Forum Discussion
Start successor when predecessor is not complete
In this scenario i wouldn't use the split task feature but i would breakdown the work. I would breakdown Task 1 to (Task1 six months , Task2 four months) and create a relationship between them , then i add task 3 which is the five months one and link it to task one. in this scenario Task 3 will only be impacted if there was delay in the first 6 months and its unrelated to the second stretch of the work
Dear malshayeb,
thank you for your answer. If I apply the method you proposed, what happens in the management of the activity? If Task1 lasts one month more than expected since a problem in the activity occurs at month n.7, also Task2 is shifted one month ahead. If this is the case, this solution, unfortunately, does not help me. In my case, Task 2 should be shifted only if the activities between months n.1 and n.6 of Task1 last more than expected. There is a way to do this without splitting Task1 in two parts?
I look forward to your answer.
In this scenario i wouldn't use the split task feature but i would breakdown the work. I would breakdown Task 1 to (Task1 six months , Task2 four months) and create a relationship between them , then i add task 3 which is the five months one and link it to task one. in this scenario Task 3 will only be impacted if there was delay in the first 6 months and its unrelated to the second stretch of the work
- malshayeb
Thank you again for your prompt answer. I am going to use the last approach.
Best regards,
Giuseppe Palaia