Teamcenter on Oracle AI Database@Azure: Architecture, Validation, and Results
Teamcenter on Azure with Oracle Exadata Database@Azure delivers seamless, low-latency connectivity between Teamcenter application tiers and Exadata within the same Azure region, combining Azure-native services with Oracle RAC-powered database capabilities. Successful end-to-end functional validation confirmed application compatibility, workload execution, backup and recovery, and stable database performance, demonstrating enterprise readiness for Teamcenter workloads.
mpi-stage: High-Performance File Distribution for HPC Clusters
When running containerized workloads on HPC clusters, one of the first problems you hit is getting container images onto the nodes quickly and repeatably. A .sqsh is a Squashfs image (commonly used by container runtimes on HPC). In some environments you can run a Squashfs image directly from shared storage, but at scale that often turns the shared filesystem into a hot spot. Copying the image to local NVMe keeps startup time predictable and avoids hundreds of nodes hammering the same source during job launch. In this post, I'll introduce mpi-stage, a lightweight tool that uses MPI broadcasts to distribute large files across cluster nodes at speeds that can saturate the backend network. The Problem: Staging Files at Scale On an Azure CycleCloud Workspace for Slurm cluster with GB300 GPU nodes, I needed to stage a large Squashfs container image from shared storage onto each node's local NVMe storage before launching training jobs. At small scale you can often get away with ad-hoc copies, but once hundreds of nodes are all trying to read the same source file, the shared source filesystem quickly becomes the bottleneck. I tried several approaches: Attempt 1: Slurm's sbcast Slurm's built-in sbcast seemed like the natural choice. In my quick testing it was slower than I wanted, and the overwrite/skip-existing behavior didn't match the "fast no-op if already present" workflow I was after. I didn't spend much time exploring all the configuration options before moving on. Attempt 2: Shell Script Fan-Out I wrote a shell script using a tree-based fan-out approach: copy to N nodes, then each of those copies to N more, and so on. This worked and scaled reasonably, but had some drawbacks: Multiple stages: The script required orchestrating multiple rounds of copy commands, adding complexity Source filesystem stress: Even with fan-out, the initial copies still hit the source filesystem simultaneously — a fan-out of 4 meant 4 nodes competing for source bandwidth Frontend network: Copies went over the Ethernet network by default — I could have configured IPoIB, but that added more setup The Solution: MPI Broadcasts The key insight was that MPI's broadcast primitive (MPI_Bcast) is specifically optimized for one-to-many data distribution. Modern MPI implementations like HPC-X use tree-based algorithms that efficiently utilize the high-bandwidth, low-latency InfiniBand network. With mpi-stage: Single source read: Only one node reads from the source filesystem Backend network utilization: Data flows over InfiniBand using optimized MPI collectives Intelligent skipping: Nodes that already have the file (verified by size or checksum) skip the copy entirely Combined, this keeps the shared source (NFS, Lustre, blobfuse, etc.) from being hammered by many concurrent readers while still taking full advantage of the backend fabric. How It Works mpi-stage is designed around a simple workflow: The source node reads the file in chunks and streams each chunk via MPI_Bcast. Destination nodes write each chunk to local storage immediately upon receipt. This streaming approach means the entire file never needs to fit in memory — only a small buffer is required. Key Features Pre-copy Validation Before any data is transferred, each node checks if the destination file already exists and matches the source. You can choose between: Size check (default): Fast comparison of file sizes—sufficient for most use cases Checksum: Stronger validation, but requires reading the full file and is therefore slower If all nodes already have the correct file, mpi-stage completes in milliseconds with no data transfer. Double-Buffered Transfers The implementation uses double-buffered, chunked transfers to overlap network communication with disk I/O. While one buffer is being broadcast, the next chunk is being read from the source. Post-copy Validation Optionally verify that all nodes received the file correctly after the copy completes. Single-Writer Per Node The tool enforces one MPI rank per node to prevent filesystem contention and ensure predictable performance. Real-World Performance In one run using 156 GPU nodes, distributing a container image achieved approximately 3 GB/s effective distribution rate (file_size/time), completing in just over 5 seconds: [0] Copy required: yes [0] Starting copy phase (source writes: yes) [0] Copy complete, Bandwidth: 3007.14 MB/s [0] Post-validation complete [0] Timings (s): Topology check: 5.22463 Source metadata: 0.00803746 Pre-validation: 0.0046786 Copy phase: 5.21189 Post-validation: 2.2944e-05 Total time: 5.2563 Because every node writes the file to its own local NVMe, the cumulative write rate across the cluster is roughly this number times the node count: ~3 GB/s × 156 ≈ ~468 GB/s of total local writes. Workflow: Container Image Distribution The primary use case is distributing Squashfs images to local NVMe before launching containerized workloads. Run mpi-stage as a job step before your main application: #!/bin/bash #SBATCH --job-name=my-training-job #SBATCH --ntasks-per-node=1 #SBATCH --exclusive # Stage the container image srun --mpi=pmix ./mpi_stage \ --source /shared/images/pytorch.sqsh \ --dest /nvme/images/pytorch.sqsh \ --pre-validate size \ --verbose # Run the actual job (from local NVMe - much faster!) srun --container-image=/nvme/images/pytorch.sqsh ... mpi-stage will create the destination directory if it doesn't exist. If your container runtime supports running the image directly from shared storage, you may not strictly need this step—but staging to local NVMe tends to be faster and more predictable at large scale. Because of the pre-validation, you can include this step in every job script without penalty—if the image is already present, it completes in milliseconds. Getting Started git clone https://github.com/edwardsp/mpi-stage.git cd mpi-stage make For detailed usage and options, see the README. Summary mpi-stage started as a solution to a very specific problem—staging large container images efficiently across a large GPU cluster—but the same pattern may be useful in other scenarios where many nodes need the same large file. By using MPI broadcasts, only a single node reads from the source filesystem, while data is distributed over the backend network using optimized collectives. In practice, this can significantly reduce load on shared filesystems and cloud-backed mounts, such as Azure Blob Storage accessed via blobfuse2, where hundreds of concurrent readers can otherwise become a bottleneck. While container images were the initial focus, this approach could also be applied to staging training datasets, distributing model checkpoints or pretrained weights, or copying large binaries to local NVMe before a job starts. Anywhere that a “many nodes, same file” pattern exists is a potential fit. If you're running large-scale containerized workloads on Azure HPC infrastructure, give it a try. If you use mpi-stage in other workflows, I'd love to hear what worked (and what didn't). Feedback and contributions are welcome. Have questions or feedback? Leave a comment below or open an issue on GitHub.Announcing the Public Preview of AMLFS 20: Azure Managed Lustre New SKU for Massive AI&HPC Workloads
