Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Group Calendar Web Part Pop Up Color
We have created a branding theme for modern sharepoint sites to match corporate colors. When clinking on a Group Calendar event, the pop up now applies a background color we didn't have in the theme as primary or secondary. Just seems to be auto selected by SP. It's too dark to read the text. I've found the Them in the classic _catalog Theme Gallery and can pull the theme into NotePad to read it but can't seem to tell which variable controls the background of pop ups. Just need it to be white (ffffff). Anyone have a solution? {"name":"(Company Theme Name)","isInverted":false,"palette":{"themeDarker":"#243360","themePrimary":"#17244C","themeSecondary":"#5e6d9b","themeTertiary":"#7885af","themeLight":"#94a0c2","themeLighter":"#b3bcd6","themeLighterAlt":"#d6dbea","black":"#000000","neutralDark":"#201f1e","neutralPrimary":"#323130","neutralPrimaryAlt":"#3b3a39","neutralSecondary":"#605e5c","neutralTertiary":"#a19f9d","neutralTertiaryAlt":"#c8c8c8","neutralLight":"#eaeaea","neutralLighter":"#f4f4f4","neutralLighterAlt":"#f8f8f8","white":"#ffffff","neutralQuaternaryAlt":"#dadada","neutralQuaternary":"#d0d0d0"},"displayMode":"light","secondaryColors":{"light":[{"themePrimary":"#ffffff","backgroundColor":"#17244C"},{"themePrimary":"#6BC289"},{"themePrimary":"#ffffff","backgroundColor":"#6BC289"},{"themePrimary":"#26A9E1"},{"themePrimary":"#ffffff","backgroundColor":"#26A9E1"},{"themePrimary":"#1B75BC"},{"themePrimary":"#ffffff","backgroundColor":"#1B75BC"},{"themePrimary":"#E7EBF6"},{"themePrimary":"#ffffff","backgroundColor":"#E7EBF6"},{"themePrimary":"#ACBFE3"},{"themePrimary":"#ffffff","backgroundColor":"#ACBFE3"},{"themePrimary":"#B6BBBF"},{"themePrimary":"#ffffff","backgroundColor":"#B6BBBF"}],"dark":[]}}
Size increase of .sppkg packages with heft/v1.22
After upgrading our solution to SPFx 1.22.rc-0 and switching to the new heft build toolchain our .sppkg packages have suddenly grown massively in size. They are more than double the size of the 1.21 version. Is there a reason for this? Is there anything we can do to reduce the package size back to what it was previously? Our main solution contains both web parts and list extensions, split into several bundles. Let me know what other details would be helpful.
Is Creating Multiple ClientContext Instances Efficient in CSOM for one Site Url?
Is it efficient to create a new ClientContext for each site URL and for each query, such as getting site users, lists, groups, and group members from the Web object? These queries can return a very large number of items, and CSOM does not support paging when retrieving data from Web properties. Because of this, there is a risk of memory issues. In this case, is creating multiple ClientContext objects a good approach? Also, how does ClientContext work internally, and how does it handle memory and performance?
any possible to extend client ID and secret for app registered in SharePoint Online
Hi Team, is there any possible to extend client ID and secret for app registered in SharePoint Online? right now, we are not allowed to create any new app registration from SharePoint Online, only way is from Azure AD - App registration. how about the client ID and secret getting expired which is created earlier using SharePoint Online? is there any way like powershell script something to extend the validity of Client ID and secret for app registered in SharePoint Online? if yes, please share the detailed instructions and guidelines to perform. if no, then what is the possible way for next step of actions to do? you can reachout to me - mailto:email address removed for privacy reasons for further discussion about this issue. Thanks for the help!Show Access and Confidentiality Message to External Users in a SharePoint Document Library
Is it possible to display the following text inside a SharePoint document library page so that it’s visible to external users when they open the shared link? Text to Display: Access and Use Access is restricted to authorized representatives and internal personnel. Users must not share their login credentials or grant access to any third party. Uploaded and downloaded documents must relate solely to the agreed scope of work Disclaimer Use of this site constitutes acceptance of these terms. Access may be suspended or restricted if security, confidentiality, or compliance risks are identified. Goal: I want this text to be clearly visible to external parties (for example, when they open a document library link to upload or view files).
Sharepoint SitePage
Using Graph API . I want to access a specific Sitepage , I need to know the Sitepageid, based on /pages it will return all Page id within the Site, Is there a way to get the Sitepage id directtly based on the Sitepage name.aspx ? I want to detect files changes on that Sitepage and be able to downlaod the files from the sitepage ? How can we do that using Graph API I know we can detect files changed at the drive level within a site. I am looking for Sitepage can we do the same ?what API can be used ?Repository structure and CI/CD pipeline for SPFx WebParts
I am currently developing SPFx WebParts for a single SharePoint site. In our development repository, I have: A shared SPFx library Six separate WebParts, each in its own solution, organized as follows: library webparts webpart1 webpart2 webpart3 ... At the moment, on Azure DevOps, everything is managed in a single repository. To build and deploy a WebPart, I check Git for changes, build the WebPart, and then deploy it. I am considering whether, for the CI/CD pipeline, it might be more efficient to adopt a separate repository for each WebPart, allowing independent pipelines for each solution. In this scenario, I have two main questions: Is it considered a best practice to separate WebParts into distinct repositories? How should the shared SPFx library be managed in this case? I assume it would need a separate repository, but I would like guidance on the best way to integrate it with the WebParts. Thank you for your support.Having issues with SPFx isolation build lately
Hello We have a customer using an isolation version of our product and when we built a new version last week, it stopped working with below error. Unfortunately, once we install the new build, replacing with the older ones that used to work stopped working and showing the same error. "authorize:90 Unsafe attempt to initiate navigation for frame with origin 'https://xxxx.sharepoint.com' from frame with URL 'https://login.microsoftonline.com/..........'. The frame attempting navigation of the top-level window is sandboxed, but the flag of 'allow-top-navigation' or 'allow-top-navigation-by-user-activation' is not set" We would really appreciate how to handle these errors. Thanks Vijay
Accessing endpoints published to Entra Application Proxy from SPFx
We have an on-premises web service (hosted in IIS) published through Entra Application Proxy. When attempting to access the published endpoints from a SharePoint (SPFx) web part, we encounter CORS errors (302 Found). Accessing these endpoints directly from a browser address bar works as expected. In IIS, the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header is set to * (wildcard). We have also tried specifying a particular domain, but that did not resolve the issue. Pre-authentication is enabled in Entra Application Proxy. Has anyone successfully connected to endpoints behind Entra Application Proxy from an SPFx web part? Any insights or solutions would be greatly appreciated.
