Deep Dive: Insider Risk Management in Microsoft Purview
Hi everyone I recently explored the Insider Risk Management (IRM) workflow in Microsoft Purview and how it connects across governance, compliance, and security. This end-to-end process helps organizations detect risky activities, triage alerts, investigate incidents, and take corrective action. Key Phases in the IRM Workflow: Policy: Define rules to detect both accidental (data spillage) and malicious risks (IP theft, fraud, insider trading). Alerts: Generate alerts when policies are violated. Triage: Prioritize and classify alerts by severity. Investigate: Use dashboards, Content Explorer, and Activity Explorer to dig into context. Action: Take remediation steps such as user training, legal escalation, or SIEM integration. Key takeaways from my lab: Transparency is essential (balancing privacy vs. protection). Integration across Microsoft 365 apps makes IRM policies actionable. Defender + Purview together unify detection + governance for insider risk. This was part of my ongoing security lab series. Curious to hear from the community — how are you applying Insider Risk Management in your environments or labs?Securing Data with Microsoft Purview IRM + Defender: A Hands-On Lab
Hi everyone I recently explored how Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management (IRM) integrates with Microsoft Defender to secure sensitive data. This lab demonstrates how these tools work together to identify, investigate, and mitigate insider risks. What I covered in this lab: Set up Insider Risk Management policies in Microsoft Purview Connected Microsoft Defender to monitor risky activities Walkthrough of alerts triggered → triaged → escalated into cases Key governance and compliance insights Key learnings from the lab: Purview IRM policies detect both accidental risks (like data spillage) and malicious ones (IP theft, fraud, insider trading) IRM principles include transparency (balancing privacy vs. protection), configurable policies, integrations across Microsoft 365 apps, and actionable alerts IRM workflow follows: Define policies → Trigger alerts → Triage by severity → Investigate cases (dashboards, Content Explorer, Activity Explorer) → Take action (training, legal escalation, or SIEM integration) Defender + Purview together provide unified coverage: Defender detects and responds to threats, while Purview governs compliance and insider risk This was part of my ongoing series of security labs. Curious to hear from others — how are you approaching Insider Risk Management in your organizations or labs?
secCon levels differ between from blog post and github
Hi, I'm looking into securing an environment and found this blog post about windows hardening and security levels; https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2019/04/11/introducing-the-security-configuration-framework-a-prioritized-guide-to-hardening-windows-10/ The security levels mentioned in this post refer to the following which is based on DEFCON levels. How-ever when I click on the following link at the end of the blog post it takes me to github and it seems to have the levels around the wrong way; https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/threat-protection/windows-security-configuration-framework/windows-security-configuration-framework I'm presuming that since it's based on DEFCON levels that the first one is correct? i.e SECCON level 1 is for Admin Workstations.