Sachin Sheth - Principal PDM Manager Brian Barbisch - Principal Group Software Engineering Manager Matt White - Principal Group Software Engineering Manager Brian Lepore - Principal Product Manager Wolfgang De Salvador - Senior Product Manager Ron Hogue - Senior Product Manager Introduction We are excited to announce the Public Preview of AMLFS Durable Premium 20 (AMLFS 20), a new SKU in Azure Managed Lustre designed to deliver unprecedented performance and scale for demanding AI and HPC workloads. Key Features Massive Scale: Store up to 25 PiB of data in a single namespace, with up to 512 GB/s of total bandwidth. Advanced Metadata Performance: Multi-MDS (Metadata Server) architecture dramatically improves metadata IOPS. In mdtest benchmarks, AMLFS 20 demonstrated more than 5x improvement in metadata operations. An additional MDS is provided for every 5 PiB of provisioned filesystem. High File Capacity: Supports up to 20 billion inodes for maximum namespace size. Why AMLFS 20 Matters Simplified Architecture: Previously, datasets larger than 12.5 PiB required multiple filesystems and complex management. AMLFS 20 enables a single, high-performance file system for massive AI and HPC workloads up to 25 PiB, streamlining deployment and administration. Accelerated Data Preparation: The multi-MDT architecture significantly increases metadata IOPS, which is crucial during the data preparation stage of AI training, where rapid access to millions of files is required. Faster Time-to-Value: Researchers and engineers benefit from easier management, reduced bottlenecks, and faster access to large datasets, accelerating innovation. Availability AMLFS 20 is available in Public Preview alongside the already existing AMLFS SKUs. For more details on other SKUs, visit the Azure Managed Lustre documentation. How to Join the Preview If you are working with large-scale AI or HPC workloads and would like early access to AMLFS 20, we invite you to fill out this form to tell us about your use case. Our team will follow up with onboarding details.Join Microsoft @ SC25: Experience HPC and AI Innovation
Supercomputing 2025 is coming to St. Louis, MO, November 16–21! Visit Microsoft Booth #1627 to explore cutting-edge HPC and AI solutions, connect with experts, and experience interactive demos that showcase the future of compute. Whether you’re attending technical sessions, stopping by for a coffee, or joining our partner events, we’ve got something for everyone. Booth Highlights Alpine Formula 1 Showcar: Snap a photo with a real Alpine F1 car and learn how high-performance computing drives innovation in motorsports. Silicon Wall: Discover silicon diversity—featuring chips from our partners AMD and NVIDIA, alongside Microsoft’s own first-party silicon: Maia, Cobalt, and Majorana. NVIDIA Weather Modeling Demo: See how AI and HPC predict extreme weather events with Tomorrow.io and NVIDIA technology. Coffee Bar with Barista: Enjoy a handcrafted coffee while you connect with our experts. Immersive Screens: Watch live demos and visual stories about HPC breakthroughs and AI innovation. Hardware Bar: Explore AMD EPYC™ and NVIDIA GB200 systems powering next-generation workloads. Whether you’re attending technical sessions, stopping by for a coffee and chat with our team, or joining our partner events, we’ve got something for everyone. Conference Details Conference week: Sun, Nov 16 – Fri, Nov 21 Expo hours (CST): Mon, Nov 17: 7:00–9:00 PM (Opening Night) Tue, Nov 18: 10:00 AM–6:00 PM Wed, Nov 19: 10:00 AM–6:00 PM Thu, Nov 20: 10:00 AM–3:00 PM Customer meeting rooms: Four Seasons Hotel Quick links RSVP — Microsoft + AMD Networking Reception (Tue, Nov 18): https://aka.ms/MicrosoftAMD-Mixer RSVP — Microsoft + NVIDIA Panel Luncheon (Wed, Nov 19): Luncheon is now closed as the event is fully booked. Earned Sessions (Technical Program) Sunday, Nov 16 Session Type Time (CST) Title Microsoft Contributor(s) Location Tutorial 8:30 AM–5:00 PM Delivering HPC: Procurement, Cost Models, Metrics, Value, and More Andrew Jones Room 132 Tutorial 8:30 AM–5:00 PM Modern High Performance I/O: Leveraging Object Stores Glenn Lockwood Room 120 Workshop 2:00–5:30 PM 14th International Workshop on Runtime and Operating Systems for Supercomputers (ROSS 2025) Torsten Hoefler Room 265 Monday, Nov 17 Session Type Time (CST) Title Microsoft Contributor(s) Location Early Career Program 3:30–4:45 PM Voices from the Field: Navigating Careers in Academia, Government, and Industry Joe Greenseid Room 262 Workshop 3:50–4:20 PM Towards Enabling Hostile Multi-tenancy in Kubernetes Ali Kanso; Elzeiny Mostafa; Gurpreet Virdi; Slava Oks Room 275 Workshop 5:00–5:30 PM On the Performance and Scalability of Cloud Supercomputers: Insights from Eagle and Reindeer Amirreza Rastegari; Prabhat Ram; Michael F. Ringenburg Room 267 Tuesday, Nov 18 Session Type Time (CST) Title Microsoft Contributor(s) Location BOF 12:15–1:15 PM High Performance Software Foundation BoF Joe Greenseid Room 230 Poster 5:30–7:00 PM Compute System Simulator: Modeling the Impact of Allocation Policy and Hardware Reliability on HPC Cloud Resource Utilization Jarrod Leddy; Huseyin Yildiz Second Floor Atrium Wednesday, Nov 19 Session Type Time (CST) Title Microsoft Contributor(s) Location BOF 12:15–1:15 PM The Future of Python on HPC Systems Michael Droettboom Room 125 BOF 12:15–1:15 PM Autonomous Science Network: Interconnected Autonomous Science Labs Empowered by HPC and Intelligent Agents Joe Tostenrude Room 131 Paper 1:30–1:52 PM Uno: A One‑Stop Solution for Inter‑ and Intra‑Data Center Congestion Control and Reliable Connectivity Abdul Kabbani; Ahmad Ghalayini; Nadeen Gebara; Terry Lam Rooms 260–267 Paper 2:14–2:36 PM SDR‑RDMA: Software‑Defined Reliability Architecture for Planetary‑Scale RDMA Communication Abdul Kabbani; Jie Zhang; Jithin Jose; Konstantin Taranov; Mahmoud Elhaddad; Scott Moe; Sreevatsa Anantharamu; Zhuolong Yu Rooms 260–267 Panel 3:30–5:00 PM CPUs Have a Memory Problem — Designing CPU‑Based HPC Systems with Very High Memory Bandwidth Joe Greenseid Rooms 231–232 Paper 4:36–4:58 PM SparStencil: Retargeting Sparse Tensor Cores to Scientific Stencil Computations Kun Li; Liang Yuan; Ting Cao; Mao Yang Rooms 260–267 Thursday, Nov 20 Session Type Time (CST) Title Microsoft Contributor(s) Location BOF 12:15–1:15 PM Super(computing)heroes Laura Parry Rooms 261–266 Paper 3:30–3:52 PM Workload Intelligence: Workload‑Aware IaaS Abstraction for Cloud Efficiency Anjaly Parayil; Chetan Bansal; Eli Cortez; Íñigo Goiri; Jim Kleewein; Jue Zhang; Pantea Zardoshti; Pulkit Misra; Raphael Ghelman; Ricardo Bianchini; Rodrigo Fonseca; Saravan Rajmohan; Xiaoting Qin Room 275 Paper 4:14–4:36 PM From Deep Learning to Deep Science: AI Accelerators Scaling Quantum Chemistry Beyond Limits Fusong Ju; Kun Li; Mao Yang Rooms 260–267 Friday, Nov 21 Session Type Time (CST) Title Microsoft Contributor(s) Location Workshop 9:00 AM–12:30 PM Eleventh International Workshop on Heterogeneous High‑performance Reconfigurable Computing (H2RC 2025) Torsten Hoefler Room 263 Booth Theater Sessions Monday, Nov 17 — 7:00 PM–9:00 PM Time (CST) Session Title Presenter(s) 8:00–8:20 PM Inside the World’s Most Powerful AI Data Center Chris Jones 8:30–8:50 PM Transforming Science and Engineering — Driven by Agentic AI, Powered by HPC Joe Tostenrude Tuesday, Nov 18 — 10:00 AM–6:00 PM Time (CST) Session Title Presenter(s) 11:00–11:50 AM Ignite Keynotes 12:00–12:20 PM Accelerating AI workloads with Azure Storage Sachin Sheth; Wolfgang De Salvador 12:30–12:50 PM Accelerate Memory Bandwidth‑Bound Workloads with Azure HBv5, now GA Jyothi Venkatesh 1:00–1:20 PM Radiation & Health Companion: AI‑Driven Flight‑Dose Awareness Olesya Sarajlic 1:30–1:50 PM Ascend HPC Lab: Your On‑Ramp to GPU‑Powered Innovation Daniel Cooke (Oakwood) 2:00–2:20 PM Azure AMD HBv5: Redefining CFD Performance and Value in the Cloud Rick Knoechel (AMD) 2:30–2:50 PM Empowering High Performance Life Sciences Workloads on Azure Qumulo 3:00–3:20 PM Transforming Science and Engineering — Driven by Agentic AI, Powered by HPC Joe Tostenrude 4:00–4:20 PM Unleashing AMD EPYC on Azure: Scalable HPC for Energy and Manufacturing Varun Selvaraj (AMD) 4:30–4:50 PM Automating HPC Workflows with Copilot Agents Xavier Pillons 5:00–5:20 PM Scaling the Future: NVIDIA’s GB300 NVL72 Rack for Next‑Generation AI Inference Kirthi Devleker (NVIDIA) 5:30–5:50 PM Enabling AI and HPC Workloads in the Cloud with Azure NetApp Files Andy Chan Wednesday, Nov 19 — 10:00 AM–6:00 PM Time (CST) Session Title Presenter(s) 10:30–10:50 AM AI‑Powered Digital Twins for Industrial Engineering John Linford (NVIDIA) 11:00–11:20 AM Advancing 5 Generations of HPC Innovation with AMD on Azure Allen Leibovitch (AMD) 11:30–11:50 AM Intro to LoRA Fine‑Tuning on Azure Christin Pohl 12:00–12:20 PM VAST + Microsoft: Building the Foundation for Agentic AI Lior Genzel (VAST Data) 12:30–12:50 PM Inside the World’s Most Powerful AI Data Center Chris Jones 