Universal print would be a lot more useful if it provided support for both Windows and macOS devices as many enterprises support both platforms.
52 Comments
- JeroenFHCopper Contributor
Our entire organization works with macOC. Function would be a great added value.
- Brad_BillingsCopper Contributor
We need it too, any updates here yet?
- Martin_UKCopper Contributor
Its not Universal Printing if it does not support OS X devices, which most businesses these days do have to support.
- ingo-awareBrass Contributor
Big disappointment that it's not usable on Macs.
- Kari_PasanenCopper Contributor
Definately, this is something our clients are expecting us to work on in 2022
- Rani_AbdellatifFormer Employee
Work on this feature has started but we don't currently have a time estimate for completion.
- amritsingh79Copper Contributor
I cant believe this does not have MAC OS support. Please rectify this immediately, nobody can actually implement this in a serious corporate environment if you Ignore MAC OS
- RobPhelpsCopper Contributor
We are a mix of Windows/MAC client systems. Support for MAC printing would go a long way to being able to consider moving our US printing infrastructure (maybe even global) to the cloud in Azure. The potential for reduced latency due to regional routing could be leveraged. Unfortunately, local resources and alternative vendors must be utilized instead.
- simonneedhamCopper Contributor
How do you go live with "Universal Print" with no Mac support 🤦:male_sign:
- aussiepeteCopper Contributor
Mac would be nice, iOS is really essential though. MacOS at least you can manage and secure enough to add to the internal network, iOS especially BYOD most organizations are putting in a wifi SSID that's walled off - but AirPlay is not easily configured in large organizations, without building multi-NIC bridge boxes in every site that spans your firewall. Universal Print would neatly solve that by allowing print to internal print servers while only needing internet access not internal network.