Please tell me how to disable the Pin Copilot message
Morning! I wrote a message yesterday but nobody replied, so here's another one so it doesn't get lost Can somebody tell me how to disable the annoying "Pin Copilot Chat" popup? every morning I have to say "Maybe Later" when I really mean to say NEVER IN A THOUSAND YEARSOverload to Optimal: Tuning Microsoft Fabric Capacity
Co-Authored by: Daya Ram, Sr. Cloud Solutions Architect Optimizing Microsoft Fabric capacity is both a performance and cost exercise. By diagnosing workloads, tuning cluster and Spark settings, and applying data best practices, teams can reduce run times, avoid throttling, and lower total cost of ownership—without compromising SLAs. Use Fabric’s built-in observability (Monitoring Hub, Capacity Metrics, Spark UI) to identify hot spots and then apply cluster- and data-level remediations. For capacity planning and sizing guidance, see Plan your capacity size. Options to Diagnose Capacity Issues 1) Monitoring Hub — Start with the Story of the Run What to use it for: Browse Spark activity across applications (notebooks, Spark Job Definitions, and pipelines). Quickly surface long‑running or anomalous runs; view read/write bytes, idle time, core allocation, and utilization. How to use it From the Fabric portal, open Monitoring (Monitor Hub). Select a Notebook or Spark Job Definition to run and choose Historical Runs. Inspect the Run Duration chart; click on a run to see read/write bytes, idle time, core allocation, overall utilization, and other Spark metrics. What to look for Use the guide: application detail monitoring to review and monitor your application. 2) Capacity Metrics App — Measure the Whole Environment What to use it for: Review capacity-wide utilization and system events (overloads, queueing); compare utilization across time windows and identify sustained peaks. How to use it Open the Microsoft Fabric Capacity Metrics app for your capacity. Review the Compute page (ribbon charts, utilization trends) and the System events tab to see overload or throttling windows. Use the Timepoint page to drill into a 30‑second interval and see which operations consumed the most compute. What to look for Use the Troubleshooting guide: Monitor and identify capacity usage to pinpoint top CU‑consuming items. 3) Spark UI — Diagnose at Deeper Level Why it matters: Spark UI exposes skew, shuffle, memory pressure, and long stages. Use it after Monitoring Hub/Capacity Metrics to pinpoint the problematic job. Key tabs to inspect Stages: uneven task durations (data skew), heavy shuffle read/write, large input/output volumes. Executors: storage memory, task time (GC), shuffle metrics. High GC or frequent spills indicate memory tuning is needed. Storage: which RDDs/cached tables occupy memory; any disk spill. Jobs: long‑running jobs and gaps in the timeline (driver compilation, non‑Spark code, driver overload). What to look for Set via environment Spark properties or session config. Data skew, Memory usage, High/Low Shuffles: Adjust Apache Spark settings: i.e. spark.ms.autotune.enabled, spark.task.cpus and spark.sql.shuffle.partitions. Section 2: Remediation and Optimization Suggestions A) Cluster & Workspace Settings Runtime & Native Execution Engine (NEE) Use Fabric Runtime 1.3 (Spark 3.5, Delta 3.2) and enable the Native Execution Engine to boost performance; enable at the environment level under Spark compute → Acceleration. Starter Pools vs. Custom Pools Starter Pool: prehydrated, medium‑size pools; fast session starts, good for dev/quick runs. Custom Pools: size nodes, enable autoscale, dynamic executors. Create via workspace Spark Settings (requires capacity admin to enable workspace customization). High Concurrency Session Sharing Enable High Concurrency to share Spark Sessions across notebooks (and pipelines) to reduce session startup latency and cost; use session tags in pipelines to group notebooks. Autotune for Spark Enable Autotune (spark.ms.autotune.enabled = true) to auto‑adjust per‑query: spark.sql.shuffle.partitions Spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold spark.sql.files.maxPartitionBytes. Autotune is disabled by default and is in preview; enable per environment or session. B) Data‑level best practices Microsoft Fabric offers several approaches to maintain optimal file sizes in Delta tables, review documentation here: Table Compaction - Microsoft Fabric. Intelligent Cache Enabled by default (Runtime 1.1/1.2) for Spark pools: caches frequently read files at node level for Delta/Parquet/CSV; improves subsequent read performance and TCO. OPTIMIZE & Z‑Order Run OPTIMIZE regularly to rewrite files and improve file layout. V‑Order V‑Order (disabled by default in new workspaces) can accelerate reads for read‑heavy workloads; enable via spark.sql.parquet.vorder.default = true. Vacuum Run VACUUM to remove unreferenced files (stale data); default retention is 7 days; align retention across OneLake to control storage costs and maintain time travel. Collaboration & Next Steps Engage Data Engineering Team to Define an Optimization Playbook Start with reviewing capacity sizing guidance, cluster‑level optimizations (runtime/NEE, pools, concurrency, Autotune) and then target data improvements (Z‑order, compaction, caching, query refactors). Triage: Monitor Hub → Capacity Metrics → Spark UI to map workloads and identify high‑impact jobs, and workloads causing throttling. Schedule: Operationalize maintenance: OPTIMIZE (full or selective) during off‑peak windows; enable Auto Compaction for micro‑batch/streaming writes; add VACUUM to your cadence with agreed retention. Add regular code review sessions to ensure consistent performance patterns. Fix: Adjust pool sizing or concurrency; enable Autotune; tune shuffle partitions; refactor problematic queries; re‑run compaction. Verify: Re‑run the job and change, i.e. reduced run time, lower shuffle, improved utilization.