1:00–1:20 PM Supervised GenAI Simulation – Stroke Prognosis (NVads V710 v5) Kurt Niebuhr 1:30–1:50 PM What You Don’t See: How Azure Defines VM Families Anshul Jain 2:00–2:20 PM Hammerspace Tier 0: Unleashing GPU Storage Performance on Azure Raj Sharma (Hammerspace) 2:30–2:50 PM GM Motorsports: Accelerating Race Performance with AI Physics on Rescale Bernardo Mendez (Rescale) 3:00–3:20 PM Hurricane Analysis and Forecasting on the Azure Cloud Salar Adili (Microsoft); Unni Kirandumkara (GDIT); Stefan Gary (Parallel Works) 3:30–3:50 PM Performance at Scale: Accelerating HPC & AI Workloads with WEKA on Azure Desiree Campbell; Wolfgang De Salvador 4:00–4:20 PM Pushing the Limits of Performance: Supercomputing on Azure AI Infrastructure Biju Thankachen; Ojasvi Bhalerao 4:30–4:50 PM Accelerating Momentum: Powering AI & HPC with AMD Instinct™ GPUs Jay Cayton (AMD) Thursday, Nov 20 — 10:00 AM–3:00 PM Time (CST) Session Title Presenter(s) 11:30–11:50 AM Intro to LoRA Fine‑Tuning on Azure Christin Pohl 12:00–12:20 PM Accelerating HPC Workflows with Ansys Access on Microsoft Azure Dr. John Baker (Ansys) 12:30–12:50 PM Accelerate Memory Bandwidth‑Bound Workloads with Azure HBv5, now GA Jyothi Venkatesh 1:00–1:20 PM Pushing the Limits: Supercomputing on Azure AI Infrastructure Biju Thankachen; Ojasvi Bhalerao 1:30–1:50 PM The High Performance Software Foundation Todd Gamblin (HPSF) 2:00–2:20 PM Heidi AI — Deploying Azure Cloud Environments for Higher‑Ed Students & Researchers James Verona (Adaptive Computing); Dr. Sameer Shende (UO/ParaTools) Partner Session Schedule Tuesday, Nov 18 Date Time (CST) Title Microsoft Contributor(s) Location Nov 18 11:00 AM–11:50 AM Cloud Computing for Engineering Simulation Joe Greenseid Ansys Booth Nov 18 1:00 PM–1:30 PM Revolutionizing Simulation with Artificial Intelligence Joe Tostenrude Ansys Booth Nov 18 4:30 PM–5:00 PM [HBv5] Jyothi Venkatesh AMD Booth Wednesday, Nov 19 Date Time (CST) Title Microsoft Contributor(s) Location Nov 19 11:30 AM–1:30 PM Accelerating Discovery: How HPC and AI Are Shaping the Future of Science (Lunch Panel) Andrew Jones (Moderator); Joe Greenseid (Panelist) Ruth's Chris Steak House Nov 19 1:00 PM–1:30 PM VAST and Microsoft Kanchan Mehrotra VAST Booth Demo Pods at Microsoft Booth Azure HPC & AI Infrastructure Explore how Azure delivers high-performance computing and AI workloads at scale. Learn about VM families, networking, and storage optimized for HPC. Agentic AI for Science See how autonomous agents accelerate scientific workflows, from simulation to analysis, using Azure AI and HPC resources. Hybrid HPC with Azure Arc Discover how Azure Arc enables hybrid HPC environments, integrating on-prem clusters with cloud resources for flexibility and scale. Ancillary Events (RSVP Required) Microsoft + AMD Networking Reception — Tuesday Night When: Tue, Nov 18, 6:30–10:00 PM (CST) Where: UMB Champions Club, Busch Stadium RSVP: https://aka.ms/MicrosoftAMD-Mixer Microsoft + NVIDIA Panel Luncheon — Wednesday When: Wed, Nov 19, 11:30 AM–1:30 PM (CST) Where: Ruth’s Chris Steak House Topic: Accelerating Discovery: How AI and HPC Are Shaping the Future of Science Panelists: Dan Ernst (NVIDIA); Rollin Thomas (NERSC); Joe Greenseid (Microsoft); Antonia Maar (Intersect360 Research); Fernanda Foertter (University of Alabama) RSVP: Luncheon is now closed as the event is fully booked. Conclusion We’re excited to connect with you at SC25! Whether you’re exploring our booth demos, attending technical sessions, or joining one of our partner events, this is your opportunity to experience how Microsoft is driving innovation in HPC and AI. Stop by Booth #1627 to see the Alpine F1 showcar, explore the Silicon Wall featuring AMD, NVIDIA, and Microsoft’s own chips, and enjoy a coffee from our barista while networking with experts. Don’t forget to RSVP for our Microsoft + AMD Network Reception and Microsoft + NVIDIA Panel Luncheon See you in St. Louis!Explore HPC & AI Innovation: Microsoft + AMD at HPC Roundtable 2025
The HPC Roundtable 2025 in Turin brings together industry leaders, engineers, and technologists to explore the future of high-performance computing (HPC) and artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure. Hosted by DoITNow, the event features Microsoft and AMD as key participants, with sessions highlighting real-world innovations such as Polestar’s adoption of Microsoft Azure HPC for Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE). Attendees will gain insights into cloud-native HPC, hybrid compute environments, and the convergence of simulation and machine learning. The roundtable offers networking opportunities, strategic discussions, and showcases how Microsoft Azure and AMD are accelerating engineering innovation and intelligent workloads in automotive and other industries.CycleCloud + Hammerspace
Abstract The theme of this blog is “Simplicity”. Today’s HPC user has an overabundance of choices when it comes to HPC Schedulers, clouds, infrastructure in those clouds, and data management solutions. Let's simplify it! Using CycleCloud as the nucleus, my intent is to show how simple it is to deploy a Slurm cluster on the Hammerspace data platform while using a standard NFS protocol. And for good measure, we will use a new feature in CycleCloud called Scheduled Events – which will automatically unmount the NFS share when the VM’s are shutdown. CycleCloud and SLURM Azure CycleCloud Workspace for Slurm is an Azure Marketplace solution template that delivers a fully managed SLURM workload environment on Azure. This occurs without requiring manually configured infrastructure or Slurm settings. To get started, go to the Azure marketplace and type “Azure CycleCloud for Slurm” I have not provided a detailed breakdown of the steps for Azure CycleCloud for Slurm as Kiran Buchetti does an excellent job of that in the blog here. It is a worthwhile read so please take a minute to review. Getting back to the theme of this blog, simplicity of Azure CycleCloud Workspace for Slurm is one of its most important value propositions. Please see below for my top reasons why: CycleCloud Workplace for Slurm is a simple template for entire cluster creations. Without the above, a user would have to manually install CycleCloud, install Slurm, configure the compute partitions, attach storage, etc. Instead, you fill out a marketplace template and a working cluster is live in 15-20 minutes. Preconfigured best practices, prebuilt Slurm nodes, partitions, network and security rules are done for the end user. No deep knowledge of HPC or SLURM is required! Automatic Cost control: Workplace for Slurm is designed to deploy only when a job is submitted. From there, the solution will auto shutdown after a job is complete. Moreover, workplace for Slurm comes with preconfigured partitions (GPU partition, HTC spot partition) – so end users can submit jobs to the right partition based on performance and budget. Now that we have a cluster built – let's turn our attention to data management. I have chosen to highlight the Hammerspace Data Platform in this blog. Why? Namely, because it is a powerful solution that provides high performance and global access to CycleCloud HPC/AI nodes. Sticking true to our theme... it is also incredibly simple to integrate with CycleCloud. Who is Hammerspace ? Before discussing integration, let's take a minute to introduce you to Hammerspace. Hammerspace is a software-defined data orchestration platform that provides a global file system across on-premises infrastructure and public clouds. It enables users and applications to access and manage unstructured data anywhere at any time. This all comes without the need to copy, migrate, or manually manage data. Hammerspace’s core philosophy is that “Data should follow the user, not the other way around”. Great information on Hammerspace at the following link: Hammerspace Whitepapers Linux Native Hammerspace's foundation as a data platform is built natively into the Linux kernel, requiring no additional software installation on any nodes. The company’s goal is to deliver a High-Performance Plug and Play model – using standard NFS protocols (v3, v4, pNFS) – that make high performance & scalable file access familiar to any Linux system administrator. Let’s break down why the native Kernel approach is important to a CycleCloud Workplace on SLURM user: POSIX compliant high performance