Blog Post

Microsoft Mission Critical Blog
16 MIN READ

Preparing for Azure PostgreSQL Certificate Authority Rotation: A Comprehensive Operational Guide

AndreasSemmelmann's avatar
Dec 15, 2025

The Challenge

It started with a standard notification in the Azure Portal: Tracking-ID YK3N-7RZ. A routine Certificate Authority (CA) rotation for Azure Database for PostgreSQL.

As Cloud Solution Architects, we’ve seen this scenario play out many times. The moment “certificate rotation” is mentioned, a wave of unease ripples through engineering teams. Let’s be honest: for many of us—ourselves included—certificates represent the edge of our technical “comfort zone.” We know they are critical for security, but the complexity of PKI chains, trust stores, and SSL handshakes can be intimidating. There is a silent fear: “If we touch this, will we break production?”

We realized we had a choice. We could treat this as an opportunity, and we could leave that comfort zone.

We approached our customer with a proactive proposal: Let’s use this event to stop fearing certificates and start mastering them. Instead of just patching the immediate issue, we used this rotation as a catalyst to review and upgrade the security posture of their database connections. We wanted to move from “hoping it works” to “knowing it’s secure.”

The response was overwhelmingly positive. The teams didn’t just want a quick fix; they wanted “help for self-help.” They wanted to understand the mechanics behind sslmode and build the confidence to manage trust stores proactively.

This guide is the result of that journey. It is designed to help you navigate the upcoming rotation not with anxiety, but with competence—turning a mandatory maintenance window into a permanent security improvement.

Two Levels of Analysis

A certificate rotation affects your environment on two distinct levels, requiring different expertise and actions:

Level

Responsibility

Key Questions

Actions

Platform Level

Cloud/Platform Teams

Which clusters, services, and namespaces are affected? How do we detect at scale?

Azure Service Health monitoring, AKS scanning, infrastructure-wide assessment

Application Level

Application/Dev Teams

What SSL mode? Which trust store? How to update connection strings?

Code changes, dependency updates, trust store management

This article addresses both levels - providing platform-wide detection strategies (Section 5) and application-specific remediation guidance (Platform-Specific Remediation).

 

Business Impact: In production environments, certificate validation failures cause complete database connection outages. A single missed certificate rotation has caused hours of downtime for enterprise customers, impacting revenue and customer trust.

Who’s Affected: DevOps engineers, SREs, database administrators, and platform engineers managing Azure PostgreSQL instances - especially those using: - Java applications with custom JRE cacerts - Containerized workloads with baked-in trust stores - Strict SSL modes (sslmode=verify-full, verify-ca)

 

The Solution

What we’ll cover:

🛡️ Reliability: How to prevent database connection outages through proactive certificate management

🔄 Resiliency: Automation strategies that ensure your trust stores stay current

🔒 Security: Maintaining TLS security posture while rotating certificates safely

 

Key Takeaway:

This rotation is a client trust topic, not a server change. Applications trusting root CAs (DigiCert Global Root G2, Microsoft RSA Root CA 2017) without intermediate pinning are unaffected. Risk concentrates where strict validation meets custom trust stores.

 

📦 Platform-Specific Implementation: Detailed remediation guides for Java, .NET, Python, Node.js, and Kubernetes are available in our GitHub Repository.

Note: The GitHub Repository. contains community-contributed content provided as-is. Test all scripts in non-production environments before use.

 

1. Understanding Certificate Authority Rotation

What Changes During CA Rotation?

Azure Database for PostgreSQL uses TLS/SSL to encrypt client-server connections. The database server presents a certificate chain during the TLS handshake:

Certificate Chain Structure:

 

 

Figure: Certificate chain structure showing the rotation from old intermediate (red, deprecated) to new intermediate (blue, active after rotation). Client applications must trust the root certificates (green) to validate the chain.

📝 Diagram Source: The Mermaid source code for this diagram is available in certificate-chain-diagram.mmd.

