Deep Dive: Insider Risk Management in Microsoft Purview
Hi everyone I recently explored the Insider Risk Management (IRM) workflow in Microsoft Purview and how it connects across governance, compliance, and security. This end-to-end process helps organizations detect risky activities, triage alerts, investigate incidents, and take corrective action. Key Phases in the IRM Workflow: Policy: Define rules to detect both accidental (data spillage) and malicious risks (IP theft, fraud, insider trading). Alerts: Generate alerts when policies are violated. Triage: Prioritize and classify alerts by severity. Investigate: Use dashboards, Content Explorer, and Activity Explorer to dig into context. Action: Take remediation steps such as user training, legal escalation, or SIEM integration. Key takeaways from my lab: Transparency is essential (balancing privacy vs. protection). Integration across Microsoft 365 apps makes IRM policies actionable. Defender + Purview together unify detection + governance for insider risk. This was part of my ongoing security lab series. Curious to hear from the community — how are you applying Insider Risk Management in your environments or labs?Securing Data with Microsoft Purview IRM + Defender: A Hands-On Lab
Hi everyone I recently explored how Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management (IRM) integrates with Microsoft Defender to secure sensitive data. This lab demonstrates how these tools work together to identify, investigate, and mitigate insider risks. What I covered in this lab: Set up Insider Risk Management policies in Microsoft Purview Connected Microsoft Defender to monitor risky activities Walkthrough of alerts triggered → triaged → escalated into cases Key governance and compliance insights Key learnings from the lab: Purview IRM policies detect both accidental risks (like data spillage) and malicious ones (IP theft, fraud, insider trading) IRM principles include transparency (balancing privacy vs. protection), configurable policies, integrations across Microsoft 365 apps, and actionable alerts IRM workflow follows: Define policies → Trigger alerts → Triage by severity → Investigate cases (dashboards, Content Explorer, Activity Explorer) → Take action (training, legal escalation, or SIEM integration) Defender + Purview together provide unified coverage: Defender detects and responds to threats, while Purview governs compliance and insider risk This was part of my ongoing series of security labs. Curious to hear from others — how are you approaching Insider Risk Management in your organizations or labs?Custom Windows Server Standard VM on Azure: It Works, But Is It Licensing Compliant?
Hi everyone, I wanted to share a recent technical experience where I successfully created and deployed a Windows Server Standard VM on Azure using a fully custom image. I started by downloading the official Windows Server Standard Evaluation ISO. I created a Generation 2 VM in Hyper-V and completed the OS setup using the Desktop Experience edition. Once the configuration was done, I ran sysprep to generalize the image. After that, I converted the disk from VHDX to VHD in fixed format, which turned out to be a critical step because Azure does not accept dynamic disks. The resulting file was around 127 GB, so I uploaded it to a premium storage account container to ensure performance. From there, I created a Generation 2 image in Azure and deployed a new VM from it. I then activated the Standard edition with a valid product key. Everything worked smoothly, but I’m still unsure whether this method is fully compliant with Microsoft’s licensing policies. Specifically, I’m trying to understand if going from an Evaluation ISO to sysprep, upload, deployment, and activation in Azure is a valid and compliant scenario when not using BYOL with Software Assurance or a CSP license. Has anyone gone through this process or has any insights on the compliance aspect? Thanks in advance for any guidance or clarification.👉 Securing Azure Workloads: From Identity to Monitoring
