Forum Discussion
SUM PRODUCT - Multiple Critera Failing at Last Arguement
This formula
=SUMPRODUCT( (HX!DV2:DV66410 = "-") * (--HX!Q2:Q66410 = 735) * ( ( (--HX!P2:P66410 = 90327) + (--HX!P2:P66410 = 91142) + (--HX!P2:P66410 = 99327) > 0 ) ) * ( ( (--HX!DL2:DL66410 = 5500) + (--HX!DL2:DL66410 = 5500) + (--HX!DL2:DL66410 = 5500) + (--HX!DL2:DL66410 = 5500) > 0 ) ) * HX!BC2:BC66410 )
returns some result, but here are not exactly the same column as in sample. In general
- you need to define which columns to use. If they could be in different positions it's better select columns based on headers in first row
- Do you have numbers, or texts which looks like numbers, or any other text like "-", or combination of texts and numbers in columns
Depends on above formula could be modified to make it more universal.
Perhaps you mean something like
=SUM( SUMPRODUCT( (HX!DV2:DV63590 = 18)* (HX!Q2:Q63590 = "0735")* ( (--HX!P2:P63590 = 94001) + (--HX!P2:P63590 = 91142) + (--HX!P2:P63590 = 94004) ) * ( (HX!EN2:EN63590 = "5500") + (HX!EO2:EO63590 = "5500") + (HX!EP2:EP63590 = "5500") + (HX!EQ2:EQ63590 = "5500") ) * --HX!BC2:BC63590 ) )
In any case you need to start from the second row and check where are numbers and where are texts which looks like numbers.
Your sample file has no HX sheet and I'm not sure columns in Sheet1 are mapped on ones used in formula. Thus above is just my guess.
- ReginaAnnCopper Contributor
Thank you for your prompt response.
I apologize for not including the correct sheet name in the previous file. I have now updated the file to reflect the correct sheet name, which is HX, and the formulas are adjusted accordingly. I applied your formula to the Formula Test tab; however, it returns zero, which does not match the expected result. According to the sample data, the correct result should be -6,662.62. Additionally, I have tried another formula, which is also returning zero which is labeled Regina.
Could you please provide further assistance to resolve this issue? Any additional guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your help.
Best regards,
Regina
- JoeUser2004Bronze Contributor
As Excel shows us (in my version), you have an extra right-parenthesis at the end. Also, the use of SUM and SUMPRODUCT is redundant. Choose one of the following:
=SUM((HX!DV1:DV63590 = 18) * (HX!Q1:Q63590 = "0735") * ((HX!P1:P63590 = 94001) + (HX!P1:P63590 = 91142) + (HX!P1:P63590 = 94004)) * ((HX!EN1:EN63590 = "5500") + (HX!EO1:EO63590 = "5500") + (HX!EP1:EP63590 = "5500") + (HX!EQ1:EQ63590 = "5500")) * HX!BC1:BC63590)
or
=SUMPRODUCT((HX!DV1:DV63590 = 18) * (HX!Q1:Q63590 = "0735") * ((HX!P1:P63590 = 94001) + (HX!P1:P63590 = 91142) + (HX!P1:P63590 = 94004)) * ((HX!EN1:EN63590 = "5500") + (HX!EO1:EO63590 = "5500") + (HX!EP1:EP63590 = "5500") + (HX!EQ1:EQ63590 = "5500")) * HX!BC1:BC63590)
The SUM version works in versions of Excel that are dynamic-array aware.
The SUMPRODUCT version works in all versions of Excel.
I don't know why you provided the Excel data file. If you want help with debugging your logic, you need to provide a file with data in the appropriate columns. And you should highlight rows where you expect the logic to be true. I don't see any column with 18 in the highlighted rows in your file.
- ReginaAnnCopper Contributor
Thank you for your help.
I apologize for not including the correct sheet name in the previous file. I have now updated the file to reflect the correct sheet name, which is HS, and the formulas are adjusted accordingly. I applied your formula to the Formula Test tab; however, it returns #value, which does not match the expected result. According to the sample data, the correct result should be -6,662.62. Additionally, I have tried another formula, which is also returning zero.
Could you please provide further assistance to resolve this issue? Any additional guidance or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your help.
Best regards,
Regina- JoeUser2004Bronze Contributor
1. With your version of my formula, the #VALUE error is because the ranges start with row 1 instead of row 2. Since row 1 contains column titles, "* HX!BC1" at the end produces an error. Change all ranges to 2:63590, as they were originally.
ERRATA.... I see that you used the range 1:63590 orginally, and I copied the error. Sergei corrected the range to 2:63590, and I had not seen his posting while I was writing mine.
2. Your formulas return zero because the sample data is (again) not in the columns referenced by the formulas. For example, DV2:DV63590 is empty.
3. I still do not see 18 in any column, much less a highlighted row. So none of the conditions DV2:DV63590=18 would be TRUE, even if we assume one of the bogus columns should be column DV.
ERRATA.... I see now that E41 does indeed have the number 18 (and it is numeric, not text). I don't know how I missed that when I used ctrl+f (Find). No matter! If I assume that column E should be DV, HX!Q2:Q63590 = "0735" is FALSE for all rows because column Q is now empty. Bottom line: Provide an Excel file with all of the data in the correct locations.
4. FYI, there is no need to array-enter the SUMPRODUCT formula. OTOH, I'm not sure you did. That might simply be the way the formula in your version of Excel was interpreted in my older version of Excel (2010).