file access with no changes in code required. No agents needed on the hosts, no additional CycleCloud templates needed. From a CycleCloud perspective, Hammerspace is simply an “external NFS” No re-staging of jobs required. Its NFS – all the compute nodes can access the same data (regardless of where it resides). The days of copying / moving data between compute nodes are over. Seamless Mounting. Native NFS mounts can be added easily in CycleCloud and files are instantly available for SLURM jobs with no unnecessary job prep time. We will take a deeper dive into this topic in the next section. How to export NFS Native NFS mounts can be added easily to CycleCloud such as the example below... NFS mounts can be entered on the Marketplace template or alternatively via the scheduler. For Hammerspace – click on External NFS. Put in the IP of the Hammerspace Anvil Metadata server, add in your mount options, and that’s it. The example below uses NFS mounts for /sched and /data Once the nodes are provisioned, log into any of the nodes and they will be mounted. On the Hammerspace user interface, we see the /sched share deployed with any relevant IOPS, growth, and files That’s it. That’s all it takes to mount a powerful parallel file system to CycleCloud. Now let's look at the benefits of a Hammerspace/CycleCloud implementation Simplified data management: CycleCloud orchestrates HPC infrastructure on demand – Hammerspace ensures that the data is immediately available whenever the compute comes up. Hammerspace will also place data in the right location or tier based on its policy driven management. This reduces the need for manual scripting to put data on lower cost tiers of storage. No application refactoring: Applications do not need to add additional agents, nor do they have to change to benefit from using a Global Access system like Hammerspace. CycleCloud Scheduled Events The last piece of the story is the shutdown/termination process. The HPC jobs are complete, now it is time to shut down the nodes and save costs. What happens to the NFS mounts that are on each node? Prior to CycleCloud 8.2.2 – if nodes were not unmounted properly, NFS mounts could hang indefinitely waiting for IO. Users can now take advantage of “Scheduled Events” in CycleCloud – a feature that lets you put a script on your HPC nodes to automatically be executed when a supported event occurs. In our case, our supported event is a node termination. The following is taken straight from the CycleCloud Main page here. CycleCloud supports enabling Terminate Notification on scaleset VMs (e.g., execute nodes). To do this, set EnableTerminateNotification to true on the nodearray. This will enable it for scalesets created for this nodearray. To override the timeout allowed, you can set TerminateNotificationTimeout to a new time. For example, in a cluster template: The script to unmount a NFS share during a terminate event is not trivial: Add it to your project project.spec Attach it to the shutdown task: Simple! Now a user can run a job and terminate the nodes after job completion without worrying about what it does to the backend storage. No more cleanup! This is cost savings, operational efficiency, and resource cleanliness (no more stale azure resources like IP’s, NICs, and disks cluttering up a subscription). Conclusion Azure CycleCloud along with Slurm and the Hammerspace Data Platform provides a powerful, scalable and cost-efficient solution for HPC in the cloud. CycleCloud automates the provisioning (and the elastic scaling up and down) of the Infrastructure, SLURM manages the task of job scheduling, and Hammerspace delivers a global data environment with high performance parallel NFS. Ultimately, the most important element of the solution is the simplicity. Hammerspace enables HPC organizations to focus on solving core problems vs the headache of managing infrastructure, setup, and unpredictable storage mounts. By reducing the administrative overhead needed to run HPC environments, the solution described in this blog will help organizations accelerate time to results, lower costs, and drive innovation across all industries.Benchmark Different Capacities for EDA Workloads on Microsoft HPC Storages
Overview Semiconductor (or Electronic Design Automation [EDA]) companies prioritize reducing time to market (TTM), which depends on how quickly tasks such as chip design validation and pre-foundry work can be completed. Faster TTM also helps save on EDA licensing costs, as less time spent on work means more time available for the licenses. To achieve shorter TTM, storage solutions are crucial. As illustrated in the article “Benefits of using Azure NetApp Files for Electronic Design Automation (EDA)” (1*), with Large Volume feature, which requires a minimum size of 50TB, Azure NetApp Files can be boosted to reach up to 652,260 I/O rate at 2ms latency, and 826,379 at performance edge (~7 ms) for one Large Volume. Objective In real-world production, EDA files—such as tools, libraries, temporary files, and output—are usually stored in different volumes with varying capacities. Not every EDA job needs extremely high I/O rates or throughput. Additionally, cost is a key consideration, since larger volumes are more expensive. The objective of this article is to share benchmark results for different storage volume sizes: 50TB, 100TB, and 500TB, all using the Large Volume features. We also included a 32TB case—where Large Volume features aren't available on ANF—for comparison with Azure Managed Lustre File System (AMLFS), another Microsoft HPC storage solution. These benchmark results can help customers evaluate their real-world needs, considering factors like capacity size, I/O rate, throughput, and cost. Testing Method EDA workloads are classified into two primary types—Frontend and Backend, each with distinct requirements for the underlying storage and compute infrastructure. Frontend workloads focus on logic design and functional aspects of chip design and consist of thousands of short-duration parallel jobs with an I/O pattern characterized by frequent random reads and writes across millions of small files. Backend workloads focus on translating logic design to physical design for manufacturing and consists of hundreds of jobs involving sequential read/write of fewer larger files. The choice of a storage solution to meet this unique mix of frontend and backend workload patterns is non-trivial. Frontend and backend EDA workloads are very demanding on storage solutions – standard industry benchmarks indicate a high I/O profile of the workloads described above that include a substantial amount of NFS access, lookup, create, getattrs, link and unlink operations, as well as small and large file read and write operations. This blog contains the output from the performance testing of an industry standard benchmark for EDA. For this particular workload, the benchmark represents the I/O blend typical of a company running both front- and backend EDA workloads in parallel. Testing Environment We used 10 E64dsv5 as client VMs connecting to one single ANF or AMFLS volume with nconnect mount option (for ANF) to ensure generate enough workloads for benchmark. The client VM’s tuning and configuration are the same that specified on (1*). ANF mount option: nocto,actimeo=600,hard,rsize=262144,wsize=262144,vers=3,tcp,noatime,nconnect=8 AMLFS mount: sudo mount -t lustre -o noatime,flock All resources reside in the same VNET and same Proximity Placement Group when possible to ensure low network latency. Figure 1. High level architecture of the testing environment Benchmark Results As EDA jobs are highly latency sensitive. For today’s more complex chip designs, 2 milliseconds of latency per EDA operation is generally seen as the ideal target, while edge performance limit is around 7 milliseconds. We listed the I/O rates achieved at both latency points for easier reference. Throughput (in MB/s) is also included, as it is essential for many back-end tasks and the output phase. (Figure 2., Figure 3,. Figure 4, and Table 1.) For cases where the Large Volume feature is enabled, we observe the following: 100TB with Ultra tier and 500TB with Standard, Premium or Ultra tier can reach to over 640,000 I/O rate at 2ms latency. This is consistent to the 652,260 as stated in (*1). For Ultra 500TB volume can even reach 705,500 I/O rate at 2ms