Azure SQL is Deprecating the “No Minimum TLS” (MinTLS None) Configuration
As part of the retirement of lower TLS versions 1.0 and 1.1 and the enforcement of 1.2 as the new default minimum TLS version, we will be removing the No Minimum TLS (MinTLS = “None” or "0") option and updating these configurations to TLS 1.2. No Minimum TLS allowed Azure SQL Database and Azure SQL Managed Instance resources to accept client connections using any TLS protocol version and unencrypted connections. Over the past year, Azure has retired TLS 1.0 and 1.1 for all Azure databases, due to known security vulnerabilities in these older protocols. As of August 31, 2025, creating servers configured with versions 1.0 and 1.1 was disallowed and migration to 1.2 began. With legacy TLS versions being deprecated, TLS 1.2 will become the secure default minimum TLS version for new Azure SQL DB and MI configurations and for all client-server connections, rendering the MinTLS = None setting obsolete. As a result, the MinTLS = None configuration option will be deprecated for new servers, and existing servers configured with No Minimum TLS will be upgraded to 1.2. What is changing? After July 15, 2026, we will disallow minimum TLS value "None", for the creation of new SQL DB and MI resources using PowerShell, Azure CLI, and any other REST based interface. This configuration option has already been removed from the Portal during the deprecation of TLS versions 1.0 and 1.1. Creating new Azure SQL Database and Managed Instance servers with MinTLS = None (which was previously considered the default) will no longer be a supported configuration. If the server parameter value for the minimum TLS is left blank, it will default to minimum TLS version 1.2. Attempts to create an Azure SQL server with MinTLS = None will fail with an “Invalid operation” error and downgrades to None will be disallowed. While attempts to connect with TLS 1.0, 1.1 or unencrypted connections will fail with “Error: 47072/171 on Gateway.” Effective date (retirement milestone) MinTLS = None (0) MinTLS left blank (defaults to supported minimum) Before 8/31/25 Any + Unencrypted Any + Unencrypted After 8/31/25 1.2 + Unencrypted 1.2 After July 15, 2026 Invalid operation error (for new server creates) Downgrades will be disallowed TLS error: 47072/171 (for unencrypted connections) 1.2 In summary, after July 15, 2026, Azure SQL Database and Azure SQL Managed Instance will require all client connections to use TLS 1.2 or higher and unencrypted connections will be denied. The minimum TLS version setting will no longer accept the value "None" for new or existing servers and servers currently configured with this value will be upgraded to explicitly enforce TLS 1.2. Who is impacted? For most Azure SQL customers, there is no action required. Most clients already use TLS 1.2 or higher. After July 15, 2026, if your Azure SQL Database or Managed Instance is still configured with No Minimum TLS and using 1.0, 1.1 or unencrypted connections, it will automatically update to TLS 1.2 to reflect the current minimum protocol enforcement in client-server connectivity. We do recommend you verify your client applications – especially any older or third-party client drivers – to ensure they can communicate with TLS 1.2 or above. In some rare cases, very old applications, such as an outdated JDBC driver or older .NET framework version, may need an update or need to enable TLS 1.2. Conclusion This deprecation is part of Azure’s broader security strategy to ensure encrypted connections are secure by modern encryption standards. TLS version 1.2 is more secure than older versions and is now the industry standard (required by regulations like PCI DSS and HIPAA). This change eliminates the use of unencrypted connections which ensure all database connections meet current security standards. If you’ve already migrated to TLS 1.2 (as most customers have), you will most likely not notice any change, except that the No Minimum TLS option will disappear from configurations.Zero Trust for data: Make Microsoft Entra authentication for SQL your policy baseline
A policy-driven path from enabled to enforced. Why this matters now Security and compliance programs were once built on an assumption that internal networks were inherently safer. Cloud adoption, remote work, and supply-chain compromise have steadily invalidated that model. U.S. federal guidance has now formalized this shift: Executive Order 14028 calls for modernizing cybersecurity and accelerating Zero Trust adoption, and OMB Memorandum M-22-09 sets a federal Zero Trust strategy with specific objectives and timelines. Meanwhile, attacker economics are changing. Automation and AI make reconnaissance, phishing, and credential abuse cheaper and faster. That concentrates risk on identity—the control plane that sits in front of systems, applications, and data. In Zero Trust, the question is no longer “is the network trusted,” but “is this request verified, governed by policy, and least-privilege?” Why database authentication is a first‑order Zero Trust control Databases are universally treated as crown-jewel infrastructure. Yet many data estates still rely on legacy patterns: password-based SQL authentication, long-lived secrets embedded in apps, and shared administrative accounts that persist because migration feels risky. This is exactly the kind of implicit trust Zero Trust architectures aim to remove. NIST SP 800-207 defines Zero Trust as eliminating implicit trust based solely on network location or ownership and focusing controls on protecting resources. In that model, every new database connection is not “plumbing”—it is an access decision to sensitive data. If the authentication mechanism sits outside the enterprise identity plane, governance becomes fragmented and policy enforcement becomes inconsistent. What changes when SQL uses Microsoft Entra authentication Microsoft Entra authentication enables users and applications to connect to SQL using enterprise identities, instead of usernames and passwords. Across Azure SQL and SQL Server enabled by Azure Arc, Entra-based authentication helps align database access with the same identity controls organizations use elsewhere. The security and compliance outcomes that leaders care about Reduce password and secret risk: move away from static passwords and embedded credentials. Centralize