User Profile
Rob-Hindman
Joined 9 years ago
User Widgets
Recent Discussions
Re: Why it is not possible to "downgrade" from WS DC Azure Edition 2025 b26060 to WS DC 2025 b26085
Hi Karl, Thank you for your question - we currently do not permit "upgrade" in these two cases: (a) "Datacenter Azure Edition" to "Datacenter" or "Standard" (b) "Datacenter" to "Standard" because there is potential loss of features, for example a customer using a feature that is only included in "Datacenter Azure Edition" might lose that feature if they "upgraded" (technically a downgrade) to "Datacenter". -Rob.796Views1like0CommentsRe: Existing Windows Sever 2016 Datacenter Edition GUI to Insider Preview
Hi Calvin, Thanks for your note - Generally speaking, it is possible to upgrade from one edition to another edition that is the same or closely related. Server Core should be upgradable to Server Core, Server with Desktop Experience should be upgradable to Server with Desktop Experience. In this specific case, we are not releasing the Server with Desktop Experience editions to the Insider community, so unfortunately there is no version of Server with Desktop Experience to upgrade to. If you had a Windows Server, version 1709 Server Core version, then you could upgrade it to the latest insiders build, which I believe is build 17079. Please let me know if you have any follow-up questions. Thanks, Calvin!!! -Rob.2.4KViews0likes1CommentRe: Short questions
Q8 What is Marginal Drive Handling? [Rob for Cosmos]: Documentation on this will be coming soon. In general, we are hardening Storage Spaces Direct with defenses against drives which exhibit too many bad blocks, too many IO errors or retries, or (in next year’s spring update) outlier latency. After certain (configurable) thresholds are exceeded, we mark the drive as Warning and suggest that the user should consider replacing it.4.2KViews1like1CommentRe: Short questions
Q6 Do you expect to use M.2 devices as data store? [Rob for Cosmos]: There is no reason (that I can think of) preventing M.2 devices being used as cache or capacity for the Storage Spaces Direct pool. We don’t really care about the physical form factor, as long as it speaks NVMe. However, a consideration would be serviceability – it’s internal and therefore hard to access, and it’s generally not safe to replace without powering down the server. AFAIK, the main appeal of M.2 is the small size, e.g. for laptops. For servers, I don’t see a clear benefit - but it should work.4.2KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Short questions
Q3 What kind of information will we be able to collect using Time Series or Alerts? [Rob for Cosmos]: Timeseries collects over 50 total series across Cluster, Server, VM, VHD, Volume, and Drive. This includes CPU, Memory, storage IOPS, IO latency, IO throughput, and even network and RDMA activity. The exact series will be published shortly, we’re writing the documentation now!4.2KViews1like0Comments
Recent Blog Articles
Container Storage Support with Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV), Storage Spaces Direct (S2D), SMB Global Mapping
First published on MSDN on Aug 10, 2017 By Amitabh TamhaneGoals: This topic provides an overview of providing persistent storage for containers with data volumes backed by Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV)...15KViews0likes0CommentsContainer Storage Support with Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV), Storage Spaces Direct (S2D), SMB Global Mapping
First published on MSDN on Aug 10, 2017 By Amitabh TamhaneGoals: This topic provides an overview of providing persistent storage for containers with data volumes backed by Cluster Shared Volumes (CSV)...13KViews0likes0CommentsHow can we improve the installation and patching of Windows Server? (Survey Request)
First published on MSDN on Sep 11, 2015 Do you want your server OS deployment and servicing to move faster? We're a team of Microsoft engineers who want your experiences and ideas around solving real ...2.5KViews0likes0Comments