Forum Discussion
How to "link up" to set a Start to Finish type in predecessors?
Unfortunately the note you superimposed over the screen shot blocks out vital information I need to replicate that part of your plan. Also it looks like there is an error in the note, it talks about task 57 which is not shown. I assume you meant task 67.
I also note the you show a link to a summary line (i.e. task ID 62). That is a no-no. Never place predecessors or successors on summary lines. Summary lines are not tasks, they are simply a summary of the subtasks under them.
Based on what I could see, this rendering of your plan should at least get you pointed in the right direction.
John
Probably what you are doing wrong is trying to use a start-to-finish relationship. The detail description of what you want indicates you should use a start-to-start relationship with a lead like shown here.
Changing the start date of task 67, will change the start date of task 48, if and only if, task 48 has not already started. In that case the link becomes null and void.
If the above relationship is not what you want please elaborate in more detail and we'll help you out.
John
Hi John,
Thank you so much for your quick reply. I am very, very new to Project so please bear with me. It may be that the advice you gave me is exactly what I need to do. However, when I try it, it doesn't seem to work.
First when I select task 59 (previously t48) and then select t67 and change the type in the predecessor tab to Start to Start, it doesn't seem to show the same relationship in the gaunt, the arrow remains top to bottom as opposed to going bottom and up, like yours.
Here is what I want to do:
I need to create dependencies based on the start date of the Townhall, things will be sent in function of when it will begin. Some like T59, 3 weeks before others 3-4 days before. I'm not sure how to link those tasks to change according to the start date of T67.
I hope this is clearer.
Thanks for your help,
K.
Unfortunately the note you superimposed over the screen shot blocks out vital information I need to replicate that part of your plan. Also it looks like there is an error in the note, it talks about task 57 which is not shown. I assume you meant task 67.
I also note the you show a link to a summary line (i.e. task ID 62). That is a no-no. Never place predecessors or successors on summary lines. Summary lines are not tasks, they are simply a summary of the subtasks under them.
Based on what I could see, this rendering of your plan should at least get you pointed in the right direction.
John
- John-project
I unlinked everything I had and copied your model and it worked perfectly.
Thank you very much for your help and patience.
Karine- Karine,
You're welcome and thanks for the feedback.
John