Exempt - Azure CSPM Recommendation" (Terraform exemption
The reason you're not finding a standalone policyAssignmentId/policyDefinitionId for this specific recommendation is that it isn't a standalone assignment — it's one control inside the built-in CSPM initiative (the "ASC Default" / Microsoft Cloud Security Benchmark assignment). That initiative does have an assignment ID; you just need to target the specific control within it, not look for a separate one. In azurerm_resource_policy_exemption (or the subscription/resource-group variants), the relevant fields are: policy_assignment_id → the ID of the initiative assignment (ASC Default / MCSB), not a per-recommendation assignment policy_definition_reference_ids → an array scoping the exemption to just this one control instead of the whole initiative resource "azurerm_resource_policy_exemption" "function_app_network_exemption" { name = "exempt-function-network-restriction" resource_id = azurerm_linux_function_app.example.id policy_assignment_id = data.azurerm_subscription_policy_assignment.asc_default.id policy_definition_reference_ids = [ "<reference-id-for-the-specific-control>" ] exemption_category = "Waiver" # or "Mitigated" if an equivalent control exists expires_on = "2026-12-31T00:00:00Z" } To find the policy_definition_reference_id for this specific control: in the Azure Portal, go to Policy → Definitions, search for "Restricted network access should be configured on Internet exposed Function app" to get its definition ID, then open the initiative definition (ASC Default) and find the matching entry in its policyDefinitions[].policyDefinitionReferenceId array — that string is what goes in the array above. Two things worth deciding upfront before automating this: Waiver vs Mitigated — if you've genuinely restricted access another way (e.g., Private Endpoint), use Mitigated so it's distinguishable from accepted risk in reporting. Consider whether the exemption belongs at the resource scope (just this Function App) vs resource group/subscription — narrower is safer, but if you have a pattern of similar apps, a tagged-based resourceSelectors block can scale this without per-resource blocks.
Updating SDK for Java used by Defender for Server/CSPM in AWS
Hi, I have a customer who is Defender for Cloud/CSPM in AWS. Last week, Cloud AWS Health Dashboard lit up with a recommendation around the use of AWS SDK for Java 1.x in their organization. This version will reach end of support on December 31, 2025. The recommendation is to migrate to AWS SDK for Java 2.x. The issue is present in all of AWS workload accounts. They found that a large amount of these alerts is caused by the Defender CSPM service, running remotely, and using AWS SDK for Java 1.x. Customer attaching a couple of sample events that were gathered from the CloudTrail logs. Please note that in both cases: assumed-role: DefenderForCloud-Ciem sourceIP: 20.237.136.191 (MS Azure range) userAgent: aws-sdk-java/1.12.742 Linux/6.6.112.1-2.azl3 OpenJDK_64-Bit_Server_VM/21.0.9+10-LTS java/21.0.9 kotlin/1.6.20 vendor/Microsoft cfg/retry-mode/legacy cfg/auth-source#unknown Can someone provide guidance about this? How to find out if DfC is going to leverage AWS SDK for Java 2.x after Dec 31, 2025? Thanks, TerruRuntime protection - Microsoft Defender for Cloud DevOps Security (Defender CSPM)
Hi team! The current support status for Microsoft Defender for Cloud DevOps Security (Defender CSPM) and runtime protection across services are this one : Fully Supported for Runtime Protection Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) are there more runtime in the product roadmap (Azure Container Apps, AWS, Fargate for Amazon ECS, Azure Functions, AWS Lambda)? Thanks
Secure score power BI dashboard
We are following https://github.com/Azure/Microsoft-Defender-for-Cloud/tree/main/Secure%20Score to deploy secure score over the time dashboard for MDC. however steps for the deployment are very old when we had azure security center instead of MDC and prerequisites are not properly documented. As per the article we need to: Export the secure score data to Log analytics workspace by using continuous report option in MDC portal. Deploy Secure Score over the time workbook which can export the secure score data to Log Analytics workspace (not clear if this will pull reports every 24 hours and what permissions are required on Log Analytics workspace and to deploy the workbook) Do we need to export the secure score data to same Log Analytics workspace on which MDC is deployed or a separate workspace is needed ? If MDC already uses Log analytics workspace in the backend to store the logs then why can't we pull the secure score log data directly? why we need to export the secure score data to Log Analytics workspace first then to connect it to dashboard ?DevOps Security: MDC-ADO integration through Service account
Hi All, Is it possible to integrate MDC-ADO Integration with Service Account? When I attempted to authorize ADO in MDC during the integration process, it appears to only accept individual accounts. Does anyone have insights on how to utilize a Service Account for this integration?