governance: bring database access under the same identity policies, access reviews, and lifecycle controls used across the enterprise. Improve auditability: tie access to enterprise identities and create a consistent control surface for reporting. Enable policy enforcement at scale: move from “configured” controls to “enforced” controls through governance and tooling. This is why Entra authentication is a high-ROI modernization step: it collapses multiple security and operational objectives into one effort (identity modernization) rather than a set of ongoing compensating programs (password rotation programs, bespoke exceptions, and perpetual secret hygiene projects). Why AI makes this a high priority decision AI accelerates both reconnaissance and credential abuse, which concentrates risk on identity. As a result, policy makers increasingly treat phishing-resistant authentication and centralized identity enforcement as foundational—not optional. A practical path: from enabled to enforced Successful security programs define a clear end state, a measurable glide path, and an enforcement model. A pragmatic approach to modernizing SQL access typically includes: Discover active usage: Identify which logins and users are actively connecting and which are no longer required. Establish Entra as the identity authority: Enable Entra authentication on SQL logical servers, starting in mixed mode to reduce disruption. Recreate principals using Entra identities: Replace SQL Authentication logins/users with Entra users, groups, service principals, and managed identities. Modernize application connectivity: Update drivers and connection patterns to use Entra-based authentication and managed identities. Validate, then enforce: Confirm the absence of password‑based SQL authentication traffic, then move to Entra‑only where available and enforce via policy. By adopting this sequencing, organizations can mitigate risks at an early stage and postpone enforcement until the validation process concludes. For a comprehensive migration strategy, refer to Securing Azure SQL Database with Microsoft Entra Password-less Authentication: Migration Guide. Choosing which projects to fund — and which ones to stop When making investment decisions, priority is given to database identity projects that can demonstrate clear risk reduction and lasting security benefits. Microsoft Entra authentication as the default for new SQL workloads, with a defined migration path for the existing workloads. Managed identities for application-to-database connectivity to eliminate stored secrets. Centralized governance for privileged database access using enterprise identity controls. At the same time, organizations should explicitly de-prioritize investments that perpetuate password risk: password rotation projects that preserve SQL Authentication, bespoke scripts maintaining shared logins, and exception processes that do not scale. Security and scale are not competing goals Security is often seen as something that slows down innovation, but database identity offers unique benefits. When enterprise identity is used for access controls, bringing in new applications and users shifts from handing out credentials to overseeing policies. Compliance reporting also becomes uniform rather than customized, making it easier to grow consistently thanks to a single control framework. Modern database authentication is not solely about mitigating risk— it establishes a scalable operational framework for secure data access. A scorecard designed for leadership readiness To elevate the conversation from implementation to governance, use outcome-based metrics: Coverage: Percentage of SQL workloads with Entra authentication enabled. Enforcement: Percentage operating in Entra-only mode after validation. Secret reduction: Applications still relying on stored database passwords. Privilege hygiene: Admin access governed through enterprise identity controls. Audit evidence: Ability to produce identity-backed access reports on demand. These map directly to Zero Trust maturity expectations and provide a defensible definition of “done.” Closing Zero Trust is an operating posture, not a single control. For most organizations, the fastest way to make that posture measurable is to standardize database access on the same identity plane used everywhere else. If you are looking for a single investment that improves security, reduces audit friction, and supports responsible AI adoption, modernizing SQL access with Microsoft Entra authentication — and driving it from enabled to enforced — is one of the most durable choices you can make. References US Government sets forth Zero Trust architecture strategy and requirements (Microsoft Security Blog) Securing Azure SQL Database with Microsoft Entra Password-less Authentication: Migration Guide (Microsoft Tech Community) OMB Memorandum M-22-09: Federal Zero Trust Strategy (White House) NIST SP 800-207: Zero Trust Architecture CISA: Zero Trust Enforce Microsoft Entra-only authentication for Azure SQL Database and Azure SQL Managed InstanceVersionless keys for Transparent Data Encryption in Azure SQL Database (Generally Available)
With this release, you no longer need to reference a specific key version stored in Azure Key Vault or Managed HSM when configuring Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) with customer‑managed keys. Instead, Azure SQL Database now supports a versionless key URI, automatically using the latest enabled version of your key. This means: Simpler key management—no longer necessary to specify the key version. Reduced operational overhead by eliminating risks tied to outdated key versions. Full control remains with the customer. This enhancement streamlines encryption at rest, especially for organizations operating at scale or enforcing strict security and compliance standards. Versionless keys for TDE are available today across Azure SQL Database with no additional cost. Versioned vs. Versionless Key URIs To highlight the difference, here are real examples: Versioned Key URI (old approach — explicit version required) https://demotdeakv.vault.azure.net/keys/TDECMK/40acafb8a7034b20ba227905df090a1f Versionless Key URI (new approach) https://demotdeakv.vault.azure.net/keys/TDECMK A versionless key URI references only the key name. Azure SQL Database automatically uses the newest enabled version of the key. Learn more Transparent Data Encryption - Azure SQL Database Azure SQL transparent data encryption with customer-managed key Transparent data encryption with customer-managed keys at the database level