Hi everyone 👋 — following up on my journey, I want to share how I approach end-to-end security in Azure workloads. - Identity First – Microsoft Entra ID for Conditional Access, PIM, and risk-based policies. - Workload Security – Defender for Cloud to monitor compliance and surface misconfigurations. - Visibility & Monitoring – Log Analytics + Sentinel to bring everything under one pane of glass. Through my projects, I’ve been simulating enterprise scenarios where security isn’t just a checklist — it’s integrated into the architecture. Coming soon: - A lab demo showing how Defender for Cloud highlights insecure configurations. - A real-world style Conditional Access baseline for Azure workloads. Excited to hear how others in this community are securing their Azure environments! #Azure | #AzureSecurity | #MicrosoftLearn | #ZeroTrust | #PerparimLabs
Azure IAM Report – Explicit Permissions Only
Hi all, Is anyone currently working on a request to generate a report of all IAM permissions across all Azure resources? My idea is to create a script that reports only explicitly assigned permissions at the Management Group, Subscription, Resource Group, or individual Resource level. However, I’m struggling to find a way to filter only explicit permissions at the Management Group level — everything seems to include inherited roles as well. Has anyone already solved this issue or found a workaround? Thanks in advance!Scaling Smart with Azure: Architecture That Works
Hi Tech Community! I’m Zainab, currently based in Abu Dhabi and serving as Vice President of Finance & HR at Hoddz Trends LLC a global tech solutions company headquartered in Arkansas, USA. While I lead on strategy, people, and financials, I also roll up my sleeves when it comes to tech innovation. In this discussion, I want to explore the real-world challenges of scaling systems with Microsoft Azure. From choosing the right architecture to optimizing performance and cost, I’ll be sharing insights drawn from experience and I’d love to hear yours too. Whether you're building from scratch, migrating legacy systems, or refining deployments, let’s talk about what actually works.
Service Trust Portal no longer support Microsoft Account (MSA) access
Dear all, We need to access certain documents (i.e., SOC 2 or ISO 27xxx) on the https://servicetrust.microsoft.com/DocumentPage/d013b518-c1fe-462c-8124-de901f3b68dc. To download documents you need to be signed in first. However, when I click on "sign in" (using the same email/account as for our azure account) I get the error message "Service Trust Portal no longer support Microsoft Account (MSA) access." (see screenshot below). It seems that I am not the only one since other users had similar issues but they also could not find a solution (or at least it was not mentioned in their post): https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/security-compliance-and-identity/cannot-login-to-service-trust-portal/m-p/3632978 I have been trying this now since more than a week and also created a support ticket (which has not been assigned to a support agent yet). It is quite cumbersome and I hope some of you could have an idea since getting these documents is quite crucial for us.Comparision on Azure Cloud Sync and Traditional Entra connect Sync.
Introduction In the evolving landscape of identity management, organizations face a critical decision when integrating their on-premises Active Directory (AD) with Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD). Two primary tools are available for this synchronization: Traditional Entra Connect Sync (formerly Azure AD Connect) Azure Cloud Sync While both serve the same fundamental purpose, bridging on-prem AD with cloud identity, they differ significantly in architecture, capabilities, and ideal use cases. Architecture & Setup Entra Connect Sync is a heavyweight solution. It installs a full synchronization engine on a Windows Server, often backed by SQL Server. This setup gives administrators deep control over sync rules, attribute flows, and filtering. Azure Cloud Sync, on the other hand, is lightweight. It uses a cloud-managed agent installed on-premises, removing the need for SQL Server or complex infrastructure. The agent communicates with Microsoft Entra ID, and most configurations are handled in the cloud portal. For organizations with complex hybrid setups (e.g., Exchange hybrid, device management), is Cloud Sync too limited?
