Forum Discussion
Dynamic Array formula not backward compatible
- Feb 10, 2019
Unless I am getting myself confused, it is backward compatibility that is enabled by the SINGLE that inserts implicit intersection into the process, as was always the case for the traditional Excel calculation. Forward compatibility in which old versions are expected to emulate dynamic arrays will be more of an issue.
Mind you, I seem to be the only person on the planet who consistently used named formulae to bypass the Excel's implicit intersection trick and allow me to perform many array calculations without CSE. They work equally well as traditional or new dynamic arrays.
IMHO, there is no backward compatibility from using of these 6 or so functions point of view, you may see only result.
- PeterBartholomew1Feb 08, 2019Silver Contributor
Compatibility works in the other direction. Anything your colleague does should be usable by you, even if the occasional 'SINGLE' has been inserted, but past versions cannot be expected to emulate functionality they do not possess.
- BrianGGGFeb 08, 2019Copper Contributor
Yes, I guess it makes sense that previous versions would not have access to the new functionality.
This is just, for lack of a better term, a huge bummer. What this means is that I (with my Insider Edition) can not pass on any spreadsheets with the new formulas to my colleagues (who have regular 365).
Very limiting until 365 gets the new array functions...
BrianGGG
- PrologysDec 27, 2019Copper ContributorI have the same issue but I think there is a solution to this. I just did a small test by using Office 365 Excel Online version and that worked. The office version I used is from my customer and that even translated the Unique formula into a German one. I tried to also use textjoin and that also got translated as a formula.
Try it.
Kind regards,
Jaap
- SergeiBaklanFeb 08, 2019Diamond Contributor
Not sure I catch that. Yes, compatibility in other direction works fine, in modern Excel appears SINGLE but formulas works. Backward compatibility is the question, it doesn't work. At least not always. Even if you don't use new functions of the modern Excel.
- PeterBartholomew1Feb 10, 2019Silver Contributor
Unless I am getting myself confused, it is backward compatibility that is enabled by the SINGLE that inserts implicit intersection into the process, as was always the case for the traditional Excel calculation. Forward compatibility in which old versions are expected to emulate dynamic arrays will be more of an issue.
Mind you, I seem to be the only person on the planet who consistently used named formulae to bypass the Excel's implicit intersection trick and allow me to perform many array calculations without CSE. They work equally well as traditional or new dynamic arrays.