Microsoft's inconsistent implementation of tagging in Azure
We revamped our Azure resource tagging strategy several years ago and rely on them heavily for#Governanceand#FinOps. We not only enforce#tagsvia#AzurePolicy, we also enforce tag values based on a set of permissible values for each tag. Even with that in place we experience some drift due to exclusions required in the policy definition or exemptions in the policy assignments. I won't get into why this flexibility is needed here, that's a whole separate discussion. Establishing a soundtag hygieneprocess becomes a vital component of your overallgovernance and FinOps strategies.One method we employ for tag hygiene is to surface the non-compliant resources in a#PowerBireport using an#AzureResourceGraph(ARG) query. Yes, you can do this in the Compliance section of Azure Policy as well however it lacks ease of use. For example, flipping back and forth between policies, filtering by subscriptions, surfacing other linked metadata is a cumbersome experience in the Azure Policy blade. Now onto my frustrations with how Microsoft has implemented tagging across Azure. 1. Inconsistent application of Tag case-sensitivity across tools - In Azure Policy and in the Azure portal, tag names arecase-insensitivewhereas tag values arecase-sensitive. - In Azure Resource Graph Explorer, both tag names and tag values arecase-sensitive. - Why is there inconsistency with case-sensitivity of tag names? 2. Inconsistent Tag validation across Resource Types - When deploying a Storage Account, Azurevalidates my tag policy beforeI am able to hit the create button (before it's submitted to ARM) whereas when deploying a resource like a Public IP Address, thatvalidation only occurs afteryou hit the create button. This likely happens with other resource types as well. By the way, my tagging policy specifies "Indexed" for mode, so in effect it should apply to any and all resources that support tagging in Azure. - Why is does the evaluation of the tag policy differ based on the resource being deployed? 3. Inconsistent Tag UX across Resource Types - When deploying a Storage Account, the tags input isa drop-down list. However, when deploying an Azure Virtual Machine, the tags input isa textbox. Although the latter makes use of predictive text, it's still clearly a different experience. This inconsistency is found across multiple Azure resources. - Why is the tag UX different between resource types? I realize some of this is addressed or is less of a concern when using IaC but that may not be for everyone, or work in all scenarios.It would be great if Microsoft could standardize their implementation of tagging resources uniformly across the entire Azure estate. In my opinion I don't think that's a huge ask.Azure Advisor aggregate score for 2+ subscriptions - how is it calculated?
Dear all, I would like to understandhow Azure Advisor calculates aggregationsfor the 5 pillars, for multiple subscriptions. In the example below we have values for Azure Advisor subscription 1 – (Cost = 68, Security = 47, Reliability = 86, Operational Excellence = 83, Performance = 100) And subsequently values for Azure Advisor subscription 2 - (Cost = 35, Security = 69, Reliability = 91, Operational Excellence = 79, Performance = 100) When selecting both subscriptions, we obtain the aggregate values – Naively I might have expected that the aggregate advisor scores could be the arithmetic average between the two, but that is not the case. Any help is much appreciated! ❤️ Thank you very much in advance, Best Regards, Eva
Newly created resource and tag unavailable in Budget filter list due to cost being under $0.01
We have a Shopify app running on Azure, and it creates resources automatically when a merchant installs our app on their Shopify store. This allows us to know costs associated with a merchant's app usage by who installs our app. Our goal is to use PowerShell functions to create these merchant resources and the associated cost monitoring and alerts yet, Azure's budget logic does not show filter tags for resources whose costs are less than $0.01. This essentially means a human will need to monitor such resource costs until they are over $0.01 before creating any budgets and alerts for said resource. Computers are meant to reduce human effort, and MS Azure developers have inadvertently created the scenario for this use case to require human monitoring vs their system. Microsoft Azure developers, please remove this $0.01 threshold, so budget filters can show newly created resources and tags to create budgets automatically using PowerShell. Thanks, John
Amortized costs in Azure Budgets
Currently Azure budgets can only evaluate actual spend, there is no option to evaluate amortized cost. This results in inaccurate representation of spend when RI's are in play. Does anyone know if this is on the roadmap to be released in Budgets any time soon? In Cost Analysis you can already switch between actual and amortized view but nothing similar in budget configurations yet. Thanks you!Microsoft Monitoring Agent being reinstalled by Automanage
As MMA (Microsoft Monitoring Agent) will be retired on August 2024 I decided to go AMA (Azure Monitoring Agent) right away, even though it is known some of its functionalities still on preview. So I uninstalled MMA via script below (with a foreach targeting all my machines), I also assigned Azure policies to not have MMA installed on my environment and all the policies for self-configuring AMA (DCRs, Workspaces, etc). $app = Get-WmiObject -ClassName Win32_Product | Where-Object { $.name -eq "Microsoft Monitoring Agent" } $app.Uninstall() Problem is my machines were reinstalling MMA out of the blue. So I went all the way down to hunt the culprit of doing that: GPO, SCCM, Scripts, you name it. I finally found out Azure Automanage was the one reinstalling MMA so I had to disable it from my environment. Are any of you aware of this issue? Most important: is there a way to have Automanage working without reinstalling MMA? In my case Automanage helps a lot as I don't need to apply lots and lots of settings manually but as it is reinstalling MMA I cannot enable it. senagangbealexandredebargis
Is it possible to deny the access to Cost Management?
Hi, I try to deny the access to Cost Management for a user. I don't want to block the access to the Azure Portal. I don't want to remove the current role of this specific user. I found that this could be achieved using Azure Blueprint. But I can't see where to apply the deny permission. Does anyone can help? Thanks. 🙂
Common Cost Management Errors
Error message 400. Many feature-specific errors that use the 400 error code Mitigation - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/consumption/#getting-list-of-billing-periods https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/cost-management Error message 401. For an Enterprise Agreement, confirm that the view charges options (Account Owner or Department Administrator) have been enabled. Mitigation - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cost-management-billing/costs/cost-management-error-codes#AuthorizationFailed Error message 404. Mitigation - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cost-management-billing/costs/cost-management-error-codes#NotFound Error message 500. Internal error. Wait an hour and try again. Mitigation - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cost-management-billing/costs/cost-management-error-codes#GatewayTimeout Error message 503. Mitigation - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cost-management-billing/costs/cost-management-error-codes#create-a-support-request https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cost-management-billing/costs/cost-management-error-codes#GatewayTimeout
We have built an open-source multi-cloud governance CLI
Dear community, To make governance and management in the cloud easier, we've been working on a CLI that allows you to govern your cloud accounts across Azure and AWS & GCP. We would love to learn more about what you would be looking for when governing your clouds altogether. For now, we've focused on the following points: Viewing cloud accounts across all clouds, including tags. Viewing costs across all clouds Viewing IAM resources per cloud account (including inherited rights) Analyzing tagging density across all clouds (e.g. answering "Which subscriptions are missing the CostCenter tag?") We would love to learn more about what you would be looking for in such a free tool, and what problems and challenges you work on when governing your (multiple) clouds. I hope it is okay to share its GitHub link, which you can find here. Thank you, and looking forward to your replies! (P.S. If you're interested, I would be willing to help you use it in a 1:1 session. The tool directly integrates with your `az` CLI)how do i implement sql server under hippa compliance using azure policies/initiative ?
i assign hippa/hittrust for perticular rg in my subscription and created sql server under that after creating sql server on that is shows following output. and also where i ensure what ever resource i deploy that is hippa compliant? is there any audit to fulfill this scenario?