Why Root Trust Matters

Key Principle: If your application trusts the root certificate and allows the chain to be validated dynamically, you are not affected. The risk occurs when:

  1. Custom trust stores contain only the old intermediate certificate (not the root)
  2. Certificate pinning is implemented at the intermediate level
  3. Strict validation is enabled (sslmode=verify-full in PostgreSQL connection strings)

 

2. Who Is Affected and Why

Risk Assessment Matrix

Application Type

Trust Store

SSL Mode

Risk Level

Action Required

Cloud-native app (Azure SDK)

OS Trust Store

require

🟢 Low

None - Azure SDK handles automatically

Java app (default JRE)

System cacerts

verify-ca

🟡 Medium

Verify JRE version (11.0.16+, 17.0.4+, 8u381+)

Java app (custom cacerts)

Custom JKS file

verify-full

🔴 High

Update custom trust store with new intermediate

.NET app (Windows)

Windows Cert Store

require

🟢 Low

None - automatic via Windows Update

Python app (certifi)

certifi bundle

verify-ca

🟡 Medium

Update certifi package (pip install --upgrade certifi)

Node.js app (default)

Built-in CAs

verify-ca

🟢 Low

None - Node.js 16+, 18+, 20+ auto-updated

Container (Alpine)

/etc/ssl/certs

verify-full

🔴 High

Update base image or install ca-certificates-bundle

Container (custom)

Baked-in certs

verify-full

🔴 High

Rebuild image with updated trust store

How to Read This Matrix

Use the above matrix to quickly assess whether your applications are affected by CA rotation. Here is an overview, how you read the matrix:

Column

Meaning

Application Type

What kind of application do you have? (e.g., Java, .NET, Container)

Trust Store

Where does the application store its trusted certificates?

SSL Mode

How strictly does the application validate the server certificate?

Risk Level

🟢 Low / 🟡 Medium / 🔴 High - How likely is a connection failure?

Action Required

What specific action do you need to take?

Risk Level Logic:

Risk Level

Why?

🟢 Low

Automatic updates (OS/Azure SDK) or no certificate validation

🟡 Medium

Manual update required but straightforward (e.g., pip install --upgrade certifi)

🔴 High

Custom trust store must be manually updated - highest outage risk

SSL Mode Security Posture

Understanding SSL modes is critical because they determine both security posture AND rotation impact. This creates a dual consideration:

SSL Mode

Certificate Validation

Rotation Impact

Security Level

Recommendation

disable

❌ None

✅ No impact

🔴 INSECURE

Never use in production

allow

❌ None

✅ No impact

🟠 WEAK

Not recommended

prefer

❌ Optional

✅ Minimal

🟡 WEAK

Not recommended

require

❌ No (Npgsql 6.0+)

✅ No impact

🟡 WEAK

Upgrade to verify-full

verify-ca

✅ Chain only

🔴 Critical

🔵 MODERATE

Update trust stores

verify-full

✅ Chain + hostname

🔴 Critical

🟢 SECURE

Recommended - Update trust stores

Key Insight: Applications using weak SSL modes (everything below verify-ca) are technically unaffected by CA rotation but represent security vulnerabilities. The safest path is verify-full with current trust stores.

⚖️ The Security vs. Resilience Trade-off

The Paradox: Secure applications (verify-full) have the highest rotation risk 🔴, while insecure applications (require) are unaffected but have security gaps.

Teams discovering weak SSL modes during rotation preparation face a critical decision:

Option

Approach

Rotation Impact

Security Impact

Recommended For

🚀 Quick Fix

Keep weak SSL mode (require)

✅ No action needed

⚠️ Security debt remains

Emergency situations only

🛡️ Proper Fix

Upgrade to verify-full

🔴 Requires trust store updates

✅ Improved security posture

All production systems

 

Our Recommendation: Use CA rotation events as an opportunity to improve your security posture. The effort to update trust stores is a one-time investment that pays off in long-term security.

Common Scenarios

Scenario 1: Enterprise Java Application

  • Problem: Custom trust store created 2+ years ago for PCI compliance
  • Risk: High - contains only old intermediate certificates
  • Solution: Export new intermediate from Azure, import to custom cacerts

Scenario 2: Kubernetes Microservices

  • Problem: Init container copies trust store from ConfigMap at startup
  • Risk: High - ConfigMap never updated since initial deployment
  • Solution: Update ConfigMap, redeploy pods with new trust store

Scenario 3: Legacy .NET Application

  • Problem: .NET Framework 4.6 on Windows Server 2016 (no Windows Update)
  • Risk: Medium - depends on manual certificate store updates
  • Solution: Import new intermediate to Windows Certificate Store manually

 

3. Trust Store Overview

A trust store is the collection of root and intermediate CA certificates that your application uses to validate server certificates during TLS handshakes. Understanding where your application’s trust store is located determines how you’ll update it for CA rotations.