BYOPI - Design your own custom private AI Search indexer with no code ADF (SQLServer on private VM)
Executive Summary Building a fully private search indexing solution using Azure Data Factory (ADF) to sync SQL Server data from private VM to Azure AI Search is achievable but comes with notable complexities and limitations. This blog shares my journey, discoveries, and honest assessment of the BYOPI (Build Your Own Private Indexer) architecture. Architectural flow: Table of Contents Overall Setup How ADF works in this approach with Azure AI Search Challenges - discovered Pros and Cons: An Honest Assessment Conclusion and Recommendations 1. Overall Setup: Phase 1: Resource Group & Network Setup : create resource group and vNET (virtual network) in any region of your choice Phase 2: Deploy SQL Server VM: Phase 3: Create Azure Services - ADF (Azure Data Factory), Azure AI Search and AKV (Azure Key Vault) service from portal or from your choice of deployment. Phase 4: Create Private Endpoints for all the services in their dedicated subnets: Phase 5: Configure SQL Server on VM : connect to VM via bastion and setup database, tables & SP: Sample metadata used as below: CREATE DATABASE BYOPI_DB; GO USE BYOPI_DB; GO CREATE TABLE Products ( ProductId INT IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY, ProductName NVARCHAR(200) NOT NULL, Description NVARCHAR(MAX), Category NVARCHAR(100), Price DECIMAL(10,2), InStock BIT DEFAULT 1, Tags NVARCHAR(500), IsDeleted BIT DEFAULT 0, CreatedDate DATETIME DEFAULT GETDATE(), ModifiedDate DATETIME DEFAULT GETDATE() ); CREATE TABLE WatermarkTable ( TableName NVARCHAR(100) PRIMARY KEY, WatermarkValue DATETIME ); INSERT INTO WatermarkTable VALUES ('Products', '2024-01-01'); CREATE PROCEDURE sp_update_watermark @TableName NVARCHAR(100), @NewWatermark DATETIME AS BEGIN UPDATE WatermarkTable SET WatermarkValue = @NewWatermark WHERE TableName = @TableName; END; INSERT INTO Products (ProductName, Description, Category, Price, Tags) VALUES ('Laptop Pro', 'High-end laptop', 'Electronics', 1299.99, 'laptop,computer'), ('Office Desk', 'Adjustable desk', 'Furniture', 599.99, 'desk,office'), ('Wireless Mouse', 'Bluetooth mouse', 'Electronics', 29.99, 'mouse,wireless'); Phase 6: Install Self-Hosted Integration Runtime Create SHIR in ADF: Go to ADF resource in Azure Portal Click "Open Azure Data Factory Studio" Note: You need to access from a VM in the same VNet or via VPN since ADF is private In ADF Studio, click Manage (toolbox icon) Select Integration runtimes → "+ New" Select "Azure, Self-Hosted" → "Self-Hosted" Name: SHIR-BYOPI or of your choice Click "Create" Copy Key1 (save it) Install SHIR on VM In the VM (via Bastion): Open browser, go to: https://www.microsoft.com/download/details.aspx?id=39717 Download and install Integration Runtime During setup: Launch Configuration Manager Paste the Key1 from Step 14 Click "Register" Wait for "Connected" status Phase 7: Create Search Index through below powershell script and saving it as search_index.ps1 $searchService = "search-byopi" $apiKey = "YOUR-ADMIN-KEY" $headers = @{ 'api-key' = $apiKey 'Content-Type' = 'application/json' } $index = @{ name = "products-index" fields = @( @{name="id"; type="Edm.String"; key=$true} @{name="productName"; type="Edm.String"; searchable=$true} @{name="description"; type="Edm.String"; searchable=$true} @{name="category"; type="Edm.String"; filterable=$true; facetable=$true} @{name="price"; type="Edm.Double"; filterable=$true} @{name="inStock"; type="Edm.Boolean"; filterable=$true} @{name="tags"; type="Collection(Edm.String)"; searchable=$true} ) } | ConvertTo-Json -Depth 10 Invoke-RestMethod ` -Uri "https://$searchService.search.windows.net/indexes/products-index?api-version=2020-06-30" ` -Method PUT ` -Headers $headers ` -Body $index Phase 8: Configure AKV & ADF Components - Link AKV and ADF for secrets Create Key Vault Secrets Navigate to kv-byopi (created AKV resource) in Portal Go to "Access policies" Click "+ Create" Select permissions: Get, List for secrets Select principal: adf-byopi-private Create Go to "Secrets" → "+ Generate/Import": Name: sql-password, Value: <> Name: search-api-key, Value: Your search key Create Linked Services in ADF Access ADF Studio from the VM (since it's private): Key Vault Linked Service: Manage → Linked services → "+ New" Search "Azure Key Vault" Configure: Name: LS_KeyVault Azure Key Vault: kv-byopi Integration runtime: AutoResolveIntegrationRuntime Test connection → Create SQL Server Linked Service: "+ New" → "SQL Server" Configure: Name: LS_SqlServer Connect via: SHIR-BYOPI Server name: localhost Database: BYOPI_DB Authentication: SQL Authentication User: sqladmin Password: Select from Key Vault → LS_KeyVault → sql-password Test → Create Azure Search Linked Service: "+ New" → "Azure Search" Configure: Name: LS_AzureSearch URL: https://search-byopi.search.windows.net Connect via: SHIR-BYOPI - Important - use SHIR API Key: From Key Vault → LS_KeyVault → search-api-key Test → Create Phase 9: Create ADF