Forum Discussion
Shihab Azimullah
Nov 05, 2019Copper Contributor
Direct Routing SBC failover planning in carrier hosted setup (derived trunk model)
Hi, I am trying to setup Teams Direct Routing in our network using the hosted carrier model using two SBCs which are in active/active setup for outbound and inbound calls. I haven't begun any con...
- Jul 07, 2020
For hosting provider failover routing, the hosting provider will need to configure multiple PSTN gateways in their tenant. For example:
- sbc1.contoso.com
- sbc2.contoso.com
This will require multiple wildcard san names to support each namespace. For example:
- *.sbc1.contoso.com
- *.sbc2.contoso.com
Each customer will be provide two FQDN's to be added to Tenant domain and a single user licensed for SfB Online in the namespace to create the domain in the service forest. For example:
- cust1.sbc1.contoso.com
- cust2.sbc1.contoso.com
Then a route will be created for each of these gateways.
Carolyn Blanding (MS TEAMS)
Microsoft
VoipGuyUK
Jul 07, 2020Copper Contributor
The failover section does not cover it full I think and is missing things.
The doc shows base domain of:
customers.adatum.biz
Yet for failover the domain has swapped to that of the customer:
customer1.sbc1.contoso.com
customer1.sbc2.contoso.com
The is no explanation of what is going on. Does the carrier domain stay the same, it would suggest not by that example? Do you need 2x carrier domains as sbc1.contoso.com & sbc2.contoso.com or a single contoso.com. Why is it now the customers domain, are derived trunks not used for failover and its back to the old method?
The doc shows base domain of:
customers.adatum.biz
Yet for failover the domain has swapped to that of the customer:
customer1.sbc1.contoso.com
customer1.sbc2.contoso.com
The is no explanation of what is going on. Does the carrier domain stay the same, it would suggest not by that example? Do you need 2x carrier domains as sbc1.contoso.com & sbc2.contoso.com or a single contoso.com. Why is it now the customers domain, are derived trunks not used for failover and its back to the old method?