Home

Why doesn't outlook.com have a plus sign in the Edge address bar like other Chromium browsers do?

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1047423%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWhy%20doesn't%20outlook.com%20have%20a%20plus%20sign%20in%20the%20Edge%20address%20bar%20like%20other%20Chromium%20browsers%20do%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1047423%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EFor%20example%2C%20Twitter%20and%20Google%20Maps%20had%20a%20plus%20sign%20in%20the%20address%20bar%20and%20I%20installed%20them.%20I%20think%20they%20are%20%22real%22%20PWAs.%26nbsp%3B%20I've%20read%20that%20outlook.com%20in%20now%20a%20PWA%2C%20so%20why%20doesn't%20it%20too%20have%20a%20plus%20sign%20in%20the%20address%20bar%3F%26nbsp%3B%20I'm%20using%20Dev%20channel%20Edge.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20do%20see%20the%20%22install%20this%20site%20as%20an%20app%22%20but%20is%20that%20%22really%22%20the%20same%20as%20a%20PWA%3F%26nbsp%3B%20%26nbsp%3B%20%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1048013%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Why%20doesn't%20outlook.com%20have%20a%20plus%20sign%20in%20the%20Edge%20address%20bar%20like%20other%20Chromium%20browsers%20do%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1048013%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F324908%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40DaveLPG%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Boutlook%20is%20not%20yet%20a%20PWA.%20I'm%20not%20sure%20if%20they%20have%20a%20timeline%20yet%20for%20becoming%20one%20or%20not%2C%20unfortunately.%20However%2C%20you%20get%20basically%20the%20same%20experience%20when%20you%20%22install%20site%20as%20an%20app%22%20as%20you%20do%20from%20a%20PWA%2C%20the%20differences%20are%20subtle.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EIn%20order%20to%20get%20the%20%22Plus%22%20sign%20in%20the%20omnibox%20for%20install%2C%20three%20things%20must%20be%20true%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E1.%20the%20site%20is%20served%20over%20HTTPS%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E2.%20the%20site%20has%20a%20manifest%20json%20file%20at%20the%20root%20of%20the%20domain%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E3.%20the%20site%20has%20service%20workers%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EYou%20can%20always%20go%20to%20webhint.io%20and%20run%20a%20scan%20on%20any%20url%20to%20get%20a%20%22PWA%22%20score.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EAll%20that%20said%2C%20we%20expect%20that%20end%20users%20will%20really%20not%20be%20able%20to%20tell%20much%20difference%20between%20a%20%22real%22%20PWA%20and%20a%20site%20that%20is%20installed.%20Primarily%2C%20the%20differences%20will%20come%20from%20what%20would%20be%20contained%20in%20the%20manifest%2C%20as%20well%20as%20potential%20offline%20capabilities.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E-John%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-1050018%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Why%20doesn't%20outlook.com%20have%20a%20plus%20sign%20in%20the%20Edge%20address%20bar%20like%20other%20Chromium%20browsers%20do%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-1050018%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F318459%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40johnjansen%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%20Thank%20you%20for%20your%20quick%20reply%20and%20explanation.%26nbsp%3B%20I%20think%20I'll%20wait%20till%20I%20see%20a%20plus%20sign%20before%20I%20%22install%22%20outlook.com.%26nbsp%3B%20While%20PWAs%20sound%20interesting%2C%20they%20are%2C%20at%20least%20at%20the%20moment%2C%20confusing%20from%20a%20user%20perspective.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EDave...%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
DaveLPG
Occasional Contributor

For example, Twitter and Google Maps had a plus sign in the address bar and I installed them. I think they are "real" PWAs.  I've read that outlook.com in now a PWA, so why doesn't it too have a plus sign in the address bar?  I'm using Dev channel Edge. 

 

I do see the "install this site as an app" but is that "really" the same as a PWA?     

2 Replies

@DaveLPG outlook is not yet a PWA. I'm not sure if they have a timeline yet for becoming one or not, unfortunately. However, you get basically the same experience when you "install site as an app" as you do from a PWA, the differences are subtle.

 

In order to get the "Plus" sign in the omnibox for install, three things must be true:

 

1. the site is served over HTTPS

2. the site has a manifest json file at the root of the domain

3. the site has service workers

 

You can always go to webhint.io and run a scan on any url to get a "PWA" score. 


All that said, we expect that end users will really not be able to tell much difference between a "real" PWA and a site that is installed. Primarily, the differences will come from what would be contained in the manifest, as well as potential offline capabilities.

 

-John

@johnjansen  Thank you for your quick reply and explanation.  I think I'll wait till I see a plus sign before I "install" outlook.com.  While PWAs sound interesting, they are, at least at the moment, confusing from a user perspective.

 

Dave... 

Related Conversations
Dark new tab
UltraPako in Discussions on
12 Replies
Portable variant of Edge-Chromium
random_user in Discussions on
1 Replies
Outlook, PowerPoint, Excel, Word Version 1.0?!
boossy in Discussions on
3 Replies
iOS Edge not syncing with new Chromium Edge
dnlhrnz in Discussions on
2 Replies