Datasets and PipelineCreate Datasets SQL Products Dataset: Author → Datasets → "+" → "New dataset" Select "SQL Server" → Continue Select "Table" → Continue Properties: Name: DS_SQL_Products Linked service: LS_SqlServer Table: Select Products click OK Watermark Dataset: Repeat with: Name: DS_SQL_Watermark Table: WatermarkTable Search Dataset: "+" → "Azure Search" Properties: Name: DS_Search_Index Linked service: LS_AzureSearch Index name: products-index Create Pipeline Author → Pipelines → "+" → "Pipeline" Name: PL_BYOPI_Private From Activities → General, drag "Lookup" activity Configure Lookup 1: Name: LookupOldWatermark Settings: Source dataset: DS_SQL_Watermark Query: below sql SELECT WatermarkValue FROM WatermarkTable WHERE TableName='Products' - **First row only**: ✓ Add another Lookup: Name: LookupNewWatermark Query: below sql SELECT MAX(ModifiedDate) as NewWatermark FROM Products Add Copy Data activity: Name: CopyToSearchIndex Source: Dataset: DS_SQL_Products Query: sql SELECT CAST(ProductId AS NVARCHAR(50)) as id, ProductName as productName, Description as description, Category as category, Price as price, InStock as inStock, Tags as tags, CASE WHEN IsDeleted = 1 THEN 'delete' ELSE 'upload' END as [@search.action] FROM Products WHERE ModifiedDate > '@{activity('LookupOldWatermark').output.firstRow.WatermarkValue}' AND ModifiedDate <= '@{activity('LookupNewWatermark').output.firstRow.NewWatermark}' Sink: Dataset: DS_Search_Index Write behavior: Merge Batch size: 1000 Add Stored Procedure activity: Name: UpdateWatermark SQL Account: LS_SqlServer Stored procedure: sp_update_watermark Parameters: TableName: Products NewWatermark: @{activity('LookupNewWatermark').output.firstRow.NewWatermark} Connect activities with success conditions Phase 10: Test and Schedule Test Pipeline Click "Debug" in pipeline Monitor in Output panel Check for green checkmarks Create Trigger In pipeline, click "Add trigger" → "New/Edit" Click "+ New" Configure: Name: TR_Hourly Type: Schedule Recurrence: Every 1 Hour OK → Publish All Monitor Go to Monitor tab View Pipeline runs Check Trigger runs Your pipeline should look like this: Phase 11: Validation & Testing Verify Private Connectivity From the VM, run PowerShell: # Test DNS resolution (should return private IPs) nslookup adf-byopi-private.datafactory.azure.net # Should show private IP like : 10.0.2.x nslookup search-byopi.search.windows.net # Should show private IP like : 10.0.2.x nslookup kv-byopi.vault.azure.net # Should show private IP like : 10.0.2.x # Test Search $headers = @{ 'api-key' = 'YOUR-KEY' } Invoke-RestMethod -Uri "https://search-byopi.search.windows.net/indexes/products-index/docs?`$count=true&api-version=2020-06-30" -Headers $headers Test Data Sync (adding few records) and verify in search index: -- Add test record INSERT INTO Products (ProductName, Description, Category, Price, Tags) VALUES ('Test Product Private', 'Testing private pipeline', 'Test', 199.99, 'test,private'); -- Trigger pipeline manually or wait for schedule -- Then verify in Search index 2. How ADF works in this approach with Azure AI search: Azure AI Search uses a REST API for indexing or called as uploading. When ADF sink uploads data to AI Search, it's actually making HTTP POST requests: for example - POST https://search-byopi.search.windows.net/indexes/products-index/docs/index?api-version=2020-06-30 Content-Type: application/json api-key: YOUR-ADMIN-KEY { "value": [ { "@search.action": "upload", "id": "1", "productName": "Laptop", "price": 999.99 }, { "@search.action": "delete", "id": "2" } ] } Delete action used here is soft delete and not hard delete. pipeline query: SELECT CAST(ProductId AS NVARCHAR(50)) as id, -- Renamed to match index field ProductName as productName, -- Renamed to match index field Description as description, Category as category, Price as price, InStock as inStock, Tags as tags, CASE WHEN IsDeleted = 1 THEN 'delete' ELSE 'upload' END as [@search.action] -- Special field with @ prefix FROM Products WHERE ModifiedDate > '2024-01-01' ``` Returns this resultset: ``` id | productName | description | category | price | inStock | tags | @search.action ----|----------------|------------------|-------------|--------|---------|----------------|--------------- 1 | Laptop Pro | High-end laptop | Electronics | 1299 | 1 | laptop,computer| upload 2 | Office Chair | Ergonomic chair | Furniture | 399 | 1 | chair,office | upload 3 | Deleted Item | Old product | Archive | 0 | 0 | old | delete The @search.action Field - The Magic Control This special field tells Azure AI Search what to do with each document: @search.action What It Does When to Use What Happens If Document... upload Insert OR Update Most common - upsert operation Exists: Updates it<br>Doesn't exist: Creates it merge Update only When you know it exists Exists: Updates specified fields<br>Doesn't exist: ERROR mergeOrUpload Update OR Insert Safe update Exists: Updates fields<br>Doesn't exist: Creates it delete Remove from index To remove documents