SOLVED

Planner Limitations

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-61650%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EPlanner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-61650%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Planner%20Team%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3EWe%20have%20noticed%20that%20the%20following%20are%20the%20known%20limitations%20in%20Planner.%3CBR%20%2F%3E-%20250%20assigned%20tasks%20per%20user%20irrespective%20of%20plans%3CBR%20%2F%3E-%201500%20tasks%20can%20be%20created%20by%20an%20user%20irrespective%20of%20plans%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-%20250%20Active%20tasks%20(Not%20Started%2C%20In%20Progress)%20per%20plan%20%3CSTRONG%3E%3CEM%3E%5BUpdated%2018%20Aug%202017%5D%3C%2FEM%3E%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EIf%20an%20user%20need%20to%20overcome%20250%20assigned%20tasks%20limitation%20he%20has%20to%20unassign%20the%20tasks%20assigned%20to%20him.%26nbsp%3B%20The%20worst%20part%20to%20overcome%201500%20created%20tasks%20limitation%20is%20to%20delete%20the%20tasks%20created%20by%20him.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3EThese%20limitations%20seems%20to%20limit%20the%20planner%20usage.%20For%20the%20long%20term%20plans%2C%20users%20will%20get%20250%20tasks%20assigned%20and%201500%20tasks%20created%20in%20a%20short%20span%20of%20time.%20Also%20these%20limitations%20are%20not%20well%20documented%20and%20this%20made%20us%20to%20fear%20about%20the%20hidden%20unknown%20limitations.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3ESo%20in%20order%20to%20ease%20the%20Planner%20adoption%20we%20request%20you%20to%20declare%20the%20limitations%20and%20see%20the%20possibility%20to%20increase%20these%20limits.%20This%20will%20only%20help%20the%20organizations%20to%20adopt%20for%20Planner%20easily.%26nbsp%3B%20We%20have%20two%20clients%20of%20us%20who%20are%20worst%20affected%20by%20these%20limitations%20and%20reconsidering%20the%20usage%20of%20planner%20now.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-394580%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-394580%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20using%20Planner%20to%20document%20the%20actions%20my%20team%20has%20taken%20on%20pieces%20of%20equipment%2C%20and%20I%20need%20to%20make%20sure%20that%20there%20is%20no%20limitation%20on%20task%20quantity%20or%20age.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20need%20completed%20tasks%20to%20be%20searchable%20(another%20thread%20-%20I%20know%20this%20is%20a%20work%20in%20progress)%20and%20be%20a%20PERMANENT%20archive.%26nbsp%3B%20Can%20I%20please%20get%20confirmation%20that%20complete%20tasks%20will%20never%20be%20auto-deleted%20by%20the%20system%2C%20regardless%20of%20age%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThank%20you!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-356674%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-356674%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EDid%20some%20additional%20tests%20with%20Planner%20from%20a%20150mb%20cable%20connection%20(external%20to%20my%20company)%20on%20a%20workstation%20class%20machine%20with%20a%20beefy%20video%20card%20and%20connected%20to%20my%20Plans%20externally%20and%20the%20speed%2Fbehavior%20was%20near%20identical.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EAlso%20took%20a%20look%20at%20Chrome%E2%80%99s%20developer%20tools-%26gt%3B%20Network%20and%20can%20see%20it%20take%20several%20minutes%20for%20things%20to%20load%20and%20then%20a%20bit%20longer%20to%20open%20various%20buckets.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-355844%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-355844%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EBrian%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EWhen%20I%20click%20on%20the%20plan%20with%20the%2050%2B%20buckets%20(and%20configuration%20I%20described)%2C%20it%20takes%20a%20few%20minutes%20for%20everything%20to%20load%20in%20the%20plan%20and%20then%20a%20bit%20longer%20when%20I%20start%20clicking%20on%20tasks%20and%20then%20a%20bit%20longer%20to%20let%20the%20data%20in%20the%20task%20to%20load.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EAs%20I%20mentioned%2C%20scrolling%20left%20or%20right%20can%20bog%20down%20until%20I%20let%20everything%20completely%20load.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EI%20don%E2%80%99t%20see%20these%20issues%20on%20any%20other%20sites%20and%20I%E2%80%99ve%20confirmed%20I%20have%20tasks.office.com%20whitelisted%20in%20my%20ad%20blocker.%20I%20should%20note%20this%20is%20easily%20reproducible%20across%20every%20machine%20in%20our%20environment.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-355838%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-355838%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThere%20is%20a%20continued%20focus%20on%20performance%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F285422%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40HustleFlow%3C%2FA%3E%20.%26nbsp%3B%20Just%20because%20you%20have%20a%201GB%20connection%20to%20the%20network%20doesn't%20mean%20that%20speed%20goes%20all%20the%20way%20to%20the%20Office%20365%20services.%26nbsp%3B%20Can%20you%20tell%20specifically%20what%20is%20slow%20to%20load%3F%26nbsp%3B%20F12%20dev%20tools%20in%20any%20browser%20can%20show%20you%20what%20is%20coming%20over%20the%20network.%26nbsp%3B%20I'll%20check%20with%20the%20team%20on%20specific%20improvements%20coming%20for%20scrolling%20and%20task%20opening.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBest%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBrian%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-355691%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-355691%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThat%20would%20be%20very%20annoying.%20Have%20you%20tried%20with%20other%20browsers%3F%20Edge%20or%20even%20IE.%20Maybe%20Firefox.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-355665%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-355665%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAny%20work%20being%20done%20to%20improve%20performance%20with%20respect%20to%20scrolling%20through%20a%20plan%20with%2050%2B%20buckets%20all%20of%20which%20have%20from%201%20-%209%20tasks%20and%20each%20task%20has%20an%20average%20of%20five%20checklist%20items%20each%20and%20each%20task%20has%20two%20labels%20assigned%20-%20this%20is%20using%20the%20latest%20chrome%20browser%20on%20a%20machine%20with%2032GB%20ram%20and%208%20core%20processor%20and%20high%20end%20video%20card%20and%201%20GB%20connection%20our%20network%2C%20scrolling%20perf%20is%20abysmal%20at%20times%20as%20is%20opening%20tasks.%20I%20usually%20have%20to%20wait%20for%20things%20to%20load%20and%20it%20will%20appear%20at%20times%20as%20if%20data%20has%20gone%20missing%20from%20the%20bucket%20only%20to%20appear%20after%20a%20minute%20or%20two%20of%20it%20being%20open.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EAnyone%20seeing%20this%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-299093%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-299093%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYeah%2C%20i%20have%20found%20checklist%20limitation%20very%20fast%20when%20started%20using%20Planner.%20I%20guess%20it%20is%20designed%20for%20%22Get%20milk%22%20type%20of%20checklists..%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-299062%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-299062%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20found%20another%20limitation...%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EChecklist%20items%20cannot%20have%20more%20than%20100%20characters.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EComing%20from%20Trello%20to%20Planner%2C%20I%20can%20certainly%20understand%20the%20frustration%20in%20this%20thread.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-298919%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-298919%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHello%20Clemens%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3ESame%20story%20on%20my%20side%20!%20My%20customer%20manage%20tasks%20for%20a%20group%20of%20~17%20persons.%3CBR%20%2F%3ECurrently%2C%20he%20cannot%20get%20over%2011%20assigned%20peoples%20for%20a%20single%20task.%3CBR%20%2F%3EUse%20Case%20%3A%20A%20task%20like%20%22Please%20review%20and%20validate%20the%20document%20blablabla%22%20can%20be%20assigned%20to%20more%20than%2011%20reviewer.%3CBR%20%2F%3E...%20Please%20expand%20this%20limit%20too%20...%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EThibaud%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-290334%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-290334%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWe%20just%20came%20across%20another%20limitation%3A%20It's%20not%20possible%20to%20assign%20more%20than%2011%20people%20to%20one%20planner%20task.%20(I%20know%2C%20it%20can%20be%20questioned%20if%20it%20makes%20sense%20to%20assign%20so%20many%20people%20to%20one%20task...%20but%20it%20makes%20sense%20in%20this%20case.)%20Has%20anybody%20else%20ever%20seen%20this%20limitation%20or%20does%20anybody%20know%20if%20this%20will%20be%20removed%20in%20the%20future%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-285042%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-285042%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThe%20term%20%22Delete%22%20is%20not%20really%20acceptable%20for%20enterprise%20as%20you%20can%20imagine%2C%20audit%20paths%20are%20important%20from%20a%20legal%20perspective.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ECan%20you%20please%20provide%20updates%20against%20the%20initial%20raised%20limitations.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMany%20thanks%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-284193%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-284193%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20agree%20with%20the%20frustrations%20here%20regarding%20not%20having%20the%20limits%20published.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWhat%20I've%20done%20is%20used%20Flow%20to%20create%20tasks%20in%20Planner%20to%20a%20scale%20per%20the%20requirements%20we%20expect%20to%20need%20to%20meet.%26nbsp%3BThis%20has%20allowed%20us%20to%20test%20if%20we%20can%20use%20Planner%20for%20our%20scenarios.%20I%20think%20in%20one%20scenario%20I%20stopped%20after%20about%20800%20tasks%20in%20a%20single%20bucket.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20didn't%20hit%20any%20limits%20in%20the%20testing%20but%20this%20is%20purely%20anecdotal.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-284020%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-284020%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ESeems%20to%20be%20a%20very%20awkward%20situation%20for%20Microsoft.%20The%20app%20has%20extremely%20high%20potential%2C%20but%20as%20it%20goes%20with%20apps%20like%20that%2C%20seems%20it%20has%20a%20limitation%20no%20one%20was%20officially%20aware%20of.%20Now%20that%20people%20raised%20it%2C%20we%20still%20don't%20have%20an%20answer.%20Is%20there%20a%20limit%20then%3F%20Is%20there%20not%3F%20Is%20it%20tenant%20dependant%2C%20license%20(E3%2FE5)%2C%20do%20we%20need%20to%20pay%20extra%20when%20we%20hit%20the%20limit%3F%20What%20is%20the%20limit%3F%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EA%20message%20to%20you%20guys%20in%20the%20dev%20team%2C%20for%20some%20of%20your%20users%20knowing%20the%20use%20case%20is%20extremely%20important.%20You%20would%20not%20want%20someone%20use%20Planner%20for%20developing%20of%20a%20critical%20project%2C%20let's%20say%20in%20a%20Hospital%2C%20infrastructure%20rebuild%20-%20and%20then%20hit%20a%20roadblock%20of%20tasks%20limit.%20Nobody%20plans%20for%20the%20planner%20app%20to%20fail.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EA%20lot%20of%20users%20do%20not%20use%20it%20only%20for%20'Update%20X%20or%20Y'%20plans%2C%20but%20aim%20to%20build%20their%20work%20tracker%20through%20Planner.%20Without%20knowing%20when%20do%20we%20hit%20the%20limit%2C%20the%20stability%20of%20the%20app%20is%20put%20into%20question.%20With%20stability%20being%20unknown%2C%20people%20can't%20honestly%20recommend%20the%20use%20of%20Planner.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EPlanner%20is%20a%20really%20good%20addition%20to%20365.%20Please%20rebuild%20the%20trust%20in%20it%2C%20then%20improve%20your%20presence%20on%20the%20Microsoft%20Roadmap.%20You%20are%20probably%20not%20the%20main%20revenue%20driver%20like%20SharePoint%2C%20Azure%20or%20Exchange%2C%20but%20you%20still%20should%20build%20a%20solid%20presence%20in%20the%20365%20Catalog%20and%20improve%20the%20application's%20potential.