Forum Discussion
KayB1595
Sep 20, 2024Copper Contributor
Fill Formula function not working when using R1C1 reference style for columns
I've discovered that the formula auto fill function does not work when my workbook is using the R1C1 reference style, with numbers instead of letters in the columns. It just copies the exact same fo...
m_tarler
Steel Contributor
actually RC format may feel weird but can be very useful. It is just a matter of getting used to it.
another useful format is structured references for referring to tables (e.g. TABLE1[NAME]). It is also a little different and takes some getting used to but also very useful.
another useful format is structured references for referring to tables (e.g. TABLE1[NAME]). It is also a little different and takes some getting used to but also very useful.
KayB1595
Sep 20, 2024Copper Contributor
I struggle to see how the R1C1 reference is useful for the average user. It is more complicated, involves typing in longer formulas and renders the formula fill-in non-functional. In what circumstances would the R1C1 reference be preferred or useful? Genuinely curious.
- m_tarlerSep 20, 2024Steel ContributorTBH the main place is when using VBA (macros) and you can fill in a whole line of cells with the same formula and not need excel to autoincrement. Using A1 style you might have a running sum starting in cell B2 as =A2+B1 and then as you fill down you expect and need Excel to increment
but using RC style you have =RC[-1] + R[-1]C and that is the exact same formula entry down the whole column. Note also that in this format you know this formula will add the cell to the left to the cell above. The =A2+B1 you have to also know that you are looking at cell B2 to know that. Again, it isn't necessarily that one is better than the other, they are just different and each has their advantages and disadvantages.