Exists: Deletes it<br>Doesn't exist: Ignores (no error) ADF automatically converts SQL results to JSON format required by Azure Search: { "value": [ { "@search.action": "upload", "id": "1", "productName": "Laptop Pro", "description": "High-end laptop", "category": "Electronics", "price": 1299.00, "inStock": true, "tags": "laptop,computer" }, { "@search.action": "upload", "id": "2", "productName": "Office Chair", "description": "Ergonomic chair", "category": "Furniture", "price": 399.00, "inStock": true, "tags": "chair,office" }, { "@search.action": "delete", "id": "3" // For delete, only ID is needed } ] } ADF doesn't send all records at once. It batches them based on writeBatchSize and each batch is a separate HTTP POST to Azure Search How ADF will detect new changes and run batches: Watermark will be updated after each successful ADF run to detect new changes as below: Handling different scenarios: Scenario 1: No Changes Between Runs: Run at 10:00 AM: - Old Watermark: 09:45:00 - New Watermark: 10:00:00 - Query: WHERE ModifiedDate > '09:45' AND <= '10:00' - Result: 0 rows - Action: Still update watermark to 10:00 - Why: Prevents reprocessing if changes come later Scenario 2: Bulk Insert Happens: Someone inserts 5000 records at 10:05 AM Run at 10:15 AM: - Old Watermark: 10:00:00 - New Watermark: 10:15:00 - Query: WHERE ModifiedDate > '10:00' AND <= '10:15' - Result: 5000 rows - Action: Process all 5000, update watermark to 10:15 Scenario 3: Pipeline Fails Run at 10:30 AM: - Old Watermark: 10:15:00 (unchanged from last success) - Pipeline fails during Copy activity - Watermark NOT updated (still 10:15:00) Next Run at 10:45 AM: - Old Watermark: 10:15:00 (still the last successful) - New Watermark: 10:45:00 - Query: WHERE ModifiedDate > '10:15' AND <= '10:45' - Result: Gets ALL changes from 10:15 to 10:45 (30 minutes of data) - No data loss! Note: There is still room for improvement by refining this logic to handle more advanced scenarios. However, I have not examined the logic in depth, as the goal here is to review how the overall setup functions, identify its limitations, and compare it with the indexing solutions available in AI Search. 3. Challenges - disovered: When I tried to set out to build a private search indexer for SQL Server data residing on an Azure VM with no public IP, the solution seemed straightforward: use Azure Data Factory to orchestrate the data movement to Azure AI Search. The materials made it sound simple. The reality? It's possible, but the devil is in the details. What We Needed: ✅ SQL Server on private VM (no public IP) ✅ Azure AI Search with private endpoint ✅ No data over public internet ✅ Support for full CRUD operations ✅ Near real-time synchronization ✅ No-code/low-code solution Reality Check: ⚠️ DELETE operations not natively supported in ADF sink ⚠️ Complex networking requirements ⚠️ Higher costs than expected ⚠️ Significant setup complexity ✅ But it IS possible with workarounds Components Required Azure VM: ~$150/month (D4s_v3) Self-Hosted Integration Runtime: Free (runs on VM) Private Endpoints: ~$30/month (approx 3 endpoints) Azure Data Factory: ~$15-60/month (depends on frequency) Azure AI Search: ~$75/month (Basic tier) Total: ~$270-315/month** The DELETE Challenge: Despite Azure AI Search REST API fully supporting delete operations via @search.action, ADF's native Azure Search sink does NOT support delete operations. -- This SQL query with delete action SELECT ProductId as id, CASE WHEN IsDeleted = 1 THEN 'delete' ELSE 'upload' END as [@search.action] FROM Products -- Will NOT delete documents in Azure Search when using Copy activity -- The @search.action = 'delete' is ignored by ADF sink! Nevertheless, there is a workaround using the Web Activity approach or by calling the REST API from the ADF side to perform the delete operation. { "name": "DeleteViaREST", "type": "Web", "typeProperties": { "url": "https://search.windows.net/indexes/index/docs/index", "method": "POST", "body": { "value": [ {"@search.action": "delete", "id": "123"} ] } } } Development Challenges No Direct Portal Access: With ADF private, you need: Jump box in the same VNet VPN connection Bastion for access Testing Complexity: Can't use Postman from local machine Need to test from within VNet Debugging requires multiple tools 4. Pros and Cons: An Honest Assessment: Pros: Security: Complete network isolation Compliance: Meets strict requirements No-Code: Mostly configuration-based Scalability: Can handle large datasets Monitoring: Built-in ADF monitoring Managed Service: Microsoft handles updates Cons: DELETE Complexity: Not natively supported Cost: Higher than expected Setup Complexity: Many moving parts Debugging: Difficult with private endpoints Hidden Gotchas: - SHIR requires Windows VM (Linux in preview) - Private endpoint DNS propagation delays - ADF Studio timeout with private endpoints - SHIR auto-update can break pipelines 5. Conclusion and Recommendations: When to Use BYOPI: ✅ Good Fit: Strict security requirements Needs indexing