Recent Discussions
Skype phone numbers we are using for US, AU are not working at all, we need help please
We have already paid for yearly renting of the Skype phone numbers we are using for US, AU and these are not working because are not getting redirected after the right settings in place, also the voicemails are not working at all, no settings working at all and after paying there is no one to talk to and report the issue, no email of support, no department of support to send ticket, no phone number, absolutely nothing to provide you support as client for something that you paid and is not working!!! I have tried to adjust the settings based on the forms from the Skype app for windows also from the Skype app for web and I tried both the redirect also the voicemail and none of them working to be setup. So disappointed and we already paid for 1 year in advance for both of them. We need help!Salesforce Integration with Skype For Business
A while back you may have heard that there is a way to integrate Skype for Business with Salesforce. We just posted an article to the Skype for Business Community Blog detailing how to do this. Check it out here. Salesforce currently has this feature available as a publicBeta. Over time we hope to see continued enhancements to this integration. Let us know what you think!Client-lawyer confidentiality
In the Netherlands, the asylum procedure is going to take place -due to COVID 19- online. Also lawyers should contact the clients through meetings organised by the government, using Skype for Bussiness. Asylum seekers usually do not have phones, tablets or laptops that a capable of setting up our own meeting, and even if they do, the internet connection in the asylum centers is usually of very poor quality. (In an asylum center, few laptops are installed by the government to be used by the asylum seeker) The government is setting up these meetings, but they should not take part in the meeting between the lawyer and his/her client (the asylum seeker). As lawyers, we are worried about client-lawyer confidentiality... can the government record our meeting, even without taking part in the meeting? Can they listen in, 'incognito' to the meeting? Does SKYPE (for Bussiness) have these options?
Unable to download 7.0.2046.524 Core Components update?
I am met with a 403 forbidden when I try to download the 5029968Cumulative Updatejuly 2023 7.0.2046.524 for Skype for Business Server 2019, Core Components fromOpdateringer for Skype for Business Server 2019 (KB4470124) - Microsoft Support I have downloaded all other7.0.2046.524 updates without problems. Does anyone know what is going on here?Skype buzz feature request
I would like Skype for Business to add a buzz feature. I would like to be able to buzz the given target meaning raise their messaging window to the top and shake the window to get their attention. Sound alerts are not an option for me, I missed far to many timely messages because all I have is a small flashing icon in my task bar. If someone needs immediate attention, sends me a message, and I don't respond. I want them to be able to buzz me causing my window to come to the front and visibly shake.
SONUS - CAS-R2 CD Bit error
I'm trying to setup a SONUS 1K in Brazil with Vivo as a provider It's an E1 R2 CAS connection, but I can't get in or outgoing calls to work This is my current R2 CAS profile When I restart SONUS, I get this CAS-R2 CD Bit error Does anyone have experience with SONUS and an E1 R2 CAS connection to Vivo?Skype Web Components Server Error
Good day all, Been having a strange issue regarding TLS andWeb Components Server Errors since deploying a new single server. There is currently 2 single servers on the topology and moving a user from one FE server to the other seems to not always work, especially if they are coming via the EDGE server. On most login requests we receive the below errors in the even logs: { An unhandled exception was encountered. Service: WebTicketService, exception details: System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception (0x80004005): The client and server cannot communicate, because they do not possess a common algorithm at System.Net.SSPIWrapper.AcquireCredentialsHandle(SSPIInterface SecModule, String package, CredentialUse intent, SecureCredential scc) at System.Net.Security.SecureChannel.AcquireCredentialsHandle(CredentialUse credUsage, SecureCredential& secureCredential) at System.Net.Security.SecureChannel.AcquireClientCredentials(Byte[]& thumbPrint) at System.Net.Security.SecureChannel.GenerateToken(Byte[] input, Int32 offset, Int32 count, Byte[]& output) at