Why Developers and DBAs love SQL’s Dynamic Data Masking (Series-Part 1)
Dynamic Data Masking (DDM) is one of those SQL features (available in SQL Server, Azure SQL DB, Azure SQL MI, SQL Database in Microsoft Fabric) that both developers and DBAs can rally behind. Why? Because it delivers a simple, built-in way to protect sensitive data—like phone numbers, emails, or IDs—without rewriting application logic or duplicating security rules across layers. With just a single line of T-SQL, you can configure masking directly at the column level, ensuring that non-privileged users see only obfuscated values while privileged users retain full access. This not only streamlines development but also supports compliance with data privacy regulations like GDPR and HIPAA, etc. by minimizing exposure to personally identifiable information (PII). In this first post of our DDM series, we’ll walk through a real-world scenario using the default masking function to show how easy it is to implement and how much development effort it can save. Scenario: Hiding customer phone numbers from support queries Imagine you have a support application where agents can look up customer profiles. They need to know if a phone number exists for the customer but shouldn’t see the actual digits for privacy. In a traditional approach, a developer might implement custom logic in the app (or a SQL view) to replace phone numbers with placeholders like “XXXX” for non-privileged users. This adds complexity and duplicate logic across the app. With DDM’s default masking, the database can handle this automatically. By applying a mask to the phone number column, any query by a non-privileged user will return a generic masked value (e.g. “XXXX”) instead of the real number. The support agent gets the information they need (that a number is on file) without revealing the actual phone number, and the developer writes zero masking code in the app. This not only simplifies the application codebase but also ensures consistent data protection across all query access paths. As Microsoft’s documentation puts it, DDM lets you control how much sensitive data to reveal “with minimal effect on the application layer” – exactly what our scenario achieves. Using the ‘Default’ Mask in T-SQL : The ‘Default’ masking function is the simplest mask: it fully replaces the actual value with a fixed default based on data type. For text data, that default is XXXX. Let’s apply this to our phone number example. The following T-SQL snippet works in Azure SQL Database, Azure SQL MI and SQL Server: SQL -- Step 1: Create the table with a default mask on the Phone column CREATE TABLE SupportCustomers ( CustomerID INT PRIMARY KEY, Name NVARCHAR(100), Phone NVARCHAR(15) MASKED WITH (FUNCTION = 'default()') -- Apply default masking ); GO -- Step 2: Insert sample data INSERT INTO SupportCustomers (CustomerID, Name, Phone) VALUES (1, 'Alice Johnson', '222-555-1234'); GO -- Step 3: Create a non-privileged user (no login for simplicity) CREATE USER SupportAgent WITHOUT LOGIN; GO -- Step 4: Grant SELECT permission on the table to the user GRANT SELECT ON SupportCustomers TO SupportAgent; GO -- Step 5: Execute a SELECT as the non-privileged user EXECUTE AS USER = 'SupportAgent'; SELECT Name, Phone FROM SupportCustomers WHERE CustomerID = 1 Alternatively, you can use Azure Portal to configure masking as shown in the following screenshot: Expected result: The query above would return Alice’s name and a masked phone number. Instead of seeing 222-555-1234, the Phone column would show XXXX. Alice’s actual number remains safely stored in the database, but it’s dynamically obscured for the support agent’s query. Meanwhile, privileged users such as administrator or db_owner which has CONTROL permission on the database or user with proper UNMASK permission would see the real phone number when running the same query. How this helps Developers : By pushing the masking logic down to the database, developers and DBAs avoid writing repetitive masking code in every app or report that touches this data. In our scenario, without DDM you might implement a check in the application like: If user_role == “Support”, then show “XXXX” for phone number, else show full phone. With DDM, such conditional code isn’t needed – the database takes care of it. This means: Less application code to write and maintain for masking Consistent masking everywhere (whether data is accessed via app, report, or ad-hoc query). Quick changes to masking rules in one place if requirements change, without hunting through application code. From a security standpoint, DDM reduces the risk of accidental data exposure and helps in compliance scenarios where personal data must be protected in lower environments or by certain roles, while reducing the developer effort drastically. In the next posts of this series, we’ll explore other masking functions (like Email, Partial, and Random etc) with different scenarios. By the end, you’ll see how each built-in mask can be applied to make data security and compliance more developer-friendly! Reference Links : Dynamic Data Masking - SQL Server | Microsoft Learn Dynamic Data Masking - Azure SQL Database & Azure SQL Managed Instance & Azure Synapse Analytics | Microsoft LearnSecuring Azure SQL Database with Microsoft Entra Password-less Authentication: Migration Guide
