You Belong Here: Three MVPs on Imposter Syndrome
Imposter syndrome is the persistent feeling that your success is undeserved - or that others may discover you are not as capable as they think. It can surface before a presentation, while learning a fast-moving technology, or after receiving recognition such as the Microsoft MVP award. In candid conversations, MVPs Rachel Irabor, Dan Barber, and Cat Schneider described self-doubt not as proof that they do not belong, but as a familiar signal to pause, seek perspective, and reconnect with what they contribute. Their stories remind technologists at every stage: confidence can fluctuate, while your value remains real. Three paths through self-doubt Rachel’s response begins with a question: Why do I believe I am not enough? Early in her Microsoft Power Platform journey, she nearly discounted a Power Automate presentation because it seemed “too basic” for a call filled with experienced community members. She delivered it anyway - and MVPs told her they had learned an action they had never tried. That moment became evidence that usefulness is not measured by seniority. A beginner can notice, explain, or connect something an expert has missed. Her story is also one of motion. Soon after university, Rachel relocated from Nigeria to Malta for her first corporate role - her first time travelling and a move she initially treated as simply the next task. Only later did she pause long enough to recognize its scale. Today, she tries to compare herself with “the 2022 Rachel,” who was still a student and unsure of her next step, rather than with a room full of people decades into their careers. Before speaking, Rachel changes the conditions around the fear. She arrives early, gets familiar with the room, plays upbeat music, and dances until her body relaxes. She may begin with anxiety, but once she starts, she finds her flow. The goal is not to wait until doubt disappears; it is to create a routine that helps her move with it. That same approach shaped her public learning. She shared modules, small projects, problems, and fixes even while wondering whether people would judge the posts as too simple. Over time, those small acts helped build a career and a community. Her reminder is direct: one article, video, or explanation does not need to reach hundreds of people to matter. If it helps one person solve a problem or see a possible path, it has made an impact. “Get out of your head… I’m just doing my own part. I’m just being me.” - Rachel Irabor Dan’s perspective is shaped by more than two decades in technology leadership. Experience has not silenced his inner critic; he describes it as a daily voice that can turn recognition into suspicion and opportunity into self-rejection. When he received the MVP award, his first response was disbelief. His community work often centers on the human side of technology - mentoring, coaching, leadership, consulting habits, and high-performing teams - and he wondered whether that belonged beside more visibly technical contributions. The volume of new opportunities after the award created another pressure: the feeling that he should add more to everything he was already doing. Dan learned to replace, not simply add. When a new “shiny thing” appears, he asks what he will stop doing so that work, family, community contribution, and wellbeing can remain sustainable. The award recognizes what someone has already contributed; it is not an instruction to raise the bar until burnout. When doubt starts “nibbling away” at his confidence, Dan conducts an evidence check. He writes down contributions, mentoring, invitations, feedback, and people who sought his help. Then he asks whether the internal story - that he is a fraud or does not do enough - actually fits those facts. This is not forced positivity. It is a deliberate decision to give empirical evidence at least as much authority as the loudest thought in the room. Dan also refuses the idea that an MVP must acquire every other MVP’s strength. He compares the community to a network of people with different superpowers: each member brings something distinct and gains access to expertise they do not need to reproduce themselves. “Do not lose track of your superpower,” he advises. Belonging comes from contributing your own value, not becoming everything to everyone. “Your uniqueness is your superpower… Take pride in what you do and how you do it.” - Dan Barber Cat’s imposter syndrome often sounds like a question: Who made the decision to bring me in? She can look around a technical community and feel unlike the people producing content every day - then remember that her contribution is different, not lesser. She builds community, helps people find one another, and can offer “15 different ways” to approach a problem. The award did not erase doubt, but it gave her another piece of evidence: Microsoft continued to recognize a voice and a form of impact worth hearing. She has also seen what can happen when self-doubt gets to make the decision. In 2022, Cat received an offer for a Microsoft role while considering another opportunity. The scale of the role made her worry that