Forum Discussion
In defence of modern attachments... suggestions?
Hi Paul.
Unfortunately I have no good arguments in favor of the default behavior of Outlook 2016, for the simple reason that there are no good arguments to defend a wrong choice.
Sure, if you want indeed to send a "cloudy attachment", and you know exactly what you are doing, having such possibility is a great plus.
But, as VasilMichev says, the bare minimum would have been to give us an option to set the default type of the link.
In the meanwhile, I have been forced to revert all my customers to the previous behavior, when possible...
Thanks VasilMichev, thanks Salvatore Biscari. I agree with you both regarding the fact that organisations cannot change the default behaviour of Outlook attachments. I can make a defence of modern attachments, I can even argue that they should be by default, but the fact that we don't have the choice is just wrong.
In case it is of interest the defence I came up with is attached. Classic attachment ;)