from an un-supported scenarios for example SQL server residing on private VM Budget > $500/month Team familiar with Azure networking Read-heavy workloads ❌ Poor Fit: Simple search requirements Budget conscious Need real-time updates Heavy DELETE operations Small team without Azure expertise BYOPI works, but it's more complex and expensive than initially expected. The lack of native DELETE support in ADF sink is a significant limitation that requires workarounds. Key Takeaways It works but requires significant effort DELETE (hard) operations need workarounds Costs will be higher than expected Complexity is substantial for a "no-code" solution Alternative solutions might be better for many scenarios Disclaimer: The sample scripts provided in this article are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. The author is not responsible for any issues, damages, or problems that may arise from using these scripts. Users should thoroughly test any implementation in their environment before deploying to production. Azure services and APIs may change over time, which could affect the functionality of the provided scripts. Always refer to the latest Azure documentation for the most up-to-date information. Thanks for reading this blog! I hope you've found this approach of creating own private indexing solution for Azure AI Search (BYOPI) useful 😀
Sentinel Data Connector: Google Workspace (G Suite) (using Azure Functions)
I'm encountering a problem when attempting to run the GWorkspace_Report workbook in Azure Sentinel. The query is throwing this error related to the union operator: 'union' operator: Failed to resolve table expression named 'GWorkspace_ReportsAPI_gcp_CL' I've double-checked, and the GoogleWorkspaceReports connector is installed and updated to version 3.0.2. Has anyone seen this or know what might be causing the table GWorkspace_ReportsAPI_gcp_CL to be unresolved? Thanks!Secure Delta Sharing Between Databricks Workspaces Using NCC and Private Endpoints
This guide walks you through the steps to share Delta tables between two Databricks workspaces (NorthCentral and SouthCentral) and configure Network Connectivity Configuration (NCC) for a Serverless Warehouse. These steps ensure secure data sharing and connectivity for your workloads. Part 1: Delta Sharing Between Workspaces Access Delta Shares From your NorthCentral Workspace, go to Catalog. Hover over Delta Shares Received. When the icon appears, click it. → This will redirect you to the Delta Sharing page. Create a New Recipient On the Delta Sharing page, click Shared by me. Click New Recipient. Fill in the details: Recipient Name: (Enter your recipient name) Recipient Type: Select Databricks Sharing Identifier: azure:southcentralus:3035j6je88e8-91-434a-9aca-e6da87c1e882 To get the sharing identifier using a notebook or Databricks SQL query: (SQL) SELECT CURRENT_METASTORE(); Click Create. Share Data Click "Share Data". Enter a Share Name. Select the data assets you want to share. Note: Please disable History for the selected data assets, as the current data snapshot. Disabling the History option on the Delta Share will simplify the share and prevent unnecessary access to historical versions. Additionally, review whether you can further simplify your share by partitioning the data where appropriate. Add the recipient's name you created earlier. Click Share Data. Add Recipient From the newly created share, click Add Recipient. Select your South-Central Workspace Metastore ID. South-CentralWorkspace In your South-Central Workspace, navigate to the Delta Sharing page. Under Shared with me tab, locate your newly created share and click on it. Add the share to a catalog in Unity Catalog. Part 2: Enable NCC for Serverless Warehouse 6. Add Network Connectivity Configuration (NCC) Go to the Databricks Account Console: https://accounts.azuredatabricks.net/ Navigate to Cloud resources, click Add Network Connectivity Configuration. Fill in the required fields and create a new NCC for SouthCentral. 7. Associate NCC with Workspace In the Account Console, go to Workspaces. Select your SouthCentral workspace, click Update Workspace. From the Network Connectivity Configuration dropdown, select the NCC you just created. 8. Add Private Endpoint Rule In Cloud resources, select your NCC, select Private Endpoint Rules and click Add Private Endpoint Rule. Provide: Resource ID: Enter your Storage Account Resource ID in NorthCentral. Note: This can be found in your storage account (NorthCentral). Click on “JSON View” top right. Azure Subresource type: dfs & blob. 9. Approve Pending Connection Go to your NorthCentral Storage Account, Networking, Private Endpoints. You will see a Pending connection from Databricks. Approve the connection and you will see the Connection status in your Account Console as ESTABLISHED. You will now see your share listed under “Delta Shares Received” Note: If you cannot view your share, run the following SQL command: GRANT USE_PROVIDER ON METASTORE TO `username@xxxx.com`.