Trust Store Locations by Platform

Category

Platform

Trust Store Location

Update Method

Auto-Updated?

OS Level

Windows

Cert:\LocalMachine\Root

Windows Update

✅ Yes

 

Debian/Ubuntu

/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt

apt upgrade ca-certificates

✅ Yes (with updates)

 

Red Hat/CentOS

/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt

yum update ca-certificates

✅ Yes (with updates)

Runtime Level

Java JRE

$JAVA_HOME/lib/security/cacerts

Java security updates

✅ With JRE updates

 

Python (certifi)

site-packages/certifi/cacert.pem

pip install --upgrade certifi

❌ Manual

 

Node.js

Bundled with runtime

Node.js version upgrade

✅ With Node.js updates

Custom

Custom JKS

Application-specific path

keytool -importcert

❌ Manual

 

Container image

/etc/ssl/certs (baked-in)

Rebuild container image

❌ Manual

 

ConfigMap mount

Kubernetes ConfigMap

Update ConfigMap, redeploy

❌ Manual

Why This Matters for CA Rotation

Applications using auto-updated trust stores (OS-managed, current runtime versions) generally handle CA rotations automatically. The risk concentrates in:

  1. Custom trust stores created for compliance requirements (PCI-DSS, SOC 2) that are rarely updated
  2. Baked-in container certificates from images built months or years ago
  3. Outdated runtimes (old JRE versions, frozen Python environments) that haven’t received security updates
  4. Air-gapped environments where automatic updates are disabled

When planning for CA rotation, focus your assessment efforts on applications in the “Manual” update category.

 

4. Platform-Specific Remediation

📦 Detailed implementation guides are available in our GitHub repository:

azure-certificate-rotation-guide

Quick Reference: Remediation by Platform

Platform

Trust Store Location

Update Method

Guide

Java

$JAVA_HOME/lib/security/cacerts

Update JRE or manual keytool import

java-cacerts.md

.NET (Windows)

Windows Certificate Store

Windows Update (automatic)

dotnet-windows.md

Python

certifi package

pip install --upgrade certifi

python-certifi.md

Node.js

Built-in CA bundle

Update Node.js version

nodejs.md

Containers

Base image /etc/ssl/certs

Rebuild image or ConfigMap

containers-kubernetes.md

Scripts & Automation

Script

Purpose

Download

State

Scan-AKS-TrustStores.ps1

Scan all pods in AKS for trust store configurations

PowerShell

tested

validate-connection.sh

Test PostgreSQL connection with SSL validation

Bash

not tested

update-cacerts.sh

Update Java cacerts with new intermediate

Bash

not tested

 

5. Proactive Detection Strategies

Database-Level Discovery: Identifying Connected Clients

One starting point for impact assessment is querying the PostgreSQL database itself to identify which applications are connecting. We developed a SQL query that joins pg_stat_ssl with pg_stat_activity to reveal active TLS connections, their SSL version, and cipher suites.

🔍 Get the SQL Query: Download the complete detection script from our GitHub repository: detect-clients.sql

Important Limitations

This query has significant constraints that you must understand before relying on it for CA rotation planning:

Limitation

Impact

Mitigation

Point-in-time snapshot

Only shows currently connected clients

Run query repeatedly over days/weeks to capture periodic jobs and batch processes

No certificate details

Cannot identify which CA certificate the client is using

Requires client-side investigation (trust store analysis)

Connection pooling

May show pooler instead of actual application

Use application_name in connection strings to identify true source

Idle connections

Long-running connections may be dormant

Cross-reference with application activity logs

Recommended approach: Use this query to create an initial inventory, then investigate each unique application_name and client_addr combination to determine their trust store configuration and SSL mode.

Proactive Monitoring with Azure Monitor

To detect certificate-related issues before and after CA rotation, configure Azure Monitor alerts. This enables early warning when SSL handshakes start failing.

Why this matters: After CA rotation, applications with outdated trust stores will fail to connect. An alert allows you to detect affected applications quickly rather than waiting for user reports.

Official Documentation: For complete guidance on creating and managing alerts, see Azure Monitor Alerts Overview and Create a Log Search Alert.

