Forum Discussion
Accept & Do Not Send a Response
Hi Calendar Community,
We'd like your feedback & reactions to a change we're considering:
Current experience:
When attendees receive a meeting invite, they are provided with 3 response options:
The first two options (Edit the response before sending & Send the response now) both send an email to the organizer, and the attendee's response is recorded in the organizer's tracking list.
The third option (Do not send a response) does not notify organizer, so the attendee's response remains as "None" in the organizer's tracking list.
What we'd like to change:
Many users report that they expect Do not send a response to be recorded in the organizer's tracking list, but just not to send an email. We are considering updating the behavior so that all 3 response options are recorded in the organizer's tracking list. Attendees can still use the Do not send a response option to avoid sending email to the organizer, but their response would now be recorded & shared with organizer.
Questions to the Community:
- Do you like this change? Does this match what you & others are expecting?
- What about when an organizer does not request responses (so there is just a simple Accept button without additional options)? Do you think the intention is to avoid email responses? In other words, would you expect this same behavior (responses are always recorded) to apply even when organizer does not request responses?
What's the status of this change to allow for tracking the response if the user selects "Accept Do Not Send a response"?
Thank you - Jack
308 Replies
- MrNicGCopper Contributor
Someone brought up the topic of when you would want to accept but not have your attendance registered, and that is something I used to think of when I would accept and not send the response. The idea was that I would be adding it to my calendar for awareness but would not want to be considered as acknowledging that I would be there to represent my team. (On a change control, for example). Now I just use Tentative for that. I think if the invitee's response is always going to be registered with the organizer, then Accept/Tentative/Decline is all that anyone would need and the default should be to not send an email reply.
- John_RedingtonCopper Contributor
As this thread was started in 2018 and numerous users have provided feedback, has a decision been made? I know that not knowing if a user has accepted a meeting has caused friction between managers and personnel and if a decision can be made one way or the other so that it can be communicated out, would be helpful.
- mblazewiczCopper Contributor
- JimBluntBrass Contributor
1. Undoubtedly Yes. I have come across several upper-level Executive Assistants and Admins that don't understand why this option doesn't tally in their tracking results and what I'm going to do to fix the issue. Since I can't rewrite Microsoft code, my only response to date has been that the end-user will need to re-accept the meeting invitation and choose to send some kind of a response.
2. Yes and Yes. If the organizer is simply organizing a meeting with no options to change the time and doesn't require a response from the invitee, I think they are still going to want to know who is attending and who isn't. Primarily in larger organizations, this is a great way to cut down on the amount of e-mail received and that the organizer has to deal with.
- brandonaCopper ContributorYes; I like the change, it matches what I thought/expected to happen, and Yes, I think the intention when someone does not request responses is to avoid unnecessary emails
- MrMattCopper Contributor
Julia Foran responses always recorded so we dont have extra emails.
- hiren_vadhiyaCopper Contributor
Hi Julia Foran ,
Do we have any update on the above change? Its really helpful to see the tracking whether requester accepted the meeting or not.
thank you in advance.
- stephen_b78Iron Contributor
Julia Foran this is how I always assumed it worked and have never checked. Why would it operate any differently? This should not be a question to the community but implemented as it is a design flaw. This post was raised 18 months ago and still nothing has changed, even though it has received a lot of attention??? Currently there has been 47.1k people to view the post, so if that doesn't tell you that people had to google it to find out why the "Accept but Do Not Send a Response" did not work as expected, then nothing will.
Furthermore, if I don't click either accept option then the invite stays in your calendar anyway as tentative, unless you decline or delete the event.
- Outlook1958Tin Contributor
- mc422Copper Contributor
Yes and yes. Organizer's calendar should be updated with the response. At work, we thought it was a bug with our office 365 upgrade . Didn't know this was default behavior. Never noticed it in old Outlook.