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-281047%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-281047%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3E%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWe%20are%20aware%20of%20limits%20that%20are%20expanding%20and%20continuously%20changing.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThat's%20why%20you%20need%20to%26nbsp%3Bcontinuously%20publish%20updates%20about%20the%20current%20limits%20as%20you%20go%20along.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EA%20project%2C%20critical%20for%20the%20organisation%2C%20can't%20have%20a%20risk%20of%20failing%20due%20to%20an%20unknown%20tool%20limitation!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt%20makes%20me%20wonder%20how%20%3CSPAN%3Eserious%3C%2FSPAN%3E%20MS%20is%20about%20Planner.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-280979%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-280979%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESorry%20if%20it%20will%20sound%20kind%20of%20harsh%2C%20but%26nbsp%3B%20-%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3E%20-%20reading%20the%20whole%20thread%20long%2C%20it%20just%20seems%20to%20me%2C%20that%20it%20is%20a%20clear%20intention%20of%20MS%20to%20actually%20not%20provide%20such%20info%20publicly.%20Please%20don't%20hide%20it%20behind%20some%20collective%20team%20decisions%20-%20there's%20always%20one%20person%20responsible%20for%20the%20actual%20decision%20and%20this%20thread%20should%20provide%20enough%20of%20signal%20to%20any%20product%20manager%20about%20how%20the%20product%20is%20perceived.%20Ppl%20are%20simply%20feeling%20insecure.%20Ppl%20want%20to%20know%20the%20numbers%20for%20a%20reason%20-%20to%20plan%20ahead.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EWhy%20is%20not%20Planner%20team%20inspired%20by%20the%20MS%20Flow%20for%20e.g.%3F%20We%20know%20actual%20numbers%2C%20we%20can%20buy%20more%20advanced%20plans%20for%20particular%20users.%20Translating%20to%20Planner%2C%20if%20we%20have%20two%20assistants%20to%20putting-in%20all%20the%20company%20management%20tasks%2C%20we%20could%20buy%20the%20higher%20Plan%20limit%20for%20them.%20With%20Flow%2C%20you%20can%20even%20buy%20additional%20Flows%20for%20the%20whole%20tenant%20generally.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOf%20course%20the%20question%20is%2C%20what%20is%20the%20Planner's%20future%20in%20general%20-%20in%20the%20Microsoft%20365%20Roadmap%2C%20I%20can't%20see%20any%20new%20features%20planned%20for%202019%2C%20most%20of%20the%20being%20just%20Q1-Q3%2F2018%20%3B)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-277395%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-277395%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHow%20can%20we%20plan%20a%20deployment%20and%20not%20know%20whether%20or%20not%20we'll%20have%20an%20issue%20with%20task%20limits%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Just%20hope%20for%20the%20best%20and%20then%20give%20Microsoft%20a%20ring%20when%2Fif%20we%20hit%20them%3F%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20think%20most%20people%20on%20here%20are%20smart%20enough%20to%20realize%20that%20limits%20posted%20a%20year%20ago%20may%20not%20be%20accurate.%26nbsp%3B%20It%20would%20be%20helpful%20for%20many%20of%20us%20to%20just%20know%20the%20current%20limit%20with%20the%20understanding%20that%20things%20change.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-277247%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-277247%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EBrian%2C%20i%20kind%20of%20understand%20your%20point%2C%20but%20you%20say%20that%20customers%20should%20expect%20Microsoft%20to%20expand%20limits%20in%20a%20timely%20manner%20when%20their%20usage%20reaches%20them.%20This%20is%20not%20encouraging.%20Also%20Planner%20is%20odd%20among%20other%20services%20that%20always%20had%20and%20have%20documented%20limits%20and%20they%20increase%20with%20the%20time%20(SharePoint%20file%20size%2C%20Exhange%20mailbox%2C%20etc.).%20This%20is%20just%20against%20regular%20MS%20practice.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-277194%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-277194%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EBrian%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWe%20regularly%20have%20use%20cases%20where%20a%20single%20person%20will%20need%20to%20create%20many%20hundreds%20of%20work%20items%20and%20maintain%20them%20for%20the%20duration%20of%20the%20project%20as%20part%20of%20the%20project%20record%3B%20deleting%20old%20items%20is%20a%20non-starter%20from%20a%20metrics%20perspective.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPlease%20keep%20this%20in%20mind%3A%26nbsp%3B%20the%20more%20important%20%2F%20larger%20%2F%20complex%20the%20project%2C%20the%20closer%20we%20get%20to%2C%20or%20hit%2C%20these%20limits.%26nbsp%3B%20Without%20disclosure%20it%20is%26nbsp%3Bunlikely%20that%20we%20can%20recommend%26nbsp%3Bthis%20product%20on%20a%20project%26nbsp%3Bof%20any%20significant%20impact.%26nbsp%3B%20Too%20risky.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20hope%20this%20helps.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-277188%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-277188%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Tobias%20-%20we%20monitor%20usage%20and%20expand%20accordingly.%26nbsp%3B%20Limits%20are%20present%20to%20protect%20the%20service.%26nbsp%3B%20Right%20now%26nbsp%3Bas%20I%20write%20this%20a%20deployment%20is%20happening%20to%20further%20increase%20those%20limits.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20can't%20say%20what%20those%20limits%20are%20as%20the%20numbers%20will%20soon%20be%20wrong%20again%20-%20depending%20when%20this%20is%20read%20(like%20the%20rest%20of%20the%20thread).%26nbsp%3B%20As%20a%20support%20person%20it%20would%20be%20nice%20to%20point%20to%20an%20exact%20article%2C%20but%20I%20also%20understand%20why%20the%20team%20are%20choosing%20not%20to%20do%20that.%26nbsp%3B%20If%20you%20have%20a%20use%20case%20that%20you%20feel%20is%26nbsp%3Bhampered%20by%20your%20perceived%20current%20limits%20then%20please%20share.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBest%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBrian%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-275887%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-275887%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHelp%20us%20recommend%20Planner%2C%20please.%20We%20need%20it%20to%20scale%20and%20we%20need%20evidence%20of%20that.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EWe%20like%20Planner%20and%20want%20it%20to%20succeed.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-275880%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-275880%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EGreat%20point%2C%20if%20Microsoft%20does%20increase%20the%20%23%20of%20task%20how%20will%20you%20you%20know%20the%20results%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-272006%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-272006%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E%22But%2C%20I%20hope%20that%20your%20concern%20around%20Planner's%20lack%20of%20explicit%20limit%20documentation%20doesn't%20prevent%20you%20from%20using%20and%20advising%20others%20to.%22%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EThis%20will%20always%20have%20an%20opposite%20effect%20no%20matter%20how%20you%20put%20it.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-250735%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-250735%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIs%20this%20still%20an%20issue%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAnd%20what%20should%20I%20tell%20my%20customers%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ERight%20now%20we%20can't%20provide%20Planner%20as%20a%20task%20handler%20with%20any%20amount%20of%20viable%20history%20handling%20%3A%5C%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-241946%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-241946%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHey%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F165981%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Scott%20Lonheim%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EIn%20case%20this%20message%20got%20lost%20earlier%20in%20this%20thread%2C%20I'll%20summarize%20a%20few%20things%20here.%20First%2C%20%3CSTRONG%3Ethe%20limits%20you've%20mentioned%20are%20now%20out%20of%20date%20as%20they%20have%20since%20been%20raised.%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20Our%20team%20has%20had%20an%20ongoing%20effort%20to%20improve%20our%20performance.%20With%20each%20incremental%20improvement%2C%20we've%20been%20able%20to%20raise%20these%20limits.%20We're%20not%20finished%20with%20our%20work%20in%20this%20area%20and%20want%20to%20make%20sure%26nbsp%3Ball%20improvements%20are%20fully%20shipped%20and%20stable%20before%20we%26nbsp%3Bpublicly%20post%20documentation%20around%20this.%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3ESecond%2C%20Planner%20has%20been%20adopted%20by%20many%20organizations%20of%20size%20to%20be%20used%20for%20projects%20of%20length.%20We%20wouldn't%20be%20standing%20today%20if%20users%20weren't%20able%20to%20use%20Planner%20for%20anything%20more%20than%20event%20planning.%20Again%2C%20if%20you're%20concerned%20with%20a%20particular%20limit%20or%20have%20a%20scenario%20in%20mind%2C%20I'm%20happy%20to%20speak%20more%20about%20this.%20But%2C%20I%20hope%20that%20your%20concern%20around%20Planner's%20lack%20of%20explicit%20limit%20documentation%20doesn't%20prevent%20you%20from%20using%20and%20advising%20others%20to.%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EThanks%2C%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EJoanna%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-241938%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-241938%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F73630%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Joanna%20Parkhurst%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bif%20you'll%20post%20the%20current%20official%20limits%20we%20can%20give%20you%20detailed%20feedback%20on%20where%20Planner%20is%20letting%20us%20down.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20recently%20gave%20a%20talk%20about%20Planner%20to%20several%20clients%20where%20unfortunately%20I%20had%20to%20tell%20them%20not%20to%20use%20it%20and%26nbsp%3Badvised%20other%20solutions.%20I%20like%20Planner%20and%20want%20to%20see%20it%20become%20something%20we%20can%20recommend.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHere's%20what%20we%20know%20right%20now%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-%20250%20assigned%20tasks%20per%20user%20irrespective%20of%20plans%3CBR%20%2F%3E-%201500%20tasks%20can%20be%20created%20by%20an%20user%20irrespective%20of%20plans%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E-%20250%20Active%20tasks%20(Not%20Started%2C%20In%20Progress)%20per%20plan%3CSPAN%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3CSTRONG%3E%3CEM%3E%5BUpdated%2018%20Aug%202017%5D%3C%2FEM%3E%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EYour%20response%20sounds%20like%20these%20won't%20be%20addressed%2C%20which%20means%20this%20is%26nbsp%3Blikely%20a%20non-starter%20for%20any%20organization%20of%20size%20or%20project%20of%20length.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3BI%20could%20see%20it%20being%20good%20for%20event%20planning.%26nbsp%3B%20That's%20just%20not%20something%20we%20or%20most%20of%20our%20clients%20do.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-241932%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-241932%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F186103%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Fritz%20Griffioen%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BGlad%20to%20hear%20your%20company%20is%20loving%20O365%20and%20is%20excited%20about%20potentially%20adopting%20Planner!%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EAre%20there%20any%20limits%20in%20particular%20you're%20concerned%20about%3F%20As%20I%20stated%20earlier%20on%20this%20thread%2C%20organizations%20of%20all%20shapes%20and%20sizes%20utilize%20Planner%20(including%20our%20own%20organization%2C%20Microsoft!)%20with%20great%20success%20-%20we've%20built%20our%20service%20with%20the%20expectation%20that%20it%20should%20handle%20the%20workload%20required%20by%20organizations%20and%20were%20able%20to%20learn%20from%26nbsp%3BOffice%20products%20like%20Project%20and%20Excel%20to%20understand%20these%20demands.%20I'm%20confident%20that%20your%20organization%20could%20adopt%20Planner%20without%20hitting%20any%20issues%20of%20this%20nature!