Here is a short example of an Azure Monitor Alert definition as a starting point.

{
  "alertRule": {
    "name": "PostgreSQL SSL Connection Failures",
    "severity": 2,
    "condition": {
      "query": "AzureDiagnostics | where ResourceType == 'SERVERS' and Category == 'PostgreSQLLogs' and Message contains 'SSL error' | summarize count() by bin(TimeGenerated, 5m)",
      "threshold": 5,
      "timeAggregation": "Total",
      "windowSize": "PT5M"
    }
  }
}

Alert Configuration Notes:

Setting

Recommended Value

Rationale

Severity

2 (Warning)

Allows investigation without triggering critical incident response

Threshold

5 failures/5min

Filters noise while catching genuine issues

Evaluation Period

5 minutes

Balances responsiveness with alert fatigue

Action Group

Platform Team

Ensures quick triage and coordination

 

6. Production Validation

Pre-Rotation Validation Checklist

  • Inventory all applications connecting to Azure PostgreSQL
  • Identify trust store locations for each application
  • Verify root certificate presence in trust stores
  • Test connection with new intermediate in non-production environment
  • Update monitoring alerts for SSL connection failures
  • Prepare rollback plan if issues occur
  • Schedule maintenance window (if required)
  • Notify stakeholders of potential impact

Testing Procedure

We established a systematic 3-step validation process to ensure zero downtime. This approach moves from isolated testing to gradual production rollout.

🧪 Technical Validation Guide: For the complete list of psql commands, connection string examples for Windows/Linux, and automated testing scripts, please refer to our Validation Guide in the GitHub repository.

Connection Testing Strategy

The core of our validation strategy was testing connections with explicit sslmode settings. We used the psql command-line tool to simulate different client behaviors.

Test Scenario

Purpose

Expected Result

Encryption only (sslmode=require)

Verify basic connectivity

Connection succeeds even with unknown CA

CA validation (sslmode=verify-ca)

Verify trust store integrity

Connection succeeds only if CA chain is valid

Full validation (sslmode=verify-full)

Verify strict security compliance

Connection succeeds only if CA chain AND hostname match

Pro Tip: Test with verify-full and an explicit root CA file containing the new Microsoft/DigiCert root certificates before the rotation date. This validates that your trust stores will work after the intermediate certificate changes.

Step 1: Test in Non-Production

Validate connections against a test server using the new intermediate certificate (Azure provides test endpoints during the rotation window).

Step 2: Canary Deployment

Deploy the updated trust store to a single “canary” instance or pod. Monitor: - Connection success rate - Error logs - Response times

Step 3: Gradual Rollout

Once the canary is stable, proceed with a phased rollout: 1. Update 10% of pods 2. Monitor for 1 hour 3. Update 50% of pods 4. Monitor for 1 hour 5. Complete rollout

 

7. Best Practices and Lessons Learned

Certificate Management Best Practices

Practice

Guidance

Example

Trust Root CAs, Not Intermediates

Configure trust stores with root CA certificates only. This provides resilience against intermediate certificate rotations.

Trust Microsoft TLS RSA Root G2 and DigiCert Global Root G2 instead of specific intermediates

Automate Trust Store Updates

Use OS-provided trust stores when possible (automatically updated). For custom trust stores, implement CI/CD pipelines.

Schedule bi-annual trust store audits

Use SSL Mode Appropriately

Choose SSL mode based on security requirements. verify-ca is recommended for most scenarios.

See Security Posture Matrix in Section 2

Maintain Container Images

Rebuild container images monthly to include latest CA certificates. Use init containers for runtime updates.

Multi-stage builds with CA certificate update step

Avoid Certificate Pinning

Never pin intermediate certificates. If pinning is required for compliance, implement automated update processes.

Pin only root CA certificates if absolutely necessary

SSL Mode Decision Guide

SSL Mode

Security Level

Resilience

When to Use

require

Medium

High

Encrypted traffic without certificate validation. Use when CA rotation resilience is more important than MITM protection.

verify-ca

High

Medium

Validates certificate chain. Recommended for most production scenarios.

verify-full

Highest

Low

Strictest validation with hostname matching. Use only when compliance requires it.

