Forum Discussion
Best Practices for Permissions on an O365 Group SharePoint Site
In the current Groups UI, site permissions are managed in the new pane accessible from the cog menu:
And, as clearly stated, owners and members should be managed only by OWA.
you are right, it's recommended to manage permissions with the end user interface. However, every PowerUser is aware how to use the native permissions from previous normal site collections. Very often companies have complex permission requirements, which will definitely not be covered by only three groups (Owners, Members, Visitiors). Therefore we want to conifgure additional permissions directly on the site. It's deifnitely confusing, when users are granted permission to this site, but there is actually nobody in the regarding groups.
Doesn't matter, which UI I use, it should be deifnitely consistent to avoid ambiguities. That's my opinion. Happy to hear your opinion. :-)
- DeletedFeb 23, 2018
Hello everyone!
I absolutely agree with Robert Mulsow. I also cannot see members once I enter the advanced site permissions options for a specific private group.Also, it is very difficult to set permissions on a folder level. I entered the library settings and then entered permissions for this library. Later I tried to break the inheritance, but I ended up being kicked out of the group.
Any recommendations?It is important to be able to set permissions on a document or a folder level as 3 types of group members (owner, member, visitor) will not cut it :(.
- Salvatore BiscariFeb 24, 2018Silver Contributor
Deleted
As it has been stated in several other threads, it is better to leave alone permissions in Groups teamsites.
If you need more sophisticated permissions structures, then you should better use classic team sites.
- Ivan54Feb 26, 2018Bronze ContributorOr a modern communication site, if the design template fits the use case.
- Salvatore BiscariMar 07, 2017Silver Contributor
I agree with you: the various UIs should be consistent.
Nevertheless, Groups have definitely a non-standard implementation wrt their parts (team sites, shared mailbox etc.): I think we should accept it.
Also, in classic team sites, upon creation, the three groups (Owners, in particular, but also Members and Visitors, of course) are empty.
- Brent EllisMar 07, 2017Silver ContributorYou think that's fun, try creating a subsite in a Group team site, the permissions there are all wonky too. The same restrictions are applied to "sub-site Members" (can't edit default "Edit" permissions). It tries to act like a "Group", but its not, "site information" doesn't load because it is not a Group. No way to get back up a level unless you hard code in a "go back" link or inherit menu, which may or may not work depending on the day.
This is a mess.