Forum Discussion
Confusion Regarding Filter Precedence
App Deployment/Packaging Here's the scenario I'm facing (VPP app): Group A (Required Assignment): Users: Identical to Group B. Filter: Include only corporate iPhones. Purpose: Auto...
I'm running into the exact same issue. I have some applications that I want available to anyone to install, but I also have devices that are used for specific projects where the expected behavior is that these apps are automatically installed (required). I have a filter in place on the required assignment but the apps are also installing onto the users' BYOD device, not jus the project device. I feel like this kind of defeats the purpose of the filter.
BillerDude , did you ever figure this out?
Having the same issue outlined above and same use case
App must install as required to Corp devices
Available for All User to install if they want on Personal devices
Have Dynamic Groups of users for our Company that has all the Permanent employees.
App is assigned as required to this group with Device Filter - Corporate Devices only
- Filter: (device.deviceOwnership -eq "Corporate")
- Evaluation result: Not evaluated due to a conflicting assignment without filters.
Then apps is assigned as Available to 'All Users' with no filter.
