The Future of AI: Structured Vibe Coding - An Improved Approach to AI Software Development
In this post from The Future of AI series, the author introduces structured vibe coding, a method for managing AI agents like a software team using specs, GitHub issues, and pull requests. By applying this approach with GitHub Copilot, they automated a repetitive task—answering Microsoft Excel-based questionnaires—while demonstrating how AI can enhance developer workflows without replacing human oversight. The result is a scalable, collaborative model for AI-assisted software development.The Future of AI: How Lovable.dev and Azure OpenAI Accelerate Apps that Change Lives
Discover how Charles Elwood, a Microsoft AI MVP and TEDx Speaker, leverages Lovable.dev and Azure OpenAI to create impactful AI solutions. From automating expense reports to restoring voices, translating gestures to speech, and visualizing public health data, Charles's innovations are transforming lives and democratizing technology. Follow his journey to learn more about AI for good.The Future of AI: Developing Lacuna - an agent for Revealing Quiet Assumptions in Product Design
A conversational agent named Lacuna is helping product teams uncover hidden assumptions embedded in design decisions. Built with Copilot Studio and powered by Azure AI Foundry, Lacuna analyzes product documents to identify speculative beliefs and assess their risk using design analysis lenses: impact, confidence, and reversibility. By surfacing cognitive biases and prompting reflection, Lacuna encourages teams to validate assumptions through lightweight evidence-gathering methods. This experiment in human-AI collaboration explores how agents can foster epistemic humility and transform static documents into dynamic conversations.The Future of AI: Vibe Code with Adaptive Custom Translation
This blog explores how vibe coding—a conversational, flow-based development approach—was used to build the AdaptCT playground in Azure AI Foundry. It walks through setting up a productive coding environment with GitHub Copilot in Visual Studio Code, configuring the Copilot agent, and building a translation playground using Adaptive Custom Translation (AdaptCT). The post includes real-world code examples, architectural insights, and advanced UI patterns. It also highlights how AdaptCT fine-tunes LLM outputs using domain-specific reference sentence pairs, enabling more accurate and context-aware translations. The blog concludes with best practices for vibe coding teams and a forward-looking view of AI-augmented development paradigms.Keeping Agents on Track: Introducing Task Adherence in Azure AI Foundry
Task Adherence is coming soon to public preview in both the Azure AI Content Safety API and Azure AI Foundry. It helps developers ensure AI agents stay aligned with their assigned tasks, preventing drift, misuse, or unsafe tool calls.Announcing a new Azure AI Translator API (Public Preview)
Microsoft has launched the Azure AI Translator API (Public Preview), offering flexible translation options using either neural machine translation (NMT) or generative AI models like GPT-4o. The API supports tone, gender, and adaptive custom translation, allowing enterprises to tailor output for real-time or human-reviewed workflows. Customers can mix models in a single request and authenticate via resource key or Entra ID. LLM features require deployment in Azure AI Foundry. Pricing is based on characters (NMT) or tokens (LLMs).Effective AI Governance with Azure
Why is AI Governance needed? As organizations increasingly adopt AI in their cloud environments, effective governance is essential to ensure sustainability, security, and operational excellence. Without proper oversight, AI workloads can escalate costs, expose vulnerabilities, and struggle with resiliency under dynamic conditions. AI Governance provides a structured approach to managing AI investments, securing sensitive data, optimizing performance, and ensuring compliance with evolving regulations. By implementing governance best practices, enterprises can balance innovation with control, enabling AI-driven solutions to scale efficiently and responsibly. This blog explores key areas of AI Governance, including cost management, security, resiliency, operational optimization, and model oversight. Five Pillars of AI Governance Manage AI Costs Choose the right billing model: For unpredictable usage, the Pay-as-you-go model works best, while predictable workloads benefit from Provisioned Throughput Units (PTUs). Mixing PTU endpoints with consumption-based endpoints helps save money, as PTUs take care of the main tasks while consumption-based endpoints deal with any extra demand. Choose the right model: Opting for an AI model should balance performance requirements with cost considerations. Select less expensive models unless the use case demands a higher-cost option. During fine-tuning, ensure maximum utilization of time within each billing period to prevent incurring additional charges. Reservations: By committing to a reservation for Provisioned Throughput Units (PTUs) over a period of one month or one year, you can realize savings. Most OpenAI models offer reservations, with discounts typically ranging from 30% to 60%. Track and control token usage: The Generative AI Gateway helps manage costs by tracking and throttling token usage, applying circuit breakers, and routing requests to multiple AI endpoints. Incorporating a semantic cache can further optimize both performance and expenses when using LLMs. Additionally, setting model-based provisioning quotas ensures better cost control by preventing unnecessary usage. Policies to shut down unused instances: Establish a policy requiring AI resources to enable the automatic shutdown feature on virtual machines and compute instances in Azure AI Foundry and Azure Machine Learning. This requirement applies to nonproduction environments and production workloads that can be taken offline periodically. Secure AI