Forum Discussion
Cell Format within ABCD
If I understand correctly, you want to rate A B C D see the value of X; if there is a string between X, you check Y, then Z.
That is correct. but I forgot to explain something, I have explained below.
How many groups (A B C ...) do you have in general? 4? Or they can be 10, 200, 5000?
Only 4 at least and 8 at most in 1 group. 3 at least but rare.
I created something you need to check.
Thank you and appreciated it.
Try changing the value in the green cell, and check the red (do not change the red cell!). Is that the right way to check the position?
Ok. Yes, that's the way to check the position but there's a little more explanations that I have not described in the exact way that is, To get the real position between A, B, C, D, first need to refer to the most X, secondly refer Y most and third refer Z at least . This is because X is the amount of points collected for the entire game of example between A and B who won the game will earn 1 point, followed by Y is the highest total winning points for each game set (example) 1 to 5 set who is first, while Z is the total of lost point. This means the total number of points Y (needs a lot) and total points Z (need to be less) to determine who is eligible for a position between 1 to 4 (if 1 group has 4).
In the end, you should hide the columns F to J (so you will not see calc).
Ok.
I have attach the another schedule with a difference amounts and example if amount in the red pentagon is less than another should be winner. But If amount in green pentagon are same also the last refer is what i call (head to head) that is very rare due to need check current match between B and D who's win the game should be winner (example) in green pentagon between B and D, D are win the current match and the position is No 1.
I hope you can help me about this. I very appreciated what you have did for me.
Thanks,
Regards,
Uncle Rich...
I understood.
By switching the ranking order of Z values (adding ";1") you give to values the opposite valor (less means better).
Then, in case of a tie, you have to check who is the direct-winner, right?
I'm not getting how some matches are not symmetric (A vs C is 1x 2y 0z and C vs A is 0x 1y 2z; I thought it should be 0x 0y 2x aka simply switching y and z -I ignore x that is the final result win/lose-).
I'm attaching a newer version with tons of calcs that I'm not able to explain in details.
Column AA to AD check if there are some ties.
Column AE to AM are a table with multiple entries that states who won against who and meanwhile count all ties between first place, second, third etcetera.
Column AN to AS assign to each Team (A B C D E F G H) its appropriate opposite in the tie breaker. ATTENTION: you must name the teams with A to H, and this is not working if there are more than 2 teams in a tie (let's say A, B and F are all 1x 2y 0z). This 3+ ties results in #N/D! Error in the table (col U, "POS").
Column AU to BD assigns points to a team IF it won against its opposer Team in the tie.
Column BE sums these points and BF create the specular (needed to rank). Column BG add these values to the rankings summed before (before applying tie-breaks).
BH is now "Rank of Totals" with all Tie Breaks applied.
Hide from W to BH for a better output ;)