How to programmatically assign security standards on Defender for Cloud
Hi all, i would like to know if there is a way to programmatically (REST API, Terraform,...) activate custom secutity Standards on Defender for Cloud. Basically the step 6 on this guide https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/defender-for-cloud/update-regulatory-compliance-packages. I didn't found any way to do that. I have a policySet that i would like to activate in an automated way. Any ideas? Thank you in advance!KQL Secure score controls and Assessments
I have a query that is working but is not producing what I need. a query that will combine the Recommedation categories( 13 listed under the Classic View in recommendations) and the individual assessments associated to those categories: securityresources | where type == "microsoft.security/securescores/securescorecontrols" | extend category_name = tostring(properties.displayName) //category name | extend Tenant_Id=tostring(tenantId) | extend healthy = properties.healthyResourceCount | extend unhealthy = properties.unhealthyResourceCount | extend notApplicable = properties.notApplicableResourceCount | extend score = properties.score | extend scr= parse_json(score) | project category_name, healthy, unhealthy, notApplicable, CurrentScore=scr.current, MaxScore=scr.max, Tenant_Id | join ( securityresources | where type == "microsoft.security/assessments" | extend assessment_name = tostring(properties.displayName) //assessment name | extend Tenant_Id=tostring(tenantId) | extend resourceName = properties.resourceDetails.ResourceName | extend status = properties.status.code | extend metadata = properties.metadata | extend severity = metadata.severity | project assessment_name, resourceName, status, severity, Tenant_Id ) on Tenant_Id | project category_name, assessment_name, resourceName, status, severity, healthy, unhealthy, notApplicable, CurrentScore, MaxScore,Tenant_Id This is a work in progress script, I do get a valid script but I know it is not working like I need it to work. For example, when I run this script, I get for "assessment_name: EDR solution should be installed on Virtual Machines" but for the "category_name" I get "Restrict unauthorized network access". It should be category_name = Enable endpoint protection. I'm trying to find a valid join field but not getting it correctly. Perhaps I need to add anothere "Type" but I'm not sure which. Please advise, Serge
Enhancing Governance Rules/Notifications with Risk-Based Recommendations
Hi everyone, I'm looking to improve how governance rules in Defender for Cloud integrate with risk-based recommendations from Defender for CSPM. Currently, governance rules measure against the severity of recommendations, but our users receive emails highlighting severity without any mention of risk. This has led to confusion because the default view in the portal sorts by risk. Is there a way to make governance rules more flexible to incorporate risk-based recommendations? Also, are there any upcoming integrations for different ticketing tools like Jira? Any advice or updates would be appreciated. Thanks!
Azure Secure Score Comparison for Similar Organizations
Is there a way to see comparison of Azure Secure Score for similar organizations like how Microsoft Secure Score in the Defender portal shows? For example, Microsoft Secure Score has the below options, and I am looking for a something similar in Azure Secure Score/Defender for Cloud Secure Score.
New Blog | New Dimensions in Cybersecurity - Advanced Export for Defender for Cloud Attack Insights
Microsoft Defender for Cloud (MDC) has been instrumental in offering proactive security management through its detailed Attack Path insights, helping organizations identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. While these insights have long provided value within the MDC portal and through one-time snapshots via Azure Resource Graph, a significant update enhances how organizations can leverage this information. Read the full blog here: Unlocking New Dimensions in Cybersecurity - Advanced Export for Defender for Cloud Attack Insights - Microsoft Community Hub