System.Net.Security.SecureChannel.NextMessage(Byte[] incoming, Int32 offset, Int32 count) at System.Net.Security.SslState.StartSendBlob(Byte[] incoming, Int32 count, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.ForceAuthentication(Boolean receiveFirst, Byte[] buffer, AsyncProtocolRequest asyncRequest) at System.Net.Security.SslState.ProcessAuthentication(LazyAsyncResult lazyResult) at System.Net.Security.SslStream.AuthenticateAsClient(String targetHost) at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.WebServicesAuthFramework.RemoteCertificateResolver.ResolveCertificate(HostAddress hostAddress, Int32 port, ICollection`1 allowedNameList) at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.WebServicesAuthFramework.WebTicketRemoteSecurityTokenStore.ResolveAndCache(String key, HostAddress hostName, Int32 port, ICollection`1 allowedNameList) at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.WebServicesAuthFramework.WebTicketRemoteSecurityTokenStore.GetSigningTokenByIssuer(HostAddress hostAddress, Int32 port, ICollection`1 allowedNameList) at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.WebServicesAuthFramework.WebTicketRemoteSecurityTokenStore.EnsureIssuerSecurityToken(HostAddress machineAddress, Int32 port, ICollection`1 allowedNameList) at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.WebServicesAuthFramework.WebTicketKeyStore.EnsureIssuerSecurityToken(Uri issuerUri) at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.WebTicketService.WebTicketService.BeginIssueToken(Message rstMessage, AsyncCallback callback, Object state) at AsyncInvokeBeginBeginIssueToken(Object , Object[] , AsyncCallback , Object ) at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.AsyncMethodInvoker.InvokeBegin(Object instance, Object[] inputs, AsyncCallback callback, Object state) at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.DispatchOperationRuntime.InvokeBegin(MessageRpc& rpc) at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage5(MessageRpc& rpc) at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.ImmutableDispatchRuntime.ProcessMessage11(MessageRpc& rpc) at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.MessageRpc.Process(Boolean isOperationContextSet). Cause: Application error. Please look through the exception details for more information. Resolution: Restart the server. If the problem persists contact product support.} Restart obviously didnt resolve this issue. Checking the system logs, I see the following schannel errors: A fatal error occurred while creating a TLS client credential. The internal error state is 10013. When I checked the TLS settings on the FE (which is where I get all these errors above) withinetcpl.cpl I see that only TLS 1.2 is ticket. Looking at the EDGE server, there is no apparent error that is causing this. We just added the new servers to the SRV and A Record DNS entries, so this shouldnt be an issue. The EDGE has the below schannel errors: An TLS 1.2 connection request was received from a remote client application, but none of the cipher suites supported by the client application are supported by the server. The TLS connection request has failed. Not sure if this could cause any issues though as the working environment has the same errors as the above.
call persistance
Hello to all Related to Skype for Business On-premises 2015 Someone might start calling the mobile app while away from work by connecting over a 3G network, then switch to the corporate Wi-Fi network. In this case, assuming the necessary actions in the configuration, will the call be interrupted or can it continue?
Microsoft Phone System + Calling Plans + Analogue Device
Hi Everyone, We use Microsoft Teams and Microsoft Phone System with Calling Plans. This is our single phone system for everything, we do not have any other PSTN, SIP Trunks, nothing. Is it at all possible to somehow connect an analogue phone line to this environment? We own an AudioCodecs VE SBC and have an MP-112 ATA, Our AudioCodecs SBC is connected to Teams with Direct Route, but since we use Calling Plans..we don't really know where to go from here or if it's even possible. In an ideal world, we would provision a user in our AD, give it a phone number from Microsoft Calling Plans, and then have that phone number be the number of an analogue device (FAX). Any inbound and outbound faxes would go through the Calling Plans from Microsoft. I just want to know if that's even possible? I have attached the picture I modified from some AudioCodecs documentation. Since we use Calling Plans, everything is in the Microsoft Bubble on the right. Thank you so much for your time.
