OME
3 TopicsProduct Feedback for Advanced Message Encryption
Hi there, I've just evaluated Advanced Message Encryption for Exchange Online so thought I would feedback my thoughts. It's a good product if your only goal is to guarantee that emails are encrypted. However if your goal is to limit data breaches, there are two minor features missing which significantly limit its usefulness:- It's not possible to revoke encrypted emails* sent to Microsoft tenanted email accounts (basically almost everyone), since they are displayed inline in Outlook clients, rather than using a link-based experience (where the recipient is required to sign in to the OME portal to view the message). *This applies to emails encrypted In Outlook by selecting the Encrypt drop down menu, or by applying a Sensitivity Label. It's not possible for the user (or an admin) to query whether a sent link-based encrypted email has been read or not by the recipient, and if so at what date and time. These two features are likely easy to implement, and would make this product much more useful. End users would be able to rectify their own accidental email data breaches, for example forgetting to use the BCC field, or fat-fingering the Outlook To field autocomplete and selecting the wrong recipient. I understand that products such as Mimecast and Egress Protect already have these features. Being able to reliably revoke an email, and know for sure whether it was accessed or not by the recipient (and prove so), is the difference between being legally required to report a breach to your region's data regulator or not. I understand that some organisations may have the priority of an easy user experience, so would want to keep the encrypted message inline in Outlook, but for those whose priority is data breach minimisation, being able to switch this off and use the link-based experience for all recipients would be very useful. I understand that it's possible to setup a transport rule to force recipients to use the OME portal, but this only works if you encrypt *all* of your organisation's messages, rather than those the user has selected to encrypt. If this feature became available I would have no hesitation to roll it out organisation-wide.2.2KViews0likes6CommentsCan Exchange Online Protection check for TLS before forcing encryption
I know this is possible in Iron Port but not sure if EOP can handle this scenario, so asking for others opinions. In Iron Port, you can setup rules to say "If this email contains DLP data, check for TLS delivery. If email is being sent with TLS -> do not force message encryption. If email is not being sent with TLS -> Force message encryption." Can EOP execute similar functionality. Essentially what I am looking for is whether not EOP is smart enough to only use OME when TLS is not available.Solved1.8KViews1like1CommentOffice 365 Message Encryption delays for internal recipients
Tech community - I have a question for you all. I have deployed Office 365 message encryption and i am seeing some delays and hope to get some feedback or confirmation that this is happening else where. I will post my tests and results below. My keyword is #Secure in the subject based on the rule. Test: Send an email with #Secure in the subject to only one/multiple internal recipients Result: Message is delivered immediately Test: Send an email with #Secure in the subject to only one/multiple external recipients Result: Message is delivered immediately ISSUE Test: Send an encrypted message to one/multiple external email address and one/multiple internal email addresses. Result: External recipients get the encrypted message immediately. The internal recipients take a minimum of 30 min to appear in the mailbox. Sometimes it takes hours for the internal recipient to get the message. Can someone lend any advice or information? I have confirmed that the rule i created is not stopping any more rules from being processed or anything out of the ordinary.2.6KViews0likes2Comments