The Secure Future Initiative is Microsoft’s strategic framework for embedding security into every layer of the data platform—from infrastructure to identity. As part of this initiative, Microsoft Entra authentication for Azure SQL Database offers a modern, password less approach to access control that aligns with Zero Trust principles. By leveraging Entra identities, customers benefit from stronger security postures through multifactor authentication, centralized identity governance, and seamless integration with managed identities and service principals. Onboarding Entra authentication enables organizations to reduce reliance on passwords, simplify access management, and improve auditability across hybrid and cloud environments. With broad support across tools and platforms, and growing customer adoption, Entra authentication is a forward-looking investment in secure, scalable data access. Migration Steps Overview Organizations utilizing SQL authentication can strengthen database security by migrating to Entra Id-based authentication. The following steps outline the process. Identify your logins and users – Review the existing SQL databases, along with all related users and logins, to assess what’s needed for migration. Enable Entra auth on Azure SQL logical servers by assigning a Microsoft Entra admin. Identify all permissions associated with the SQL logins & Database users. Recreate SQL logins and users with Microsoft Entra identities. Upgrade application drivers and libraries to min versions & update application connections to SQL Databases to use Entra based managed identities. Update deployments for SQL logical server resources to have Microsoft Entra-only authentication enabled. For all existing Azure SQL Databases, flip to Entra‑only after validation. Enforce Entra-only for all Azure SQL Databases with Azure Policies (deny). Step 1: Identify your logins and users - Use SQL Auditing Consider using SQL Audit to monitor which identities are accessing your databases. Alternatively, you may use other methods or skip this step if you already have full visibility of all your logins. Configure server‑level SQL Auditing. For more information on turning the server level auditing: Configure Auditing for Azure SQL Database series - part1 | Microsoft Community Hub SQL Audit can be enabled on the logical server, which will enable auditing for all existing and new user databases. When you set up auditing, the audit log will be written to your storage account with the SQL Database audit log format. Use sys.fn_get_audit_file_v2 to query the audit logs in SQL. You can join the audit data with sys.server_principals and sys.database_principals to view users and logins connecting to your databases. The following query is an example of how to do this: SELECT (CASE WHEN database_principal_id > 0 THEN dp.type_desc ELSE NULL END) AS db_user_type , (CASE WHEN server_principal_id > 0 THEN sp.type_desc ELSE NULL END) AS srv_login_type , server_principal_name , server_principal_sid , server_principal_id , database_principal_name , database_principal_id , database_name , SUM(CASE WHEN succeeded = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS sucessful_logins , SUM(CASE WHEN succeeded = 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) AS failed_logins FROM sys.fn_get_audit_file_v2( '<Storage_endpoint>/<Container>/<ServerName>', DEFAULT, DEFAULT, '2023-11-17T08:40:40Z', '2023-11-17T09:10:40Z') -- join on database principals (users) metadata LEFT OUTER JOIN sys.database_principals dp ON database_principal_id = dp.principal_id -- join on server principals (logins) metadata LEFT OUTER JOIN sys.server_principals sp ON server_principal_id = sp.principal_id -- filter to actions DBAF (Database Authentication Failed) and DBAS (Database Authentication Succeeded) WHERE (action_id = 'DBAF' OR action_id = 'DBAS') GROUP BY server_principal_name , server_principal_sid , server_principal_id , database_principal_name , database_principal_id , database_name , dp.type_desc , sp.type_desc Step 2: Enable Microsoft Entra authentication (assign admin) Follow this to enable Entra authentication and assign a Microsoft Entra admin at the server. This is mixed mode; existing SQL auth continues to work. WARNING: Do NOT enable Entra‑only (azureADOnlyAuthentications) yet. That comes in Step 7. Entra admin Recommendation: For production environments, it is advisable to utilize an PIM Enabled Entra group as the server administrator for enhanced access control. Step 3: Identity & document existing permissions (SQL Logins & Users) Retrieve a list of all your SQL auth logins. Make sure to run on the master database.: SELECT * FROM sys.sql_logins List all SQL auth users, run the below query on all user Databases. This would list the users per Database. SELECT * FROM sys.database_principals WHERE TYPE = 'S' Note: You may need only the column ‘name’ to identify the users. List permissions per SQL auth user: SELECT database_principals.name , database_principals.principal_id , database_principals.type_desc , database_permissions.permission_name , CASE WHEN class = 0 THEN 'DATABASE' WHEN class = 3 THEN 'SCHEMA: ' + SCHEMA_NAME(major_id) WHEN class = 4 THEN 'Database Principal: ' + USER_NAME(major_id) ELSE OBJECT_SCHEMA_NAME(database_permissions.major_id) + '.' + OBJECT_NAME(database_permissions.major_id) END AS object_name , columns.name AS column_name , database_permissions.state_desc AS permission_type FROM sys.database_principals AS database_principals INNER JOIN sys.database_permissions AS database_permissions ON database_principals.principal_id = database_permissions.grantee_principal_id LEFT JOIN sys.columns AS columns ON database_permissions.major_id = columns.object_id AND database_permissions.minor_id = columns.column_id WHERE type_desc = 'SQL_USER' ORDER BY database_principals.name Step 4: Create SQL users for your Microsoft Entra identities You can create users(preferred) for all Entra identities. Learn more on Create user The "FROM EXTERNAL PROVIDER" clause in TSQL distinguishes Entra users from SQL authentication users. The most straightforward approach to adding Entra users is to use a managed identity for Azure SQL and grant the required three Graph API permissions. These permissions are necessary for Azure SQL to validate Entra users. User.Read.All: Allows access to Microsoft Entra user information. GroupMember.Read.All: Allows access to Microsoft Entra group information. Application.Read.ALL: Allows access to Microsoft Entra service principal (application) information. For creating Entra users with non-unique display names, use Object_Id in the Create User TSQL: -- Retrieve the Object Id from the Entra blade from the Azure portal. CREATE USER [myapp4466e] FROM EXTERNAL PROVIDER WITH OBJECT_ID = 'aaaaaaaa-0000-1111-2222-bbbbbbbbbbbb' For more information on finding the Entra Object ID: Find tenant ID, domain name, user object ID - Partner Center | Microsoft Learn Alternatively, if granting these API permissions to SQL is undesirable, you may add Entra users directly using the T-SQL commands provided below. In these scenarios, Azure SQL will bypass Entra user validation. Create SQL user for managed identity or an application - This T-SQL code