Dial 0 to reach Operator
Is there a way with any of the SfB Online features or preview features (currently enrolled in Dial Plans and AA preview programs) to enable the option to dial 0 after reaching a user's voice mailbox? This is one of the most important features we are waiting for as our users would like to give callers the option to reach our operator if they have an urgent issue. We also don't necessarly want all calls to go to the operator- with call forwarding- but looking for another option to route calls if needed. I've looked for a workaround since I know Exchange UM is not supported with SfB Online yet.... so any ideas would be very helpful!
Speed up meeting joins - Application Initialization Module for IIS 7.5
lacking a test environment, I'm curious if anybody has used the Application Initialization Module for IIS on SFB to preload all the apps? Our first joins of the day take quite some time, and this might help. https://www.iis.net/downloads/microsoft/application-initialization I was also told at Ignite that I could increase the settings on the IIS pool so it doesn't garbage collect it so fast. Has anyone else run into longer join times on initial meetings? If so, how did you solve it?
Join Skype for Business Meeting delay
Hi everyone, I wonder if someone could help me. We‘re using Skype for business OnPrem 2019 and some of our customers complaining about joining meetings. Sometimes it takes several minutes to let you join a meeting. Have you ever experienced something like this delays? We can’t really see anything on the Skype for business server. Could it be related to the hardware itself for example drivers? Thanks in advance.
Teams Room "Cannot Fetch Calendar"
Good day, I have just finished setting up our Lenovo ThinkSmart Hub500. Creating the room and users account as per MS instructions is all done and Teams Room is logged in. I can start a new meeting and project but no meetings are showing up. At the top it says "Cannot Fetch Calendar". What are we doing wrong? Thanks.
Skype Meeting App issue
Having an issue with invitees joining Skype For Business 2019 meetings hosted on on-premises. Using the join meeting URL externally brings up a blank screen with the thinking wheel of dots. Using the same URL on the same browser with ?SL= appended to it brings up the Guest sign in screen.Skype for Business Server 2019 IM Integration with Exchange Server 2019
I am having difficulty getting the IM/Presence integration to work between my on-prem Skype for Business 2019 Server and my Exchange 2019 Server. I believe I am having a certificate trust issue. On important note is that my internal domain is domain.local and the external is domain.com. So, my public wildcard certificate is for *.domain.com. When I look at the certificates on the exchange server, there is another certificate that is assigned to IIS issued by the local certificate authority which protects domain.local. I have tried a variety of combinations using either the local certificate with the domain.local name of the servers as well as the public wildcard certificate thumbprint and the dns a record with domain.com that points to each server. None of these combinations seem to work for me. I have run these commands on the SfB Server: New-CsTrustedApplicationPool -Identity exchangeserver.domain.local-Registrar sfbserver.domainlocal-Site "My Site" -RequiresReplication $False New-CsTrustedApplication -ApplicationId OutlookWebApp -TrustedApplicationPoolFqdn exchangeserver.domain.local-Port 5199 I have run these commands on the Exchange Server: New-SettingOverride -Name "IM Override" -Component OwaServer -Section IMSettings -Parameters @("IMServerName=sfbserver.domain.local","IMCertificateThumbprint=mycertificatethumbprint") -Reason "Configure IM" Get-ExchangeDiagnosticInfo -Server EXCHANGESERVER -Process Microsoft.Exchange.Directory.TopologyService -Component VariantConfiguration -Argument Refresh Restart-WebAppPool MSExchangeOWAAppPool Get-OwaMailboxPolicy | Set-OwaMailboxPolicy -InstantMessagingEnabled $True -InstantMessagingType OCS When I check the instant messaging logs on the Exchange Server I see the following: If I try to use the domain.com name and the wildcard certificate I get this error: ERROR:InstantMessageOCSProvider.GenerateInstantMessageUnavailablePayload. Context: User=email address removed for privacy reasons, Sip address=sip:email address