Workloads AI threat protection: Defender for Cloud provides real-time monitoring of Gen AI applications to detect security vulnerabilities. AI threat protection works with Azure AI content safety prompt shields and Microsoft’s threat intelligence to identify risks such as data leakage, data poisoning, jailbreak attempts, and credential threats. Integration with Defender XDR enables security teams to centralize alerts for AI workloads within the Defender XDR portal. Access and identity controls: Grant the minimum necessary user access to centralized AI resources. Leverage managed identities across supported Azure AI services and restrict access to essential AI model endpoints only. Implement just-in-time access to enable temporary elevation of permissions when required. Disable local authentication as needed. Key management: Azure AI services provide two API keys for each resource to facilitate secret rotation, enhancing security by enabling regular key updates. This feature protects service privacy in case of key leakage. It is recommended to store all keys securely in Azure Key Vault. Regulatory compliance: AI regulatory compliance involves utilizing industry-specific initiatives in Azure Policy and applying relevant policies for services like Azure AI Foundry and Azure Machine Learning. Compliance checklists designed for specific industries and locations, along with standards like ISO/IEC 23053:2022, assist in reviewing and confirming that AI workloads meet regulatory requirements. Network security: Azure AI services use a layered security model to restrict access to specific networks. Configuring network rules ensures that only applications from designated networks can access the account. Access can be further filtered by IP addresses, ranges, or Azure Virtual Network subnets. When network rules are in effect, applications must be authorized using Microsoft Entra ID credentials or a valid API key. Data security: Maintain strict data security boundaries by cataloging data to avoid feeding sensitive information to public-facing AI endpoints. Use legally licensed data for AI model grounding or training, and implement tools like Protected Material Detection to prevent copyright infringement. Establish version control for grounding data to track and revert changes, ensuring consistency and compliance across deployments. Regularly review outputs for intellectual property adherence. Tag sensitive information using Azure Information Protection. Risk scenario Risk impact Resiliency mitigation example Cyberattacks Ransomware, distributed denial of service (DDoS), or unauthorized access. To reduce impact, include robust security measures, including an appropriate backup and recovery process, in your adoption strategy and plan. System failures Hardware or software malfunctions. Design for quick recovery and data integrity restoration. Handle transient faults in your applications, and provide redundancy in your infrastructure, such as multiple replicas with automatic failover. Configuration issues Deployment errors or misconfigurations. Treat configuration changes as code changes by using infrastructure as code (IaC). Use continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, canary deployments, and rollback mechanisms to minimize the impact of faulty updates or deployments. Demand spikes or overload Performance degradation during peak usage or spikes in traffic. Use elastic scalability to ensure that systems automatically scale to handle an increased demand without disruption to service. Compliance failures Breaches of regulatory standards. Adopt compliance tools like Microsoft Purview and use Azure Policy to enforce compliance requirements. Natural disasters Datacenter outages caused by earthquakes, floods, or storms. Plan for failover, high availability, and disaster recovery by using availability zones, multiple regions, or even multicloud approaches. Resilience for AI Platforms Deploy AI landing zones: AI landing zones provide pre-designed, scalable environments that provide a structured foundation for deploying AI workloads in Azure. They integrate various Azure services to ensure governance, compliance, security, and operational efficiency. ALZ’s help streamline AI deployments while maintaining best practices for scalability and performance. Reliable scaling strategy: AI applications require effective scaling strategies, such as auto scaling and automatic scaling mechanisms. While auto-scaling operates based on predefined threshold rules, automatic scaling leverages intelligent algorithms to adaptively scale resources by analyzing learned usage patterns. Disaster recovery planning: A critical component of business continuity that requires the development of techniques for High Availability (HA) and Disaster Recovery (DR) for your AI endpoints and AI Data. This involves deploying zonal services within a region to ensure HA and provisioning instances in a secondary region to enable effective DR. Building global resilience: Global deployment optimizes capacity utilization and throughput for generative AI by accessing distributed pools across regions. Intelligent routing prioritizes less busy instances, ensuring processing efficiency and reliability. Azure API Management (APIM) with premium SKU supports resilient global deployments, maintaining a single endpoint for seamless failover and enhanced scalability without burdening applications. Optimizing AI Operations Latency: With generative AI, inferencing time far outweighs network latency, making network time negligible in overall operations. A global deployment, leveraging intelligent routing to identify less busy capacity pools worldwide, ensures faster processing by utilizing idle resources effectively. This approach transforms traditional latency considerations, emphasizing the scalability and efficiency of globally distributed models over proximity. Additionally, seasonal differences across regions further enhance the potential for optimized performance. Capacity