Teams Phone Numbers Mysteriously Unassigned
Over the last 2 weeks or so, we've noticed a handful of our Teams phone numbers which were assigned to users, become Unassigned. We have no automation in place - everything move, add or change we perform with our phone numbers is manual. The numbers in question have been assigned for months now. It wasn't until my phone number was assigned to someone else that we realized the issue. In order to assign a phone number that is already assigned, you'd have to delete the current user - which we certainly have not done. Mysteriously, the phone number status changed from assigned to unassigned. Has anyone experienced this? We have Operator Connect through Pure-IP. Thye don't touch our numbers once they are given to us in the Admin portal (or do they?). My MS Premier ticket came up empty. Apparently there are no audit logs for phone numbers, just licenses. And we verified no change in license status at all.
Dîaling phone number from Outlook contact card not working with new Teams V2 client
Dear all I mentioned an issue with dialing phone numbers from outlook contact cards with new Teams V2 client. If contact does not have a mail address but a phone number and you click to this phone number, Teams V2 does nothing. In MS Teams summary.log, following error will be reported: Latest errors for Core 2023-09-16T14:13:04.957Z Err command-result-service: Command abandoned, correlationId: fb6ca2b9-3735-470e-bce7-ab381b38915a, reason Abandoned, previousStep: ChunkLoadSucceeded 2023-09-16T14:13:04.957Z Err CommandTelemetryService: Command Result of Abandoned and correlationId fb6ca2b9-3735-470e-bce7-ab381b38915a was reported but no pending command was found 2023-09-16T14:13:04.507Z Err command-result-service: Command abandoned, correlationId: 62a2898b-5117-4542-b156-c264a776bffb, reason Abandoned, previousStep: ChunkLoadSucceeded 2023-09-16T14:13:02.831Z Err command-result-service: Command incomplete, correlationId: 11716958-f163-4df5-bfe8-7e79d9bb1cc9, reason WindowNotUpdated, previousStep: CommandAfterGetAppViewEntitiesSucceeded 2023-09-16T14:10:37.486Z Err command-result-service: Command incomplete, correlationId: 3ae62bc6-2730-4d45-ba18-f358792317be, reason Incomplete, previousStep: CommandAfterGetAppViewEntitiesSucceeded Latest errors for e2e4b3d7-3955-466f-b704-d90c098b5723 2023-09-16T14:13:11.738Z Err OfficeIntegration: Failed to start call 2023-09-16T14:13:11.736Z Err resolverUncaughtErrorBoundary__doNotAssignToGraphQLTeam: Uncaught error in a GraphQL resolver, at field selection path: getUsers 2023-09-16T14:13:05.305Z Err esp-engine/BIEvent(federatedChatCoachmark): Failed to activate ESP target component. Cannot activate ESP target 'shell' because the registered window does not contain an element for [data-tid='chat-list-new-chat-button'] 2023-09-16T14:13:05.304Z Err resolverUncaughtErrorBoundary__doNotAssignToGraphQLTeam: Uncaught error in a GraphQL resolver, at field selection path: activateEspTarget 2023-09-16T14:13:05.216Z Err CID[e64c4672-c24a-4a90-b2b1-073aaf9c9628] useCallForwardingSettings: Error encountered while fetching call forwarding settings with subscription. ErrorMessage=[Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'subscribe')] If you add a mail address (valid or a stupid mail address) to this contact, you can click to the phone number and MS Teams dials this number. Dialing not working: If you add a mail address (valid or not doesn't matter), dialing starts working: Hope this can be fixed soon. In the meantime, I hope this info is useful for you as a workaround. Best Regards,
LineURI with Same Phone Number and Different Extension
I have a department that wants all of their outgoing calls to go from one number. I have a set of test phones which I changed to do this process, but I wanted to make sure I am not going to break anything or cause issues at a later time. What I did was set the Line URI to be in the following format: tel:+1######3537;ext=3524 Where the tel:+1######3537 remains the same for each of the numbers, but ;ext=3524 is whatever number that phone is logged on as. It appears to work as I can still call the 3524 in this case and it rings to the correct phone or vice versa. If I call outside of our campus, caller ID displays as ###-###-3537 which is correct. Again, I want to make sure I am not causing any new issues or issues down the road. I know that the ext=#### is simply to allow us to be able to log on easily to a phone in our case using PIN. Does doing this set up cause any issues or are others doing this to control how caller ID goes out for some areas? If this works, I can see using this similar set up for department chairs or others that do not want to display their real number. For this set up, I did not want to create private numbers which we have done, but if the above process works, then I would like to set this up. We are a hybrid setup. Let me know if you there are any questions. Curious if this is going to cause me any issues now or in the future. Thank you! John