Organizational Communication Model

Effective certificate rotation requires structured communication across multiple layers:

Layer

Responsibility

Key Action

Azure Service Health

Microsoft publishes announcements to affected subscriptions

Monitor Azure Service Health proactively

Platform/Cloud Team

Receives Azure announcements, triages criticality

Follow ITSM processes, assess impact

Application Teams

Execute application-level changes

Update trust stores, validate connections

Security Teams

Define certificate validation policies

Set compliance requirements

Ownership and Responsibility Matrix

Team

Responsibility

Deliverable

Platform/Cloud Team

Monitor Azure Service Health, coordinate response

Impact assessment, team notifications

Application Teams

Application-level changes (connection strings, trust stores)

Updated configurations, validation results

Security Teams

Define certificate policies, compliance requirements

Policy documentation, audit reports

All Teams (Shared)

Certificate lifecycle collaboration

Playbooks, escalation paths, training

Certificate Rotation Playbook Components

Organizations should establish documented playbooks including:

Component

Recommended Frequency

Purpose

Trust Store Audits

Bi-annual (every 6 months)

Ensure certificates are current

Certificate Inventory

Quarterly review

Know what certificates exist where

Playbook Updates

Annual or after incidents

Keep procedures current

Team Training

Annual

Build knowledge and confidence

Field Observations: Common Configuration Patterns

Pattern

Observation

Risk

Implicit SSL Mode

Teams don’t explicitly set sslmode, relying on framework defaults

Unexpected behavior during CA rotation

Copy-Paste Configurations

Connection strings copied without understanding options

Works until certificate changes expose gaps

Framework-Specific Defaults

Java uses JRE trust store, .NET uses Windows Certificate Store, Python depends on certifi package

Some require manual updates, some are automatic

Framework Trust Store Defaults

Framework

Default Trust Store

Update Method

Risk Level

Java/Quarkus

JRE cacerts

Manual or JRE update

Medium - requires awareness

.NET

Windows Certificate Store

Windows Update

Low - automatic

Node.js

Bundled certificates

Node.js version update

Low - automatic

Python

certifi package

pip install --upgrade certifi

High - manual intervention required

Knowledge and Confidence Challenges

Challenge

Impact

Mitigation

Limited certificate knowledge

Creates uncertainty and risk-averse behavior

Proactive education, hands-on workshops

Topic intimidation

“Certificates” can seem complex, leading to avoidance

Reality: Implementation is straightforward once understood

Previous negative experiences

Leadership concerns based on past incidents

Document successes, share lessons learned

Visibility gaps

Lack of visibility into application dependencies

Maintain certificate inventory, use discovery tools

Monitoring Strategy (Recommended for Post-Rotation):

While pre-rotation monitoring focuses on inventory, post-rotation monitoring should track:

  • Key Metrics: - Connection failure rates (group by application, SSL error types) - SSL handshake duration (detect performance degradation) - Certificate validation errors (track which certificates fail) - Application error logs (filter for “SSL”, “certificate”, “trust”)
  • Recommended Alerts: - Threshold: >5 SSL connection failures in 5 minutes - Anomaly detection: Connection failure rate increases >50% - Certificate expiry warnings: 30, 14, 7 days before expiration
  • Dashboard Components: - Connection success rate by application - SSL error distribution (validation failures, expired certificates, etc.) - Certificate inventory with expiry dates - Trust store update status across infrastructure

These metrics, alerts and thresholds are only starting points and need to be adjusted based on your environment and needs.

Post-Rotation Validation and Telemetry

Note: This article focuses on preparation for upcoming certificate rotations. Post-rotation metrics and incident data will be collected after the rotation completes and can inform future iterations of this guidance.

Recommended Post-Rotation Activities:

Here are some thoughts on post-rotation activities that could create more insights on the effectiveness of the preparation.

  1. Incident Tracking:
    After rotation completes, organizations should track: - Production incidents related to SSL/TLS connection failures - Services affected and their business criticality - Mean Time to Detection (MTTD) for certificate-related issues - Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) from detection to fix
  2. Success Metrics to Measure
    1. Pre-Rotation Validation: - Number of services inventoried and assessed - Percentage of services requiring trust store updates - Testing coverage (dev, staging, production)
    2. Post-Rotation Outcomes: - Zero-downtime success rate (percentage of services with no impact) - Applications requiring emergency patching - Time from rotation to full validation
  3. Impact Assessment
    Telemetry to Collect: - Total connection attempts vs. failures (before and after rotation) - Duration of any service degradation or outages - ustomer-facing impact (user-reported issues, support tickets) - Geographic or subscription-specific patterns
  4. Continuous Improvement
    1. Post-Rotation Review: - What worked well in the preparation phase? - Which teams or applications were unprepared? - What gaps exist in monitoring or alerting? - How can communication be improved for future rotations?
    2. Documentation Updates: - Update playbooks with lessons learned - Refine monitoring queries based on observed patterns - Enhance team training materials - Share anonymized case studies across the organization

8. Engagement & Next Steps

Discussion Questions

We’d love to hear from the community:

  1. What’s your experience with certificate rotations? Have you encountered unexpected connection failures during CA rotation events?
  2. Which trust store update method works best for your environment? OS-managed, runtime-bundled, or custom trust stores?
  3. How do you handle certificate management in air-gapped environments? What strategies have worked for your organization?

Share Your Experience

If you’ve implemented proactive certificate management strategies or have lessons learned from CA rotation incidents, we encourage you to:

  • Comment below with your experiences and tips
  • Contribute to the GitHub repository with additional platform guides or scripts
  • Connect with us on LinkedIn to continue the conversation

Call to Action

Take these steps now to prepare for the CA rotation:

  1. Assess your applications - Use the Risk Assessment Matrix (Section 2) to identify which applications use sslmode=verify-ca or verify-full with custom trust stores
  2. Import root CA certificates - Add DigiCert Global Root G2 and Microsoft RSA Root CA 2017 to your trust stores
  3. Upgrade SSL mode - Change your connection strings to at least sslmode=verify-ca (recommended: verify-full) for improved security
  4. Document your changes - Record which applications were updated, what trust stores were modified, and the validation results
  5. Automate for the future - Implement proactive certificate management so future CA rotations are handled automatically (OS-managed trust stores, CI/CD pipelines for container images, scheduled trust store audits)

 

9. Resources

Official Documentation

Azure PostgreSQL:

PostgreSQL & libpq:

Certificate Authorities:

Community Resources

Tools and Scripts

Industry Context

Certificate rotation challenges are not unique to Azure PostgreSQL. Similar incidents have occurred across the industry:

Historical Incidents: - Let’s Encrypt Root Expiration (2021): Widespread impact when DST Root CA X3 expired, affecting older Android devices and legacy systems - DigiCert Root Transitions: Multiple cloud providers experienced customer impact during CA changes - Internal PKI Rotations: Enterprises face similar challenges when rotating internally-issued certificates

Relevant Standards: - NIST SP 800-57: Key Management Guidelines (certificate lifecycle best practices) - OWASP Certificate Pinning: Guidance on balancing security and operational resilience - CIS Benchmarks: Recommendations for TLS/SSL configuration in cloud environments

 

Authors

Author

Role

Contact

Andreas Semmelmann

Cloud Solution Architect, Microsoft

LinkedIn

Mpho Muthige

Cloud Solution Architect, Microsoft

LinkedIn

 

Disclaimers

Disclaimer:
The information in this blog post is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or professional advice. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information at the time of publication, Microsoft makes no warranties or representations as to its completeness or accuracy. Product features, availability, and timelines are subject to change without notice. For specific guidance, please consult your legal or compliance advisor.

Microsoft Support Statement:
This article represents field experiences and community best practices. For official Microsoft support and SLA-backed guidance:

Production Issues: Always open official support tickets for production-impacting problems.

Customer Privacy Notice:
This article describes real-world scenarios from customer engagements. All customer-specific information has been anonymized. No NDAs or customer confidentiality agreements were violated in creating this content.

AI-generated content disclaimer:
This content was generated in whole or in part with the assistance of AI tools. AI-generated content may be incorrect or incomplete. Please review and verify before relying on it for critical decisions. See terms

Community Contribution: The GitHub repository referenced in this article contains community-contributed scripts and guides. These are provided as-is for educational purposes and should be tested in non-production environments before use.

Tags: #AzurePostgreSQL #CertificateRotation #TLS #SSL #TrustStores #Operations #DevOps #SRE #CloudSecurity #AzureDatabase

Updated Dec 15, 2025
Version 1.0
No CommentsBe the first to comment