snippet establishes a SQL user for an application or managed identity. Please substitute the `MSIname` and `clientId` (note: use the client id, not the object id), variables with the Display Name and Client ID of your managed identity or application. -- Replace the two variables with the managed identity display name and client ID declare @MSIname sysname = '<Managed Identity/App Display Name>' declare @clientId uniqueidentifier = '<Managed Identity/App Client ID>'; -- convert the guid to the right type and create the SQL user declare @castClientId nvarchar(max) = CONVERT(varchar(max), convert (varbinary(16), @clientId), 1); -- Construct command: CREATE USER [@MSIname] WITH SID = @castClientId, TYPE = E; declare nvarchar(max) = N'CREATE USER [' + @MSIname + '] WITH SID = ' + @castClientId + ', TYPE = E;' EXEC (@cmd) For more information on finding the Entra Client ID: Register a client application in Microsoft Entra ID for the Azure Health Data Services | Microsoft Learn Create SQL user for Microsoft Entra user - Use this T-SQL to create a SQL user for a Microsoft Entra account. Enter your username and object Id: -- Replace the two variables with the MS Entra user alias and object ID declare sysname = '<MS Entra user alias>'; -- (e.g., username@contoso.com) declare uniqueidentifier = '<User Object ID>'; -- convert the guid to the right type declare @castObjectId nvarchar(max) = CONVERT(varchar(max), convert (varbinary(16), ), 1); -- Construct command: CREATE USER [@username] WITH SID = @castObjectId, TYPE = E; declare nvarchar(max) = N'CREATE USER [' + + '] WITH SID = ' + @castObjectId + ', TYPE = E;' EXEC (@cmd) Create SQL user for Microsoft Entra group - This T-SQL snippet creates a SQL user for a Microsoft Entra group. Set groupName and object Id to your values. -- Replace the two variables with the MS Entra group display name and object ID declare @groupName sysname = '<MS Entra group display name>'; -- (e.g., ContosoUsersGroup) declare uniqueidentifier = '<Group Object ID>'; -- convert the guid to the right type and create the SQL user declare @castObjectId nvarchar(max) = CONVERT(varchar(max), convert (varbinary(16), ), 1); -- Construct command: CREATE USER [@groupName] WITH SID = @castObjectId, TYPE = X; declare nvarchar(max) = N'CREATE USER [' + @groupName + '] WITH SID = ' + @castObjectId + ', TYPE = X;' EXEC (@cmd) For more information on finding the Entra Object ID: Find tenant ID, domain name, user object ID - Partner Center | Microsoft Learn Validate SQL user creation - When a user is created correctly, the EntraID column in this query shows the user's original MS Entra ID. select CAST(sid as uniqueidentifier) AS EntraID, * from sys.database_principals Assign permissions to Entra based users – After creating Entra users, assign them SQL permissions to read or write by either using GRANT statements or adding them to roles like db_datareader. Refer to your documentation from Step 3, ensuring you include all necessary user permissions for new Entra SQL users and that security policies remain enforced. Step 5: Update Programmatic Connections Change your application connection strings to managed identities for SQL authentication and test each app for Microsoft Entra compatibility. Upgrade your drivers to these versions or newer. JDBC driver version 7.2.0 (Java) ODBC driver version 17.3 (C/C++, COBOL, Perl, PHP, Python) OLE DB driver version 18.3.0 (COM-based applications) Microsoft.Data.SqlClient 5.2.2+ (ADO.NET) Microsoft.EntityFramework.SqlServer 6.5.0 (Entity Framework) System.Data.SqlClient(SDS) doesn't support managed identity; switch to Microsoft.Data.SqlClient(MDS). If you need to port your applications from SDS to MDS the following cheat sheet will be helpful: https://github.com/dotnet/SqlClient/blob/main/porting-cheat-sheet.md. Microsoft.Data.SqlClient also takes a dependency on these packages & most notably the MSAL for .NET (Version 4.56.0+). Here is an example of Azure web application connecting to Azure SQL, using managed identity. Step 6: Validate No Local Auth Traffic Be sure to switch all your connections to managed identity before you redeploy your Azure SQL logical servers with Microsoft Entra-only authentication turned on. Repeat the use of SQL Audit, just as you did in Step 1, but now to confirm that every connection has moved away from SQL authentication. Once your server is up and running with only Entra authentication, any connections still based on SQL authentication will not work, which could disrupt services. Test your systems thoroughly to verify that everything operates correctly. Step 7: Enable Microsoft Entra‑only & disable local auth Once all your connections & applications are built to use managed identity, you can disable the SQL Authentication, by turning the Entra-only authentication via Azure portal, or using the APIs. Step 8: Enforce at scale (Azure Policy) Additionally, after successful migration and validation, it is recommended to deploy the built-in Azure Policy across your subscriptions to ensure that all SQL resources do not use local authentication. During resource creation, Azure SQL instances will be required to have Microsoft Entra-only authentication enabled. This requirement can be enforced through Azure policies. Best Practices for Entra-Enabled Azure SQL Applications Use exponential backoff with decorrelated jitter for retrying transient SQL errors, and set a max retry cap to avoid resource drain. Separate retry logic for connection setup and query execution. Cache and proactively refresh Entra tokens before expiration. Use Microsoft.Data.SqlClient v3.0+ with Azure.Identity for secure token management. Enable connection pooling and use consistent connection strings. Set appropriate timeouts to prevent hanging operations. Handle token/auth failures with targeted remediation, not blanket retries. Apply least-privilege identity principles; avoid global/shared tokens. Monitor retry counts, failures, and token refreshes via telemetry. Maintain auditing for compliance and security. Enforce TLS 1.2+ (Encrypt=True, TrustServerCertificate=False). Prefer pooled over static connections. Log SQL exception codes for precise error handling. Keep libraries and drivers up to date for latest features and resilience. References Use this resource to troubleshoot issues with Entra authentication (previously known as Azure AD Authentication): Troubleshooting problems related to Azure AD authentication with Azure SQL DB and DW | Microsoft Community Hub To add Entra users from an external tenant, invite them as guest users to the Azure SQL Database's Entra administrator tenant. For more information on adding Entra guest users: Quickstart: Add a guest user and send an invitation - Microsoft Entra External ID | Microsoft Learn Conclusion Migrating to Microsoft Entra password-less authentication for Azure SQL Database is a strategic investment in security, compliance, and operational efficiency. By following this guide and adopting best practices, organizations can reduce risk, improve resilience, and future-proof their data platform in alignment with Microsoft’s Secure Future Initiative.Geo-Replication and Transparent Data Encryption Key Management in Azure SQL Database
