Forum Discussion
ODBC tables connection problem since 16.0.15831.20216
- Jan 16, 2023
Hi Gontran,
The problem and potential workarounds are documented in our bug tracking blog.
Servus
Karl
****************
Access Bug Trackers
Access News
Access DevCon
We have the same issue in all of our customer installations running any version above 15831.20208
We are reverting all our customers to version 15831.20208 in order to be able work.
We hope this major issue will be fixed soon in a new version.
- Jan 19, 2023
Hi,
> We hope this major issue will be fixed soon in a new version.
A fix is planned for next week. I have updated the already mentioned doc article.
Servus
Karl
****************
Access Bug Trackers
Access News
Access DevCon- Jan 26, 2023
Hi,
The new version 2301 (Build 16026.20146) released in the Current Channel today, should provide a fix for this bug. Please report if it worked for you.
It can take a few days to roll out new versions. Those affected by the bug can actively request it with Update Now.
I will also report on the effects or side effects in my documentation article.
Servus
Karl
****************
Access Bug Trackers
Access News
Access DevCon- ndarrasJan 29, 2023Copper ContributorGood to know this is fixed.
As Tom_van_Stiphout suggested, we are moving our clients to the semi-annual channel, so I have not tested if the new version works for us. If we have any further issues, I will let you know.
Thank you for letting us know Karl.
- nikos_dJan 19, 2023Copper ContributorThanks Karl
- GontranHarveyJan 19, 2023Brass ContributorMe I'm lucky because I'm using the same codeDB for all my connections for all my clients, so I only had to change one line of code Replace("MyRemoteTableName","dbo.","") and that's it. Should be a good Insight for people who like to copy code.
Again Karl, thank for your work on that.
- Tom_van_StiphoutJan 19, 2023Steel ContributorWhile you're reverting: also switch away from Current Channel. Way to aggressive in most business situations.
- nikos_dJan 19, 2023Copper ContributorIn our case, this is not feasible, because our MSAccess Application customers are using whatever Office version they have already purchased.
- Tom_van_StiphoutJan 20, 2023Steel ContributorThe channel has nothing to do with the version.
While clients make the final decision, you can advise them, and tell them if they don't want to be on the bleeding edge, they should revert to Semi-Annual Enterprise channel. Let others deal with the bugs!
- GontranHarveyJan 19, 2023Brass ContributorHere all you need :
https://www.accessforever.org/post/naming-of-linked-sql-server-tables-is-inconsistent- nikos_dJan 19, 2023Copper ContributorThank you for the link. Good to know that it will be fixed soon.