removed for privacy reasons, Lyncserver=sfbserver.domain.local. endPoint: Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.UCWAuthenticatedEndpoint, MethodName: InstantMessageOCSProvider.SignInCallback, InstantMessageServiceError: SipEndpointConnectionFailure, Exception: UCWEB Failure: Code=TlsFailure, SubCode=TlsIncorrectNameInRemoteCertificate, Reason=\r\nMicrosoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.Utilities.UCWException: The target principal name is incorrect ---> Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.TlsFailureException: The target principal name is incorrect ---> Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.TLSException: outgoing TLS negotiation failed; HRESULT=-2146893022\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.TlsTransportHelper.HandleNegotiationFailure(Int32 status, Boolean incoming)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.TlsTransportHelper.OutgoingTlsNegotiation(TransportsDataBuffer receivedData, TransportsDataBuffer& pDataToSend)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.TlsTransportHelper.NegotiateConnection(TransportsDataBuffer receivedData, TransportsDataBuffer& pDataToSend)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.TlsTransport.DelegateNegotiation(TransportsDataBuffer receivedData)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.TlsTransport.OnReceived(Object data)\r\n --- End of inner exception stack trace ---\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.SipAsyncResult`1.ThrowIfFailed()\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.Helper.EndAsyncOperation[T](Object owner, IAsyncResult result)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.UCWAuthenticatedEndpoint.OotyUserEndpointEstablish_callback(IAsyncResult asyncResult)\r\n --- End of inner exception stack trace ---\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.Utilities.AsyncHelper.EndAsyncCall[T](IAsyncResult asyncResult, String methodName, T ucwScopeInstance)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.UCWAuthenticatedEndpoint.EndSignIn(IAsyncResult asyncResult)\r\n at Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa2.Server.Core.InstantMessageOCSProvider.<>c__DisplayClass89_0.<SignInCallback>b__0(RequestDetailsLogger logger)", When I use the internal domain.local server name and the certificate issued by the local certificate authority, I see: 2024-02-25T14:36:21.783Z,19,5,,,,0,"DEBUG:InstantMessageOCSProvider.SignInCallback. Ignoring exception after the connection is closed: Context User=email address removed for privacy reasons, Sip address=sip:email address removed for privacy reasons, Lyncserver=sfbserver.domain.local, Exception: UCWEB Failure: Code=TlsFailure, SubCode=TlsRemoteDisconnected, Reason=\r\nMicrosoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.Utilities.UCWException: Unknown error (0x80131500) ---> Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.TlsFailureException: Unknown error (0x80131500) ---> Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.RemoteDisconnectedException: Peer disconnected while outbound capabilities negotiation was in progress ---> System.Net.Sockets.SocketException: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host\r\n at System.Net.Sockets.Socket.EndReceive(IAsyncResult asyncResult)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.Sip.TcpTransport.OnReceived(Object arg)\r\n --- End of inner exception stack trace ---\r\n --- End of inner exception stack trace ---\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.SipAsyncResult`1.ThrowIfFailed()\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Signaling.Helper.EndAsyncOperation[T](Object owner, IAsyncResult result)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.UCWAuthenticatedEndpoint.OotyUserEndpointEstablish_callback(IAsyncResult asyncResult)\r\n --- End of inner exception stack trace ---\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.Utilities.AsyncHelper.EndAsyncCall[T](IAsyncResult asyncResult, String methodName, T ucwScopeInstance)\r\n at Microsoft.Rtc.Internal.UCWeb.UCWAuthenticatedEndpoint.EndSignIn(IAsyncResult asyncResult)\r\n at Microsoft.Exchange.Clients.Owa2.Server.Core.InstantMessageOCSProvider.<>c__DisplayClass89_0.<SignInCallback>b__0(RequestDetailsLogger logger)",On MACP, (400 : HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request) when enabling a user.