Transparent data encryption (TDE) in Azure SQL with customer-managed key (CMK) enables Bring Your Own Key (BYOK) scenario for data protection at rest. With customer-managed TDE, the customer is responsible for and in a full control of a key lifecycle management (key creation, upload, rotation, deletion), key usage permissions, and auditing of operations on keys. Geo-replication and Failover Groups in Azure SQL Database creates readable secondary replicas across different regions to support disaster recovery and high availability. There are several considerations when configuring geo-replication for Azure SQL logical servers that use Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) with Customer-Managed Keys (CMK). This blog post provides detailed information about setting up geo-replication for TDE-enabled databases. Understanding the difference between a TDE protector and a server/database Key To understand the geo-replication considerations, I first need to explain the roles of the TDE protector and a server key. The TDE protector is the key responsible for encrypting the Database Encryption Key (DEK), which in turn encrypts the actual database files and transaction logs. It sits at the top of the encryption hierarchy. A server or database key is a broader concept that refers to any key registered at the server or database level in Azure SQL. One of the registered server or database keys is designated as the TDE protector. Multiple keys can be registered, but only one acts as the active protector at any given time. Geo-replication considerations Azure Key Vault considerations In active geo-replication and failover group scenarios, the primary and secondary SQL logical servers can be linked to an Azure Key Vault in any region — they do not need to be located in the same region. Connecting both SQL logical servers to the same key vault reduces the potential for discrepancies in key material that can occur when using separate key vaults. Azure Key Vault incorporates multiple layers of redundancy to ensure the continued availability of keys and key vaults in the event of service or regional failures. The following diagram represents a configuration for paired region (primary and secondary) for an Azure Key Vault cross-failover with Azure SQL setup for geo-replication using a failover group. Azure SQL considerations The primary consideration is to ensure that the server or database keys are present on both the primary and secondary SQL logical servers or databases, and that appropriate permissions have been granted for these keys within Azure Key Vault. The TDE protector used on the primary does not need to be identical to the one used on the secondary. It is sufficient to have the same key material available on both the primary and secondary systems. You can add keys to a SQL logical server with the Azure Portal, PowerShell, Azure CLI or REST API. Assign user-assigned managed identities (UMI) to primary and secondary SQL servers for flexibility across regions and failover scenarios. Grant Get, WrapKey, UnwrapKey permissions to these identities on the key vault. For Azure Key Vaults using Azure RBAC for access configuration, the Key Vault Crypto Service Encryption User role is needed by the server identity to be able to use the key for encryption and decryption operations. Different encryption key combinations Based on interactions with customers and analysis of livesite incidents involving geo-replication with TDE CMK, we noticed that many clients do not configure the primary and secondary servers with the same TDE protector, due to differing compliance requirements. In this chapter, I will explain how you can set up a failover group with 2 different TDE protectors. This scenario will use TDECMK key as the TDE protector on the primary server (tdesql) and TDECMK2 key as the TDE protector on the secondary server (tdedr). As a sidenote, you can also enable the Auto-rotate key to allow end-to-end, zero-touch rotation of the TDE protector Both logical SQL Servers have access to the Azure Key Vault keys. Next step is to create the failover group and replicate 1 database called ContosoHR. The setup of the failover group failed because the CMK key from the primary server was (intentionally) not added to the secondary server. Adding a server key can easily be done with the Add-AzSqlServerKeyVaultKey command. For example: Add-AzSqlServerKeyVaultKey -KeyId 'https://xxxxx.vault.azure.net/keys/TDECMK/ 01234567890123456789012345678901' -ServerName 'tdedr' -ResourceGroupName 'TDEDemo' After the failover group setup, the sample database on the secondary server becomes available and uses the primary's CMK (TDECMK), regardless of the secondary's CMK configuration. You can verify this by running the following query both on primary and secondary server. SELECT DB_NAME(db_id()) AS database_name, dek.encryption_state, dek.encryption_state_desc, -- SQL 2019+ / Azure SQL dek.key_algorithm, dek.key_length, dek.encryptor_type, -- CERTIFICATE (service-managed) or ASYMMETRIC KEY (BYOK/CMK) dek.encryptor_thumbprint FROM sys.dm_database_encryption_keys AS dek WHERE database_id <> 2 ; database_name encryption_state_desc encryptor_type encryptor_thumbprint ContosoHR ENCRYPTED ASYMMETRIC KEY 0xC8F041FB93531FA26BF488740C9AC7D3B5827EF5 The encryptor_type column shows ASYMMETRIC KEY, which means the database uses a CMK for encryption. The encryptor_thumbprint should match on both the primary and secondary servers, indicating that the secondary database is encrypted using the CMK from the primary