Blog Post

Azure Database Support Blog
4 MIN READ

Azure SQL Database Data Sync Retirement: Migration Scenarios and Recommended Alternatives

Mohamed_Baioumy_MSFT's avatar
Dec 30, 2025

Azure SQL Database Data Sync has long been used to keep data consistent across multiple Azure SQL databases. However, as the service moves toward retirement, many customers are now asking an important question: How do we replace Azure SQL Data Sync with a supported, future‑proof solution—without significant data loss or downtime? In this article, we’ll walk through: What Data Sync retirement means in practice Typical migration challenges A real-world customer scenario Recommended alternatives A step‑by‑step migration approach from DEV to PROD Useful references and documentation

Why Azure SQL Data Sync Retirement Matters

Azure SQL Data Sync relies on:

  • Triggers
  • Metadata tables
  • Hub-and-spoke topology

While functional, this architecture introduces complexity, performance overhead, and operational risks, especially as data volumes and workloads grow.

Microsoft’s long-term direction favors scalable, resilient, and observable data integration services, such as Azure Data Factory (ADF) and event-driven replication patterns.

If you are currently using Data Sync, planning a migration early is strongly recommended.

Official guidance:

https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/azure-sql/database/sql-data-sync-data-sql-server-sql-database 

Sample Customer Scenario

Let’s consider a real scenario commonly seen in the field:

  • 4 Azure SQL Databases
  • Subscription: Contoso-DEV
  • Current topology: Azure SQL Data Sync
  • Target state: Consolidate all data into one Azure SQL Database
  • Environment flow: DEV → UAT → PROD
  • Database tiers: Standard (S0 / S1)
  • Size: Below 250 GB per database
  • Key requirements:
    • Minimal data loss
    • Quick replication
    • Azure-native and supported replacement
    • Clear operational model

Migration Design Considerations

Before selecting a tool, several factors must be evaluated:

  • Latency tolerance (near real-time vs scheduled sync)
  • Write patterns (conflicts, bidirectional vs unidirectional)
  • Schema compatibility
  • Operational overhead
  • Long-term supportability

For most consolidation scenarios, unidirectional replication (many → one) provides the best balance of simplicity and reliability.

Diagram 1: Current State – Azure SQL Data Sync (Before Retirement)

This diagram represents the existing topology, where multiple databases are synchronized using Azure SQL Data Sync into a single consolidated database.

Characteristics

  • Trigger‑based synchronization
  • Additional metadata tables
  • Limited observability
  • Service approaching retirement

Diagram 2: Target State – Azure Data Factory Based Consolidation

This diagram shows the recommended replacement architecture using Azure Data Factory.

Advantages

  • No triggers or sync metadata tables
  • Parallel ingestion
  • Built‑in retry, monitoring, and alerting
  • Fully supported and future‑proof

Diagram 3: Incremental Replication Logic (ADF)

This diagram explains how minimal data loss is achieved using incremental replication.

Key Points

  • No continuous connection required
  • Typical RPO: 1–5 minutes
  • Safe restart after failures

Diagram 4: DEV → PROD Migration Flow

This diagram highlights the recommended rollout approach starting with POC in DEV.

Best Practices

  • Build once, reuse across environments
  • Parameterize connection strings
  • Enable monitoring before PROD cutover

Recommended Alternatives to Azure SQL Data Sync

✅ Option 1: Azure Data Factory (ADF) – Primary Recommendation

Azure Data Factory provides a fully supported and scalable replacement for Data Sync when consolidating databases.

Architecture Overview

  • One pipeline per source database
  • Initial full load
  • Incremental replication using:
    • Change Tracking, or
    • CDC (if applicable), or
    • Watermark columns (ModifiedDate / identity)

Why ADF?

  • Microsoft’s strategic data integration platform
  • Built-in monitoring and retry logic
  • Parallel ingestion
  • Schema mapping and transformation support

📌 Best fit when:

  • You need consolidation
  • Near real‑time (minutes) is acceptable
  • You want a future‑proof design

📘 References:

⚠️ Option 2: SQL Transactional Replication (Limited Use)

Transactional replication can still work in narrow scenarios, but:

  • Adds operational complexity
  • Limited flexibility for schema changes
  • Not recommended for new designs

📘 Reference:

🧭 Option 3: Azure SQL Managed Instance Link (Future‑Facing)

If your long-term roadmap includes Azure SQL Managed Instance, the MI Link feature enables near real-time replication.

However:

  • Not applicable if your target remains Azure SQL Database
  • Requires infrastructure change

📘 Reference:

Recommended Migration Approach (DEV → PROD)

Phase 1 – Assessment

  • Review schema overlaps and key conflicts
  • Identify identity and primary key strategies
  • Confirm availability of:
    • Change Tracking
    • ModifiedDate / watermark columns

📘 Change Tracking:

Phase 2 – Initial Seeding (DEV)

  • Use ADF Copy Activity for full loads
  • Ingest each source DB into:
    • Dedicated schemas, or
    • Logical partitions
  • Validate:
    • Row counts
    • Referential integrity
    • Performance impact

Phase 3 – Incremental Replication

  • Enable incremental pipelines
  • Recommended frequency: every 1–5 minutes
  • Use parallelism for scalability
  • Simulate Data Sync behavior without triggers

Phase 4 – Cutover

  • Optional short write freeze
  • Final delta sync
  • Application validation
  • Promote pipelines to PROD

Data Loss and Performance Expectations

MetricExpected Outcome
RPOMinutes (configurable)
DowntimeNear‑zero
Performance impactPredictable and controllable
ObservabilityBuilt‑in via ADF monitoring

Final Recommendation Summary

Azure Data Factory with initial full load + incremental replication
✅ Azure-native, strategic, and supported
✅ Ideal for Data Sync retirement scenarios
✅ Scales from DEV to PROD with minimal redesign

 

Azure SQL Data Sync retirement is an opportunity—not a setback.

With services like Azure Data Factory, customers can move toward:

  • Better observability
  • Cleaner architectures
  • Easier production operations
  • Long-term platform alignment

If you are still relying on Azure SQL Data Sync, now is the right time to assess, plan, and migrate.

Helpful Resources

Published Dec 30, 2025
Version 1.0
No CommentsBe the first to comment