Event banner
Event details
How does Microsoft expect to convince tenants that have gone to 3rd party solutions that have been doing this for years to switch? Cost is not going to be the best approach since Privilege Management is new for Microsoft and not for a company doing this for years.
There are a lot of benefits. You get a first party, M365 integrated solution that should lower your total cost of ownership. Single console, single vendor, single identity provider you are already using, lots of benefits only Microsoft can provide, and so forth.
- First party, single console / vendor / identity is not a good argument for a lower TCO. It takes relatively very little effort and cost to spin up a third-party solution that integrates with AAD. If the goal is to drive adoption, then the onus is on Microsoft to deliver a solid real-world TCO, or lower prices and/or restructure the licensing model.
- I understand that a Single Pane Glass approach that is M365 integrated would be nice. The issue is that we are talking about a product that has not released yet for companies to test. If there is a private preview of this I would greatly want to test this as we just purchased 500 licenses for another PM product for testing for nearly 2000 endpoints.
- Is quick assist going anywhere?
- Not going anywhere! Here's a new blog post on this: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-it-pro-blog/try-an-improved-quick-assist-experience/ba-p/3696459
