Forum Discussion
Does New Outlook require a separate desktop license for each email address?
- Feb 29, 2024Sorry for the confusion here JanetVanPelt. I will follow up with these support agents to correct this mistake. The article is correct. And since you are on a Mac, you can reference this one which says the same thing from Mac. You'll find it by clicking the Learn More link in that dialog box you shared. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/how-licensing-and-access-works-in-outlook-for-mac-13365c6c-7d94-4546-ad53-d92ee9e0ffa4
If you are still seeing that error, it is because you are on an older build of Outlook for Mac. Please update to 16.82.120.0 or greater.
AllenFilush We have two tenants because of unique security requirements our organization has. We're fully licensed in our primary tenant with Apps for enterprise and E1/E2's (We're non-profit so we still have legacy E2's). Our secondary tenant is licensed with E1/E2's and none of the secondary tenant mailboxes work with the new Outlook unless we add a license that has Apps for Business or Apps for enterprise included. We get the "invalid license" message when trying to add a mailbox from our secondary tenant.
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/outlook-blog/how-licensing-works-for-work-and-school-accounts-in-the-new/ba-p/4047361
- CoorzmanApr 19, 2024Copper Contributor
AllenFilush Yes, that's how it should work, but it's not the behavior we're seeing as to why I'm posting here. The issue we found is there is a flag on the outlook mailbox "OneWinNativeOutlookEnabled" that is disabled on our secondary tenant mailboxes. If I manually enable that it works. Any new mailbox still has that option disabled. Adding an Apps for enterprise license changes that option to enabled. So the problem is that the mailboxes actually have the option turned off by default unless the Apps for business/enterprise license is added.
So for us it doesn't matter the order the accounts are added, the option is disabled by default to support the new Outlook.