Microsoft would eventually regret hiring her, and she said no. She does not treat the choice as a failure - the path she took gave her new skills and room to grow - but she can name the part imposter syndrome played. That honesty matters: the inner critic does not only make us uncomfortable; sometimes it quietly removes us from opportunities before anyone else can decide. Today, rapid changes in AI can recreate that feeling. Cat has attended sessions, asked product experts questions, and kept experimenting, yet she can still feel behind when a tool does not click. Her response is patient rather than performative: everyone learns at a different pace, sometimes persistence works, and sometimes the next right step is asking for help. Cat turns that compassion outward. At conferences, she notices people on the edges and “adopts” them - making introductions, showing them where to go, and helping them approach others. She offers new speakers smaller, lower-pressure formats such as short presentations, co-presenting, or interviews. As the self-described leader of the “Heckle and Hype crew,” she also shows up to cheer others on. Her story makes belonging tangible: sometimes we believe we have a place because someone actively makes room for us. “If I wasn’t meant to be here, then I wouldn’t be here. I’m meant to be here.” - Cat Schneider What helps when the inner critic gets loud Rachel, Dan, and Cat do not offer a single cure. Instead, they show how to interrupt the spiral from several directions: Name the thought, then ask why. Is the evidence really that you do not belong—or are you responding to a new room, a new responsibility, or people with different experience? Compare backward, not sideways. Measure your growth against an earlier version of yourself instead of someone else’s visible highlight reel. Collect evidence of impact. Save feedback, invitations, solved problems, mentoring moments, and messages from people you helped. Review the record when memory becomes selective. Change the conditions around the fear. Arrive early, rehearse, play music, bring a co-presenter, choose a shorter format, or ask a trusted person to sit in the room. Turn expertise into curiosity. If you are not the smartest person in the room, you are in a room where you can learn. Ask a follow-up question instead of treating a gap as a verdict. Protect your capacity. Recognition does not require endless expansion. For each new commitment, decide what you will pause, delegate, or decline. Do not tackle it alone. Ask for perspective from someone who knows your work, collaborate with a peer, or tell the truth about where you are stuck. Most importantly, take one small action before certainty arrives: submit the session, share the lesson, ask the question, or introduce yourself to one person. Action creates new evidence, and new evidence gives the inner critic less room to invent the whole story. When someone else’s inner critic gets loud The most useful response is rarely “You’re brilliant - stop worrying.” Start by listening. Ask what happened, what the person is afraid of will happen, and what evidence they are using. Then offer specific observations: name the question they asked, the person they helped, the clarity they brought, or the preparation you witnessed. Specific evidence is easier to trust than broad reassurance. Community leaders can also design for belonging before anyone has to request it. Rachel emphasizes foundations where beginner and expert questions are welcomed with empathy. Cat shows the power of personal invitations, introductions, and low-pressure ways to contribute. Dan models visible honesty from a senior position, making it safer for others to seek support instead of becoming “lone wolves.” Together, their practices create a healthier message: you do not have to hide uncertainty to be credible, and you do not have to carry it alone. Your contribution counts If imposter syndrome has made you hesitate - to publish an article, submit a session, ask a question, or pursue the MVP path - choose one small next step. Share what you learned, ask someone you trust for perspective, and keep a record of the people your work helps. Learn more from Rachel Irabor, Dan Barber, and Cat Schneider. Want to learn more about Imposter Syndrome? In a recent podcast, Dan explores how imposter syndrome can show up in a technology career, why experience does not always quiet the inner critic, and how awareness, evidence, and support can help us move forward without facing self-doubt alone. You do not need to know everything to contribute something meaningful. You only need to begin. Want to Learn More About the MVP Program? To find an MVP and learn more about the MVP Program visit the MVP Communities website and follow our updates on LinkedIn or #mvpbuzz. Join us for a future live session through the Microsoft Reactor where we walk through what the MVP program is about, what we look for, and how nominations work. These sessions are designed to help you connect the dots between the work you’re already doing and the impact the MVP Program recognizes - with time for questions, examples, and real conversations.
