Forum Discussion

MasPAN74's avatar
MasPAN74
Brass Contributor
Aug 18, 2025
Solved

Exchange 2016 Maximum number of recipients in a message that's sent by the specific sender

 

Hello,

 

I want to know if the RecipientLimits value on a mailbox can override the MaxRecipientEnvelopeLimit.

 

For example, if I set the MaxRecipientEnvelopeLimit to 50 to limit all organization mailboxes to a maximum of 50 recipients, and then I set the RecipientLimits of a specific mailbox, let’s say user10@mylab.local, to unlimited.

 

Can user10 send an email with 100 recipients or not?

  • In Exchange 2016, the RecipientLimits property on a mailbox takes precedence over the organization-wide MaxRecipientEnvelopeLimit. That means if you set the global MaxRecipientEnvelopeLimit to 50 but configure a specific mailbox (e.g., user10@mylab.local
    ) with RecipientLimits set to Unlimited, that mailbox can bypass the organizational limit. In your example, user10 would indeed be able to send a message to 100 recipients, since the mailbox-specific RecipientLimits overrides the global setting.

6 Replies

  • Russean's avatar
    Russean
    Iron Contributor

    Yes, the RecipientLimits set on a specific mailbox overrides the organization, wide MaxRecipientEnvelopeLimit. So if you set the global limit to 50 but configure user10 with Recipient Limits = Unlimited, that user can send a message to 100 recipients.

  • Russean's avatar
    Russean
    Iron Contributor

    In Exchange 2016, the RecipientLimits property on a mailbox takes precedence over the organization-wide MaxRecipientEnvelopeLimit. That means if you set the global MaxRecipientEnvelopeLimit to 50 but configure a specific mailbox (e.g., user10@mylab.local
    ) with RecipientLimits set to Unlimited, that mailbox can bypass the organizational limit. In your example, user10 would indeed be able to send a message to 100 recipients, since the mailbox-specific RecipientLimits overrides the global setting.

    • Dan_Snape's avatar
      Dan_Snape
      Iron Contributor

      As per the Microsoft documentation, that's not correct if the RecipientLimit is set to Unlimited. Please see the link in my previous post.

  • Dan_Snape's avatar
    Dan_Snape
    Iron Contributor

    This Microsoft Learn page says: If the mailbox level RecipientLimits is set to unlimited (the default value), then the maximum number of recipients per message for the mailbox is controlled by the Transport level MaxRecipientEnvelopeLimit.

    • MasPAN74's avatar
      MasPAN74
      Brass Contributor

      Hello Dan_Snape​ 

      You are right, when I set the "RecipientLimit" to 80 for user01, I was able to bypass the "MaxRecipientEnvelopeLimit" during my tests.

Resources