Forum Discussion
Worry about Nano Server Future ...
I'm really worry about future of Nano Server. I read this article on technet and I have many doubts about.
I think this is a really bad idea "downgrade" Nano Server as a standalone server. There are many escenarios that is perfect, DNS Server, IIS Server, Storage Server, Hyper-V host, Container host, Azure Server, Host Guardian Server, and many many others. Limit Nano Server to a Container is really sad.
What about headless is great ! Less surface of attack, more secure ! Small footprint and less services running ! Nano Server is the future of cloud server ! Please reconsider that decission, If we want to use Server Core, Full desktop or Nano Server, let us decide, please. I love Nano Server and I expend many hours testing and making manuals like this.
Hope Microsoft Server Team consider this post.
- Completely agree.
Anybody that cares about this issue should give their feedback to Microsoft.
Posting here and/or at uservoice are both good options: https://windowsserver.uservoice.com/forums/295068-nano-server/suggestions/19604629-bring-back-hyper-v-to-nano-server
Whoever took over from Snover needs to communicate.
2 Replies
- I agree. I think that its a bad idea to limit Nano's exposure in Window's Server's stronghold - ENTERPRISE!
- Completely agree.
Anybody that cares about this issue should give their feedback to Microsoft.
Posting here and/or at uservoice are both good options: https://windowsserver.uservoice.com/forums/295068-nano-server/suggestions/19604629-bring-back-hyper-v-to-nano-server
Whoever took over from Snover needs to communicate.
