Forum Discussion
Excluding Guest accounts in the General channel
- Jul 07, 2020
Hi maenardm2020 ,
This was a big thing for many and certainly one that Slack users had come to just expect.
This is where Private Channels come in. So this would give you the ability and is defined when creating a channel, to basically just permission a channel separate to that of a Team.
So I think this, short of a different Team or perhaps the Private 1:1 and Group Chat may serve your purposes better, is the feature you are looking for?However and forgive me as I haven't checked this in a while, but I believe for you to add Guests to a private channel, they would still ultimately need to be a member of the Team that the private channel sits within.
So for me I utilised a Team called Partners as an example, the general channel became a way of us notifying partners/guests broadly (they were not allowed to contribute) and then there was a specific private channel per partner.
Let me know if that doesn't answer your question and I will look further.Thanks
Henry
Thanks a lot. HenryPhillipsNimbitech
Yes, that's another option I am considering, which I am glad you confirmed. Though, I also read in some of the posts that email addresses of the team users are also visible, which may not sit well with our customers. This is why i am considering separate team for each account, albeit cumbersome. Or simply stick with Slack just because of this one, major limitation.
Hi maenardm2020 ,
I hear you. It is also worth mentioning about the Teams User Voice if you are not aware. So I would raise it there too or up vote an existing entry if it fits your same need, as you will not be alone in your thoughts. It can be accessed here: https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public
On the cumbersome bit, if there is a large volume of Teams needing to be created, there are many more automated ways of provisioning Teams. Or if say they all need to follow a similar set of Channels as an example, even from within the Teams client you can create a Team based on another Team.
Or more on the automated side, you can make use of Templates or even PowerShell scripts to get a Team easily provisioned with minimal effort. Or do your own custom app utilising the MS Graph.
There are other benefits to having a completely separate Team too, such as the file side of things, so like a private channel, each Team has its own site collection. Whereas stacking channels on top of one another, essentially SharePoint wise, that is just another folder in the same library. So this may not be an issue but even if you could stop channel interaction, you are not doing much separation file wise behind the scenes. Just worth noting.
Thanks
Henry
- maenardm2020Jul 07, 2020Copper Contributor
Hahaha, you are start to convince mo to stick with MS Team, HenryPhillipsNimbitech
It's working!
Yes, will certainly consider your last message.
Thanks again!