Event details
Policy management has evolved and improved. Are you keeping up? If you're still having pizza parties to review Group Policy spreadsheets, come see why you should consider leveraging the Settings C...
Heather_Poulsen
Updated Dec 27, 2024
efailor
Feb 28, 2023Copper Contributor
Hello,
Another question. With Intune, if we have two Configuration Profiles that manage the same setting, and in one policy the setting is set to enabled, and in the other policy that setting is set to disabled, it's our understanding that the setting will not be set, becuase there is this conflict, and there is no such thing as last one wins, like we have in Group Policy land. Does MSFT have any plans to change this behavior, to include something like link order for managing priority?
It would be nice to have a built-in report of which policies are conflicting.
It would also be nice to see a way to generate a settings report, that is similar to the Resultant Set of Policies (RSoP) we have in policy land, which tells us from which policy the setting is being managed from. We use RSoP quite a bit in troubleshooting, and we don't have this for cloud only devices.
jnash-lit
Feb 28, 2023Copper Contributor
In my opinion, if something is turned on in 1 policy, it should reflect that in some way in the other policy catalogs so you know when you go to set it that it was set already. It shouldn't prevent you from setting it, but should warn you.
- efailorFeb 28, 2023Copper ContributorMy question is more about what happens on the endpoint. When we have two Intune policies that manage the same setting, and in one policy that setting is enabled, and in the other policy that setting is disabled, it's our unstinting that on the endpoint when policy process that setting will not be managed at all. If this were two GPOs, we would see the last policy in the link order would win. In Intune, neither policy wins.