Azure NSG Challenge : When NIC and Subnet Rules Collide
Imagine this real-world scenario: 🔹 A VM needs to connect outbound via RDP (TCP 3389) to an external server for management. 🔹 The NIC-level NSG allows outbound RDP, ensuring the VM can initiate connections. 🔹 However, the Subnet-level NSG has an inbound deny rule specifically for RDP. 💭 Question for IT Pros: 👉 Would the outbound RDP session succeed or be blocked due to the subnet-level NSG? 👉 How do you design NSG rules to prevent misconfigurations while maintaining security? ####################################################### Great challenge! Let's break it down: 🚦 Would the outbound RDP session succeed or be blocked? The outbound RDP session would succeed because the subnet-level NSG applies to inbound traffic coming into the subnet, not traffic leaving the VM. Since outbound RDP is explicitly allowed at the NIC level, the VM can initiate connections without issue. However, if the external server tries to respond back, the inbound deny rule at the subnet level would block the return traffic. This effectively disrupts the session, making it seem like the connection failed. 🔒 How to design NSG rules effectively? To prevent misconfigurations while maintaining security: 1- Understand NSG processing – Rules are evaluated independently at the NIC and Subnet levels, but both must allow the required traffic. 2- Use least privilege principles – Only allow necessary traffic and explicitly deny everything else. 3- Be careful with inbound rules at the subnet level – Blocking inbound traffic here can unintentionally interfere with legitimate outbound sessions. 4- Log traffic flows with NSG Flow Logs – Use diagnostic settings to capture insights for troubleshooting. 5- Consider Application Security Groups (ASGs) – These simplify NSG management by grouping resources dynamically.🚀 Azure Application Gateway: Smart Load Balancing & Security
Ensuring high availability and efficient load balancing is crucial for web applications. Azure offers several traffic management solutions, including Application Gateway, Front Door, Load Balancer, and Traffic Manager. Today, let's focus on why Application Gateway stands out as a powerful tool for managing web traffic. 🚀 Why we should use Azure Application Gateway? 🔹 Layer 7 Load Balancing: Unlike Layer 3 or 4 solutions, Application Gateway makes intelligent routing decisions based on HTTP request properties. For example, requests to /images/ can be directed to dedicated image servers, while /videos/ traffic is routed to specialized video servers. 🔹 SSL/TLS Termination (Offloading): Reduces processing load on backend servers by decrypting traffic at the gateway before forwarding it unencrypted. Note: This might conflict with compliance requirements, so verify your app’s security needs !! 🔹 Autoscaling: Dynamically scales up or down based on traffic patterns, ensuring cost-effective resource utilization. 🔹 Zone Redundancy: Operates across multiple Availability Zones, enhancing fault tolerance without needing separate gateways in each zone. 🔹 Web Application Firewall (WAF): Provides centralized security against common exploits like SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS). Built on OWASP 3.1 (WAF_v2), it can function in Detection Mode (alerting admins) or Prevention Mode (blocking threats proactively). 🔹 URL-Based Routing: Enables smart traffic distribution by directing different types of content to the most appropriate backend pools. Example: http://contoso.com/video/* → VideoServerPool 🔹 Multiple-Site Hosting: Hosts multiple web applications on a single gateway, routing requests based on hostname or domain. Example: http://contoso.com → ContosoServerPool 🔹 Redirection & Rewrite Capabilities: ✔ Redirect HTTP → HTTPS to enforce encrypted traffic. ✔ Rewrite HTTP headers & URLs to enhance security (e.g., add HSTS or remove sensitive response headers). 🔹 Cookie-Based Session Affinity: Ensures users maintain session continuity by always connecting to the same backend server. Useful when session state is stored locally. ⚙️ How to Deploy & Configure Azure Application Gateway ⚙️ ✅ Dedicated Subnet: Create a subnet (e.g., myAGSubnet) within a Virtual Network. ✅ Frontend IP: Define whether to use a public or private IP or both (If you configured multiple listeners) to receive client requests. ✅ Backend Pool: Assign backend servers via NICs, Virtual Machine Scale Sets, public/internal IPs, or FQDNs. ✅ HTTP/HTTPS Listener: Specify which port (e.g., 80, 443) will handle incoming requests. ✅ Routing Rules: Set up domain-based (host-based routing) or path-based routing logic. 🔹 Host-Based Routing means routing traffic based on the hostname in the HTTP request header 🔹 Path-based Routing allows you to direct traffic to different backend pools based on the URL path in the request. ✅ Health Probes: Ensure backend servers are online using TCP or HTTP-based monitoring.
