 mitigation for CVE-2026-42897. Verification Run the following commands in the Exchange Management Shell. 1. Check the installed Exchange Security Update version (Get-Command ExSetup.exe).FileVersionInfo.ProductVersion 2. Check whether the Emergency Mitigation Service is enabled Get-OrganizationConfig | fl MitigationsEnabled 3. Check applied and blocked mitigations Get-ExchangeServer | fl Name,MitigationsApplied,MitigationsBlocked For example, a server affected by this issue may show: MitigationsApplied : {PING1, M2.1.0} MitigationsBlocked : {M2.1.0} 4. Check the IIS URL Rewrite rule Import-Module WebAdministration Get-WebConfigurationProperty -PSPath "IIS:\Sites\Default Web Site\owa" -Filter "system.webServer/rewrite/outboundRules/rule" -Name "." | Select-Object name The following rule may be present: EEMS M2.1 OWA CSP - outbound Microsoft provides Security Updates (SUs) to address security vulnerabilities in Exchange Server. Exchange Server SE is currently supported, while Exchange Server 2016 and Exchange Server 2019 can continue to receive applicable security updates through the Extended Security Updates (ESU) program. Note: Exchange Server 2016 and Exchange Server 2019 reached end of support in October 2025. ESU must be purchased separately to continue receiving applicable security updates. Resolution 1. Install the July 2026 SU or later Install the July 2026 SU or a later Security Update (preferably the latest available SU), and then restart the server. Installing the update does not automatically remove the previously applied CVE-2026-42897 mitigation. 2. Block M2.1.0 from being reapplied If M2.1.0 is not already listed under MitigationsBlocked, add it: Set-ExchangeServer -Identity EXSE-01 -MitigationsBlocked @{Add="M2.1.0"} Note: Adding M2.1.0 to MitigationsBlocked does not remove the IIS rules that have already been applied. It prevents EEMS from reapplying the M2.1.0 mitigation. 3. Back up the OWA web.config file Copy-Item ` -Path "$env:ExchangeInstallPath\FrontEnd\HttpProxy\owa\web.config" ` -Destination "$env:ExchangeInstallPath\FrontEnd\HttpProxy\owa\web.config.$((Get-Date).ToString('yyyyMMdd-HHmmss')).bak" 4. Remove the M2.1.0 IIS URL Rewrite rule and precondition Remove-WebConfigurationProperty ` -PSPath "IIS:\Sites\Default Web Site\owa" ` -Filter "system.webServer/rewrite/outboundRules" ` -Name "." ` -AtElement @{name="EEMS M2.1 OWA CSP - outbound"} Then remove the associated precondition: Remove-WebConfigurationProperty ` -PSPath "IIS:\Sites\Default Web Site\owa" ` -Filter "system.webServer/rewrite/outboundRules/preConditions" ` -Name "." ` -AtElement @{name="EEMS M2.1 OWA SPA HTML shell - precondition"} Verification After Rollback Without restarting the Exchange Server or running IISReset, reopen the same OWA message that previously failed to display the inline image and verify that the image is now displayed correctly. Test Results I reproduced the issue in an Exchange Server SE June 2026 SU test environment. After EEMS automatically applied the M2.1.0 mitigation, an inline PNG image that was displayed correctly in Outlook was no longer displayed in OWA. After blocking M2.1.0 and removing the M2.1.0 IIS rules according to Microsoft's rollback guidance, the inline image in the same message was displayed correctly again in OWA. No Exchange Server restart or IISReset was required after removing the IIS rules.Microsoft Entra Connect 2.x Version Retirement Reminder
Microsoft is retiring older versions of Microsoft Entra Connect Sync 2.x as part of its version lifecycle policy. Version 2.5.79.0 Retirement date: 23 October 2026 This version will retire 12 months after the release of version 2.5.190.0. Important to know Microsoft Entra Connect Sync 2.x versions retire 12 months after a newer version is released. This retirement policy has been in effect since 15 March 2023. For new installations: Always install the latest available version. For existing environments: Plan your upgrade to the latest version before your currently installed version reaches its retirement date.The Demise of the OWA Light Client
On July 8, Microsoft said that they will retire the OWA Light client for Exchange Server in August 2026. But what happened to the OWA Light client for Exchange Online? It seems like Microsoft announced the retirement of OWA Light for Exchange Online in June 2024, but didn’t really make the fact clear in a blog post about consumer accounts. In any case, you can’t run OWA Light for Exchange Online, even if you wanted to. https://office365itpros.com/2026/07/17/owa-light-retirement/Exchange Online PowerShell Updates to 3.10.1 to Fix CBA
Microsoft rushed out version 3.10.1 of the Exchange Online management PowerShell module to fix a problem with certificate-based authentication. It seems like a change in an internal Microsoft identity platform caused the tokens issued after a successful connection to Exchange Online to not authorize the execution of further cmdlets. To their credit, Microsoft fixed the issue, but is this the kind of thing that should be caught in testing? https://office365itpros.com/2026/07/27/exchange-online-management-3-10-1/HELP - cannot add email to the exchange with outlook classic 2021 and 2024
We have recently upgraded and have a exchange email accounts. We have tried to add emails to connect through exchange we constantly get this error message The action cannot be completed. The name cannot be matched to a name in the address list. We have searched and undertaken many things to and still says this, would anyone know how to fix this?
Remove-Calendarevents
VasilMichev and TonyRedmond Does it need permission on Termed employees calendar? i am Global Admin and when i run this command with preview it does not preview any results Remove-CalendarEvents -Identity james.bond@domain.com -CancelOrganizedMeetings -QueryStartDate 11-7-2016 -QueryWindowInDays 120 -PreviewOnly -Verbose
