Blog Post

Viva Insights Blog
1 MIN READ

Research Proves Your Brain Needs Breaks

VI_Migration's avatar
VI_Migration
Silver Contributor
Sep 27, 2021

For many people, back-to-back video meetings are a hallmark of the pandemic era. One conversation ends, another begins, and too often there’s no chance to stretch, pour a glass of water, or just clear your head.

In our latest study of brain wave activity, researchers confirmed what many people sense from experience: Back-to-back virtual meetings are stressful. But the research also points to a simple remedy—short breaks.

“Our research shows breaks are important, not just to make us less exhausted by the end of the day, but to actually improve our ability to focus and engage while in those meetings,” says Michael Bohan, senior director of Microsoft’s Human Factors Engineering group, who oversaw the project.



Settings in Microsoft Outlook make it easier and automatic to carve out these essential breaks between back-to-backs—and because we know that one size does not fit all, companies have two options. Individuals can set scheduling defaults that automatically shorten meetings they schedule. And now customers have the ability to set organization-wide scheduling defaults that shorten meetings and create space for breaks for everyone at the company.

“The back-to-back meetings that have become the norm over the last 12 months just aren’t sustainable,” says Jared Spataro, CVP, Microsoft 365. “Outlook and Microsoft Teams are used by millions of people around the world, and this small change can help customers develop new cultural norms and improve wellbeing for everyone.”

Read more here

This article originally appeared in Microsoft Workplace Insights

Published Sep 27, 2021
Version 1.0
  • VI_Migration's avatar
    VI_Migration
    Silver Contributor

    VI_Migration , great call out - I really enjoyed this article. I started leaning into some more of the MyAnalytics recommendations after reading it back in the day, including adding in focus time and lunch time slots.  

  • VI_Migration's avatar
    VI_Migration
    Silver Contributor

    VI_Migration VI_Migration VI_Migration  This is a neat article. 

    The things that come to mind -- the more things you work on, the more meetings you have re:those things, and this starts to operationalize the impact of multitasking. While it's not working on different things at the same time, the bucket of stress that come with multiple objectives is not just a function of those objectives, but the multiplicative stress added as friction between their meetings. 2 objectives=3 stress, 2 for each objective, one for the friction. 3 objectives = 5 stress. 5 objectives = 9 stress, 5 objectives + 4 friction points.