latency. For workloads not requiring much I/O rate, either 50TB with Ultra tier or 100TB with Premium tier can reach 500,000 I/O rate. For an even smaller job, 50TB with Premium tier can reach 255,000 and more inexpensive. For scenarios throughput is critical, 500TB with Standard, Premium or Ultra tier can all reach 10~12TB/s throughput. Figure 2. Latency vs. I/O rate: Azure NetApp Files- one Large Volume Figure 3. Achieved I/O rate at 2ms latency & performance edge (~7ms): Azure NetApp Files- one Large Volume Figure 4. Achieved throughput (MB/s) at 2ms latency & performance edge (~7ms): Azure NetApp Files- one Large Volume Table 1. Achieved I/O rate and Throughput at both latency: Azure NetApp Files- one Large Volume For cases with less than 50TB of capacity, where the Large Volume feature not available for ANF, we included Azure Managed Lustre File System (AMLFS) for comparison. With the same 32TB volume size, a regular ANF volume achieves about 90,000 I/O at 2ms latency, while an AMLFS Ultra volume (500 MB/s/TiB) can reach roughly double that, around 195,000. This shows that AMLFS is a better choice for performance when the Large Volume feature isn't available on ANF. (Figure 5.) Figure 5. Achieved I/O rate at 2ms latency: ANF regular volume vs. AMLFS Summary This article shared benchmark results for different storage capacities needed for EDA workloads, including 50TB, 100TB, and 500TB volumes with the Large Volume feature enabled. It also compared a 32TB volume—where the Large Volume feature isn’t available on ANF—to Azure Managed Lustre File System (AMLFS), another Microsoft HPC storage option. These results can help customers choose or design storage that best fits their needs by balancing capacity, I/O rate, throughput, and cost. With the Large Volume feature, 100TB Ultra and 500TB Standard, Premium, or Ultra tiers can achieve over 640,000 I/O at 2ms latency. For jobs that need less I/O, 50TB Ultra or 100TB Premium can reach 500,000, while 50TB Premium offers 255,000 at a lower cost. When throughput matters most, 500TB volumes across all tiers can deliver 10–12TB/s. If you have a smaller job or can’t use the Large Volume feature, Azure Managed Lustre File System (AMLFS) gives you better performance than a regular ANF volume. A final reminder, this article primarily provided benchmark results to help semiconductor customers in designing their storage solutions, considering capacity size, I/O rate, throughput, and cost. It did not address other important criteria such as heterogeneous integration or legacy compliance, which are also important when selecting an appropriate storage solution. References Benefits of using Azure NetApp Files for Electronic Design Automation (EDA) Learn more about Azure Managed LustreAnnouncing the AI Infrastructure on Azure repository
Today we’re excited to release the AI Infrastructure on Azure repository—a one-stop reference for teams building large-scale AI clusters on Azure. Authors Davide Vanzo - Senior Technical Program Manager - Azure Specialized Jer-Ming Chia - Principal Technical Program Manager - Azure Specialized Jesse Lopez - Senior Technical Program Manager - Azure Specialized Jingchao Zhang - Senior Technical Program Manager - Azure Specialized Paul Edwards - Principal Technical Program Manager - Azure Specialized Wolfgang De Salvador - Senior Product Manager - Azure Storage Introduction When building a supercomputer on Azure for AI workloads, teams must stitch together orchestration, storage, and compute components. They often spend weeks fine-tuning those configurations for peak performance. This repo delivers well-tested (Infrastructure as Code) blueprints for fully integrated clusters that prioritize reliability and performance, and that can be used to reproduce our published benchmarks. Design Considerations Building an AI supercomputer on Azure spans many moving parts: VM family selection (e.g. ND GB200 v6 vs ND H200 v5), deployment model (fully containerized AKS clusters to traditional HPC), and storage strategy—you can even run training without POSIX file systems by tuning your data lifecycle, as detailed in several blog posts and sessions. Other impactful design drivers include: Storage & I/O Capacity needs (dataset, checkpoints, logs) Throughput & IOPS (sequential vs random access patterns) Filesystem interface (POSIX-compliant vs API-native cloud storage) Tiering strategy Software & Orchestration AI framework & version (e.g MegatronLM, LLM-foundry, DeepSpeed) Container runtime (e.g enroot+pyxis, Singularity, Docker) Scheduler/Orchestration integration (e.g Slurm, Kueue, Volcano) OS image & driver stack (e.g Ubuntu/HPC image, NVIDIA drivers, IB drivers) Node Health Checks (checks for Infiniband fabric performance/health, GPU errors etc) Workflow & Automation Checkpoint frequency & size (impacts storage performance) Data staging/ingest (pre-processing on CPU nodes vs GPU nodes) Monitoring & logging (telemetry pipelines, DCGM, Prometheus) Systems optimizations CPU configs (NUMA topology files & affinity overrides) NCCL tuning (topology mapping, P2P chunk size, channel count) IB fabric tuning (queue-per-connection, zero-copy transfers) Storage tuning (mount options, I/O scheduler, parallel-FS striping) Given the breadth of these design considerations, landing on an optimal configuration can be challenging. This repo’s purpose is to centralize our battle-tested configurations and optimization guidance—so you can push the health, reliability, and performance of your Azure AI supercomputers to the limit. We’ve also published end-to-end benchmarks here, giving you clear baselines to compare your own deployments against. It also includes recommended node- and cluster-level health checks, baseline performance benchmarks, and a sample LLM training run using this configuration. Configuration guidance In this initial release, the repo provides a ready-to-run template for a "canonical" SLURM-managed HPC cluster, leveraging Azure NetApp Files for networked storage, and Azure Managed Lustre Service for parallel filesystem performance. This section of the repository is aimed to contain well-tested infrastructure as code configurations for AI supercomputers on Azure that have been widely tested and adopted. Storage Guidance The repository also provides guidance for choosing storage backends. For instance, evaluating Azure Managed Lustre tiers to match the size and performance required for the specific training jobs. One of the key elements to optimize in distributed training is the checkpoint time. This is critical for GPU utilization and it is strongly connected to the filesystem throughput. An example of this scenario for a GPT-3–style model (175 B parameters) has been presented in the repository for the case of Azure Managed Lustre. In a similar way, we present guidance on how to use BlobFuse2 with Azure Blob Storage for training jobs. Azure Blob Storage has demonstrated the ability to reach 25 Tbps of egress bandwidth on a single account in a recent Microsoft Build session. Moreover, the repository is meant to host guidance on specific filesystem tunings to maximize the delivered performance. Node and Cluster-level Healthchecks Validating cluster readiness before large-scale training runs helps catch system issues early, so you don’t waste compute cycles and can hit the performance baselines. We recommend running a series of healthchecks at both the node- and cluster-level to catch hardware or software issues early. It is recommended that AzureHPC Node Health Checks (AzNHC) is used to validate node-level functionality. Built on the LBNL NHC framework, AzNHC adds Azure-specific hardware tests for HPC and GPU VM SKUs. It includes SKU-specific tests, such as GPU availability, NVLink health, ECC memory error checks, device-to-host and host-to-device bandwidth tests, InfiniBand throughput (GDR and non-GDR), topology validation, and intra-node NCCL all-reduce benchmarks. It runs inside a Docker container that can be invoked easily. In parallel, at the cluster level, testing inter-node GPU communication with NCCL all-reduce benchmarks is an effective way to measure collective bandwidth across your fleet. The Azure HPC Image includes the prebuilt nccl-tests suite in /opt/nccl-tests/build/, which can be used to run across all nodes via MPI. The recommended NCCL settings -- CollNet/NVLS, GDR, and relaxed PCI ordering -- provide