Hello everyone! My problem is: When enabling a user on the new MACP, IF the user has configured an email address gives the subjet error. If the user doesn't have configured email address, user is enabled but not without a problem. Viewing trough developer mode on the browser, the error lies in: https://<sfbs-fe-pool-fqdn>/OcsPsws/Service.svc//$batch The payload of the $batch: --batch_1706182664593 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=changeset_21.25566040805762 --batch_1706182664593 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=changeset_21.25566040805762 --changeset_21.25566040805762 Content-Type: application/http Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary PATCH /OcsPsws/Service.svc/CsAdUser/fragments/2/<BLABLABLA> HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/json {"SipAddressType":"EmailAddress","SipDomain":"<domain.tld>","RegistrarPool":"<sfbs-fe-pool-fqdn>"} --changeset_21.25566040805762-- --batch_1706182664593 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=changeset_21.25566040805762 --changeset_21.25566040805762 Content-Type: application/http Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary PATCH /OcsPsws/Service.svc/CsUser/fragments/2/<BLABLABLA> HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/json {"AudioVideoDisabled":false,"EnterpriseVoiceEnabled":false,"RemoteCallControlTelephonyEnabled":false} --changeset_21.25566040805762-- --batch_1706182664593-- Gives this error without regards of wich option i choose about the format of the sip address (email, UPN, etc.): HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff DataServiceVersion: 1.0; Content-Type: application/xml;charset=utf-8 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><m:error xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata"><m:code /><m:message xml:lang="es-ES">The request URI is not valid. Since the segment 'CsAdUser' refers to a collection, this must be the last segment in the request URI. All intermediate segments must refer to a single resource.</m:message></m:error>--changesetresponse_a677ace1-29ed-4549-b606-2b90d0a4d6d8-- --batchresponse_681cb375-bac7-4afe-a2fa-9ceb5f199d4aContent-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=changesetresponse_608de08e-6dbe-4000-aab4-95c97c576d09 --changesetresponse_608de08e-6dbe-4000-aab4-95c97c576d09 Content-Type: application/http Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff DataServiceVersion: 1.0; Content-Type: application/xml;charset=utf-8 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <m:error xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata"><m:code /><m:message xml:lang="es-ES">The request URI is not valid. Since the segment 'CsUser' refers to a collection, this must be the last segment in the request URI. All intermediate segments must refer to a single resource.</m:message></m:error> --changesetresponse_608de08e-6dbe-4000-aab4-95c97c576d09-- --batchresponse_681cb375-bac7-4afe-a2fa-9ceb5f199d4a-- And, when enabling a user without a configured email address, the payload of $batch looks like this: --batch_1706183087284 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=changeset_3.9714624502973583 --batch_1706183087284 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=changeset_3.9714624502973583 --changeset_3.9714624502973583 Content-Type: application/http Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary PATCH /OcsPsws/Service.svc/CsAdUser('BLABLABLA') HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/json {"SipAddressType":"UserPrincipalName","SipDomain":"<domain.tld>","RegistrarPool":"<sfbs-fe-pool-fqdn>"} --changeset_3.9714624502973583-- --batch_1706183087284 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=changeset_3.9714624502973583 --changeset_3.9714624502973583 Content-Type: application/http Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary PATCH /OcsPsws/Service.svc/CsUser('<BLABLABLA>') HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/json {"AudioVideoDisabled":false,"EnterpriseVoiceEnabled":false,"RemoteCallControlTelephonyEnabled":false} --changeset_3.9714624502973583-- On the MACP i get a spinning wheel, but if i go to users, it appears as enabled. On the browser's developer tools the server gives this answer: HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff Cache-Control: no-cache DataServiceVersion: 1.0; Content-Type: application/xml;charset=utf-8 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><m:error xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/ado/2007/08/dataservices/metadata"><m:code /><m:message xml:lang="es-ES">An error occurred while processing this request.</m:message><m:innererror><m:message>No se pudo ejecutar el comando Set-CsUserDetails. Causa del problema: No se encontró ningún objeto de administración para la identidad "<ad user distinguished name>".</m:message><m:type>Microsoft.Management.Odata.CommandInvocationFailedException</m:type><m:stacktrace> en Microsoft.Management.Odata.PS.PSCommand.ExecutionCompletionHandler()
 en Microsoft.Management.Odata.PS.PSCommand.Invoke(Expression expression, Boolean noStreamingResponse)
 en Microsoft.Management.Odata.Core.PSOperationManager.InvokeCRUDCommand(CommandType commandType, String resourceTypeName, IEnumerable`1 properties)
 en Microsoft.Management.Odata.Core.PSOperationManager.Update(SenderInfo senderInfo, String resourceTypeName, IEnumerable`1 properties)
 en Microsoft.Management.Odata.Core.OperationManagerAdapter.FunctionInvoker`1.Invoke()
 en Microsoft.Management.Odata.Core.OperationManagerAdapter.InvokeMethod(IInvoker invoker, String functionName, String resourceTypeName, Boolean ignoreNotImplementedException)
 en Microsoft.Management.Odata.Core.OperationManagerAdapter.InvokeOperationManagerFunction[T](Func`1 func, String functionName, String resourceTypeName, Boolean ignoreNotImplementedException, T defaultResultForNotImplementedException)
 en Microsoft.Management.Odata.Core.OperationManagerAdapter.CUDRequest(CommandType commandType, ResourceType resourceType, Dictionary`2 properties, Dictionary`2 urlParams)
 en Microsoft.Management.Odata.Core.EntityUpdate.InvokeCommand()
 en System.Data.Services.DataService`1.BatchDataService.HandleBatchContent(Stream responseStream)</m:stacktrace><m:internalexception><m:message>No se encontró ningún objeto de administración para la identidad "CN=Carmen Morillo Rodriguez,OU=USUARIOS,OU=CUENTAS DESHABILITADAS,OU=OU _01_VARIOS,DC=depo,DC=es".</m:message><m:type>Microsoft.Rtc.Management.AD.ManagementException</m:type><m:stacktrace> en Microsoft.Rtc.Management.AD.ADTask`1.GetDataObject[TDataObject](IIdentity id, IDirectorySession session, ObjectId rootID)
 en Microsoft.Rtc.Management.AD.ADTask`1.GetDataObject(IIdentity id)
 en Microsoft.Rtc.Management.AD.SetPersonBase`2.ResolveDataObject()
 en Microsoft.Rtc.Management.AD.GenericSetADObjectIdentityTask`3.PrepareDataObject()
 en Microsoft.Rtc.Management.AD.GenericSetADTask`1.InternalValidate()
 en Microsoft.Rtc.Management.AD.ADTask`1.PrepareForScopeCheck()
 en Microsoft.Rtc.Management.OcsCmdlet.IsUserInScope()
 en Microsoft.Rtc.Management.OcsCmdlet.ProcessRecord()
 en System.Management.Automation.CommandProcessor.ProcessRecord()</m:stacktrace></m:internalexception></m:innererror></m:error> --changesetresponse_42f57019-b938-47b1-a3f6-aaf2a7bb23c8-- --batchresponse_c7d33751-d003-448c-89db-4ebcda4bc6ae-- The only difference is that on the failing payload i see: PATCH /OcsPsws/Service.svc/CsAdUser/fragments/2/<BLABLABLA> And on the working payload: PATCH /OcsPsws/Service.svc/CsAdUser('<BLABLABLA>') Sounds like a bug? Configuration problem?? Edit: I forgot to mention the environment - SfBS 2019, patched to October 2023 level. Three Win servers 2019 as front-ends, two win server 2019 as Edges. Applied, as patch requested, the prerequisites without errors. bootstrapper executed without errors. 🤷:male_sign:
