Forum Discussion
Number of participants is reported inaccurately on CallRecord endpoint
- Meghana-MSFTFeb 05, 2024
Microsoft
Apologies for the delay, we are following up with the engineering team for an update. We will update you.- Meghana-MSFTFeb 06, 2024
Microsoft
palezvar - Engineering team requires below details. Could you please share below details?
Is this on beta or v1.0 version of callRecord Graph API? Also, is this a regular call/conference or a special meeting type like a Teams Live Event or TownHall?
Currently participants are not paginated on v1.0, it's a single collection at the callRecord level and limited to 130 results. We recently introduced pagination for the participant_v2 relationship in beta, which should be available in v1.0 in the next few weeks.
Without seeing a specific Call Id it's hard to know the exact reason why there might be a discrepancy between CQD and Graph, but my guess is that this may be a live event with streaming participants. Streaming users are not currently supported in callRecord Graph API.
- palezvarFeb 06, 2024Copper ContributorThis is what we use: https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/communications/callRecords/{id}
We grab the participant section of the return for that particular call I mentioned. The number of participants listed is 45 but according to CQD it is more than 100. Do we need to engage "/communications/calls/{id}/participants" endpoint and not reply on the participant content returned in callRecord?
This was a conference call. Is there a way for me to send you the call id directly instead of sharing it here?
Thanks