Forum Discussion
Re: Allow muting a person only for me
AdamZovits ok, then wouldn't a compromise be cool?
<= 10 people per call: mixing client side;
>10: mixing server side;
Maybe there's even a sweet spot where the removal of extra calculation server side is worth adding the bandwidth.
Also, Microsoft could make the mixing client side optional - with its opt-in buried in some sub menu - then only people annoyed by it will use it and it'll hopefully barely scratch the performance...
4 Replies
- Of course it would be cool, but as long as there are so few people (275 as I write this) interested in such a solution, one should not get their hopes up. It'd be better to look for alternative solutions (as offered in this thread) or drum up more support for https://feedbackportal.microsoft.com/feedback/idea/972be416-4fbe-ed11-83ff-000d3a1f8608
- There's a high bar for people who have this problem to support this feature request - people have to come here, sign in, choose a username etc. Just had exactly this issue, fumbled through a teams meeting with my mouse on the volume slider dragging it up and down as someone nearby was talking vs. people elsewhere. Not cool 😞
- I agree - probably a lot of people who need this feature that don't have time in their day to figure out how to post here or follow this thread. Discord has had this capability for many years now. Why is Teams so far behind?