optimal collective performance and serve as the baseline. The repo includes best practices for running these validation tests. Benchmarks A recent published set of benchmarks demonstrates near-linear scaling from 8 up to 1,024 NDv5 H100 GPUs (Standard_ND96isr_H100_v5), delivering training performance on par with NVIDIA’s reference DGX systems and underscoring Azure’s infrastructure scalability and efficiency for large-scale AI workloads. These benchmarks ran on the repo’s reference architecture. The recipes, deployment instructions, and full benchmark results are all available inside the example section of the repository. Workload Examples Equally important, the repo contains some real world examples of E2E AI training -- including best practices for training jobs data preparation and execution. Currently, in the examples section, we introduced the Megatron-LM GPT175B and the LLM Foundry MPT-30B and MPT-70B case. The current examples are focused on the Azure CycleCloud Workspace for Slurm architecture, but there is the plan to extend them to additional orchestration solutions in the future. These guides allow interested users to configure sample distributed training jobs, relying on important configuration guidance for their environment and infrastructure. What’s next The repository presented in this blog post will be expanded with additional scenarios, best practices and configuration recipes. We will share periodically updates on new contents and evolution of what available in the catalog. We welcome contributions and we encourage to actively open requests for new content that you may find of interest. Thank you to all our readers!Computer-Aided Engineering “CAE” on Azure
Table of Contents: What is Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE)? Why Moving CAE to Cloud? Cloud vs. On-Premises What Makes Azure Special for CAE Workloads? What Makes Azure Stand out Among Public Cloud Providers? “InfiniBand Interconnect” Key CAE Workloads on Azure Azure HPC VM Series for CAE Workloads CAE Software Partnership “ISV’s” Robust Ecosystem of System Integrator “SI” Partners Real-World Use Case: Automotive Sector Final Thoughts -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. What is Computer-Aided Engineering “CAE”? Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) is a broad term that refers to the use of computer software to aid in engineering tasks. This includes simulation, validation, and optimization of products, processes, and manufacturing tools. CAE is integral to modern engineering, allowing engineers to explore ideas, validate concepts, and optimize designs before building physical prototypes. CAE encompasses various fields such as finite element analysis (FEA), computational fluid dynamics (CFD), and multibody dynamics (MBD) CAE tools are widely used in industries like automotive, aerospace, and manufacturing to improve product design and performance. For example, in the automotive industry, CAE tools help reduce product development costs and time while enhancing the safety, comfort, and durability of vehicles CAE tools are often used to analyze and optimize designs created within CAD (Computer-Aided Design) software CAE systems typically involve three phases: Pre-processing: Defining the model and environmental factors to be applied to it. Analysis solver: Performing the analysis, usually on high-powered computers. Post-processing: Visualizing the results In a world where product innovation moves faster than ever, Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) has become a cornerstone of modern design and manufacturing. From simulating airflow over an F1 car to predicting stress in an aircraft fuselage, CAE allows engineers to explore ideas, validate concepts, and optimize designs—before a single prototype is built. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Why Move CAE to Cloud? Cloud vs. On-Premises Historically, CAE workloads were run on-premises due to their compute-intensive nature and large data requirements. Traditional CAE methods—dependent on expensive, on-premises HPC clusters—are facing a tipping point. Many organizations are now embracing cloud-based CAE. When considering whether to use cloud or on-premises solutions, there are several factors to consider: Cost and Maintenance: On-premises solutions require a large upfront investment in hardware and ongoing costs for maintenance and upgrades. Cloud solutions, on the other hand, spread costs over time and often result in lower total cost of ownership. Security and Privacy: On-premises solutions offer control over security but require significant resources to manage. Cloud providers offer advanced security features and compliance certifications, often surpassing what individual companies can achieve on their own Scalability and Flexibility: Cloud solutions provide unmatched scalability and flexibility, allowing businesses to quickly adjust resources based on demand. On-premises solutions can be more rigid and require additional investments to scale Reliability and Availability: Cloud providers offer high availability and disaster recovery options, often with service level agreements (SLAs) guaranteeing uptime. On-premises solutions depend on the company's infrastructure and may require additional investments for redundancy and disaster recovery Integration and Innovation: Cloud solutions often integrate seamlessly with other cloud services and offer continuous innovation through regular updates, new features, and run more simulations in parallel, reducing time-to-solution, accelerating product development cycle, and faster time to market. On-premises solutions may lag in terms of innovation and require manual integration efforts. Global Access: Teams can collaborate and access data/models from anywhere. Cloud gives you global, on-demand supercomputing access without the physical, financial, and operational burden of traditional on-premise clusters. In summary, the choice between cloud and on-premises solutions depends on various factors including cost, performance, security, maintenance, flexibility, and specific business needs. Cloud provides customers with global scalability, high availability, and a broad range of capabilities within a secure, integrated platform. It enables organizations to concentrate on core product innovation, accelerating their journey to market. The following table shows Azure vs. on-premises for CAE Workloads: Aspect Cloud (Azure) On-Premises Global Reach 60+ regions worldwide — deploy compute close to users, customers, or engineers. Limited to where physical hardware is located (one or few sites). Access Flexibility Access from anywhere with secure authentication (VPN/SSO/Conditional Access). Access generally restricted to internal corporate network or VPN. Collaboration Teams across continents can work on shared HPC clusters easily. Remote collaboration can be slow and complex; security risks higher. Elastic Scaling Instantly scale resources up/down globally based on demand. Start small, grow big — then shrink when needed. Scaling requires buying, installing, maintaining new hardware. Time to Deploy No wait for procurement. Minutes to spin up a new HPC cluster in a new region. Weeks/months to procure, rack, configure hardware in new location. Disaster Recovery Built-in regional redundancy, backup options, replication across regions. Disaster recovery requires manual setup, physical duplication. Compliance & Data Residency Choose specific Azure regions to meet compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, ITAR, etc.). Need to build compliant infrastructure manually. Network Latency Optimize by deploying close to users; fast backbone network across regions. Bound by physical proximity; long-distance remote work suffers latency. Maintenance Azure handles hardware upgrades, security patches, downtime minimization. In-house IT teams responsible for all hardware, software, and patching. Security at Scale MSFT commits to invest $20B on cybersecurity over five years. Azure invests >$1B annually in cybersecurity; ISO, SOC, GDPR certified globally. Requires dedicated resources to manage security protocols and maintain visibility across all systems. This can be more complex and resource-intensive compared to cloud solutions Cost Optimization Operates on a pay-as-you-go model, enabling businesses to scale usage and costs as