server. The TDE protector on the secondary server (TDECMK2) becomes active only in the event of a failover, when the primary and secondary server roles are reversed. As illustrated in the image below, the roles of my primary and secondary servers have been reversed. If the above query is executed again following a failover, the encryptor_thumbprint value will be different, which indicates that the database is now encrypted using the TDE protector (TDECMK2) from the secondary server. database_name encryption_state_desc encryptor_type encryptor_thumbprint ContosoHR ENCRYPTED ASYMMETRIC KEY 0x788E5ACA1001C87BA7354122B7D93B8B7894918D As previously mentioned, please ensure that the server or database keys are available on both the primary and secondary SQL logical servers or databases. Additionally, verify that the appropriate permissions for these keys have been granted within Azure Key Vault. This scenario is comparable to other configurations, such as: The primary server uses SMK while the secondary server uses CMK. The primary server uses CMK while the secondary server uses SMK. Conclusion Understanding the distinction between the TDE protector and server keys is essential for geo-replication with Azure SQL. The TDE protector encrypts the database encryption key, while server keys refer to any key registered at the server or database level in Azure SQL. For successful geo-replication setup and failover, all necessary keys must be created and available on both primary and secondary servers. It is possible and, in certain cases, required to configure different TDE protectors on replicas, as long as the key material is available on each server.Why ledger verification is non-negotiable
Data integrity isn’t just a buzzword, it’s the backbone of trust in any database system. With the ledger functionality in Azure SQL and SQL Server, organizations have a powerful way to ensure their data hasn’t been tampered with. But here’s the catch: many customers implement ledger tables yet skip the critical step of running the ledger verification procedure. This oversight can leave your data vulnerable and your compliance posture shaky. What is a database digest? Ledger is a feature that allows SQL Server, Azure SQL Database or Azure SQL Managed Instance to cryptographically link transactions in a tamper-evident manner. Think of it as a blockchain-like mechanism inside your database: every transaction is hashed and chained, creating a block. The hash of the latest block in the database ledger is called the database digest. It represents the state of all ledger tables in the database at the time when the block was generated. These digests can be stored externally, such as in immutable storage or Azure Confidential Ledger, to prevent tampering, providing an independent proof of integrity. How does ledger verification work? The ledger verification procedure compares the current state of your ledger tables against the stored digests. It recalculates hashes and validates the chain to confirm that no unauthorized changes have occurred. Without this step, you’re essentially trusting the ledger without verifying it, a dangerous assumption in environments where compliance and security matter. You can launch the verification by running the following stored procedure: DECLARE @digest_locations NVARCHAR(MAX) = (SELECT * FROM sys.database_ledger_digest_locations FOR JSON AUTO, INCLUDE_NULL_VALUES); SELECT @digest_locations as digest_locations; BEGIN TRY EXEC sys.sp_verify_database_ledger_from_digest_storage @digest_locations; SELECT 'Ledger verification succeeded.' AS Result; END TRY BEGIN CATCH THROW; END CATCH Why skipping verification is risky Many organizations assume that enabling ledger tables is enough. It’s not. If you don’t run verification: Tampering goes undetected: A malicious actor could alter historical data without triggering alarms. Compliance gaps: Regulatory frameworks often require proof of integrity, not just theoretical guarantees. False sense of security: Ledger without verification is like encryption without key management, half a solution. Benefits of regular verification Assurance of data integrity: Confirms that your ledger is intact and trustworthy. Audit readiness: Provides verifiable evidence for compliance audits. Early detection: Identifies anomalies before they become catastrophic breaches. Call to action If you’re using ledger tables in SQL Server or Azure SQL, make verification part of your operational routine. Schedule it. Automate it. Treat it as essential, not optional. Your data, your compliance, and your reputation depend on it.Windows Authentication for Cloud-Native Identities: Modernizing Azure SQL Managed Instance (Preview)
Organizations moving to the cloud often face a critical challenge: maintaining seamless authentication for legacy applications without compromising security or user experience. Today, we’re excited to announce support for Windows Authentication for Microsoft Entra principals on Azure SQL Managed Instance, enabling cloud-native identities to authenticate using familiar Windows credentials. Why This Matters Traditionally, Windows Authentication relied on on-premises Active Directory, making it difficult for businesses adopting a cloud-only strategy to preserve existing authentication models. With this new capability: Hybrid Identity Support: Users synchronized between on-premises AD DS and Microsoft Entra ID can continue using a single set of credentials for both environments. Cloud-Only Identity (Preview): Identities that exist only in Microsoft Entra ID can now leverage Kerberos-based Windows Authentication for workloads like Azure SQL Managed Instance—without requiring domain controllers. This means organizations can modernize infrastructure while maintaining compatibility with legacy apps, reducing friction during migration. Key Benefits Seamless Migration: Move legacy applications to Azure SQL Managed Instance without rewriting authentication logic. Passwordless Security: Combine Windows Authentication with modern credentials like Windows Hello for Business or FIDO2 keys, enabling MFA and reducing password-related risks. Cloud-Native Integration: Microsoft Entra Kerberos acts as a cloud-based Key Distribution Center (KDC), issuing Kerberos tickets for cloud resources such as Azure SQL Managed Instance and Azure Files Breaking Barriers to Cloud Migration Many enterprises hesitate to migrate legacy apps because they depend on Windows Authentication. By extending this capability to cloud-native identities, we remove a major barrier—allowing customers to modernize at their own pace while leveraging familiar authentication models. Learn More https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-sql/managed-instance/winauth-azuread-overview?view=azuresql Microsoft Entra Kerberos OverviewStep-by-Step Guide: Route Azure SQL Audit Logs to Multiple Log Analytics Workspaces
