Forum Discussion

DGMalcolm's avatar
DGMalcolm
Iron Contributor
Aug 20, 2022

Puzzling BitLocker Status

Hey there,

 

Recently began testing a BitLocker policy. I created the policy using the recommendations from this article: https://petri.com/best-practices-for-deploying-bitlocker-with-intune/

 

At this point, the policy has been deployed to 8 systems and all of them appear to have been properly configured. In my review of everything:

 

  • The device now shows BitLocker is managed by a system admin.
  • Running 'manage-bde -status C:' shows fully encrypted.
  • There is now a recovery key listed in Azure AD for all 8 devices.
  • The same recover key is visible under the device entry in the MEM portal, too.

However, when I look at the Device Status under the BitLocker policy in the MEM portal, all 8 of the devices show an Assignment Status of "Error". I've reviewed the logs on a couple of devices and I don't see anything that looks like a deployment failure. Any thoughts?

 

TIA

~DGM~

  • Hi... could you first show us your configuration and some screenshots of that error. Did you also looked at the modern device management logs etc to determine why that config could give you errors.
    • DGMalcolm's avatar
      DGMalcolm
      Iron Contributor

      Rudy_Ooms_MVP 

      I spent a lot of time looking at logs, especially the Device Management logs in Event Viewer. In those logs I see a series of 3 events happening on the configured devices. I've included those events in the order they happen. I've also attached screenshots of the BitLocker settings.

       

      Event Type: Warning

      Event ID: 2900

      Source: DeviceManagement-Enterprise-Diagnostics-Provider

      Description:

      BitLocker CSP: GetDeviceEncryptionComplianceStatus indicates OSV is not compliant with returned status 0x80

       

      Event Type: Error

      Event ID: 810

      Source: DeviceManagement-Enterprise-Diagnostics-Provider

      Description:

      MDM PolicyManager: Set policy string, Policy: (SystemDrivesRequireStartupAuthentication), Area: (BitLocker), EnrollmentID requesting set: (xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx), Current User: (Device), String: (<enabled/><data id="ConfigureNonTPMStartupKeyUsage_Name" value="false"/><data id="ConfigureTPMStartupKeyUsageDropDown_Name" value="0"/><data id="ConfigurePINUsageDropDown_Name" value="3"/><data id="ConfigureTPMPINKeyUsageDropDown_Name" value="3"/><data id="ConfigureTPMUsageDropDown_Name" value="1"/>), Enrollment Type: (0x6), Scope: (0x0), Result:(0x8000FFFF) Catastrophic failure.

       

      Event Type: Error

      Event ID: 404

      Source: DeviceManagement-Enterprise-Diagnostics-Provider

      Description:

      MDM ConfigurationManager: Command failure status. Configuration Source ID: (xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx), Enrollment Name: (MDMDeviceWithAAD), Provider Name: (BitLocker), Command Type: (Add: from Replace or Add), CSP URI: (./Device/Vendor/MSFT/BitLocker/SystemDrivesRequireStartupAuthentication), Result: (Catastrophic failure).

       

       

  • KurtBMayer's avatar
    KurtBMayer
    Steel Contributor

    DGMalcolm 

     

    These articles suggest the "catastrophic failure" is a result of malformed XML or URLs too long within the XML. By any chance did you provide a long Recovery Key URL? It should've generated the XML for you in this case via the portal, but could possibly delete and recreate the policies to trigger a regeneration of new XML?

     

    CSP Power Policy XML Issue 

    Auto Mount Team Sites with Intune 

     

    Another possibility from your information suggests it was failing to update the CSP setting. Is it possible you have a GPO or something else in place which defines the BitLocker policy which could be causing a conflict?

     

    All that being said, if it is succeeding in getting all the recovery key info stored to Azure AD, you could possibly just ignore the error. I've seen the portal show this "stuck" error state because it couldn't properly apply on the first try, but even though it later succeeds, the state never updates. Possibly this is a portal bug.

     

    Please like or mark this thread as answered if it's helpful, thanks!

     

Resources