Defining the Raw Data Vault with Artificial Intelligence
This Article is Authored By Michael Olschimke, co-founder and CEO at Scalefree International GmbH. The Technical Review is done by Ian Clarke, Naveed Hussain – GBBs (Cloud Scale Analytics) for EMEA at Microsoft The Data Vault concept is used across the industry to build robust and agile data solutions. Traditionally, the definition (and subsequent modelling) of the Raw Data Vault, which captures the unmodified raw data, is done manually. This work demands significant human intervention and expertise. However, with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), we are witnessing a paradigm shift in how we approach this foundational task. This article explores the transformative potential of leveraging AI to define the Raw Data Vault, demonstrating how intelligent automation can enhance efficiency, accuracy, and scalability, ultimately unlocking new levels of insight and agility for organizations. Note that this article describes a solution to AI-generated Raw Data Vault models. However, the solution is not limited to Data Vault, but allows the definition of any data-driven, schema-on-read model to integrate independent data sets in an enterprise environment. We discuss this towards the end of this article. Metadata-Driven Data Warehouse Automation In the early days of Data Vault, all engineering was done manually: an engineer would analyse the data sources and their datasets, come up with a Raw Data Vault model in an E/R tool or Microsoft Visio, and then develop both the DDL code (CREATE TABLE) and the ELT / ETL code (INSERT INTO statements). However, Data Vault follows many patterns. Hubs look very similar (the difference lies in the business keys) and are loaded similarly. We discussed these patterns in previous articles of this series, for example, when covering the Data Vault model and implementation. In most projects where Data Vault entities are created and loaded manually, a data engineer eventually develops the idea of creating a metadata-driven Data Vault generator due to these existing patterns. The effort to build a generator is too considerable, and most projects are better off using an off-the-shelf solution such as Vaultspeed. These tools come with a metadata repository and a user interface for setting up the metadata and code templates required to generate the Raw Data Vault (and often subsequent layers). We have discussed Vaultspeed in previous articles of this series. By applying the code templates to the metadata defined by the user, the actual code for the physical model is generated for a data platform, such as Microsoft Fabric. The code templates define the appearance of hubs, links, and satellites, as well as how they are loaded. The metadata defines which hubs, links, and satellites should exist to capture the incoming data set consistently. Manual development often introduces mistakes and errors that result in deviations in code quality. By generating the data platform code, deviations from the defined templates are not possible (without manual intervention), thus raising the overall quality. But the major driver for most project teams is to increase productivity. Instead of manually developing code, they generate the code. Metadata-driven generation of the Raw Data Vault is standard practice in today's projects. Today’s project tasks have therefore changed: while engineers still need to analyse the source data sets and develop a Raw Data Vault model, they no longer create the code (DDL/ELT). Instead, they set up the metadata that represents the Raw Data Vault model in the tool of their choice. Each data warehouse automation tool comes with its specific features, limitations, and metadata formats. The data engineer/modeler must understand how to transfer the Raw Data Vault model into the data warehouse automation tool by correctly setting up the metadata. This is also true for Vaultspeed; the data modeler can set up the metadata either through the user interface or via the SDK. This is the most labour-intensive task concerning the Raw Data Vault layer. It also requires experts who not only know Data Vault modelling but also know (or can analyse) the source systems' data and understand the selected data warehouse automation solution. Additionally, Data Vault is not equal to Data Vault in many cases, as it allows for a very flexible interpretation of how to model a Data Vault, which also leads to quality issues. But what if the organization has no access to such experts? What if budgets are limited, time is of the essence, or there are no available experts in sufficient numbers in the field? As Data Vault experts, we can debate the value of Data Vault as much as we want, but if there are no experts capable of modeling it, the debate will remain inconclusive. And what if this problem is only getting worse? In the past, a few dozen source tables might have been sufficient to be processed by the data platform. Today, several hundred source tables could be considered a medium-sized data platform. Tomorrow, there will be thousands of source tables. The reason? There is not only an exponential growth in the volume of data to be produced and processed, but it also comes with an exponential growth in the complexity of data shape. The source of this exponential growth in data shape comes from more complex source databases, APIs that produce and deliver semi-structured JSON data, and, ultimately, more complex business processes and an increasing amount of generated and available data that needs to be analysed for meaningful business results. Generating the Data Vault using Artificial Intelligence Increasingly, this data is generated using artificial intelligence (AI) and still requires integration, transformation, and analysis. The issue is that the number of data engineers, data modelers, and data scientists is not growing exponentially. Universities around the world only produce a limited number of these roles, and some of us would like to retire one day. Based on our experience, the increase in these roles is linear at best. Even if you argue for exponential growth in these roles, it is evident that there is no debate about a growing gap between the increasing data volume and the people who should analyse it. This gap cannot be closed by humans in the future. Even in a world where all kids want to become and eventually work in a data role. Sorry for all the pilots, police officers, nurses, doctors, etc., there is no way for you to retire without the whole economy imploding. Therefore, the only way to close the gap is through the use of artificial intelligence. It is not about reducing the data roles. It's about making them efficient so that they can deal with the growing data shape (and not just the volume). For a long time, it was common sense in the industry that, if an artificial intelligence could generate or define the Raw Data Vault, it would be an assisting technology. The AI would make recommendations, for example, such as which hubs or links to model and which business keys to use. The human data modeler would make the final decision, with input from the AI. But what if the AI made the final decision? What would it look like? What if one could attach data sources to the AI platform and the AI would analyze the source datasets, come up with a Raw Data Vault model, and load that model into Vaultspeed or another data warehouse automation tool, know the source system’s data, know Data Vault modelling, and understand the selected data warehouse automation? These questions were posed by Michael Olschimke, a Data Vault and AI expert, when initially considering the challenge. He researched the distribution of neural networks on massively parallel processing (MPP) clusters to classify unstructured data at Santa Clara University in Silicon Valley. This prior AI research, combined with the knowledge he accumulated in the Data Vault, enabled him to build a solution that later became known as Flow.BI. Flow.BI as a Generative AI to Define the Raw Data Vault The solution is simple, at least from the outside: attach a few data sources, let the AI do the rest. Flow.BI supports several data sources already, including Microsoft SQL Server and derivatives, such as Synapse and Fabric, as long as a JDBC driver is available, Flow.BI should eventually be able to analyze the data source. And the AI doesn’t care if the data originates from a CRM system, such as Microsoft Dynamics, or an e-commerce platform; it's just data. There are no provisions in the code to deal with specific datasets, at least for now. The goal of Flow.BI is to produce a valid, that is, consistent and integrated, enterprise data model. Typically, this follows a Data Vault design, but it's not limited to that (we’ll discuss this later in the article). This is achieved by following a strict data-driven approach that imitates the human data modeler. Flow.BI needs data to make decisions, just like its human counterpart. Source entities with no data will be ignored. It only requires some metadata, such as the available entities and their columns. Datatypes are nice-to-have; primary keys and foreign keys would improve the target model, just like entity and column descriptions. But they are not required to define a valid Raw Data Vault model. Humans write this text, and as such, we like to influence the result of the modelling exercise. Flow.BI is appreciating this by offering many options for the human data modeler to influence the engine. Some of them will be discussed in this article, but there are many more already available and more to come. Flow.BI’s user interface is kept as lean and straightforward as possible: the solution is designed so that the AI should take the lead and model the whole Raw Data Vault. The UI’s purpose is to interact with human data modelers, allowing them to influence the results. That’s what many screens are related to - and the configuration of the security system. A client can have multiple instances, which result in independent Data Vault models. This is particularly useful when dealing with independent data platforms, such as those used by HR, the compliance department, or specific business use cases, or when creating the raw data foundation for data products within a data mesh. In this case, a Flow.BI instance equals a data product. But don’t underestimate the complexity of Flow.BI: The frontend is used to manage a large number of compute clusters that implement scalable agents to work on defining the Raw Data Vault. The platform is implementing full separation of data and processing, not only by client but also by instance. Mapping Raw Data to Organizational Ontology The very first step in the process is to identify the concepts in the attached datasets. For this purpose, there is a concept classifier that analyses the data and recognizes datasets and their classified concepts that it has seen in the past. A common requirement of clients is that they would like to leverage their organizational requirements in this process. While Flow.BI doesn’t know a client’s ontology; it is possible to override (and in some cases, complete) the concept classifications and refer to concepts from the organizational ontology. By doing so, Flow.BI will integrate the source system’s raw data into the organization's ontology. It will not create a logical Data Vault, which is where the Data Vault model reflects the desired business, but instead model the raw data as the business uses it, and therefore follow the data-driven Data Vault modeling principles that Michael Olschimke has taught to thousands of students over the years at Scalefree. Flow.BI also allows the definition of a multi-tenant Data Vault model, where source systems either provide multi-tenant data or are assigned to a specific tenant. In both cases, the integrated enterprise data model will be extended to allow queries across multiple tenants or within a single tenant, depending on the information consumer’s needs. Ensuring Security and Privacy Flow.BI was designed with security and privacy in mind. From a design perspective, this has two aspects: Security and privacy in the service itself, to protect client solutions and related assets Security and privacy are integral to the defined model, allowing for the effective utilization of Data Vault’s capabilities in addressing security and privacy requirements, such as satellite splits. While Flow.BI is using a shared architecture; all data and metadata storage and processing are separated by client and instance. However, this is often not sufficient for clients as they hesitate to share their highly sensitive data with a third party. For this reason, Flow.BI allows two critical features: Local data storage: instead of storing client data on Flow.BI infrastructure, the client provides an Azure Data Lake Storage to be used for storing the data. Local data processing: A Docker container can be deployed into the client’s infrastructure to access the client's data sources, extract the data, and process it. When using both options, only metadata, such as entity and column names, constraints, and descriptions, are shared with Flow.BI. No data is transferred from the client’s infrastructure to Flow.BI. The metadata is secured on Flow.BI’s premises as if it were actual data: row-level security separates the metadata by instance, and roles and permissions are defined per client who can access the metadata and what they can do with it. But security and privacy are not limited to the service itself. The defined model also utilizes the security and privacy features of Data Vault. For example, it enables the classification of source columns based on security and privacy. The user can set up security and privacy classes and apply them to the influence screen for both. By doing so, the column classifications are used when defining the Raw Data Vault and can later be used to implement a satellite split in the physical model (if necessary). An upcoming release will include an AI model for classifying columns based on privacy, utilizing data and metadata to automate this task. Tackling Multilingual Challenges A common challenge for clients is navigating multilingual data environments. Many data sources use English entity and column names, but there are systems using metadata in a different language. Also, the assumption that the data platform should use English metadata is not always correct. Especially in government clients, the use of the official language is mandatory. Both options, translating the source metadata to English (the default within Flow.BI) and translating the defined target model into any target language, are supported by Flow.BI’s translations tab on the influence screen: The tab utilizes an AI translator to fully automatically translate the incoming table names, column names, and concept names. However, the user can step in and override the translation to improve it to their needs. All strings of the source metadata and the defined model are passed through the translation module. It is also possible to reuse existing translations for a growing list of popular data sources. This feature enables readable names for satellites and their attributes (as well as hubs and links), resulting in a significantly improved user experience for the defined Raw Data Vault. Generating the Physical Model You should have noticed by now that we consistently discuss the defined Raw Data Vault model. Flow.BI is not generating the physical model, that is, the CREATE TABLE and INSERT INTO statements for the Raw Data Vault. Instead, it “just” defines the hubs, links, and satellites required for capturing all incoming data from the attached data sources, including business key selection, satellite splits, and special entity types, such as non-historized links and their satellites, multi-active satellites, hierarchical links, effectivity satellites, and reference tables. Video on Generating Physical Models This logical model (not to be confused with “logical Data Vault modelling”) is then provided to our growing number of ISV partner solutions that will consume our defined model, set up the required metadata in their tool, and generate the physical model. As a result, Flow.BI acts as a team member that analyses your organizational data sources and their data, knows how to model the Raw Data Vault, and how to set up metadata in the tool of your choice. The metadata is provided by Flow.BI can be used to model the landing zone/staging area (either on a data lake or a relational database such as Microsoft Fabric) and the Raw Data Vault in a data-driven Data Vault architecture, which is the recommended practice. With this in mind, Flow.BI is not a competition to Vaultspeed or your other existing data warehouse automation solution, but a valid extension that integrates with your existing tool stack. This makes it much easier to justify the introduction of Flow.BI to the project. Going Beyond Data Vault Flow.BI is not limited to the definition of Data Vault models. While it has been designed with the Data Vault concepts in mind, a customizable expert system is used to define the Data Vault model. Although the expert system is not yet publicly available, it has already been implemented and is in use for every model generation. This expert system enables the implementation of alternative data models, provided they adhere to data-driven, schema-on-read principles. Data Vault is such an example, but many others are possible, as well: Customized Data Vault models Inmon-style enterprise models in third-normal form (3NF, if no business logic is required Kimball-style analytical models with facts and dimensions, again without business logic Semi-structured JSON and XML document collections Key-value stores “One Big Table (OBT)” models “Many Big Related Table (MBRT)” models Okay, we’ve just invented the MBRT model as we're writing the article, but you get the idea: many large, fully denormalized tables with foreign–key relationships between each other. If you've developed your data-driven model, please get in touch with us. About the Authors Michael Olschimke is co-founder and CEO of Flow.BI, a generative AI that defines integrated enterprise data models, such as (but not limited to) Data Vault. Michael has trained thousands of industry data warehousing professionals, taught academic classes, and published regularly on topics around data platforms, data engineering, and Data Vault. He has over two decades of experience in information technology, with a specialization in business intelligence topics, artificial intelligence and data platforms. <<< Back to Blog Series Title Page
Device Tables are not ingesting tables for an orgs workspace
Device Tables are not ingesting tables for an orgs workspace. I can confirm that all devices are enrolled and onboarded to MDE (Microsoft defender for endpoint) I had placed an EICAR file on one of the machine which bought an alert through to sentinel,however this did not invoke any of the device related tables . Workspace i am targeting Workspace from another org with tables enabled and ingesting data Microsoft Defender XDR connector shows as connected however the tables do not seem to be ingesting data; I run the following; DeviceEvents | where TimeGenerated > ago(15m) | top 20 by TimeGenerated DeviceProcessEvents | where TimeGenerated > ago(15m) | top 20 by TimeGenerated I receive no results; No results found from the specified time range Try selecting another time range Please assist As I cannot think where this is failing