and throughput: Global deployments optimize capacity and throughput by accessing larger pools and leveraging intelligent routing to direct requests to less busy instances, ensuring faster processing and quota fulfillment. Data Zones balance broader capacity access with compliance for regions with sovereignty needs, while Provisioned Throughput Units (PTUs) can further improve utilization by dynamically managing token distribution across pools for maximum efficiency. Standard options remain limited and may restrict throughput under heavy demand. AI observability: GenAI observability encompasses monitoring model performance, capacity utilization, token throughput, and compliance across distributed systems. It tracks token utilization to ensure efficient distribution and optimize throughput, supported by tools like PTU for dynamic management. General observability features include latency tracking, resource allocation insights, error rate monitoring, and proactive alerting, enabling seamless operations and adherence to data sovereignty requirements while maximizing performance and efficiency. Azure OpenAI observability metrics Category Metric Unit Dimensions Aggregation Description HTTP Requests Total Request Count Count Endpoint, API Operation, Region Sum Tracks the total number of HTTP requests made to the Azure OpenAI endpoints. Failed Requests Count Status Code, Region, API Operation Sum Monitors the count of requests resulting in errors (e.g., 4xx, 5xx response codes). Request Rate Requests/second Endpoint, Region Average Measures the rate of incoming requests to analyze traffic patterns. Latency Request Latency Milliseconds (ms) Endpoint, Region, API Operation Average, Percentiles (50th, 90th, 99th) Captures the average response time of requests, broken down by endpoint or API call. Response Time Percentiles Milliseconds (ms) Endpoint, Region, API Operation Percentiles (50th, 90th, 99th) Identifies outliers or slow responses in terms of latency across different percentiles. Usage Token Utilization Tokens API Key, Region, Instance Type Sum, Average Tracks the number of tokens processed (prompt and completion) to monitor quota usage. Throttled Requests Count API Key, Region Sum Counts requests delayed or rejected due to throttling or quota limits. Actions Cache Hits/Misses Count Cache Type, Region, Endpoint Ratio (Hits vs Misses), Sum Monitors the efficiency of semantic or prompt caching to optimize token usage. Request Routing Efficiency Percentage (%) Region, Capacity Pool Average Tracks the accuracy of routing requests to the least busy capacity pool for better processing. Throughput Tokens/second Endpoint, Region Sum, Average Measures successfully processed tokens or requests per second to ensure capacity optimization. Govern AI Models Control the models: Azure Policy can be used to control which models teams are permitted to deploy from the Azure AI Foundry catalog. Organizations are advised to start with audit mode, which monitors model usage without restricting deployments. Transitioning to deny mode should only occur after thoroughly understanding workload teams’ development needs to avoid unnecessary disruption. It’s important to note that deny mode does not automatically remove noncompliant models already deployed, and these must be addressed manually. Evaluating models: Evaluation is a critical aspect of the generative AI lifecycle, ensuring models meet accuracy, performance, security, and ethical standards while mitigating biases and validating robustness before deployment. It plays a role at every stage, from selecting the base model to pre-production validation and post-production monitoring. Azure provides several tools to support systematic evaluation, including Azure AI Foundry, which offers built-in metrics for assessing AI model performance. The Evaluation API in Azure OpenAI Service enables automated quality checks by integrating evaluations into CI/CD pipelines. Additionally, organizations can leverage Azure DevOps and GitHub Actions to conduct bulk evaluations, ensuring AI models remain compliant, optimized, and trustworthy throughout their lifecycle. Content filters for models: Organizations are advised to define baseline content filters for generative AI models using Azure AI Content Safety. This system evaluates both prompts and completions through classification models that identify and mitigate harmful content across various categories. Key features include prompt shields, groundedness detection, and protected material text scanning for both images and text. Establishing a process for application teams to communicate governance needs ensures alignment and comprehensive oversight of safety measures. Ground AI models: To effectively manage generative AI output, utilize system messages and the retrieval augmented generation (RAG) pattern to ensure responses are grounded and reliable. Test grounding techniques using tools like prompt flow for structured workflows or the open-source red teaming framework PyRIT to identify potential vulnerabilities. These strategies help refine model behavior and maintain alignment with governance requirements.AI Agents: Building Trustworthy Agents- Part 6
This blog post, Part 6 in a series on AI agents, focuses on building trustworthy AI agents. It emphasizes the importance of safety and security in agent design and deployment. The post details a system message framework for creating robust and scalable prompts, outlining a four-step process from meta prompt to iterative refinement. It then explores various threats to AI agents, including task manipulation, unauthorized access, resource overloading, knowledge base poisoning, and cascading errors, providing mitigation strategies for each. The post also highlights the human-in-the-loop approach for enhanced trust and control, providing a code example using AutoGen. Finally, it links to further resources on responsible AI, model evaluation, and risk assessment, along with the previous posts in the series.
