Forum Discussion
Advanced Threat Protection Looking for Reviews
Thanks David. I also think that with the spoof intelligence feature and low false positive quarantine feature I read in another posts, ATP has improved from beginning of last year.
There is another solution Mimecast that i am evaluating and i find it superior but the cost is also higher (3.5x) compared with Microsoft ATP. I also wondering if having another vendor solution in the middle would make us be hybrid and not officially supported by Microsoft if we ever face an issue with e-mails.
ATP has worked pretty well for us. We added it mostly to combat zero-day malware and ransomware, which has been effective (no ransomware since enabled). I don't think ATP does anything for other spam or junkmail though. It is just a sandbox service that detects (and removes) malicious attachments / weaponized documents, etc.
- We activated the trial for ATP. We targeted some accounts that have been repeat offenders and then our accounts too. So far no issues. I have noticed my junk mail has dropped considerably. I typically would have 10 - 15 messages in my junk folder each day and since implementing ATP on Tuesday or Wednesday this week, that number is more like 2 - 3 a day. Have not checked logs to see if it is filtering or archiving more messages, but so far liking what I am seeing.
JohnWhat about E-mail delays? Have you tested average time with ATP with safe attachments ON?
How does the Safe link feature works for you? now that Microsoft rewrites the links and you cannot hover over to see what it is?
Thanks,
Javier
Javier,
We have not tested average time with ATP set up. I know I have noticed there is a slight delay, but I would say no more than a minute or two extra. As you mentioned, it does change the URL in email messages to a Microsoft site. No issues with that process either.
Sorry, I was away from forums for a bit and catching up....
John