%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EHappy%20to%20talk%20more%20about%20this%2C%20feel%20free%20to%20DM%20me%20as%20well.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-241876%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-241876%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EMy%20company%26nbsp%3Bloves%20O365%20and%20has%20been%20gearing%20up%20to%20use%20Planner%2C%20but%20these%20task%20limits%20are%20a%20big%20concern%20for%20us.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHow%20can%20we%20commit%20to%20training%20our%20teams%20on%20Planner%20when%20we%20know%20we'll%20hit%20the%20limit%20in%20a%20few%20short%20months%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWithout%20a%20removal%20of%20such%20limits%20from%20Microsoft%20very%20soon%2C%20we'll%20have%20to%20go%20with%20a%20competing%20product.%20How%20disappointing.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-229025%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-229025%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20hitting%20400%20tasks%20limit%20in%20Flow%20for%20Planner%20-%20List%20Tasks%20-%20as%20of%208%2F15%2F2018%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-225647%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-225647%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F73630%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Joanna%20Parkhurst%3C%2FA%3E.%26nbsp%3B%20Please%20can%20you%20confirm%20what%20the%20limits%20are%20in%20each%20of%20the%20cases%20listed%2C%20and%20indeed%20provide%20details%20of%20any%20further%20usage%20limits%20that%20exist%3F%26nbsp%3B%20We%20are%20not%20going%20to%20be%20able%20to%20adopt%20Planner%20if%20we%20are%20unable%20to%20ascertain%20its%20%3CSPAN%3Escalability%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E(or%20even%20basic%20usability).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI've%20DMd%20you%20with%20a%20full%20copy%20of%20the%20info%20I%20received%20form%20O365%20support.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20in%20advance%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ECraig%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-225378%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-225378%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F73630%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Joanna%20Parkhurst%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BSeems%20you%20have%20time%20to%20correct%20your%20support%20teams%2C%20but%20since%20Planner%20is%20released%20your%20product%20team%20has%20no%20time%20to%20publish%20an%20official%20support%20post%20about%20Planner%20limits%3F%20Not%20understandable.%20Recently%20I%20had%20also%20a%20case%20for%20Planner%20and%20was%20so%20disappointed%20about%20the%20support.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMaybe%20this%20support%20guy%20understands%20why%20customers%20want%20to%20know%20limits%20and%20got%20from%20other%20teams%20outdated%20information.%20How%20long%20should%20customers%20wait%20for%20official%20limits%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-225355%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-225355%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWhat%20are%20the%20limits%20then%20if%20this%20is%20incorrect%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20saw%20this%20post%20from%20%3CSPAN%3E%E2%80%8E11-10-2017%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3Ethat%20said%3A%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CEM%3ERemoving%20task%20limits%20from%20Microsoft%20Planner%3C%2FEM%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CEM%3EMany%20users%20have%20asked%20about%20overall%20task%20limits%20within%20Planner%2C%20and%20by%20the%20end%20of%20December%3CSTRONG%3E%20%5BI'm%20assuming%20this%20was%20December%202017%5D%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%2C%20we%20will%20have%20removed%20all%20functional%20limits%20to%20tasks.%20When%20users%20open%20their%20Planner%20boards%2C%20we%20will%20surface%20the%20tasks%20that%20are%20most%20relevant%20to%20them%20and%20provide%20options%20to%20fetch%20older%20tasks%20as%20needed.%3C%2FEM%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FPlanner-Blog%2FPlanner-Ignite-Review-and-Roadmap%2Fbc-p%2F126894%23M88%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2FPlanner-Blog%2FPlanner-Ignite-Review-and-Roadmap%2Fbc-p%2F126894%23M88%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-225339%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-225339%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHey%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F170485%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Craig%20Marshall%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThese%20limits%20you've%20posted%20are%20incorrect.%20In%20particular%2C%20the%20limit%20you've%20bolded%20is%20extremely%20off.%20I%20will%20follow%20up%20with%20our%20support%20team%20to%20make%20sure%20that%20we're%20not%20sharing%20limits%20that%20are%20wrong%20and%20misleading%20our%20customers.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bfor%20visibility.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EPlease%20feel%20free%20to%20contact%20me%20with%20any%20further%20questions.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThanks%2C%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EJoanna%20Parkhurst%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EPM%2C%20Microsoft%20Planner%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-222524%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-222524%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAfter%20stumbling%20across%20this%20thread%20I%20put%20a%20ticket%20on%20O365%20support%20portal%20which%20found%20its%20way%20to%20the%20Project%20Online%20%26amp%3B%20Planner%20support%20team%20who%20confirmed%20the%20following%20limitations%20(as%20of%2031.07.18)%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E200%20is%20a%20limit%20on%20the%20buckets%20in%20a%20Plan.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E250%20is%20the%20limit%20on%26nbsp%3Bactive%20tasks%20in%20a%20Plan.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E300%20is%20the%20limit%20on%20tasks%20assigned%20to%20a%20user.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3E1500%20Overall%20tasks%20that%20can%20be%20created%20in%20Planner%20Tenant.%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E13.92%20MB%20attachment%20size%20in%20Planner.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-222522%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-222522%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAfter%20stumbling%20across%20this%20thread%20I%20put%20a%20ticket%20on%20O365%20support%20portal%20which%20found%20its%20way%20to%20the%20Project%20Online%20%26amp%3B%20Planner%20support%20team%20who%20confirmed%20the%20following%20limitations%20(as%20of%2031.07.18)%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E200%20is%20a%20limit%20on%20the%20buckets%20in%20a%20Plan.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E250%20is%20the%20limit%20on%26nbsp%3Bactive%20tasks%20in%20a%20Plan.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E300%20is%20the%20limit%20on%20tasks%20assigned%20to%20a%20user.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3E1500%20Overall%20tasks%20that%20can%20be%20created%20in%20Planner%20Tenant.%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E13.92%20MB%20attachment%20size%20in%20Planner.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-222268%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-222268%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWould%20be%20nice%20if%20we%20got%20an%20update%20on%20this...%20been%20over%20a%20year%20since%20someone%20from%20Microsoft%20said%20they%20were%20working%20on%20it.%26nbsp%3B%20Understood%20you're%20working%20on%20a%20lot%20but%20I%20would%20assume%20this%20is%20relatively%20low%20hanging%20fruit...%26nbsp%3B%20If%20it%20can't%20be%20done%20soon%20it%20would%20be%20helpful%20to%20understand%20the%20complexities%20behind%20what's%20dragging%20this%20out...%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fplanner.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F330525-microsoft-planner-feedback-forum%2Fsuggestions%2F16700584-remove-250-task-limit-per-person-per-plan%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fplanner.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F330525-microsoft-planner-feedback-forum%2Fsuggestions%2F16700584-remove-250-task-limit-per-person-per-plan%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-221876%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-221876%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWould%20be%20nice%20to%20kow%20beforehand%20the%20current%20limitation%20of%20the%20product%20!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-216859%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-216859%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%2B5000%20to%20the%20request%2C%20any%20updates%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Impacting%20a%20Fortune%20500%20adopter%20for%20Planner.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-203563%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-203563%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHi%20Joanna%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EIt%20would%20be%20great%20to%20know%20the%20exact%20limitations%2C%20we%20are%20noticing%20some%20users%20getting%20%22We%20couldn't%20complete%20your%20request%20because%20your%20item%20or%20storage%20limit%20has%20been%20exceeded.%20Technical%20details.%22%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-197428%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-197428%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20hitting%20a%20limitation%20of%20400%20items%20returned%20in%20the%20List%20Tasks%20for%20the%20Planner%20connector%20in%20Flow.%26nbsp%3B%20This%20is%20the%20first%20time%20I've%20noticed%20-%20we%20have%20been%20using%20Planner%20since%20Jan%202018.%26nbsp%3B%20Is%20there%20any%20type%20of%20workaround%20for%20this%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESince%20there%20is%2C%20as%20of%20yet%2C%20no%20reporting%20from%20Planner%20-%20have%20been%20outputting%20items%20in%20Excel%20and%20creating%20pivot%20tables%20to%20produce%20the%20data%20I%20need.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ENow%20I%20am%20going%20to%20be%20stuck%20at%20400%20item%20limit.%26nbsp%3B%20Any%20words%20of%20wisdom%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-197048%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-197048%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Dave...have%20these%20limitations%20been%20resolved%3F%26nbsp%3B%20We%20need%20to%20be%20able%20to%20do%20a%20couple%20of%20things%20within%20our%20organization.%26nbsp%3B%20More%20tasks%20within%20a%20checklist%20(currently%20can%20only%20have%2020)%20and%20no%20cap%20on%20assigned%20tasks%20to%20a%20user...%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHas%20there%20been%20able%20progress%20on%20any%20of%20this%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-192897%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-192897%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EPlease%20kill%20off%20the%20applications%20dependency%20on%20Sharepoint%20and%20Groups.%20This%20is%20absolutely%20keeping%20my%20teams%20from%20using%20this%20application.%20All%20love%20the%20potential%2C%20but%20are%20sticking%20with%20Trello%20and%20Asana%20in%20that%20they%20are%20more%20fluid%20and%20you%20can%20collaborate%20without%20all%20of%20the%20clunkiness%20of%20the%20legacy%20backend%20that%20these%20tools%20are%20built%20on.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-192369%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-192369%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F73630%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Joanna%20Parkhurst%3C%2FA%3E%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIs%20there%20any%20official%20word%20on%20the%20resolution%20of%20the%20cap%20on%20task%20assignments%3F%20You%20stated%20that%20there%20was%20no%20official%20documentation%20on%20the%20limitations%2C%20but%20some%20of%20us%20are%20making%20decisions%20about%20what%20products%20to%20use%20and%20we're%20taking%20the%20limitations%20noted%20by%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F1547%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Santhosh%20Balakrishnan%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Binto%20consideration.%20Can%20you%20confirm%20if%20the%20limits%20in%20the%20original%20post%20have%20been%20lifted%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThank%20you%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EDavid%20Thurston%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-172581%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-172581%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F73630%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Joanna%20Parkhurst%3C%2FA%3E.%26nbsp%3B%20Just%20to%20be%20clear%2C%20are%20you%20monitoring%20limits%20and%20proactively%20raising%20on%20an%20aggregate%20level%2C%20or%20per%20account%20as%20needed%3F%26nbsp%3B%20In%20the%20case%20of%20our%20company%2C%20we%20are%20considering%20setting%20up%26nbsp%3Ba%20project%20template%20for%20each%20new%20client%2C%20where%201-2%20people%20would%20be%20the%20central%20administrators.%26nbsp%3B%20That%20said%2C%20we%20do%20not%20want%20to%20hit%20a%20ceiling%26nbsp%3Bshortly%20after%20roll%20out.%26nbsp%3B%20What%20action%20do%20you%20recommend%20if%20we%20do%20hit%20the%20invisible%20wall%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Will%20extended%20limits%20be%20available%20for%20purchase%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Can%20you%20give%20some%20general%20range%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EI%20also%20connected%20with%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F1547%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Santhosh%20Balakrishnan%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Byesterday%2C%20who%20unbeknownst%20to%20me%20is%20now%20sales%20head%20at%20Jiji%20Technologies%2C%20creator%20of%20product%20I've%20been%20testing.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3BThey%20seem%20to%20be%20doing%20a%20great%20job%20of%20building%20out%20some%20very%20useful%20API's%20for%20getting%20the%20most%20out%20of%20Planner%2C%20and%20he%20was%26nbsp%3Bvery%20responsive%20in%20upgrading%20me%20to%26nbsp%3Ba%20fully-functional%2030%20day%20license%20after%20I%20sent%20a%20support%26nbsp%3Bemail.%26nbsp%3B%20Although%20there%20still%20seem%20to%20be%20a%20couple%20bugs%2C%20I%20think%20it%20would%20be%20great%20if%20your%20team%20could%20take%20a%20look%20at%20what%20they're%20doing%2C%20especially%20with%20templates%2C%20export%2Fimport%20with%20excel%2C%20and%20reporting.%26nbsp%3B%20Perhaps%20we%20wouldn't%20need%20to%20completely%20reinvent%20the%20wheel%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Just%20a%20thought.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fapps4.pro%2Fplanner-manager.aspx%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fapps4.pro%2Fplanner-manager.aspx%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-172357%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-172357%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHello%20all!%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThe%20Planner%20team%20has%20lifted%20limits%20users%20may%20have%20hit%20in%20the%20past.%20We%20will%20continue%20to%20monitor%20usage%20and%20proactively%20increase%20limits%20as%20we%20see%20them%20needing%20to%20be%20raised.%20Although%20we%20won%E2%80%99t%20be%20publishing%20official%20documentation%20on%20what%20these%20limits%20are%2C%20we%20do%20want%20to%20assure%20our%20users%20that%20Planner%20is%20a%20product%20that%20can%20scale%20well%20to%20a%20large%20group%20or%20organization.%20Planner%20has%20been%20successfully%20adopted%20by%20teams%20of%20all%20sizes%2C%20and%20we%20are%20committed%20to%20ensuring%20that%20this%20isn%E2%80%99t%20something%20our%20users%20will%20need%20to%20think%20or%20worry%20about.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ECheers%2C%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EJoanna%20Parkhurst%2C%26nbsp%3BPM%20Planner%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-172307%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-172307%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F32918%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Dave%20Heller%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20my%20team%20is%20looking%20to%20upgrade%20from%20excel-based%20tracking%2C%20and%20Planner%20seems%20like%20it%20has%20a%20lot%20of%20potential.%26nbsp%3B%20However%2C%20from%20my%20review%20of%20certain%20boards%2C%20%22shortly%22%20sometimes%20seems%20like%20an%20optimistic%20word%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%26nbsp%3B%20Planner%20will%20really%20only%20work%20for%20us%20if%201)%20there%20are%20no%20task%20creation%20limits%2C%20since%20we%20will%20probably%20have%20one%20main%20administrator%2C%20and%202)%20if%20we%20will%20be%20able%20to%20create%20update%20reports%20to%20share%20with%20our%20clients.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ERE%20%231-%20has%20there%20been%20any%20updates%20on%20the%20limit%20removal%20roll-out%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ERE%20%232-%20Prior%20to%20having%26nbsp%3Bfunctional%26nbsp%3Bguest%20access%2C%26nbsp%3BI%26nbsp%3Bam%20now%20demo-ing%26nbsp%3BApps4.Pro%20Planner%20Manager%2C%20and%20iGlobe%20iPlanner%20for%20Excel%2C%20to%20create%20progress%20snapshot%20reports%20w%2F%20updates%20we%20can%20share%20on%20Sharepoint.%26nbsp%3B%20Does%20anybody%20have%20a%20similar%20experience%20in%20needing%20reporting%20functionality%20from%20Planner%2C%20and%20what%20tools%20have%20you%20found%20useful%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThanks%20all!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-143345%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-143345%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHi%20Joanna%2C%20Thanks%20for%20posting.%20We%20have%20been%20waiting%20for%20months%20to%20get%20an%20update%20from%20Microsoft%20about%20this%20serious%20issue%20which%20affects%20Planner%20adoption%20by%20many%20of%20our%20customers.%20We%20have%20some%20customers%20who%20have%20moved%20to%20other%20task%20management%20tools%20after%20knowing%20these%20limitations%20in%20Planner.%20An%20ETA%20on%20this%20would%20be%20much%20appreciated%20as%20we%20can%20inform%20our%20customers.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-143311%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-143311%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHello%20all!%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EWe%20still%20have%20a%20few%20remaining%20work%20items%20to%20increase%20our%20limits%20across%20Planner.%20I%20should%20have%20an%20update%20soon.%20In%20the%20meantime%2C%20feel%20free%20to%20mention%20or%20DM%20me%20for%20an%20update.%20We%20appreciate%20your%20patience%20with%20this!%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E-Joanna%20Parkhurst%2C%20PM%20Planner%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-143226%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-143226%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20saw%20somewhere%20else%20where%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F85297%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40George%20Bullock%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Btook%20over%20for%20Dave%2C%20so%20cc'ing%20him%20into%20this%20conversation.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-143162%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-143162%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EIs%20there%20an%20official%20source%20that%20lists%20the%20constraints%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-142281%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-142281%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ESame%20here...we%20have%20not%20heard%20about%20any%20new%20features%20and%20limits%20removal%20since%20Ignite%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-142260%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-142260%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20Dave%2C%20Any%20news%20about%20when%20the%20limits%20will%20be%20removed%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-122553%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-122553%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAn%20updates%20on%20this%20limitation%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-120930%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-120930%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EEy%20Dave%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3EWhat%20are%20going%20to%20be%20the%20new%20limits%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-120924%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-120924%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWe%20are%20rolling%20out%20the%20removal%20of%20assigned%20task%20limits.%20If%20it%20hasn't%20reached%20your%20tenant%20yet%2C%20it%20will%20shortly!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-120052%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-120052%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI've%20been%20waiting%20with%20a%20degree%20of%20frustration%20for%20these%20limits%20to%20be%20lifted%2C%20and%20confirm%20that%20on%20our%20tenant%26nbsp%3Bthese%20were%20lifted%20over%20the%20weekend.%20Yet%20I%20know%20a%20friend%20who%20is%20still%20stuck%20with%20the%20limitations%20on%20theirs.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAs%20with%20all%20changes%20to%20O365%20I%20can%20only%20assume%20the%20roll-out%20is%20gradual%20across%20all%20tenants.%20I%20would%20guess%20getting%20an%20accurate%20ETA%20is%20going%20to%20be%20tough%20for%20any%20given%20tenant.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-119993%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-119993%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EMmm...I%20think%20the%20answer%20is%20going%20to%20be%3A%20no%20ETA%20yet%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-119922%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-119922%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ERegardless%26nbsp%3Bthe%20task%20status%2C%20the%20most%20tasks%20a%20user%20may%20have%20assigned%20to%20him%2Fher%2C%20at%20a%20time%2C%20is%20250%20tasks.%26nbsp%3B%20%3CSTRONG%3EQUESTION%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3A%26nbsp%3B%20By%20what%20date%20(Month%2FYear)%20will%20Microsoft%20remove%20the%20Office365%20Planner%20limitation%20that%20limits%20an%20individual%20user%20to%20having%20a%20maximum%20of%20250%20tasks%20assigned%20to%20him%2Fher%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-114928%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-114928%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F32918%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Dave%20Heller%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20here%20is%20the%20blog%20which%20lists%20the%20recent%20announcements%20made%20from%20Ignite.%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jijitechnologies.com%2Fblogs%2Fmicrosoft-planner-new-feature-announcements-ignite%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.jijitechnologies.com%2Fblogs%2Fmicrosoft-planner-new-feature-announcements-ignite%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-113432%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-113432%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F73295%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ian%20Halliday%3C%2FA%3E%20wrote%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CP%3EI've%20not%20spotted%20anything%2C%20but%20was%20there%20any%20mention%20of%20these%20limitations%20(and%20future%20improvements)%20at%20Ignite%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%0A%3CP%3EWe%20announced%20at%20Ignite%20that%20effective%20immediately%20(or%20very%20soon%20for%20some%20customers)%2C%20we%20removed%20-%20for%20all%20intents%20and%20purposes%20-%20the%20limitations%20on%20task%20assignments.%20Will%20be%20posting%20a%20blog%20soon%20that%20reviews%20Ignite%20and%20roadmap%20announcements!%20All%20videos%20are%20currently%20on%20YouTube.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-113423%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-113423%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAFAIK%2C%20No%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-113393%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20RE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-113393%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI've%20not%20spotted%20anything%2C%20but%20was%20there%20any%20mention%20of%20these%20limitations%20(and%20future%20improvements)%20at%20Ignite%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-99965%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-99965%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWhen%20do%20you%20expect%20these%20limits%20to%20be%20eliminated%2Fincreased%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-97968%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERE%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-97968%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThese%20limitations%20have%20absolutely%20killed%20our%20roll-out%20of%20Planner.%20We%20manually%20migrated%20from%20Trello.%20At%20the%20time%20none%20of%20these%20limitations%20were%20clear.%20Now%20we%20are%20stuck%20with%20an%20unusable%20product%20as%20we%20have%20already%20hit%20limits.%20Without%20the%20ability%20to%20move%20tasks%20between%20plans%2C%20we%20can't%20even%20put%20a%20workaround%20in%20place%20at%20the%20level%20of%20detail%20we%20are%20working%20to.%20Please%20Microsoft%2C%20please%2C%20please%20up%20these%20limits!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-97520%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-97520%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20for%20your%20quick%20response...%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-97498%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-97498%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThis%20limitation%20allows%20you%20have%20250%20active%20tasks%20(Not%20Started%2C%20In%20Progress)%20per%20plan.%20When%20some%20tasks%20gets%20completed%20you%20can%20add%20few%20more.%20There%20is%20no%20confirmation%20from%20MSFT%20on%20this%20limitation.%20But%20we%20have%20customers%20of%20us%20affected%20by%20this.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-97470%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-97470%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EIs%20it%20a%20limitation%20of%26nbsp%3Bthe%20product%20or%26nbsp%3Bonly%20some%20people%20(O365%20Customers)%20are%20facing%20the%20issue%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIf%20it%20an%20issue%2C%20when%20can%20we%20expect%20the%20solution%20for%20the%20same.%20But%20if%20it%20is%20a%20limitation%20of%20the%20product%20there%20is%20no%20point%20of%20using%20it..%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-97467%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-97467%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EYes%2C%20we%20have%20receive%20dthe%20same%20issue%20with%20multiple%20customers.%20They%20are%20unable%20to%20create%20more%20than%20250%20tasks%20per%20plan.%20This%20is%20really%20a%20painul%20limitation%20and%20many%20O365%20Planner%20customers%20are%20affected%20because%20of%20this.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-97211%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-97211%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EBut%2C%20i%20was%20unable%20to%20create%20more%20then%20250%20tasks%2C%20and%20giving%20me%20an%20error...%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EError%20is%20%3A%20we%20could%20not%20compleate%20your%20request%20because%20your%20item%20or%20storage%20limit%20has%20been%20exceeded..%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ELet%20me%20explain%20my%20Planner%20details%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20have%20created%20a%20planner%20with%20the%20name%20enablement%2C%20i%20have%20created%20around%2015%20buckets(courses%20in%20my%20case)%20in%20that%20planner%20and%20invited%2080%20people.%20now%20i%20want%20to%20create%20multiple%20tasks%20under%20each%20and%20every%20bucket%20and%20assign%20it%20to%20different%20users..%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt%20will%20be%20greatful%2C%20If%20you%20can%20help%20me...%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-97198%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-97198%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYes%2C%20you%20are%20correct.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-97151%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-97151%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAs%20per%20the%20limitation%2C%20what%20i%20understand%20is%20%22i%20cannot%20assign%20more%20than%20250%20tasks%20per%20user%20but%20i%20can%20create%20upto%201500%20tasks%20and%20assign%20it%20different%20users%20not%26nbsp%3Bexceeding%20250%2Fuser%22%20righ..%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-96742%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-96742%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%2C%20The%20completed%20tasks%20will%20still%20be%20counted%20against%20the%20quota%20if%20that%20is%20assigned%20to%20you%20in%20case%20you%20fall%20under%20250%20assigned%20tasks%20per%20user%20limit.%20In%20case%20you%20fall%20under%201500%20created%20tasks%20limit%2C%20then%20you%20need%20to%20delete%20some%20tasks%20that%20are%20created%20by%20you.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-96148%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-96148%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EDoes%20anyone%20know%20if%20%22Completed%22%20tasks%20still%20count%20against%20the%20250%2F1500%20task%20limits%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-76751%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-76751%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESanthosh%2C%20many%20thanks%20for%20clearing%20this%20up!%26nbsp%3B%20I%20was%20afraid%20that%20I%20had%20lost%20my%20work.%26nbsp%3B%20I'll%20create%20a%202nd%20bucket%20as%20a%20workaround.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-76116%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-76116%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F20010%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Wietze%20de%20Vries%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20The%20Planner%26nbsp%3Bweb%20UI%20has%20the%20limitation%20to%20display%20100%20tasks%20per%20bucket.%20When%20it%20crosses%20this%20limit%20tasks%20will%20be%20hidden%20and%20not%20deleted.%20When%20you%20complete%20%2F%20delete%20some%20of%20the%20tasks%20you%26nbsp%3Bwill%20notice%20that%20the%20hidden%20tasks%20will%20start%20appear.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-75975%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-75975%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20have%20this%20problem%20too%2C%20except%20it%20seems%20like%20after%20about%20100%20tasks%20in%20the%20same%20bucket%2C%20when%20I%20added%20new%20tasks%2C%20then%20the%20old%20tasks%20are%20deleted%20without%20warning.%20I%20just%20went%20back%20to%20look%2C%20and%20my%20old%20tasks%20were%20gone.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62300%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62300%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThe%20work%20to%20extend%2Ferase%20limits%20is%20in%20process%20-%20I%20appreciate%20you%20raising%20the%20issue!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62296%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62296%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAdd%20another%20%2B1000%20to%20that.%20We%20are%20experiencing%20pretty%20wide%20spread%20adoption%20of%20Groups%20and%20Planner%20is%20one%20of%20the%20big%20selling%20features.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EI%20am%20just%20sitting%20back%20in%20worry%20for%20when%20we%20start%20to%20hit%20those%20walls....%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EWe%20are%20in%20the%20same%20boat%2C%20company%20investigating%20tools%20like%20Trello%20that%20can%20scale%20to%20meet%20larger%20enterprise%20needs%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EThis%20needs%20to%20be%20resolved%20immediately.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-62281%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-62281%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%2B1000%20to%20your%20comments%20and%20pains%20Santhosh%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-857127%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-857127%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EWith%20the%20way%20Planner%20is%20working%2C%20I'd%20rather%20use%20NOTEPAD!%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-857389%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-857389%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ESorry%20to%20hear%20that%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F131781%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Omar%20Ali%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%20what%20specifically%20is%20frustrating%20you%20with%20Planner%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBest%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBrian%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-857416%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-857416%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHey%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3COL%3E%3CLI%3EAnyone%20(and%20I%20mean%20anyone%20that%20has%20access%20to%20Planner)%20can%3A%3COL%3E%3CLI%3EModify%20%2FRename%20%2F%20Delete%20the%20Bucket%20and%20the%20ENTIRE%20contents.%26nbsp%3B%20Wow!%26nbsp%3B%20Who%20fell%20asleep%20on%20this%20job%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Admin%20can't%20stop%20this%20from%20happening!%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3EA%20team%20member%20can%20modify%20%2F%20rename%20%2F%20delete%20a%20task.%26nbsp%3B%20What's%20the%20point%20of%20assigning%20a%20task%20when%20a%20member%20of%20that%20task%20can%20delete%20it%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3EA%20team%20member%20can%20modify%20%2F%20rename%20%2F%20delete%20the%20description.%26nbsp%3B%20What's%20the%20point%20of%20having%20a%20description%20when%20when%20a%20member%20can%20delete%20%2F%20modify%20and%20even%20change%20it%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLI%3E%3C%2FOL%3E%3C%2FLI%3E%3C%2FOL%3E%3CP%3EThose%20alone%20would%20make%20Planner%20a%20COMPLETE%20USELESS%20product.%26nbsp%3B%20It%20should%20be%20PULLED%20out%20of%20production%20and%20put%20in%20an%20ALPHA%20THOUGHT%20process%20instead%20of%20production!%26nbsp%3B%20Ridiculous!%26nbsp%3B%20Whoever%20was%20in%20charge%20of%20this%20being%20released%20to%20the%20public%20should%20literally%20be%20fired.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-857639%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-857639%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20for%20the%20feedback%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F131781%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Omar%20Ali%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B.%26nbsp%3B%20If%20you%20want%20something%20that%20ties%20things%20down%20a%20lot%20more%20then%20take%20a%20look%20at%20Project%20Online.%26nbsp%3B%20Feel%20free%20to%20vote%20on%20some%20topics%20on%20UserVoice%20if%20you%20feel%20strongly%20about%20these%20items.%26nbsp%3B%20I'm%20sorry%20it%20doesn't%20fit%20your%20needs.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBest%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBrian%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1086770%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1086770%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3EIs%20there%20official%20documentation%2Farticle%20about%20Planner%20boundaries%20and%20limits%3F%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20believe%20there%20should%20be%20one%20as%20most%20of%20professional%20software%20has%20this%20documented.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt's%20hard%20to%20make%20a%20deployment%20decision%20without%20knowing%20technical%20possibilities.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087207%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087207%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F321472%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40JonasSav%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThere%20are%20a%20ton%20of%20issues%20that%20makes%20Planner%20lacking%20in%20Planning!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EBig%20issues%20that%20makes%20you%20NOT%20want%20this%20in%20production%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E1.%20ANY%20user%2C%20and%20I%20mean%20ANY%20user%20you%20add%20to%20the%20system%20can%20CHANGE%2C%20yes%2C%20CHANGE%20your%20plan!%26nbsp%3B%20What%3F%3F%3F%20Someone%20was%20definitely%20asleep%20in%20this%20step.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E2.%20ANY%20user%2C%20and%20I%20mean%20ANY%20user%20you%20add%20to%20the%20system%20can%20CHANGE%2C%20yes%2C%20CHANGE%20your%20TASKS!%26nbsp%3B%20What's%20the%20purpose%20of%20this%20system%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Beta%20testers%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087269%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087269%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F131781%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Omar%20Ali%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bif%20this%20is%20an%20issue%20for%20you%20then%20there%20are%20other%20products%20in%20the%20work%20management%20space%20from%20Microsoft%20that%20might%20suit%20you%20better%20-%20take%20a%20look%20at%20Project%20Online%20and%20Project%20for%20the%20web.%26nbsp%3B%20Planner%20is%20about%20collaboration.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBest%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBrian.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087270%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087270%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F321472%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40JonasSav%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bwe%20are%20constantly%20reviewing%20the%20various%20limits%20in%20Planner%20and%20as%20they%20are%20changing%20we%20do%20not%20list%20them.%26nbsp%3B%20In%20normal%20usage%20we%20find%20that%20customers%20are%20not%20impacted%20by%20the%20limits%20-%20as%20long%20as%20tasks%20are%20marked%20completed%20and%20eventually%20deleted%20(one%20limit%20is%20active%20tasks%20for%20example)%20then%20not%20usually%20a%20problem.%26nbsp%3B%20We%20have%20also%20seen%20customers%20hit%20limits%20for%20tasks%20for%20an%20individual%20when%20automation%20creates%20all%20tasks%20-%20but%20generally%20good%20housekeeping%20will%20keep%20you%20well%20within%20them.%26nbsp%3B%20What%20is%20your%20usage%20scenario%20that%20concerns%20you%20about%20the%20limits%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBest%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBrian%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087273%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087273%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BThank%20you.%26nbsp%3B%20I'm%20aware%20of%20the%20other%20applications.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPlanner%20should%20be%20thrown%20away%20because%20of%20the%20facts%20I've%20mentioned%20above.%26nbsp%3B%20Even%20if%20someone%20mistakenly%20delete%20projects%2C%20move%20them%2C%20delete%20tasks%2C%20move%20them%20etc.%2C%20how%20is%20that%20collaboration%3F%26nbsp%3B%20That's%20beyond%20absurd%20to%20have%20things%20like%20this%20on%20projects.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087277%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087277%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3EWhat%20is%20the%20exact%20Planner%20roadmap%20though%2C%20please%3F%20When%20for%20the%20last%20time%20the%20product%20received%20any%20strategic%20updates%3F%20We%20are%20using%20it%2C%20but%20it%20is%20really%20lacking.%20Why%20are%20Teams%20introducing%20private%20channels%2C%20yet%20Planner%20can't%20have%20private%20%2Fper%20user%20silos%3F%20What%20we%20also%20really%20miss%20is%2C%20that%20management%20tasks%20are%20filled-in%20by%20assistants%2C%20but%20we%20would%20like%20to%20get%20CEO%20notified.%20Tha%20last%20time%20I%20have%20checked%2C%20there%20is%20no%20%22Garant%22%20or%20so%20field%2C%20to%20fill%20in%20other%20persons%20watching%20the%20task%2C%20nor%20there%20is%20any%20ability%20to%20use%20mentions%20in%20comments%2C%20which%20would%20be%20sufficient%20....%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087282%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087282%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F1547%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Santhosh%20Balakrishnan%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BThese%20numbers%20are%20way%20out%20of%20date.%26nbsp%3B%20Please%20ignore.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087290%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087290%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F163372%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Petr%20Kren%C5%BEelok%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bthere%20have%20been%20continual%20updates%20all%20the%20time.%26nbsp%3B%20Private%20channels%20are%20an%20interesting%20one%20-%20as%20it%20isn't%20just%20Planner%20that%20is%20missing%20here.%26nbsp%3B%20Many%20of%20the%20features%20of%20Planner%20use%20other%20technologies%20in%20the%20stack%2C%20like%20the%20group%20inbox%2C%20or%20the%20OneDrive%20storage%20-%20so%20not%20an%20easy%20task%20truly%20making%20this%20a%20feature%20for%20Private%20channels.%20Some%20of%20the%20more%20recent%20updates%2C%20export%20to%20Excel%2C%20copy%20task%20and%20copy%20plan%2C%20the%20new%20Priority%20field.%26nbsp%3B%20That%20said%20there%20is%20no%20intention%20to%20build%20features%20that%20would%20overlap%20with%20other%20options%20in%20the%20work%20management%20space.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087294%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087294%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F131781%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Omar%20Ali%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Byou%20don't%20have%20to%20use%20it%20-%20but%20many%2C%20many%20people%20do%20use%20it%20and%20are%20very%20happy%20with%20it%20-%20and%20would%20not%20like%20us%20to%20throw%20it%20away.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20was%20recently%20at%20our%20Ignite%20conference%20and%20lost%20count%20of%20how%20many%20people%20approached%20me%20just%20to%20say%20they%20love%20Planner.%26nbsp%3B%20Does%20it%20suit%20every%20need%3F%26nbsp%3B%20Of%20course%20not%2C%20and%20for%20some%20of%20the%20reasons%20you%20state%2C%20but%20it%20certainly%20has%20its%20place.%26nbsp%3B%20That%20said%20the%20team%20continue%20to%20look%20at%20where%20we%20can%20improve%20-%20and%20I%20for%20one%20would%20like%20to%20see%20a%20recycle%20bin%20for%20Planner.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087320%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087320%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EO365%20dependance%20upon%20the%20rather%20flat%20Group%20concept%20is%20the%20limitation%20going%20thru%20many%20products.%20Copy%20task%2Fplan%20are%20nice%2C%20but%20your%20fear%20of%20overlap%20with%20other%20products%20is%20really%20unfounded.%20Are%20we%20talking%20Project%20here%3F%20You%20have%20to%20licence%20separately%20for%20that%20and%20Project%20is%20really%20a%20different%20product.%20Sometimes%2C%20just%20little%20is%20needed%20to%20help%20probudt%20being%20much%20more%20useful.%20We%20don't%20mind%20user%20separation%20that%20much%2C%20but%20really%20-%20we%20need%20our%20CEO%20to%20watch%20replies%20to%20the%20tasks.%20How%20are%20we%20supposed%20to%20do%20it%2C%20if%20he%20can't%20be%20filled%20in%20as%20a%20Garant%20%2F%20Watching%20%2F%20call%20it%20whatever%2C%20or%20at%20least%20allowing%20to%20mention%20him%20in%20the%20comments%20section%3F%20He%20is%20not%20going%20to%20fill-in%20400%20tasks%20for%20the%20whole%20management%20team%2C%20assistants%20are.%20And%20IIRC%2C%20mentions%20in%20Planner%20were%20planned%20long%20time%20ago.%20This%20feature%20alone%20would%20make%20Planner%20MUCH%20more%20collaboration%20friendly%20-%20you%20can%20simply%20address%20ppl%2C%20which%20don't%20necessarily%20have%20assigned%20particular%20tasks%20....%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087375%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087375%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BI%20don't.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20now%20urge%20people%20to%20use%20Google%20and%20more%20especially%20with%20people%20like%20you%20who%20CANNOT%20take%20responsibility%20to%20fix%20a%20broken%20system!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087387%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087387%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F131781%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Omar%20Ali%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bsorry%20you%20feel%20that%20way%20about%20people%20like%20me.%26nbsp%3B%20Happy%20New%20Year.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087394%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087394%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EOh%20my%2C%20and%20i%20thought%20i%20can%20be%20annoying.%20Go%20away%20Omar%20to%20your%20sacred%20Google%20already%20one%20post%20was%20enough%20to%20provide%20your%20personal%20opinion.%20We%20were%20using%20Planner%20for%20a%20few%20years%20in%20a%20team%20and%20it%20was%20convenient%20for%20us%20to%20be%20able%20to%20edit%20each%20other%20tasks%2C%20to%20fix%20errors%20or%20fill%20missing%20information.%20Recycle%20bin%20would%20be%20great%2C%20although%20i%20don't%20remember%20us%20needing%20one.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EBut%20i%20still%20stand%20on%20the%20limits%20question%20here.%20Brian%2C%20this%20is%20the%20same%20we%20there%20told%20over%20and%20over%20here%20and%20it%20is%20not%20concrete%20or%20satisfying.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087406%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087406%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThanks%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F163372%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Petr%20Kren%C5%BEelok%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20that%20is%20good%20feedback%20and%20I'd%20like%20to%20see%26nbsp%3B%40mentions%20and%20a%20recycle%20bin%20make%20it%20into%20the%20product%20soon.%26nbsp%3B%20I'm%20impressed%20with%20the%20new%20Teams%20integration%20that%20is%20coming%20in%20the%20early%20part%20of%20this%20year%20-%20and%20a%20new%20list%20view%20for%20tasks.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EAnd%20yes%2C%20I%20appreciate%20Project%20is%20another%20license%20cost.%26nbsp%3B%20Have%20you%20seen%20the%20new%20Project%3F%26nbsp%3B%20That%20does%20close%20the%20gap%20a%20little%20between%20Project%20Online%20and%20Planner%2C%20and%20is%20lower%20cost%20than%20Project%20Online%20-%20and%20even%20uses%20some%20of%20the%20same%20look%20and%20feel%20as%20Planner.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBest%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBrian.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087420%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087420%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20wish%20I%20could%20tell%20it%20a%20different%20way%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F33735%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Oleg%20K%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B.%26nbsp%3B%20We%20do%20seem%20to%20have%20stabilized%20on%20some%20of%20the%20limits%20now%20so%20maybe%20time%20for%20me%20to%20try%20again%20to%20get%20the%20product%20group%20to%20agree%20a%20published%20list%2C%20at%20least%20for%20some%20values.%26nbsp%3B%20For%20me%20and%20the%20other%20support%20staff%20it%20would%20be%20so%20much%20easier.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBest%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBrian%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087425%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087425%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EMentions%20would%20be%20really%20great!%20We%20use%20Planner%20for%20deparment%20tasks%2C%20management%20tasks%2C%20yearly%20bonuses%20tasks%2C%20we%20don't%20mind%20that%20much%2C%20that%20ppl%20see%20other's%20tasks.%20We%20previously%20used%20shared%20Excel%20with%20tabs%2C%20so%20it%20was%20similar%20and%20really%20works%20for%20us.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EWith%20the%20Project%20-%20we%20use%20it%20for%20the%20complete%20IT%20tasks%20tracking.%20But%20web%20version%20was%20lacking%2C%20desktop%20app%20was%20sometimes%20a%20bit%20cumbersome%2C%20we%20wanted%20it%20to%20really%20pretify%20it.%20So%20while%20we%20like%20Gant%20graph%20ability%20to%20display%20a%20baseline%2C%20we%20prefer%20to%20do%20our%20screenshots%20in%20the%20Timeline%20view.%20But%20-%20placing%20and%20moving%20stuff%20around%20is%20cumbersome%20too%2C%20as%20it%20automatically%20tries%20to%20rearrange%20tasks.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3ESo%20we%20have%20been%20really%20waiting%20for%20the%20project%20Roadmap%2C%20becuase%20we%20were%20looking%20for%20some%20simple%20means%20of%20presentation%20to%20the%20management.%20What%20a%20disappointment%20Roadam%20was.%20We%20simply%20gave%20up%20on%20that.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EI%20have%20seen%20some%20news%20on%20the%20new%20reworked%20Project%2C%20as%20well%20as%20its%20ability%20to%20link%20to%20Planner%2C%20or%20something%20like%20that.%20I%20don't%20even%20breath%20and%20waiting%20to%20give%20our%20team%20a%20try%20there.%20I%20myself%20prefer%20good%2Fnice%20design%2C%20as%20well%20as%20a%20simplicity.%20That's%20wha%20I%20also%20like%20Planner.%20Keeping%20things%20simple%20requires%20a%20lot%20of%20thoughts%2C%20and%20some%20ppl%20might%20not%20just%20realise%20it%2C%20how%20difficult%20is%20to%20keep%20things%20in%20balance%20%3A)%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1087426%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1087426%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EBefore%20deciding%20and%20recommending%20one%20or%20another%20solution%20that%20requires%20time%20for%20setting%20up%20system%2C%20migrating%20data%20and%20training%20users%20(despite%20actual%20cost%20of%20licencing)%20we%20need%20to%20understand%20system%20deeply%20to%20know%20what%20potential%20limitation%20might%20be%20reached%20after%20one%20year%20and%20of%20course%20actual%20roadmap%20from%20system%20owners%20-%20what%20features%20will%20be%20supported.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3EFor%20example%3A%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EProblem%3A%20We%20considering%20solution%20for%20teams%20and%20personal%20lists%20for%20daily%20task%20planning%20and%20reporting%20for%20management%20reasons.%20To%20see%20how%20the%20day%20looked.%20We%20need%20all%20task%20to%20stay%20and%20be%20findable%20in%20future.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EToday%20I%20got%20idea%20that%20we%20might%20use%20separate%20bucked%20list%20for%20each%20date.%20So%20I%20did%20googling%20investigation%20to%20check%20if%20it%20possible%20and%20for%20how%20long.%20Instead%20official%20and%20clear%20table%20(Like%20i%20used%20to%20see%20in%20SharePoint%20on%20premise)%20i%20found%20this%20forum%20%3A-).%20It's%20not%20clear%20what%20is%20outdated%20and%20solved%2C%20what%20is%20not.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1119361%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1119361%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Eit%20would%20be%20great%20if%20we%20could%20have%20some%20ideas%20on%20the%20limits.%20We%20have%20created%20a%20dashboard%20solution%20which%20creates%20planner%20tasks%20based%20on%20various%20ticketing%20systems%2C%20the%20system%20account%20which%20creates%20the%20tasks%20and%20modifies%20them%20will%20create%20more%20than%20the%20supposed%201500%20task%20limit%20per%20user.%20How%20do%20we%20plan%20for%20this%3F%20We%20can%20use%20multiple%20accounts%20to%20create%20tasks%20but%20that%20is%20clumsy.%20We%20will%20test%20our%20solution%20on%20a%20large%20scale%20this%20week%20and%20see%20when%20it%20stops%20working%2C%20if%20it%20is%20not%20feesible%20to%20scale%20this%20solution%20so%20a%20single%20service%20account%20can%20create%2010s%20of%20thousands%20of%20tasks%20then%20we%20will%20have%20to%20look%20elsewhere%2C%20which%20is%20less%20than%20ideal.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1120118%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1120118%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F76441%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40David%20Bargna%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bgood%20to%20hear%20you%20are%20testing%20-%20and%20to%20be%20honest%20Planner%20limits%20were%20designed%20to%20support%20the%20expected%20use%20of%20the%20Planner%20applications%20-%20not%20necessarily%20custom%20applications%20with%20a%20single%20account%20creating%20all%20the%20tasks.%26nbsp%3B%20The%20limit%20is%20way%20beyond%201500%2C%20but%20may%20not%20be%20high%20enough%20for%20you%20unless%20you%20create%20with%20multiple%20accounts.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBest%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBrian%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1127430%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1127430%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Ehere%20is%20some%20feedback%20from%20our%20tests%3C%2FP%3E%3CUL%3E%3CLI%3EThere%20is%20a%20limit%20of%202400%20tasks%20per%20Plan%20(regardless%20of%20which%20user%20creates%20them).%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3EThe%20limit%20applies%20to%20tasks%20that%20exist%20concurrently%2C%20that%20is%2C%20if%20the%20user%20reaches%202400%2C%20and%20just%20after%20deletes%20100%2C%20then%20the%20user%20has%20still%20the%20option%20to%20create%20100%20new%20tasks.%3C%2FLI%3E%3CLI%3EIf%20the%20individual%20user%20has%20a%20global%20limit%20we%20don%E2%80%99t%20know%2C%20but%20it%E2%80%99s%20definitely%20more%20than%202400%2C%20since%20once%20we%20reached%20the%20limit%20in%20one%20plan%2C%20we%20could%20create%20more%20tasks%20with%20that%20user%20in%20a%20different%20plan.%3C%2FLI%3E%3C%2FUL%3E%3CP%3Ethese%20limits%20are%20fine%20for%20us%20as%20we%20will%20not%20create%20more%20than%202400%20tasks%20per%20plan%2C%20but%20need%20to%20create%20them%20over%20multiple%20plans%2C%20so%20excellent%20news%20that%20we%20can%20rollout%20the%20dashboard%20with%20plenty%20of%20room%20to%20spare.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1127589%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1127589%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F76441%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40David%20Bargna%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20I%20neither%20confirm%20nor%20deny%20the%20current%20limit%20you%20have%20found%20%3B).%26nbsp%3B%20You%20should%20also%20see%20that%20completing%20tasks%20will%20allow%20new%20ones%20to%20be%20created%20-%20so%20the%20key%20to%20successful%20use%20is%20good%20housekeeping%20and%20completing%20and%20deleting%20tasks%20as%20the%20plans%20progress.%26nbsp%3B%20I'm%20very%20pleased%20to%20hear%20that%20this%20should%20work%20with%20your%20scenario.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBest%20regards%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EBrian%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1169078%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1169078%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Brian%20Smith%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIf%20Microsoft%20would%20take%20a%20look%20at%20Trello%2C%20it%20wouldn't%20produce%20garbage%20like%20Planner.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThe%20integration%20into%20O365%20is%20great%20but%20what%20it%20helps%20with%20all%20those%20limitations.%20Why%20can't%20I%20have%20multiple%20checklists%20with%20more%20than%2020%20items%3F%20It's%20not%20enough%20for%20us.%20What%20about%20Trello%20style%20notifications%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIn%20my%20company%20we%20use%20Trello.%20We%20are%20a%20small%20company%2C%20not%20a%20problem%20to%20register%20and%20setup%20for%20each%20user.%20As%20we%20are%20an%20IT%20system%20integrator%2C%20we%20wanted%20to%20bring%20Planner%20to%20a%20customer%20with%20close%20to%20400%20Users.%20They%20are%20in%20Oil-%20and%20Gas%20Industry.%20We%20setup%20some%20sample%20projects%20%2F%20workflows%20but%20no%20chance.%20People%20don't%20get%20notifications%2C%2020%20items%20and%20only%20one%20checklist%20is%20not%20enough%20for%20them.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ELong%20story%20short%2C%20we%20are%20rolling%20out%20Trello.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt's%20sad%20to%20see%20how%20Microsoft%20always%20brings%20out%20pre-Alpha%20releases%20and%20simply%20don't%20continue%20development%20unless%20for%20totally%20unimportant%20features.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt%20is%20clear%20to%20me%2C%20they%20don't%20use%20Planner.%20Otherwise%20they%20would%20have%20kicked%20it%20into%20the%20garbage%20can%20and%20purchased%20Trello.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1184439%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1184439%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EThe%20Limit%20about%20250%20tasks%20assigned%20per%20Person%20was%20removed%3A%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fplanner.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F330525-microsoft-planner-feedback-forum%2Fsuggestions%2F16700584-remove-250-task-limit-per-person-per-plan%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fplanner.uservoice.com%2Fforums%2F330525-microsoft-planner-feedback-forum%2Fsuggestions%2F16700584-remove-250-task-limit-per-person-per-plan%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1192009%22%20slang%3D%22de-DE%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1192009%22%20slang%3D%22de-DE%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F16778%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Thomas%20Maier%2C%3C%2FA%3Eafter%20more%20than%20a%20year%2C%20there%20are%20information%20on%20the%20new%20limit%20values.%20We%20notice%20problems%20with%20fuller%20planned%20performance.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1204514%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1204514%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F16778%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Thomas%20Maier%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThanks%20but%20not%20sure%20what%20that%20helps.%20If%20I%20have%20250%2B%20Tasks%20pending%2C%20I%20need%20to%20rethink%20my%20workflows%20and%20get%20some%20help%20(or%20a%20new%20job).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWhat%20I%20was%20referring%20to%20is%20simply%20checklists%20which%20can%20hold%20more%20than%2020%20task%20items.%20And%20also%20being%20able%20to%20have%20multiple%20checklists%20in%20the%20same%20card.%20Sometimes%20a%20work%20process%20has%20different%20teams%20involved%20so%20you%20need%20to%20have%20a%20checklist%20for%20Team%20A%20to%20process%20tasks%201-30%20and%20then%20you%20have%20follow%20up%20Tasks%20for%20Team%20B%20with%20another%2040%20tasks%20in%20the%20checklist.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThat%20being%20said%20it%20still%20leaves%20the%20issue%20with%20the%20notifications.%20Trello%20can%20show%20me%20a%20notification%20for%20any%20action%20on%20a%20card%20I%20follow.%20That's%20a%20must%20if%20you%20want%20to%20control%20smooth%20workflows.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1205259%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1205259%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EBernd%2C%20Thomas%20didn't%20reply%20directly%20to%20you.%20250%20tasks%20limit%20was%20mentioned%20in%20the%20first%20message%20by%20this%20post%20author.%20So%20it%20is%20important%20for%20some%20people%20and%20Thomas%20informed%20them%20about%20such%20limit%20lifting.%20And%20this%20is%20a%20good%20start%20on%20working%20on%20these%20limitations.%20Also%2C%20i%20thought%20you%20already%20rolled%20out%20Trello%2C%20so%20why%20do%20you%20even%20care%20replying%20here%3F%20%3AD%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1206073%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1206073%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3ELooking%20forward%20to%20see%20official%20and%20professional%20up-to-date%20documentation%2Freport%20with%20all%20limitations%20that%20Planner%20have.%20Documentation%20is%20a%20crucial%20part%20for%20Project%20Managers%2FArchitects%20to%20check%20before%20making%20long%20term%20choices.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ELike%20for%20e.g.%20SharePoint%20has%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fsharepoint%2Finstall%2Fsoftware-boundaries-and-limits-0%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fdocs.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fsharepoint%2Finstall%2Fsoftware-boundaries-and-limits-0%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1224411%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Planner%20Limitations%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1224411%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F33735%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Oleg%20K%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BWhile%20having%20rolled%20out%20Trello%20for%20a%20particular%20customer%20(we%20are%20a%20System%20Integrator)%2C%20I%20nevertheless%20keep%20looking%20at%20other%20solutions%20obviously.%20We%20have%20other%20customer's%20which%20are%20on%20Planner%20and%20fighting%20with%20all%20the%20limitations%20and%20of%20course%20I%20have%20hope%2C%20that%20Microsoft%20can%20sort%20it%20out.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPlanner%20has%20the%20benefit%20of%20being%20a%20part%20of%20O365%2C%20hence%20much%20easier%20to%20roll%20out%20than%20a%20third%20party%20app.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHope%20that%20makes%20sense.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Highlighted
Super Contributor

Hi Planner Team,
 
We have noticed that the following are the known limitations in Planner.
- 250 assigned tasks per user irrespective of plans
- 1500 tasks can be created by an user irrespective of plans

- 250 Active tasks (Not Started, In Progress) per plan [Updated 18 Aug 2017]


If an user need to overcome 250 assigned tasks limitation he has to unassign the tasks assigned to him.  The worst part to overcome 1500 created tasks limitation is to delete the tasks created by him.
 
These limitations seems to limit the planner usage. For the long term plans, users will get 250 tasks assigned and 1500 tasks created in a short span of time. Also these limitations are not well documented and this made us to fear about the hidden unknown limitations.
 
So in order to ease the Planner adoption we request you to declare the limitations and see the possibility to increase these limits. This will only help the organizations to adopt for Planner easily.  We have two clients of us who are worst affected by these limitations and reconsidering the usage of planner now.

110 Replies
Highlighted
+1000 to your comments and pains Santhosh
Highlighted
Add another +1000 to that. We are experiencing pretty wide spread adoption of Groups and Planner is one of the big selling features.

I am just sitting back in worry for when we start to hit those walls....

We are in the same boat, company investigating tools like Trello that can scale to meet larger enterprise needs

This needs to be resolved immediately.
Highlighted

The work to extend/erase limits is in process - I appreciate you raising the issue!

Highlighted
I have this problem too, except it seems like after about 100 tasks in the same bucket, when I added new tasks, then the old tasks are deleted without warning. I just went back to look, and my old tasks were gone.
Highlighted

Hi @Wietze de Vries, The Planner web UI has the limitation to display 100 tasks per bucket. When it crosses this limit tasks will be hidden and not deleted. When you complete / delete some of the tasks you will notice that the hidden tasks will start appear.

Highlighted

Santhosh, many thanks for clearing this up!  I was afraid that I had lost my work.  I'll create a 2nd bucket as a workaround.

Highlighted

Does anyone know if "Completed" tasks still count against the 250/1500 task limits?

Highlighted

Hi, The completed tasks will still be counted against the quota if that is assigned to you in case you fall under 250 assigned tasks per user limit. In case you fall under 1500 created tasks limit, then you need to delete some tasks that are created by you. 

Highlighted

As per the limitation, what i understand is "i cannot assign more than 250 tasks per user but i can create upto 1500 tasks and assign it different users not exceeding 250/user" righ..?

Highlighted
Yes, you are correct.
Highlighted

But, i was unable to create more then 250 tasks, and giving me an error...

 

Error is : we could not compleate your request because your item or storage limit has been exceeded..

 

Let me explain my Planner details:

 

I have created a planner with the name enablement, i have created around 15 buckets(courses in my case) in that planner and invited 80 people. now i want to create multiple tasks under each and every bucket and assign it to different users..

 

It will be greatful, If you can help me...

Highlighted

Yes, we have receive dthe same issue with multiple customers. They are unable to create more than 250 tasks per plan. This is really a painul limitation and many O365 Planner customers are affected because of this. 

Highlighted

Is it a limitation of the product or only some people (O365 Customers) are facing the issue?

 

If it an issue, when can we expect the solution for the same. But if it is a limitation of the product there is no point of using it..

Highlighted
This limitation allows you have 250 active tasks (Not Started, In Progress) per plan. When some tasks gets completed you can add few more. There is no confirmation from MSFT on this limitation. But we have customers of us affected by this.
Highlighted

Thanks for your quick response...

Highlighted
These limitations have absolutely killed our roll-out of Planner. We manually migrated from Trello. At the time none of these limitations were clear. Now we are stuck with an unusable product as we have already hit limits. Without the ability to move tasks between plans, we can't even put a workaround in place at the level of detail we are working to. Please Microsoft, please, please up these limits!
Highlighted

When do you expect these limits to be eliminated/increased?

Highlighted

I've not spotted anything, but was there any mention of these limitations (and future improvements) at Ignite?

Highlighted
AFAIK, No