Forum Discussion
So Windows Server Insiders is only the Core Version. How About Next Month the Full Server Is Avail..
- Jul 21, 2017
The Semi-annual Channel will release with Server Core and Nano for container runtime. See this doc which discusses:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/get-started/semi-annual-channel-overview
A Full desktop experience version is not planned. If this is important for your adoption, this is a great forum to leave that feedback.
Thanks!
Elden
The Semi-annual Channel will release with Server Core and Nano for container runtime. See this doc which discusses:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/get-started/semi-annual-channel-overview
A Full desktop experience version is not planned. If this is important for your adoption, this is a great forum to leave that feedback.
Thanks!
Elden
Hi Elden,
RDS is the strongest use case for us - the use of Server 2016 to produce a Win10-like experience becomes less valid as the gap between the current release of each widens.
At release Server 2016 dropped support for a number of components that were included by default in Windows 10 (Edge, Store, Cortana) and Windows 10 has continued to see both feature developments (nice to have) and feature improvements/fixes (essential) - changes to Start Menu behaviour is one example.
This recent servicing change is exactly the right thing to do, but it needs to cover the Desktop Experience as well - the "How it works" diagram on the blog explaining this change indicates that the vNext LTSC release is TBD, but drawn in somewhere beyond the start of 2019.
IMHO, there's a very large group of user base with a shallow-to-deep dependence on a GUI (within which RDS alone has to be a substantial number).
Excluding the Server with Desktop Experience means that RDS user groups will be on a platform which was missing components at the start, has faults which are already fixed in Win10 and won't see changes until 3 years later (that's conceivably 6 releases behind the Win10 codebase).
The RDS user base has always been serviced on the same timeframe or a little behind the traditional client user base. This model seems a *very* long way from that experience. At a point where remote working ought to be going up, the RDS platform will seem to have been sidelined.
I don't see many talking about that right now (I think because a greater bulk of those groups are just jumping to Server 2016 around now), but I don't think it will be long before they notice the shortcomings in the current release and start asking.
Thanks
Matthew
- Matthew DoddMar 24, 2018Copper Contributor
To layer intrigue on RDS intrigue - Windows Server 2019 TP doesn't actually include the RDS session host role.
No RDS in the future then?
- Mar 24, 2018Something is coming. We have to be patient!
- Matthew DoddMar 24, 2018Copper Contributor
I thought I already was :<