Scenario: Many organizations need to route audit logs from Azure SQL Database to more than one Log Analytics workspace. For example, your security team may use Microsoft Sentinel in one workspace, while your application team analyzes logs in another. Azure now makes this possible—here’s how to set it up, and what to watch out for. Why Send Audit Logs to Multiple Workspaces? Separation of Duties: Security and application teams can access the logs they need, independently. Integration with Different Tools: Sentinel may use one workspace for SIEM, while app teams use another for analytics. Compliance and Regional Needs: Some organizations must store logs in different regions or workspaces for regulatory reasons. Step-by-Step Guide Enable Auditing to Log Analytics Workspace Go to your Azure SQL Server in the Azure Portal. Under Security, select Auditing. Set the audit destination to your primary Log Analytics workspace, Click Save. Tip: Enabling auditing here automatically creates a diagnostic setting for the selected workspace. Add Diagnostic Settings for Additional Workspaces In azure portal search for Diagnostic settings. Search for your subscription and master database of SQL Server to create diagnostics setting at server level Click + Add diagnostic setting. Name your setting (e.g., “AuditToAppWorkspace”). Under Log, select audit, select SQLSecurityAuditEvents (uncheck “DevOpsAudit” if not needed). Choose an additional Log Analytics workspace as the destination. Click Save. create new setting Note: You can repeat this step to send audit logs to as many workspaces as needed. Example Use Case A customer uses: Workspace A for Microsoft Sentinel (security monitoring) Workspace B for application analytics By configuring multiple diagnostic settings, both teams receive the audit data they need—no manual exports required. Summary Configuring multiple diagnostic settings allows you to send Azure SQL Database audit logs to several Log Analytics workspaces. This is essential for organizations with different teams or compliance needs. Remember: Enable auditing first Add diagnostic settings for each workspace Monitor for cost and avoid duplicate logs References: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-sql/database/auditing https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-monitor/essentials/diagnostic-settingsAzure SQL Database LTR Backup Immutability is now Generally Available
Azure SQL Database is a fully managed, always‑up‑to‑date relational database service built for mission‑critical apps. It delivers built‑in high availability, automated backups, and elastic scale, with strong security and compliance capabilities. Today, I am very excited to announce the General Availability of immutability for Azure SQL DB LTR backups! Azure SQL Database now supports immutable long‑term retention (LTR) backups, stored in write‑once, read‑many (WORM) state for a fixed (customer configured) period. That means your LTR backups cannot be modified or deleted during the lock window—even by highly privileged identities—helping you preserve clean restore points after a cyberattack and strengthen your compliance posture. Why this matters: ransomware targets backups Modern ransomware playbooks don’t stop at encrypting production data—they also attempt to alter or delete backups to block recovery. With backup immutability, Azure SQL Database LTR backups are written to immutable storage and locked for the duration you specify, providing a resilient, tamper‑proof recovery layer so you can restore from a known‑good copy when it matters most. What we’re announcing General Availability of Backup Immutability for Long‑Term Retention (LTR) backups in Azure SQL Database. This GA applies to Azure SQL database LTR backups. What immutability does (and doesn’t) do Prevents changes and deletion of LTR backup artifacts for a defined, locked period (WORM). This protection applies even to highly privileged identities, reducing the risk from compromised admin accounts or insider misuse. Helps address regulatory WORM expectations, supporting customers who must retain non‑erasable, non‑rewritable records (for example, requirements under SEC Rule 17a‑4(f), FINRA Rule 4511(c), and CFTC Rule 1.31(c)–(d)). Always consult your legal/compliance team for your specific obligations. Complements a defense‑in‑depth strategy—it’s not a replacement for identity hygiene, network controls, threat detection, and recovery drills. See Microsoft’s broader ransomware guidance for Azure. How it works (at a glance) When you enable immutability on an LTR policy, Azure SQL Database stores those LTR backups on Azure immutable storage in a WORM state. During the lock window, the backup cannot be modified or deleted; after the lock expires, normal retention/deletion applies per your policy. Key benefits Ransomware‑resilient recovery: Preserve clean restore points that attackers can’t tamper with during the lock period. Compliance‑ready retention: Use WORM‑style retention to help meet industry and regulatory expectations for non‑erasable, non‑rewritable storage. Operational simplicity: Manage immutability alongside your existing Azure SQL Database long‑term retention policies. Get started Choose databases that require immutable LTR backups. Enable immutability on the LTR backup policy and set the retention/lock period aligned to your regulatory and risk requirements. Validate recovery by restoring from an immutable LTR backup. Documentation: Learn more about backup immutability for LTR backups in Azure SQL Database in Microsoft Learn. Tell us what you think We’d love your feedback on scenarios, guidance, and tooling that would make immutable backups even easier to adopt. Share your experiences and suggestions in the Azure SQL community forums and let us know how immutability is helping your organization raise its cyber‑resilience.
