Ilya Bukshteyn - in response to question from Deleted above (specifically about MTR vs. Surface Hub experience for wireless sharing) you mention that Surface Hub and Microsoft Teams Rooms (MTR) are completely different devices and user-experience. Is the intention that these devices will continue to be divergent in the UX, or will they be consolidated in time? (say with Surface Hub 2S)
I'm hoping that the Hub will just be a flagship device from Microsoft to accomodate Teams-based meeting spaces, but that the user experience (and IT administration) will be similar if not nearly identical - aside from MTRs not currently having touch-screens and stylus for whiteboarding experiences.
Is that part of the MTR roadmap, to support devices (televisions or large displays, not just the console) that have touch capabilities and stylus? I'm thinking of approved Microsoft Windows Collaboration Displays (WCD) such as Avocor. https://www.avocor.com/global/products/windows-collaboration-display/
It has all the right hardware, just needs to be configured as such (similar to Surface Hub) that users can walk up and touch "Join Meeting" or start a call, all customizations of the boot-up and kiosk-esque startup screen, as it doesn't/shouldn't require an individual to logon to use the device.
Could this or other Microsoft WCD-class devices be configured as such and qualified as a supported Microsoft Teams Room device?