needed. This avoids the capital expenditure of purchasing hardware. Azure also offers various pricing options and discounts, such as reserved capacity, spot pricing, and Azure Hybrid Benefit, which can significantly reduce costs — massive cost control flexibility. Requires significant upfront capital investment in hardware, software licenses, and infrastructure setup. These costs include purchasing and maintaining physical servers, which are subject to technological obsolescence. Ongoing expenses include system maintenance, support, power consumption, and cooling Innovation Access latest GPUs, CPUs (like H100, H200, GB200, AMD-MI300X, HBv3, HBv4, HBv5) Needs investments in hardware refresh cycles. Managed Storage Offers agility with instant provisioning. Scalability as virtually unlimited with automatic scale up or down. Fully managed including updates, patches, backup, etc. High Availability & DR through redundancy, geo-replication, and automated DR options. Security through enterprise-grade security with encryption at rest and in transit & compliance certifications. Pay-as-you-go or reserved pricing with no upfront HW cost (CapEx). Global access through internet. Innovation through continuous improvements with Ai-driven optimization. Offers control but demands heavy investment in HW, time-consuming deployment. Scaling is limited by physical HW capacity. Must be managed by in-house IT teams so required significant time expertise and resources. Redundancy & DR must be designed, funded and maintained manually. Security depends on in-house capabilities and requires investment. High upfront capital expenditure (CapEx). Access limited to local networks unless extended with complex remote-access solutions. Innovation depends on HW refresh cycles limited by expense and infrequency. Software Images & Marketplace Instant access to thousands of pre-built software images via Marketplace. Speedy deployment of complete environments in minutes from ready-to-use templates. Huge ecosystem — access to Microsoft, open-source, and third-party vendor solutions — constantly updated. Automated maintenance and updates as Marketplace software often comes with built-in update capabilities, auto-patching, and cloud-optimized versions. Cost flexibility by either Pay-as-you-go (PAYG) licensing, bring-your-own-license (BYOL) options, or subscription models available. Innovation trough early access to beta, cloud-native, and AI-enhanced software from top vendors through the marketplace. Security is guarded s Marketplace images are verified by cloud provider security and compliance standards. Software must be sourced, manually installed, and configured so takes days to weeks. Manual deployment, installation, environment setup, and configuration can take days or weeks. Limited by licensing agreements, internal vendor contracts, and physical hardware compatibility. Manual updates required and IT must monitor, download, test, and apply patches individually. Large upfront license purchases often needed with renewal and true-up costs can be complex and expensive. Innovation is limited as new software adoption is delayed by procurement, budgeting, and testing cycles. Security assurance depends on internal vetting processes and manual hardening. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. What Makes Azure Special for CAE Workloads? Microsoft Azure: a cloud platform enabling scalable, secure, and high-performance CAE workflows across industries. Our goal in Azure is to provide the CAE field with a one-stop, best-in-class technology platform, rich with solution offerings and supported by a robust ecosystem of partners. Azure offers several unique features and benefits that make it particularly well-suited for Computer-Aided Engineering (CAE) workloads: GPU Acceleration: Azure provides powerful GPU options, such as NVIDIA GPUs, which significantly enhance the performance of leading CAE tools. This results in improved turnaround times, reduced power consumption, and lower hardware costs. For example, tools like Ansys Speos for lighting simulation and CPFD's Barracuda Virtual Reactor have been optimized to take advantage of these GPUs. High-Performance Computing (HPC): Azure offers specialized HPC solutions, such as the HBv3, HBv4/HX series, which are designed for high-performance workloads. These solutions provide the computational power needed for complex simulations and analyses. Scalability and Flexibility: Azure's cloud infrastructure allows for easy scaling of resources to meet the demands of CAE workloads. This flexibility ensures that you can handle varying levels of computational intensity without the need for significant upfront investment in hardware. Integration with Industry Tools: Azure supports a wide range of CAE software and tools, making it easier to integrate existing workflows into the cloud environment. This includes certification and optimization of CAE tools on Azure. Support for Hybrid Environments: Azure provides solutions for hybrid cloud environments, allowing you to seamlessly integrate on-premises resources with cloud resources. This is particularly useful for organizations transitioning to the cloud or requiring a hybrid setup for specific workloads. Global Reach: As of April 2025, Microsoft Azure operates over 60 announced regions and more than 300 data centers worldwide, making it the most expansive cloud infrastructure among major providers. Azure ensures low latency and high availability for CAE workloads, regardless of where your team is located. These features collectively make Azure a powerful and flexible platform for running CAE workloads, providing the computational power, scalability, and security needed to handle complex engineering simulations and analyses. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. What Makes Azure Stand out Among Public Cloud Providers? “InfiniBand Interconnect” InfiniBand interconnect is one of the key differentiators that makes Microsoft Azure stand out among public cloud providers, especially for high-performance computing (HPC) and CAE workloads. Here’s what makes InfiniBand a game changer, unique, and impactful on Azure: a) Ultra-Low Latency & High Memory Bandwidth InfiniBand on Azure delivers 200 Gbps (and up to 400 Gbps with HDR/NDR in some cases and 800 Gbps for the latest SKU,"HBv5", currently in Preview) interconnect speeds. This ultra-low-latency, high-throughput network is ideal for tightly coupled parallel workloads, such as CFD, FEA, weather simulations, and molecular modeling. When the newly added AMD SKU, HBv5, transitions from preview to general availability (GA), memory bandwidth will no longer be a limitation for workloads such as CFD and Weather simulations. The HBv5 offers an impressive 7 TB/s of memory bandwidth, which is 8 times greater than the latest bare-metal and cloud alternatives. It also provides nearly 20 times more bandwidth than Azure HBv3 and Azure HBv2, which utilize the 3rd Gen EPYC™ with 3D V-cache “Milan-X” and the 2nd Gen EPYC™ “Rome” respectively. Additionally, the HBv5 delivers up to 35 times more memory bandwidth compared to a 4–5-year-old HPC server nearing the end of its hardware lifecycle. b) RDMA (Remote Direct Memory Access) Support RDMA enables direct memory access between VMs, bypassing the CPU, which drastically reduces latency and increases application efficiency — a must for HPC workloads. c) True HPC Fabric in the Cloud Azure is the only major public cloud provider that offers InfiniBand across multiple VM families like: HBv3/4 (for CFD, FEA, Multiphysics, Molecular Dynamics) HX-series (Structural Analysis) ND (GPU + MPI) It allows scaling MPI workloads across thousands of cores — something typically limited to on-premises supercomputers. d) Production-Grade Performance for CAE Solvers like ANSYS Fluent, STAR-CCM+, Abaqus, and MSC Nastran have benchmarked extremely well on Azure, thanks in large part to the InfiniBand-enabled infrastructure. If you’re building CAE, HPC, or AI workloads that rely on ultra-fast communication between nodes, Azure’s InfiniBand-powered VM SKUs offer the best cloud-native alternative to on-prem HPC clusters. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5. Key CAE Workloads on Azure: CAE isn’t a one-size-fits-all domain. Azure supports a broad spectrum of CAE applications, such as: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD): ANSYS Fluent, Ansys CFX, Siemens Simcenter STAR-CCM+, Convergent Science CONVERGE CFD, Autodesk CFD, OpenFOAM, NUMECA Fine/Open, Altair ACuSolve, Simerics MP+, Cadence Fidelity CFD, COMSOL Multiphysics (CFD Module), Dassault Systeme XFlow, etc. Finite Element Analysis (FEA): ANSYS Mechanical, Dassault Systemes Abaqus, Altair OptiStruct, Siemens Simcenter 3D, MSC Nastran, Autodesk Fusion 360 Simulation, COMSOL Multiphysics (Structural Module), etc. Thermal & Electromagnetic Simulation: COMSOL Multiphysics, Ansys-HFSS, CST Studio Suite, Ansys Mechanical (Thermal Module), Siemens Simcenter 3D Thermal, Dassault Systemes Abaqus Thermal, etc. Crash & Impact Testing: Ansys LS-DYNA, Altair Radioss, ESI PAM-Crash, Siemens Simcenter Madymo, Dassault Systemes Abaqus “Explicit”, Ansys Autodyn, etc. These applications require a combination of powerful CPUs, big memory footprint, high memory bandwidth, and low-latency interconnects. Some applications also offer GPU-accelerated versions. All of which are available in Azure’s purpose-built HPC VM families. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6. Azure HPC VM Series for CAE Workloads Azure offers specialized VM series tailored for CAE applications. These VMs support RDMA-enabled InfiniBand networking, critical for scaling CAE workloads across nodes in parallel simulations. CPU: HBv3, HBv4 Series: Ideal for memory-intensive workloads like CFD and FEA, offering high memory bandwidth and low-latency interconnects. HX Series: Optimized for structural analysis applications, providing significant performance boosts for solvers like MSC Nastran & others. GPU: ND Series: GPU-accelerated VMs optimized for CAE workloads, offering high double-precision compute, large memory bandwidth, and scalable performance with NVIDIA H100, H200, GB200 & AMD M300X GPUs. The highest-performing compute-optimized CPU offering in Azure today is the HBv4/HX series, featuring 176 cores of 4th Gen AMD EPYC processors with 3D V-Cache technology (“Genoa-X”). Below is a sample performance comparison of four different AMD SKU generations against the Intel “HCv1-Skylake” SKU, using the Ansys Fluent (F1 Racecar 140M cells) model. Full performance & scalability of HBv4 and HX-Series VMs with Genoa-X CPUs is HERE. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7. CAE Software Partnership “ISV’s” Independent Software Vendors (ISVs) play a critical role on Azure by bringing trusted, industry-leading applications to the platform. Their solutions — spanning CAE, CFD, FEA, data analytics, AI, and more — are optimized to run efficiently on Azure’s scalable infrastructure. ISVs ensure that customers can seamlessly move their workloads to the cloud without sacrificing performance, compatibility, or technical support. They also drive innovation by collaborating with Azure engineering teams to deliver cloud-native, HPC-ready, and AI-enhanced capabilities, helping businesses accelerate product development, simulations, and decision-making. Below is a partial list of these ISVs & their offerings on Azure: ANSYS Access: SaaS platform built on Azure, offering native cloud experiences for Fluent, Mechanical, LS-Dyna, HFSS, etc. Altair One: SaaS platform on Azure supporting Altair solvers such as HyperWorks, OptiStruct, Radioss, AcuSolve, etc. Siemens Simcenter: Validated on Azure for fluid, structural, and thermal simulation with solvers such as STAR-CCM+, NX, Femap Dassault Systèmes: Solvers such as Abaqus, CATIA, SIMULIA, XFlow COMSOL: For its flagship solver “COMSOL Multiphysics” CPFD Software: CPFD Software has optimized its simulation tool “Barracuda Virtual Reactor” for Azure, enabling engineers to perform particle-fluid simulations efficiently. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8. Robust Ecosystem of System Integrator “SI” Partners Azure CAE System Integrators (SIs) are specialized partners that assist organizations in deploying and managing CAE workloads on Microsoft Azure. These SIs provide expertise in cloud migration, HPC optimization, and integration of CAE applications, enabling businesses to leverage Azure’s scalable infrastructure for engineering simulations and analyses. a) What Do Azure CAE System Integrators Offer? Azure CAE SIs deliver a range of services tailored to the unique demands of engineering and simulation workloads: Cloud Migration: Transitioning on-premises CAE applications and data to Azure’s cloud environment. HPC Optimization: Configuring Azure’s HPC resources to maximize performance for CAE tasks. Application Integration: Ensuring compatibility and optimal performance of CAE software (e.g., ANSYS, Siemens, Altair, Abaqus) on Azure. Managed Services: Ongoing support, monitoring, and maintenance of CAE environments on Azure. b) Leading Azure CAE System Integrators Several SIs have been recognized for their capabilities in deploying CAE solutions on Azure. Partial list is below: Rescale, TotalCAE, Oakwood Systems, UberCloud “SIMR”, Capgemini, Accenture, Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence. c) Benefits of Collaborating with Azure CAE SIs By partnering with Azure CAE System Integrators, organizations can effectively harness the power of cloud computing to enhance their engineering and simulation capabilities. Engaging with Azure CAE System Integrators can provide: Expertise: Access to professionals experienced in both CAE applications and Azure infrastructure. Efficiency: Accelerated deployment and optimization of CAE workloads. Scalability: Ability to scale resources up or down based on project requirements. Cost Management: Optimized resource usage leading to potential cost savings. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9. Real-World Use Case: Automotive Sector Rimac used Azure cloud computing to help with the design, testing, and manufacturing of its next-generation components and sportscars, and it’s gaining even greater scale and speed in its product development processes with a boost from Microsoft Azure HPC Rimac’s Azure HPC environment uses Azure CycleCloud to organize and orchestrate clusters—putting together different cluster types and sizes flexibly and as necessary. The solution includes Azure Virtual Machines, running containers on Azure HBv3 virtual machines with 3 rd Gen AMD EPYC™ Milan Processors with AMD 3D V-Cache, which are much faster than previous generation Azure virtual machines for explicit calculations. Rimac’s solution takes full advantage of the power of AMD, which offers the highest performing x86 CPU for technical computing. “We’ve gained a significant increase in computational speed with AMD, which leads to lower utilization of HPC licenses and faster iterations,” says Ivan Krajinović, Head of Simulations, Rimac Technology “However complex the model we need to create, we know that we can manage it with Azure HPC. We now produce more highly complex models that simply wouldn’t have been possible on our old infrastructure.” Ivan Krajinović -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10. The Future of CAE is Cloud-Native The next frontier in CAE is not just lifting and shifting legacy solvers into the cloud—but enabling cloud-native simulation pipelines. List includes: AI-assisted simulation tuning Serverless pre/post-processing workflows Digital twins integrated with IoT data on Azure Cloud-based visualization with NVIDIA Omniverse With advances in GPU acceleration, parallel file systems (like Azure Managed Lustre File System, AMLFS), and intelligent job schedulers, Azure is enabling this next-gen CAE transformation today. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11. Final Thoughts Moving CAE to Azure is more than a tech upgrade—it’s a shift in mindset. It empowers engineering teams to simulate more, iterate faster, and design better—without being held back by hardware constraints. If you’re still running CAE workloads on aging, capacity-constrained systems, now is the time to explore what Azure HPC can offer. Let the cloud be your wind tunnel, your test track, your proving ground. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Let’s Connect Have questions or want to share how you’re using CAE in the cloud? Let’s start a conversation! We'd love to hear your thoughts! Leave a comment below and join the conversation. 👇 #CAE #HPC #AzureHPC #EngineeringSimulation #CFD #FEA #CloudComputing #DigitalEngineering #MicrosoftAzure
